Stealth Terror IV: Earthquakes
As I examine my report on earthquakes, its awesome
implications could well tie in to the present sequence one day because
New York City is not only hurricane-vulnerable, it sits on rock
formations which, when there is an inevitable (or managed) shift will,
as one possibility, destroy Brooklyn and its brick buildings and the
people in them, including a friend of mine. This could happen before
New York City sinks out of sight.
To my knowledge, earthquakes have no natural
connection to hurricanes, nor to weather conditions, for that matter.
The earth’s crust in which they occur moves because the plates are in
motion, such that continents have met and merged, and will continue to
do so. The pressure builds day by day, and century by century, until
some force triggers the movement of a plate to yield to the pressure
build-up so that there is a sudden slip. “The
key to geophysical warfare is the identification of environmental
instabilities to which the addition of a small amount of energy would
release vastly greater amounts of energy.” (Bertell)
The connection with weather events is the mechanism
that is used for pulling the trigger, by the force of ELF waves created
by HAARP. Earthquake management was started by Nikola Tesla in the
1890’s, to become the plaything of scientists over time, in which a
managed earthquake would be recognized only by its creator. That both hurricanes and earthquakes show parallel increase is a super coincidence indicative of human decision.
The official tabulation of earthquakes worldwide is
on websites of the U.S. Geological Survey with records back to 1900 and
earlier, the record of its own collection system starting in 1973,
which by December 31, 2012 completed a base of 40 years of data to
permit observation of changes in normal.
There is no question whatsoever that earthquakes
can be set off electronically by a HAARP transmitter if the underground
or undersea earth structure is ready. Abrupt changes in pattern in the
record allow one to observe by mathematical probability some oddities
that are otherwise unstated.
The reader will better understand this with some
examples, which I will keep as short as I can. One that is basic is
that simply by count, the number of earthquakes worldwide noticeably
increased in 1992, not gradually but suddenly, to a level that continues
today.
USGS FAQ: “Why are we having so many earthquakes? Has earthquake activity been increasing?”
USGS response, in short: In the last twenty
years we have definitely had an increase in the number of earthquakes we
have been able to locate each year. There are more seismograph
stations in the world and many improvements in global communications,
thus we can locate many small earthquakes which were undetected in
earlier years. Looking at the past 32 years, from 1969 through 2001,
only 1992 and 1995-1997 were years that we have reached or exceeded the
long-term average number of major earthquakes since 1971. Earthquakes
occur in clusters. Casualties increase because population is
increasing.
Response to the response: The “many small
earthquakes” that make up the growth referred to do not include the M6.0
and greater. Quakes smaller than M6.0 occasionally cause fatalities
and/or destruction and can be of interest (e.g. the M5.9 in Virginia in
2011 that cracked the Washington Monument and caused excitement in some
of the same area that later received Hurricane Sandy, e.g. New York
City) but to include them in averages with the larger ones is, in terms
of research effort, the tail wagging the dog. USGS annual estimate for
M4.0-4.9 is 13,000, M5.0-5.9 1,319, M6.0-6.9s 134, M7.0 and greater 16.
Even the M6.0-6.9 typically causes no fatalities. Further, the dates
noted in the above USGS response do not reach the spectacular period of
Bush/Cheney which defines itself. Earthquakes do occur in clusters,
some of which tell a story.
The moment in presidential history that invites
scrutiny is the approximate halfway point in the USGS record as Bill
Clinton was elected in 1992, with Bush 41 defeated. The statistics show
that in the years 1973 through 1992 the number of earthquakes M6.0 and
greater worldwide showed a low of 92 per year, a high of 128. In the subsequent period of the same length, 1993 through 2012, the low was 129, the high 203. This new level was the status quo until Barack Obama took office in 2009, when it switched back to the pre-1992 level for his first six months. At midterm his total of 55, continued for the rest of the year, would have been 110, a level not seen for the previous 18 years.
