Jacob Rothschild? Could Bankers Have Anything to Do With Two Malaysian Airline Tragedies?
You do not challenge the world banking elite and you try not to get in their way. Could it be that the reports of MH17 being mistaken for Putin’s plane are true?
Or could it simply be an attempt to frame Russia?
Maybe Russia is responsible but it certainly looks like there is an aggressive attempt to frame them. The video that is being used for evidence had a time stamp/creation date that, unless faulty, proves that the video was created before the plane was shot down.
Though direct Russian involvement can not be ruled out, it is clear that many in the West are eager to lay the blame at their feet. Though I can offer no definitive answers of what happened today, I do think we need to think about who might benefit from BOTH events.
Though the events may be unrelated, it would seem to reason that whoever is ultimately blamed for MH17 might be heavily scrutinized for potential involvement in MH370. It certainly seems that there may be more than a coincidence at work here.
The story didn’t really seem to gather much attention last week but there was a huge international story regarding BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) moving away from the establishment world banking system.
If we are to believe that world leaders are puppets, and that they answer to bankers, then this is not a small news story. The Daily Sheeple’s Lily Dane wrote an article that we republished here at D.C. Clothesline on Wednesday. This was barely 24 hours before the Malaysian Airliner was shot down:
Five countries are tired of US dominance of the global financial system and are building their own versions of the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF).
The group is called BRICS, and the members are all developing or newly industrialized countries that are distinguished by their large, fast-growing economies and significant influence on regional and global affairs.
From the AP:
Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa -the so-called BRICS countries – are seeking “alternatives to the existing world order,” said Harold Trinkunas, director of the Latin America Initiative at the Brookings Institution.
At a summit Tuesday through Thursday in Brazil, the five countries will unveil a $100 billion fund to fight financial crises, their version of the IMF. They will also launch a World Bank alternative, a new bank that will makeloans for infrastructure projects across the developing world.
The five countries will invest equally in the lender, tentatively called the New Development Bank. Other countries may join later.
The BRICS powers are still jousting over the location of the bank’s headquarters – Shanghai, Moscow, New Delhi or Johannesburg. The headquarters skirmish is part of a larger struggle to keep China, the world’s second-biggest economy, from dominating the new bank the way the United States has dominated the World Bank.
The BRICS grouping’s first formal summit was held in Yekaterinburg in June 2009. Afterward, the nations announced the need for a new global reserve currency, which would have to be “diversified, stable and predictable.” While they did not directly address the perceived “dominance” of the US dollar – something that Russia has done in the past – the statement did spark a drop in the value of the dollar against other major currencies.
On Tuesday, the group’s 6th summit began in Brazil. On the agenda: the creation of a $100 billion development bank and a $100 billion dollar reserve fund, designed to boostinvestment in BRICS economies and reduce the power of the Western-dominated World Bank and IMF.
Thomas Wright, a fellow at Brookings’ Project on International Order and Strategy, told the AP that the BRICS countries “want a safety net if they fall out with the West.”
Congress has refused to approve legislation to provide extra money to help the IMF provide more loans to troubled countries. The most recent conflict between the BRICS countries and the US was at the spring meeting of the International Monetary Fund in Washington in April when an agreed reform of the IMF failed because of a veto by Congress.
That veto caused an increase in strained relations between Brazil, and the US, reports DW:
Following the surveillance scandal revealed by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden, Brazilian President Dilma Rousseff distanced herself from Washington, promptly cancelling her planned meeting with US President Barack Obama in September 2013.
Growing trade among emerging markets resulted in China replacing the US as the primary buyer of Brazilian products in 2009. Since 2012, the Chinese have also been Brazil’s most important import partner.
When the World Bank or IMF lends money, strings are usually attached – strings which reflect the values and interests of the US and its allies.
The BRICS countries are seeking to free themselves from that US dominance, and want to have more influence in global economic policy. They now account for 21 percent of global economic output and have contributed more than 50 percent of world economic growth inthe past decade, reports Aljazeera.
As of 2013, the five BRICS countries represent almost 3 billion people with a combined nominal GDP of US$16.039 trillion and an estimated US$4 trillion in combined foreign reserves.
Russia will attempt to persuade other BRICS emerging market nations to agree to measures to prevent “sanction attacks” by the US to “harass” countries opposing its policies, President Vladimir Putin told The Moscow Times:
Putin said he would urge Brazil, China, India and South Africa to draw “substantive conclusions” from sanctions imposed on Russia over its actions in the Ukraine crisis, and said it was time to dilute the dominance of the U.S.-led West and the U.S. dollar by boosting the role of the BRICS on the global stage.
“Recently Russia has been exposed to a sanction attack by the U.S. and its allies,” Putin told the ITAR-Tass news agency.
“Together we should think about a system of measures that would help prevent the harassment of countries that do not agree with some foreign policy decisions made by the U.S. and their allies, but would promote a civilized dialogue on all points at issue based on mutual respect.”
Putin wants the emerging powers to play a bigger role in world affairs to counter U.S. influence.
