Intel Expert Says 9-11 Looks Like A Hollywood Show
by Christopher Bollynhttp://themillenniumreport.com/2014/08/intel-expert-says-9-11-looks-like-a-hollywood-show/?GD_NONCE=ead1f7a2e0
European
intelligence experts dismiss the Bush “war on terrorism” as deception
and reveal the realpolitik behind the aggression against Afghanistan.
Berlin
– In Germany, where war plans for Afghanistan were already being
discussed in July and where several of the “Arab hijackers” lived and
studied, intelligence experts say the terror attacks of September 11
could not have been carried out without the support of a state secret
service.
Eckehardt
Werthebach, former president of Germany’s domestic intelligence
service, Verfassungsschutz, told AFP that “the deathly precision” and
“the magnitude of planning” behind the attacks of September 11 would
have needed “years of planning.”
Such
a sophisticated operation, Werthebach said, would require the “fixed
frame” of a state intelligence organization, something not found in a
“loose group” of terrorists like the one allegedly led by Mohammed Atta
while he studied in Hamburg.
Many
people would have been involved in the planning of such an operation
and Werthebach pointed to the absence of leaks as further indication
that the attacks were “state organized actions.”
Andreas
von Bulow served on the parliamentary commission which oversees the
three branches of the German secret service while a member of the
Bundestag (German parliament) from 1969 to 1994, and wrote a book titled
Im Namen des Staates (In the Name of the State) on the criminal
activities of secret services, including the CIA.
Von
Bulow told AFP that he believes that the Israeli intelligence service,
Mossad, is behind the September 11 terror attacks. These attacks, he
said, were carried out to turn public opinion against the Arabs, and
boost military and security spending.
“You
don’t get the higher echelons,” von Bulow said, referring to the
“architectural structure” which masterminds such terror attacks. At this
level, he said, the organization doing the planning, such as Mossad, is
primarily interested in affecting public opinion.
The
architectural level planners use corrupt “guns for hire” such as Abu
Nidal, the Palestinian terrorist who von B’low called “an instrument of
Mossad,” high-ranking Stasi (former East German secret service)
operatives, or Libyan agents who organize terror attacks using dedicated
people, for example Palestinian and Arab “freedom fighters.”
The
terrorists who actually commit the crimes are what von Bulow calls “the
working level,” such as the 19 Arabs who allegedly hijacked the planes
on September 11. “The working level is part of the deception,” he said.
“Ninety-five
percent of the work of the intelligence agencies around the world is
deception and disinformation,” von Bulow said, which is widely
propagated in the mainstream media creating an accepted version of
events. “Journalists don’t even raise the simplest questions,” he said
adding, “those who differ are labeled as crazy.”
Both
Werthebach and von Bulow said the lack of an open and official
investigation, such as congressional hearings, into the events of
September 11 was incomprehensible.
AFP
asked von Bulow about the Taliban’s ban on opium production: “Seventy
percent of the drug trade is licensed by the intelligence agencies,” von
B’low said, and they are interested in keeping the drug traffic
“running through their mills.”
“The BND (German secret service) is steered by the CIA and the CIA is steered by Mossad,” von Bulow said.
Horst
Ehmke, who coordinated the German secret services directly under German
prime minister Willi Brandt in the 70s, predicted a similar terrorist
attack in his novel, Torches of Heaven, published last year, in which
Turkish terrorists crash hijacked planes into Berlin.
EERIE PREDICTIONS
Although
Ehmke had long expected “fundamentalist attacks,” when he saw the
televised images from September 11, he said it looked like a “Hollywood
production.”
“Terrorists
could not have carried out such an operation with 4 hijacked planes
without the support of a secret service,” Ehmke said, although he did
not want to point to any particular agency.
“The
most important thing in the struggle against terrorists, who are
abusing religion, is the battle for the soul of the people and the
nations,” Ehmke said. “If this isn’t resolved successfully, the 21st
Century could be bloodier than the last.”
A
former Stasi agent who had warned the German secret service of terror
attacks in America between September 10-20 told AFP that a high ranking
Stasi chief named Jurgen Rogalla, who is “an airplane terror
specialist,” was probably involved in the attacks of September 11 along
with Abu Nidal.
Both
Nidal and Rogalla work with the Mossad, the former agent told AFP.
Nidal, was said to be in Baghdad, and is a “leading officer for some
Mossad agents.” The agent said that Nidal was “involved directly” in the
events of September 11.
September
11 was preparation for a larger attack on the United States, which is
part of “an old plan,” the agent said. Based on prior knowledge of this
plan, the agent said that more attacks are imminent and that aircraft
carriers may be targeted next. Rogalla is also strongly anti-religious
and attacks on cathedrals or places of religious significance before
Christmas are likely.
Rogalla
was responsible for “turning NATO men” to spy for the East. One of the
East’s NATO spies, Reiner Rupp, known as “Topaz,” provided Stasi and the
Russians with the organization’s highest secrets until he was
discovered in 1993 by the BND. A CIA agent known as “Frank Lindsey”
worked with Rogalla, according to the former Stasi agent.
TERROR INVESTIGATION BLOCKED
Under
the influence of U.S. oil companies, the administration of George W.