The number of quakes increases concomitantly with the number of days per month upon which M6.0+ quakes occurred, the pre-1992 number averaging 7.5
days per month, with negligible variation—Ford 7.9, Carter 7.3, Reagan
7.3, Bush 41 at 7.3 for his first three years, seeming to define a
norm. In the final year in office of Bush Sr., 1992, his average jumped
from three years at the normal 7.3, to 11.75 days for the fourth
year. It did not go back to the norm when Clinton took office, but
continued at the higher level of Bush Sr., seemingly a new normal, for
his eight years averaging 9.4, followed by Bush/Cheney’s two terms at 9.8. Obama’s average for his first six months surprisingly met the old-time 7.5 as if to return to the old-time era. This was not to be, as he finished four years with an average of 9.7. The last half of 2009 hit 106, to end with 161,
to offer no contrast with the new “normal,” which had reached that
level. Some months in the second half reached unprecedented highs of
record, giving the appearance of someone getting a hot message in August
to catch up.
Pause here for perspective. A person new to this
and scanning rapidly could dismiss it as mere coincidence, something to
remark upon but not for one to claim as useful fact. That person also
will not have noted something about our major media. I try to keep up
with the New York Times because I believe it has a serious
goal, and reputation, for stating facts correctly and for probing
subjects that have relevance for human rights. To state it
deferentially, its flaw may be that it is too conscious of its dignified
reputation and its commercial and political base. Its failure to
comment or follow up on a condemning fact is left to “conspiracy
theorists”–who under a previous executive editor were ridiculed by the Times. Perspective: If by some quirk one knew nothing of what had happened on 9/11, or since, if he were then to read issues of the Times
from that day until the present he would have the impression that the
officially-accepted story had not been seriously challenged.
The Bush/Cheney earthquake record showed a peculiarity in 2001 and 2002 that stands by itself—a record frequency of 10-day counts, not as an average, but the total number of 10-day counts in a month in which quakes of M6.0 and greater occurred. In the Bush/Cheney first year there were 6 months with 10s, in their second year 4, in the subsequent six years of their administration 13, for a total of 23. This is unprecedented, simply not to be found elsewhere in the record since people started keeping track of earthquakes.
If there are 134 earthquakes per year of magnitude
6.0-6.9 as averaged by the USGS, and 15 of M7.0-7.9, plus one of M8.0 or
higher, total 150 for a 365-day year, the rate is one quake per 2.433 days worldwide. Ten days normally would thus see slightly more than 4 M6.0+ earthquakes, in 20 days 8. For 20 days taken out of the hands of Mother Nature there once were 25 such
quakes for the first time of record in October of Obama’s first year,
when the boys at the console were evidently playing catch-up to end the
year with a “normal” total to go into the record. In the USGS
reporting, any half-year total would no longer show the first-half
extremity after the July count was added.
In 2008 another Bush/Cheney set catches our
eye:10-15-10-12-10-13-10-14, in that order. In the last four months of
their tenure this string faded to 6-11-8-9. If those last four months
had not been so “normal” and 14 days had been set each month instead,
they could have chosen to finish their presidency with an even 1,000
days upon which M6.0+ quakes occurred–an eyecatcher to be avoided, both
for its even number and its unprecedented total. Back in the years before 1992, averaging 7.5 days per month, a normal total would have been 730 days in an 8-year term, but during the 8 years starting with 1992, 265 more days of M6.0+ earthquakes worldwide were added to that period.
My point is that this seemingly chosen use of “10”
has the appearance of a management quota, possibly for the purpose of
sharing the HAARP facility with other projects while increasing the
collection in a measured way. One may note that the 10-day regimen was initiated in Bush/Cheney’s first whole month in office,
February, 2001. The next three months dipped to a normal-looking 7, 9,
and 8 days. June then went to 10, as did July, the beginning of a
series which, had it continued, would have created a streak of 10s for
every month, June-through-January. This series was interrupted by a
two-month drop to 7 and 8 in August and September, the timing consistent
with the reported receipt on August 9 by Bush of the most definite
notice of pending attack on the WTC.
Second place for all-time record for the number “10” in day-count was the 10 “10s”
which occurred under Clinton. I see this as a program carryover set by
Bush 41 in personnel and program in his final year when Bush was
confident that he would have the next four years to develop it, but
didn’t. The “weather” record at the change, unlike the stumbling Obama
crew, shows Clinton to be more ready for “weather control.”