“The international monetary system … depends a lot on the U.S. dollar, or, to be precise, on the monetary and financial policy of the U.S. authorities. The BRICS countries want to change this,” he said.
The BRICS countries also have suggested the impacts their system will have on the US dollar:
In July 2014, the Governor of the Russian Central Bank, Elvira Nabiullina, said that the “BRICS partners the establishment of a system of multilateral swaps that will allow to transfer resources to one or another country, if needed” in an article which concluded that “If the current trend continues, soon the dollar will be abandoned by most of the significant global economies and it will be kicked out of the global trade finance. Washington’s bullying will make even former American allies choose the anti-dollar alliance instead of the existing dollar-based monetary system.” (source)
BRICS headquarters will likely be in Shanghai, China. President Xi Jinping said the country will dedicate itself to “perfecting” the role developing countries play in international affairs to give them better representation and a greater say, Reuters reports:
Xi, in an interview with South American media released by China’s Foreign Ministry, said China would try to better play the role of a responsible major power and promote the rights of the developing world.
“We will … dedicate ourselves to perfecting the international system of governance and proactively push for expanding the representation and right to speak for developing countries in international affairs,” he said.
“We will come up with more Chinese proposals and contribute China’s wisdom,” Xi added, without elaborating.
James Rickards, author of Currency Wars, told RIA Novosti that the summit of major emerging “BRICS” economies in Brazil is the latest sign of the decline of the US dollar as the standard global currency for reserves and trading:
“We see the BRICS’ desire to shift away from the dollar, a unified Eurozone with a sovereign bond market waiting in the wings and a requirement onthe International Monetary Fund to re-liquefy the world when the next financial crisis hits.
“Put all that together and you see that the dollar’s days are numbered,” he added.
“BRICS share one common goal in that they have all voiced objections to the dollar as the principal reserve currency and the impact of US Federal Reserve policy on emerging markets, which the Fed pays very little attention to.
“By shifting its policies, the Fed massively affects foreign currencies and makes it difficult for them to plan investments. BRICS members share a desire to end dollar hegemony. It’s easier said than done, but they’re trying,” concluded the analyst.
The US economy is already teetering on disaster. Will this push it over that edge?
And does BRICS represent a new New World Order – one that is shutting the US and its superpower allies out?
Lily Dane is a staff writer for The Daily Sheeple. Her goal is to help people to “Wake the Flock Up!”
Do you think that such a bold move, by five very large economies, might be enough to make the world banking elite angry?
What if those world banking elite might have been involved in the disappearance of MH370?
Would this give them a chance to kill two birds with one stone?
After all, if this was somewhat of a pre-planned false flag, it does seem to offer the opportunity to not only lay the blame of MH17 on Russia, but also potentially shift public opinion for Russia being responsible for both tragedies. If nothing else, this might put a guilty party in the clear.
Below you will find an article that was previously printed at Voltairenet.org under a creative commons license. I am not saying that the world banking elite, and specifically Jacob Rothschild were involved in the disappearance of MH370, but if they were then it might certainly tie a lot of this together.
This article is for truth seekers. Let us draw no conclusions too early and debunk whatever we can. But let’s also not accept everything we hear in the mainstream media.
- Jacob Rothschild, chairman of RIT Capital Partners and Advisory Board member of Blackstone. He also serves as Honorary President of the Institute for Jewish Policy Research.
In the post-Crimea tripolar, geostrategic world of the US, Russia and China, it is imperative to test the West’s overwhelming disinformational news campaigns, against reports from the Russian government’s almost indispensible multimedia website, Russia Today (see pages published on 3/22/14)As often happens in mysterious “accidents,” the unusual disappearance of flight MH 370 Malaysia Airlines – whose various explanations failed to fully satisfy anyone, least of the Chinese persons affected – has given rise to innumerable speculations, some, rather wild and disturbing.
While the war of sanctions by the United States and the European Union against Vladimir Putin was raging on, in a compelling article Russia Today wrote that four days after the disappearance of flight MH 370, a patent for a semiconductor was approved by the U.S. patent Office . Has a patent war been unleashed?
The patent was shared among five principal holders, owning 20 percent each: Freescale Semiconductor Company, located in Austin, Texas, with the other four holders being Chinese nationals hailing from the Chinese city of Suzhou, all of whom worked for the company and were aboard the plane, along with 16 other employees of this same company.
The Russian outlet pointed out that if any patent holder dies, the other owners would share equally the dividends of the deceased, provided that the will is not contested.
With the four Chinese patent-holders now missing and/or killed, this now leaves 100 percent ownership of the patent in the hands of the Texas-based Freescale Semiconductor Company, which, in turn, is partially owned by the shadowy Blackstone Group, a New York-based Private Equity-Investment Banking firm, owned by Israeli-British banker Jacob Rothschild .
The inventors and the applicants were the four missing Chinese and the recipient is none other than Freescale Semiconductor. What luck!