Bush blocked U.S. secret service investigations on terrorism, while it
bargained with the Taliban to turn over Osama bin Laden in exchange for
political recognition and economic aid, two French intelligence analysts
claim.
In
a recently published book, “Bin Laden, la verite interdite” (Bin Laden,
the forbidden truth), the authors, Jean-Charles Brisard and Guillaume
Dasquie, reveal that the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s deputy
director John O’Neill resigned in July in protest due to official
obstruction of his investigation of terrorism.
O’Neill
had been in charge of national security in New York. While with the
FBI, O’Neill led an investigation of Osama bin Laden and had forecast
the possibility of an organized attack by terrorists operating from
within the country.
O’Neill
had investigated the USS Cole bombing in Yemen, the bombings of U.S.
embassies in Kenya and Tanzania, and the 1993 World Trade Center
bombing. In 1995, FBI agents working under O’Neill captured Ramzi
Yousef, a suspected lieutenant of bin Laden, who later was among those
convicted for the World Trade Center bombing.
O’Neill
was considered a top-notch investigator and was known for his
pugnacity. He was barred by U.S. Ambassador to Yemen Barbara Bodine from
that country. That dispute reportedly involved a struggle between the
State Department, which sought to preserve relations with Yemen, and the
FBI, represented by O’Neill, who wanted access to Yemeni suspects.
O’Neill,
49, was hired as chief of security at the World Trade Center following a
25-year career with the FBI and died on Sept. 11, the first day of his
new job. O’Neill reportedly died after reentering the building to assist
others.
Brisard
said O’Neill told them that “the main obstacles to investigate Islamic
terrorism were U.S. oil corporate interests and the role played by Saudi
Arabia in it.”
EARLY WARNINGS
Osama
bin Laden and the Taliban received threats of possible American
military strikes against them two months before the terrorist assaults
on New York and Washington, according to The Guardian (UK).
The
warnings to the Taliban originated at a four-day meeting of senior
Americans, Russians, Iranians and Pakistanis at a hotel in Berlin in
mid-July. The meetings took place under the arbitration of Francesc
Vendrell, personal representative of UN secretary general Kofi Annan, to
discuss the situation in Afghanistan.
The
three Americans at the Berlin meeting were Tom Simons, former US
ambassador to Pakistan, Karl “Rick” Inderfurth, a former assistant
secretary of state for south Asian affairs, and Lee Coldren, who headed
the office of Pakistan, Afghan and Bangladesh affairs in the state
department until 1997.
There
were other meetings arranged by Vendrell in which “representatives of
the U.S. government and Russia, and the six countries that border with
Afghanistan were present,” according to the French authors. “Sometimes,
representatives of the Taliban also sat around the table.”
The
Berlin conference was the third meeting since November 2000 arranged by
Mr. Vendrell. As a UN meeting, its official agenda was supposedly
confined to trying to find a negotiated solution to the civil war in
Afghanistan, ending terrorism and heroin trafficking, and discussing
humanitarian aid.
CARPET OF GOLD — OR BOMBS
The
U.S. government’s primary objective in Afghanistan was to consolidate
the position of the Taliban regime in order to obtain access to the oil
and gas reserves of Central Asia, the French authors wrote.
Until
August, the U.S. government saw the Taliban regime “as a source of
stability in Central Asia that would enable the construction of an oil
pipeline across Central Asia,” from the rich oilfields in Turkmenistan,
Uzbekistan, and Kazakhstan, through Afghanistan and Pakistan, to the
Indian Ocean, they said.
“The
oil and gas reserves of Central Asia have been controlled by Russia.
The Bush government wanted to change all that,” the book says. When the
Taliban refused to accept U.S. conditions, “this rationale of energy
security changed into a military one.”
“The
Americans indicated to us that in case the Taliban does not behave and
in case Pakistan also doesn’t help us to influence the Taliban, then the
United States would be left with no option but to take an overt action
against Afghanistan,” said Niaz Naik, a former foreign minister of
Pakistan, who attended the meetings.
On
French television, Naik said during the “6+2″ meeting in Berlin in
July, the discussions turned around “the formation of a government of
national unity. If the Taliban had accepted this coalition, they would
have immediately received international economic aid.”
“And the pipe lines from Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan would have come,” he added.
Naik also claimed that Tom Simons, the U.S. representative at these meetings, openly threatened the Taliban and Pakistan.
“Simons
said, ‘either the Taliban behave as they ought to, or Pakistan
convinces them to do so, or we will use another option’. The words
Simons used were ‘a military operation’,” Naik said.
“At
one moment during the negotiations, the U.S. representatives told the
Taliban, ‘either you accept our offer of a carpet of gold, or we bury
you under a carpet of bombs’,” Brisard said in an interview in Paris.
According
to the book, the government of Bush began to negotiate with the Taliban
immediately after coming into power in February. U.S. and Taliban
diplomatic representatives met several times in Washington, Berlin and
Islamabad.
To
polish their image in the United States, the Taliban even employed a
U.S. expert on public relations, Laila Helms. The authors claim that
Helms is also an expert in the works of U.S. secret services, for her
uncle, Richard Helms, is a former director of the CIA.
No comments:
Post a Comment