The mechanism behind weather warfare and earthquake
as a weapon, HAARP, was pioneered at Penn State University and
developed there for 30 years, moved to Colorado because its electronics
caused so much interference in the Penn State area. The first large
ionospheric heater was built at Plattesville, Colorado. The operation
was moved to Alaska in 1983, near the University of Alaska, for the
uniquely beneficial location for worldwide reach and the immense amount
of energy available to fuel its acres of generators fed from a natural
gas reservoir nearby with no commercial competition. The U. of Alaska
uses HAARP for some university research, but its overriding control for
other purposes is elsewhere. Presumably direction of its 3.6
million-watt radio waves sent to bounce off the ionosphere is wherever
the Defense Advanced Research Project Agency designs to have it
controlled, by cable connection.
With very few exceptions, the official truth which
is not to be disturbed is that only Mother Nature can cause a serious
earthquake, a flood, tornado, a hurricane, or, worst of all, a drought.
Even if one finds it wise to tell his children that babies are brought
by the stork, it is still a fabrication. Geoengineering and weather
control were known well before the nations got together in 1977 to
approve the Environmental Modification Treaty —not only regarding
control of the weather, but specifically modification of the earth,
through earthquakes.
If one believes none of this is factual, what was
all the fuss about ENMOD, signed by 76 nations? And why is the
respected Secretary of Defense William M. Cohen widely quoted at a
counterterrorism conference in 1997, that ”Others are engaging in an
eco-type of terrorism whereby they can alter the climate, set off
earthquakes, volcanoes remotely through the use of electromagnetic
waves. … It’s real, and that’s the reason why we have to intensify our
efforts”?
The USSR and the USA both backed ENMOD during a
period of unusual frequency for highly fatal earthquakes during Nixon’s
second term, when he found it wise to resign and to let an unelected
“vice president,” Gerald Ford, take his place in 1974. Both nations had
the capability, and while they were probably the major protagonists, it
was a game increasingly available to others. Senator Claiborne Pell
had been central to the action but to his expressed regret was unable to
prevent the Senate from exempting research and development from the
ENMOD prohibitions, preventing only engaging in “military or other
hostile use of environmental modification techniques having widespread,
long-lasting or severe effects as the means of destruction, damage or
injury to the other party.” Pell’s prediction was that as the machinery
and skills were developed under this exception the temptation would be
great to ignore the limitations of the treaty.
The pre-ENMOD statistics of the brief Ford period
tempts one to conclude that the major earthquakes in those years were
unnatural. Not counting Ford, from 1900 to 2013 earthquakes which caused 5,000 or more fatalities occurred on the average 1.5 times per four-year term of the 18 presidents from Theodore Roosevelt to Barack Obama, most with one, others not more than 2. This is a remarkable regularity. George W. Bush had six qualifying events occurring over eight years, thus averaging 3 per term, exceeding everyone but Ford ratewise. With 7 events and only 2.4 years in office, Ford’s rate for a whole term would be 11.5.
What this best resembles is a duel between the U.S.
and the USSR, one which had statistically quieted after ENMOD took
effect on October 5, 1978, with Jimmy Carter in office. In the Carter
term, then Reagan, then the senior Bush, a period of 16 years, there
were only four earthquakes with 5,000 or more fatalities, the number
thus only 1 per presidential term against that 11.5 rate for Ford. The most fatal event of that period was under G.H.W Bush:
Iran in 1990, its 50,000 fatalities the highest number for that Muslim
nation at least since 1900. (All these coincidences require thought of
motivation.)
December 26, 1991, dawned on Russia’s first whole
day as just “Russia,” for good or ill, without its 14 companion states.
G.H.W., with 1992 the last year of what was to be his only term as
president, was confident of re-election that November, although not the
view of his wife, his campaign advisors or principal staff. He was ill,
aging, widely despised for Iran-Contra and out of touch. In his
refusal to be defeated he vomited in the Japanese prime minister’s lap,
seen on worldwide television. He won 38 percent of the vote, beaten by
Clinton’s 43 percent and Ross Perot’s 19 percent.
As I proceed with my “framework” logic, one must
remember that the atomic bomb used to Japan’s surprise in 1945 was the
product of an operation performed in complete secrecy in the U.S. The
USSR spied on the operation and wished to compete but lacked uranium.
Information about the capability of the U.S. in environmental
modification can be seen today as similarly secret in terms of the
media, and the widespread requirement for public officials, employees,
and contractors that they fabricate in defense of their continued
employment– or their survival.
As I relate numbers to presidents, I refer to
events as if all such things were within their personal knowledge and
thus responsibility, which is politically if not factually correct.