Emphasis is laid on the invisible identity of Blackstone, its interconnection with BlackRock and its partnership with Evercore Partnership which, coincidentally, is behind the privatization of PEMEX (Mexican Petroleum Company) .
Beyond the inevitable speculations, what is relevant is that these 20 Pentagon employees were likely well-versed in the art of electronic warfare, such as the avoidance of detection by military radar systems .
A curious fact as well is that 20 of the missing passengers aboard flight 370 are employees of Freescale Semiconductor, 12 originating from Malaysia and 8 from China.
Freescale Semiconductor boasts that its devices have a wide-range of applications in communications on the battlefield, avionics, missile guidance, electronic warfare and identification of friend or foe.
The controversial Texas company at issue is one of the first semiconductor of its kind in the world, having begun as a division of Motorola, from which it and was then acquired in 2006 by Blackstone, the Carlyle Group and TPG Sovereign Capital.
The Carlyle Group embodies the dynastic nepotism of the Bush family and cronies Frank Carlucci (former National Security Adviser and former Pentagon Secretary) and former British Prime Minister John Major , whose representative in Mexico is the controversial Luis Téllez Kuenzler, now in charge of the stock exchange, where a number of odd share price interferences have taken place.
TPG Capital is a powerful investment firm based in Fort Worth, Texas chaired by Israeli-American David Bonderman, whose extravagant excesses include paying US$7M to the Rolling Stones to celebrate his 60th birthday, in 2002.
Freescale Semiconductor specializes in electronic warfare and stealth (“cloak”) technology, using strategies of electronic countermeasures (ECM) applied to radars: 1) radar interference; 2) changing targets and; 3) changing the electric power properties of the air.
According to The Daily Beast, an Israeli attack on Iran would go one better than air strikes and probably let loose an electronic war against Iran’s entire electrical system; the Internet, mobile and cellular network, and emergency frequencies for firemen and policemen.
The The Daily Beast further asserts that Israel has developed a weapon capable of mimicking cellular maintenance signals, which effectively stops the transmissions . In the past decade, Israel has amassed a wide range of high-tech weapons worth billions of dollars that would enable it to jam, blind and deafen Tehran’s defenses, in the event of a preemptive air strike.
Better yet: there is a new stealth technology that renders the aircraft invisible to radar and hides it from the human eye, while the high-tech camouflage can create electromagnetic fields, as discussed in military.com .
China has accused the U.S. for an escalation in hacking attacks , at the same time as Beijing and Washington are each stepping up the arms race in cloak technology for making planes invisible.
- Lee Hamilton, chairman of the Wilson Center. This former Democratic Congressman rescued Ronald Reagan from political disaster during the Iran-Contra scandal. In 2000, he contributed to forging the colonial concept of “responsibility to protect”. He co-chaired the Presidential Commission of Inquiry on September 11 that diverted the attention away from the coup focusing only on the attacks. In 2006, he co-chaired the Baker-Hamilton Commission, which had decided on a military halt in the Middle East.
Should we see behind the black box of flight MH 370 the machinations of the dismal Blackstone / Rothschild BlackRock financial duo?
 “Rothschild hereda una patente de semiconductores al desaparecer el MH370“, Russia Today, 22 March 2014.
 “BlackRock: el mayor inversionista del mundo detrás de la privatización de Pemex“, by Alfredo Jalife-Rahme, La Jornada, 11 December 2013.
 “Lessons From Blackstone for BlackRock”, by Jeffrey Goldfarb, The New York Times, January 23, 2014.
 “Malaysia jet hidden by Electronic Weaponry? 20 EW defense-linked passengers”, by Deborah Dupre, Examiner, 9 March 2014.
 “Israel’s Secret Iran Attack Plan: Electronic Warfare” by Elie Lake, The Daily Beast, 16 November 2011.
 “Invisible Planes: China, US Race for Cloaking Tech”, by Gene J. Koprowski, Fox News, 17 December 2013.
Social and political sciences Professor at the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM). His columns on international politics feature regularly in the Mexican daily La Jornada and weekly magazine Contralínea. His latest book is El Híbrido Mundo Multipolar : un Enfoque Multidimensional (Orfila, 2010).
When our government is so eager to lay blame it immediately raises a red flag for many. It is no secret that the United States was instrumental in inciting the strife in Ukraine and installed its own puppet government there. Let’s not forget that there are unconfirmed reports that Blackwater (now called Academi) is operating in Ukraine.
Let’s also not forget that Poland borders Ukraine and they are a very amenable ally to the United States. They opened the door to America to advance its European missile shield there. It is my understanding that those plans have been halted but there is no doubt that they are willing to work with us.
Could it be that the United States is pulling the strings while having its own strings pulled by the bankers?
These are the most powerful men in the world.
Their power transcends borders and nations.
It’s just something to think about. I am drawing no conclusions as of yet and you should not either.
Update: I am not a big fan of Anonymous, however, I found a video that some of you might find interesting. It talks about Jacob Rothschild and his possible connection to MH370.