Harry Truman, shortly after taking office, learned about the Hiroshima
plan, although his personal writings said he had ordered the bomb to be
used only on military installations, not women and children. If true,
this gives one a fuzzy picture of the president’s power (or
truthfulness). My own doubt is whether a president knows in advance, or
possibly even in retrospect, that an earthquake like the one that
ruined Haiti was (1) scheduled to happen and (2) would kill as many
innocent people as it did, inasmuch as the Haitian quake in 1770 near
the same spot which also destroyed Port-au-Prince and was Haiti’s worst
since that time, killed only 200. The difference is that the one in
1770 had a foreshock, while the one in 2010 gave only four seconds’
warning before the ceilings fell—a trait typical of an engineered
earthquake.
What a difference a date makes. If a
damaging earthquake happens on a particular date which is a repetition
of the date of a damaging earthquake a year earlier, I find it contrary
to good practice as an analyst to brush it off as only a rare selection
by Mother Nature, when she appears from a distance to be weeping. The
date that draws attention is December 26. You may search the
record back to 1900, or 1800, and you will not find a date as remarkable
as this. I have tried. It’s not Mother Nature’s style. But whose
choice was it? Russia’s? Or is it British, for whom December 26 is
celebrated as an after-Christmas holiday and a second day for
gift-giving, called “Boxing Day” upon which the superior gives gifts to
his inferior, traditionally items suitable to his work, like boots, or a
new kitchen dress. An earthquake as a gift to inferiors is a
not-so-subtle irony.
December 26, 1941, was the day that British Prime
Minister Winston Churchill, on his first U.S. visit, 19 days after the
Pearl Harbor attack, addressed the Congress in special session to urge
the U.S. to persevere against the Japanese, urging that “the germ
centers of hatred and revenge be constantly and vigilantly curbed and
treated” and that “an adequate organization be set up “to make sure that
the pestilence can be controlled at its earliest beginnings before it
spreads and rages through the entire earth.”
“The United States
has long maintained the option of preemptive actions to counter a
sufficient threat to our national security The greater the threat the
greater is the risk of inaction—and the more compelling the case for
taking anticipatory action to defend ourselves, even if uncertainty
remains as to the time and place of the enemy’s attack. To forestall or
prevent such hostile acts by our adversaries, the United States will,
if necessary, act preemptively.”
Another rationale for “December 26” is the turning
point in the American War of Independence, when General Washington
crossed the Delaware River before dawn to attack the Hessian soldiers
encamped on the other side, more than normally relaxed due to their
celebration of Christmas. This has been the date chosen by some
historians to identify the moment when Britain lost its hegemony over
the United States.
These all have British connections, all fitting
political/military principles for an American or British message. It is
a message, is it not? Flaunting a transparently coded date expresses
confidence that the actor is confident of his power.
In world earthquake history the date has Soviet
significance, rather than British or American. In 1939 World War II was
well underway, Great Britain taking a beating but still a year before
the U.S. would become involved when a notable M7.8 earthquake occurred
at Erzincan, Turkey, on December 26, killing 32,700. Erzincan is a city
near the east end of the Anatolian fault which underlies the length of
Turkey as it dips north to the Black Sea. It is notable as an area for
the mining of chromate, a vital war material without which Germany
could not manufacture hard steel products like tanks, airplane engines,
weapons, and artillery shells. One of Turkey’s chromate customers was
Adolph Hitler, another Joseph Stalin, but in Hitler’s case his need was
desperate in that Germany had no other source of chromate. Turkey held
Hitler’s fate in its hands, while the USSR had other sources. Stalin
got Turkey to promise that it would not sell chromate to Hitler, which
would close down the war, except that Turkey broke its promise, Stalin
found out, and the earthquake was Turkey’s punishment.
I cannot with confidence state that the Erzincan
quake was of Russian contrivance, yet it turned out to be the beginning
of a chain of fatal earthquakes on the Anatolian fault, of which there
were several of varying fatality, moving westward, the last one on
August 17, 1999 at Izmit, Turkey, killing 17,118. Istanbul is expecting
and preparing for a big one which well may be an Erzincan descendant.
To my knowledge the special date has not re-appeared in Turkish or in
Russian earthquake events or implications.
In Russian use the message would appear to be
simply to refer to the Erzincan quake as an example of its power of
retribution—earth-shaking if one considers the subsequent reminders
along the Anatolian fault. One might suggest that use of the date by
some other nation as causing Russia’s “plausible deniability” to fade,
making the USSR plausibly guilty. With its early use of Nikola Tesla’s
techniques, Russia would be first choice so long as the U.S. could look
innocent, buttressed by Russia’s use of the weather. The last U.S.
blizzard of size comparable to Nemo in 2012 was believed to have been
caused by the USSR in 1978, only months before both parties signed the
ENMOD treaty and committed not to use the weather against other
nations. It brought a record snowfall to much of the U.S. including
Ohio, and in 1988 a drought in the western U.S. called by a Wikipedia
author the “costliest natural disaster in the history of the United
States.” From 1985 to 1991 it grew “frightening” to California fruit
growers. If DARPA is now delivering weather to Russia, it appears to be
more than getting even in recent years with record cold winters, heat
and drought.
In my mind the significance of use of the date
“December 26” is that the earthquake on such a date is a message from
the U.S. by way of a reminder of who is boss—and where it is not used in
a notably fatal earthquake it is a way to enhance our plausible
deniability, as with China or Pakistan, whose relationship we needed to
preserve.
Erzincan stands out only because when one goes back to 1900 it is the only earthquake on a December 26th of record in the 20th
Century by that date that was notable for its killing. The next one on
December 26 was in 1975 at Tonga, Melanesia, a mid-Pacific spot of
constant volcanic activity—an M7.8, no fatalities, its distinction being
that it was almost an M8.0, a size expected only once per year and
unusually powerful. The next December 26 was in 1992, an M6.8, no
fatalities, at the place in deep ocean where the continental plates move
against one another on the Mid-Atlantic Ridge at Romanche Gap. This is
a “classic” subduction zone, on the equator, equidistant from two
continents, a location that can cause it to be seen as a memorable
good-bye from George H.W. Bush as he prepared to leave office a few
weeks later, in January, forever. But no one noticed
Turning to the 21st Century, the
following table shows all the earthquakes of 500 fatalities or more
under Bush/Cheney. While Muslim countries naturally predominate in
earthquake counts, earlier presidencies do not show this degree of
consistency.
|
Date
|
Location
|
% Muslim
|
Fatalities
|
|
01/26/2001
|
India (Gujarat)
|
14.6
|
20,085
|
|
03/25/2002
|
Afghanistan (Kush)
|
99.8
|
1,000
|
|
05/21/2003
|
Algeria (Northern)
|
98.2
|
2,266
|
|
12/26/2003
|
Iran (Bam)
|
99.6
|
31,000
|
|
02/22/2004
|
Morocco (N Central)
|
99.9
|
628
|
|
02/24/2004
|
Iran (Central)
|
99.6
|
612
|
|
12/26/2004
|
Indonesia (Sumatra)
|
88.1
|
227,898
|
|
03/28/2005
|
Indonesia (N Sumatra)
|
88.1
|
1,313
|
|
10/08/2005
|
Pakistan (Kashmir)
|
96.4
|
86,000
|
|
05/26/2006
|
Indonesia (Java)
|
88.1
|
5,749
|
|
07/17/2006
|
Indonesia (S of Java)
|
88.1
|
730
|
|
08/15/2007
|
Coast of Central Peru
|
.1
|
514
|
|
05/12/2008
|
China (Sichuan)
|
1.8
|
87,652
|
The following list shows earthquakes of magnitude 6.0 or greater causing fatalities of 1,000 or more which occurred on any 26th day between 1900 and 2013
in records available from the USGS. The list supports the conclusion
that the law of averages for this type of fatal-earthquake-and-date
connection places the 21st Century already far out of line,
accomplished within only one presidential term. This connects with
hurricanes, to support the conclusion that both were manipulated in the
Bush/Cheney presidency.
|
Century
|
Date
|
Country
|
Fatalities
|
|
20th
|
12/26/1939
|
Turkey (Erzincan)
|
32,700
|
|
11/26/1943
|
Turkey (Ladik)
|
4,000
|
|
|
07/26/1963
|
Macedonia (Skopje)
|
1,100
|
|
|
21st
|
01/26/2001
|
India (Gujarat)
|
20,085
|
|
12/26/2003
|
Iran (Bam)
|
31,000
|
|
|
12/26/2004
|
Indonesia (Sumatra)
|
227,898
|
|
|
05/26/2006
|
Indonesia (Java)
|
5,749
|
The USGS, doing its job conscientiously, would say
that there appear to be more earthquakes now because more effort has
gone into finding and recording. As noted earlier, this would mainly
apply to earthquakes of magnitude less than 6.0.
|
Presidency
|
Year
|
Date
|
Location
|
Magnitude
|
Fatalities
|
|
Nixon/Ford
|
1973
|
||||
|
1974
|
|||||
|
1975
|
Dec. 26
|
Tonga, Melanesia
|
7.8
|
0
|
|
|
1976
|
|||||
|
Carter
|
1977
|
||||
|
1978
|
|||||
|
1979
|
|||||
|
1980
|
|||||
|
Reagan
|
1981
|
||||
|
1982
|
|||||
|
1983
|
|||||
|
1984
|
|||||
|
1985
|
|||||
|
1986
|
|||||
|
1987
|
|||||
|
1988
|
|||||
|
Bush
|
1989
|
||||
|
1990
|
|||||
|
1991
|
|||||
|
1992
|
Dec 26
|
Mid-Atlantic Ridge, Romanche Gap
|
6.8
|
0
|
|
|
Clinton
|
1993
|
||||
|
1994
|
|||||
|
1995
|
|||||
|
1996
|
Dec 26
|
North Coast of New Guinea, Indonesia
|
6.3
|
0
|
|
|
1997
|
Sep 26
|
Central Italy
|
6.4
|
11
|
|
|
1998
|
Dec 26
|
Equatorial Central Pacific
|
6.1
|
0
|
|
|
1999
|
|||||
|
2000
|
|||||
|
Bush II
|
2001
|
Jan 26
|
Gujarat, India
|
7.6
|
20,023
|
|
2002
|
|||||
|
2003
|
May 26
|
Halmahera, Indonesia
|
7.0
|
1
|
|
|
2003
|
Dec 26
|
Bam, Iran
|
6.6
|
31,000
|
|
|
2004
|
Nov 26
|
Papua, Indonesia
|
7.1
|
32
|
|
|
Dec 26
|
Sumatra-Andaman Islands
|
9.1
|
227,898
|
||
|
2005
|
Sep 26
|
Northern Peru
|
7.5
|
5
|
|
|
2006
|
May 26
|
Java, Indonesia
|
6.3
|
5,749
|
|
|
Dec 26
|
Taiwan Region
|
7.1
|
2
|
||
|
Dec 26
|
Taiwan Region (Different plate)
|
6.8
|
0
|
||
|
Dec 26
|
Kuril Islands, Japan
|
6.0
|
0
|
||
|
2007
|
Dec 26
|
Aleutian Islands, Alaska
|
6.0
|
0
|
|
|
2008
|
|||||
|
Obama
|
2009
|
Dec 26
|
Papua, Indonesia
|
6.3
|
0
|
|
2010
|
|||||
|
2011
|
|||||
|
2012
|
Bear in mind that a December 26 or a 26th
with no fatalities simply demonstrates the likelihood that the
attempted quake could have been intended to take a shot at a possible
event that did not work. There can be no foreshock on an earlier day
because that would not be on the intended date for a message. If HAARP
cannot budge the surrounding rock on the chosen day, it must be left for
another day. The subaqueous attempts such as Tonga and Romanche Gap
(above), and several under Bush Jr. appear to have been such tries.
Then there is the one on January 26, 2001, less
than a week after Bush/Cheney took office. They (Cheney) couldn’t wait
to get a December 26, so they used January 26, which killed 20,003
people at Gujarat, India, near the Pakistan border. Only a
coincidence? Rational answer: No.
The date “December 26,” and “26” in any month may
now have gone out of use as we see large and damaging events of
questionable authorship occurring under President Obama without that
identification. It seems remarkable that the media, even in past times,
have been reluctant to pursue this oddity. It was mentioned in
Wikipedia that three had the same date a year apart, with no further
comment. Obama’s record had a different message, really quite
remarkable.
Obama had three notable
earthquakes in his first term, none exempt from justified speculation as
to human causation (Haiti and Chile in 2010, Japan 2011) which I leave
for consideration. The surprise that Obama had for me was that the
number of M6.0 and greater quakes in his first six months in office did
not follow the regime which began in Bush Sr.’s last year in office,
1992. Rather, it would have fit perfectly in any year from 1973 to
1991. When Obama took office in 2009, the running average for him to
meet for a normal appearance was 158 (brought up from the old 110 by the constantly high annual levels after 1991). His first six months ended with 55, back to the first half of the pre-Bush average, then ….
I watched attentively in July, then August, then
September to see if the old era had indeed returned, but by September it
became obvious that management was unleashed as that month
substantially exceeded the Bush/Cheney record for a single month. In
October the lid blew off with 32 quakes on 19 days, for
which there is no precedent. Nothing close. This is not a number that
can be faked. In the NEIC “Earthquake Search Results” each event is
recorded by date, time, latitude, longitude, depth and magnitude, thus
acquiring a specific identity somewhere on earth. Some changes are
expected based on subsequent information, not enough to change totals in
most months, then only minimally.
One exception is the case of foreshocks and
aftershocks, which are in fact earthquakes, occasionally compounding
counts such as the deep sea quake offshore from Honshu in 2011 for which
there were hundreds, but this is not the cause for the Obama October
2009 extremity. In the annual USGS report of earthquake numbers one
sees only the total for the year, thus, surprising as was the six-month
count of 55, it disappeared within the annual total of 161, closely akin to the previous year’s Bush/Cheney norm.of 158. This is the only number one sees at year’s end.
When Bush/Cheney took
office after Clinton, there was no noticeable change. Obama had been in
Washington, a senator, only a year before his election in 2008, whereas
Cheney in 2000 was “inside man at the skunk works,” former Secretary of
Defense for Bush Sr., former member of Congress, during the 2001
transition at the capitol “renewing old friendships” in the
November-January interim (“In My Time / A Personal and Political
Memoir,” 2012), knowledgeable in getting the right people into the right
places. He could do that better as vice-president than if he had been
president. What the numbers say to me is that the capability first
became available for application in Bush Sr.’s term and was not
dislocated by Clinton. I see the sudden, exact drop to a former level
in 2009 as indicating something of a surprise for a largely or entirely
new Obama crew working at a high technical/political level. Democrat
Obama may have received a “figure-it-out-for-yourself” reception, having
to put things back together after the spectacular, unprecedented,
disastrous presidency of Bush/Cheney. Another listing from the record
of worldwide earthquakes is “great” earthquakes of magnitude 8.0 to 9.5.
No president since 1900 had as many great quakes as George W. Bush,
with eleven, including the one that caused the December 26, 2004
Sumatra-Andaman tsunami.
When Nikola Tesla died in January of 1943, the FBI
made it a point to seize his papers and his hundreds of patents. Under
the Franklin Roosevelt presidency just as the U.S. entered World War II
there was a “cluster” of fatal quakes in Japan, the details of which may
indicate U.S. use of the Tesla patents. Beginning later that year, on
September 10, 1943, Japan experienced its first 1,000-fatality quake
since 1933
From 1933 until January of 1995, a span of 62 years, the only 1000-fatality quakes in Japan came in a cluster between 1943 and 1948. The 1943 M7.4 (1,190 fatalities) was followed by an M8.1 on December 7, 1944
(998), then a few weeks later, on January 12, 1945 an M7.1 (1,961)
struck in the industrial area that included the factories that built the
zero fighters which accompanied the bombers at Pearl Harbor. Later
that year, on August 6th and 8th, the nuclear
bombs were dropped on Hiroshima (166,000 estimated fatalities) and
Nagasaki (80,000), which made the earthquakes seem only symbolic.
The earthquakers were not through, however. The
following year, the war over, on December 20, 1946, an M7.3 in the
Pacific Ocean south of Osaka killed 1,362. The last one, fifth in the
series, an M7.3 on June 28, 1948 on the coast of the Sea of Japan, took
3,769 lives. Had these last two in the cluster instead have been
bombings, they would have been irresponsible, violative of the September
2, 1945 terms of surrender. None of the foregoing were near enough
geographically to each other to seem related—instructive concerning the
advantage in “environmental modification,” no reason to suspect there
was a violation. A disadvantage is that even a president may not know
his people did it. I personally recall the hatred of Japan by men who
were involved in the Pacific—like a lifetime injury for some. Those
first three quakes were under Roosevelt, the last two under Truman.
It’s always possible that Mother Nature did those for President
Truman–or some U.S. military officers who felt it their duty to continue
without orders. They do that.
Not so for the Andaman-Sumatra M9.2 earthquake in
the Indian Ocean which caused the historic tsunami in 2004. Its
identification by “December 26” stamps it as caused by DARPA, who else?
Motive? I could list some for your choice, but I needn’t have that to
make me feel secure in my judgment of U.S. responsibility. The
Australian geological agency responsible for earthquake insights noted
that it was “unusual” for an undersea megathrust earthquake of this size
to have no foreshock. A similar quake off the northeast coast of Japan
in 2011 (Honshu) had several solid foreshocks over three days in
producing its devastating tsunami, but it was obviously not intended or
designed for a recognizable special date. The Great Tsunami quake
occurred within an hour of the time on December 26 the year
before–2003–when an M6.6 killed 31,000 residents of Bam, Iran, leaving
75,600 homeless, 85 percent of buildings damaged or destroyed.
Continuing the coincidence, in 2006 Taiwan got a December 26 hit from an
M7.1 that tore up undersea cables connecting Southeast-Asia-to-USA
communication and caused severe damage to the southern part of Taiwan,
with two fatalities. The USGS lists a second quake just east of Taiwan
on December 26, an M6.8, evidently on a separate plate. The same day
there was an M6.0 near the Kuril Islands which “didn’t work.” That is,
no tsunami.
I realize that it is conceivable that two
earthquakes could occur on the same day of the month in different
years. When I study forty years of world earthquake records and find
that possibility to be so unlikely in nature that it would be like
finding a new element in the atom, and I am aware that a U.S. federal
agency has the ability to create the event, anyone who claims it is
decided by chance will need to use something other than logic.
If the counter argument is that the United States
is a good country, of good people, and would not do that, I think of the
way we kill children by the thousands and hundreds of thousands in
various places and times (estimate for our Great Tsunami runs about
80,000 children), and how we kill unsuspecting families with drones, and
killing our own people with tornados and hurricanes. And chemtrails.
(Check it out.)
Here’s the thing. President Obama has joined the
clamor for controlling guns, surrounded by weeping mothers and fathers
who cannot sit idly by when 20 children are killed with a semi-automatic
rifle. Being president, Obama knows the true background for this, as
does Mayor Bloomberg, and the people on the top rungs of the New York Times who are going along with it even though it is totally hokey. They cannot claim stupidity.
The people can be steered by a president’s
emotional speech, or a newspaper’s reports about what happened. We know
you can’t trust most presidents, or most politicians, or most news
outlets beyond a certain point. But when the subject is possessing a
firearm under the Second Amendment, and you hear all these ideas for gun
control which we know build a foundation in formation of a police
state, the level of trust we end up with gives us a feeling as if there
is a gun being stuck in our back as we speak. We don’t know what
they’re dumping on us from somebody’s tanker planes, or what country is
really calling the shots in the Middle East where our last fakey
president got us so scrambled. And when the New York Times
passes on grotesque lies accompanied by advice on how best to form a
police state, we think we’d better start getting those well-regulated
state militias formed.
*James Hanson is a native of Nebraska and
graduate of Oberlin College. His first job was as reporter for the
Defiance, Ohio Crescent-News. Drafted, he was with the Korea Military
Advisory Group (KMAG) 1952-1953. His law degree is from the University
of Michigan, where he learned the importance of well-drafted
legislation.
For the Ohio Water Commission, born of the 1959
flood, Hanson assisted in creating an intelligent framework for water
management. He was legal advisor to the Director of Natural Resources,
then legislative counsel for the Ohio Legislative Service Commission.
In private practice Hanson’s long-term
representations were for environmental organizations such as the
volunteer Water Management Association of Ohio and the Ohio Water
Development Authority, bond-issuing agency for municipal sewer and water
facilities. The Wildlife Legislative Fund and the Wildlife Legislative
Fund of America became his major clients, which he created under the
direction of James H. Glass as the defenders of sportsmen’s interests in
Ohio and wherever wildlife laws came under attack. Their present
successor is the U.S. Sportsmen’s Alliance.
Retired, Hanson was writing histories of
immigration into Nebraska when he suddenly found himself duty-bound to
concentrate on the flood of government falsehoods spilling over
especially since 2001.
No comments:
Post a Comment