http://www.pakalertpress.com/2012/12/29/sandy-hook-huge-hoax-and-anti-gun-psy-op/                 

Sandy Hook: Huge Hoax and Anti-Gun “Psy Op”

truther December 29, 2012 

[Translate]

---

Jim Fetzer and Dennis Cimino
Veterans Today

There are obvious signs that tell the difference between genuine and fabricated event. The recent shooting of police and firemen responding to a deliberately-set fire has all the signs of being a bona fide event: there is a single consistent narrative, one shooter has been clearly identified, and there has been no good reason to doubt that the subject, William Spengler, went off the rails and committed the crimes. There are many articles about it, which relate the same basic themes: “Killer of 2 NY Firemen had semiautomatic rifle, left note”: “Police say the man who lured firefighters in Webster, N.Y., into a deadly ambush had the same make and caliber semiautomatic rifle as the one used in the Connecticut school massacre. Webster Police Chief Gerald Pickering said Tuesday that 62-year-old William Spengler was armed with a .223-caliber Bushmaster rifle, a .38-caliber revolver and a 12-gauge shotgun in Monday’s ambush. Spengler killed two firefighters and wounded two others before fatally shooting himself.” However bizarre the event, there is nothing about it that suggests it was either a hoax or a psy op.

In the case of Sandy Hook, however, the situation is completely different, where we have one inconsistency after another: the mother was a teacher there and Adam was a student; the mother was not a teacher there an Adam was not a student. One shooter was involved, yet police radio reports show a second suspect was apprehended at the scene and a police helicopter video show yet a third suspect being tracked in the woods. The principal called the local paper about the shooting; the principal was dead on the scene. Excellent studies of the incoherence of the Sandy Hook narrative have been published by Niall Bradley, “Sandy Hook massacre story spins out of control” (Veterans Today, 20 December 2012) and by Professor James F. Tracy, “The Sandy Hook School Massacre: Unanswered Questions and Missing Information” (Global Research, 25 December 2012). Even NBC News has reported that there were four rather than two handguns inside the school and no long gun. There is no consistent story or coherent narrative.

The Bushmaster Hoax

Perhaps the most important point made by Niall Bradley concerned the Bushmaster, which was supposed to be the weapon that was used to slaughter 20 children and six adults as follows:

Professor Tracy observes that the report given by the medical examiner raises further questions about the weapon used, leading Tracy to question whether the man who participated in this interview was the real H. Wayne Carver or an impostor: ” . . . the H. Wayne Carver who showed up to the December 15 press conference is an almost entirely different man, appearing apprehensive and uncertain, as if he is at a significant remove from the postmortem operation he had overseen. The multiple gaffes, discrepancies, and hedges in response to reporters’ astute questions suggest that he is either under coercion or an imposter. While the latter sounds untenable it would go a long way in explaining his sub-pedestrian grasp of medical procedures and terminology.”

“With this in mind,” Tracy continues, “extended excerpts from this exchange are worthy of recounting here in print. Carver is accompanied by Connecticut State Police Lieutenant H. Paul Vance and additional Connecticut State Police personnel. The reporters are off-screen and thus unidentified so I have assigned them simple numerical identification based on what can be discerned of their voices”:

Reporter #1: So the rifle was the primary weapon?
H. Wayne Carver: Yes.
Reporter #1: [Inaudible]
Carver: Uh (pause). Question was what caliber were these bullets. And I know—I probably know more about firearms than most pathologists but if I say it in court they yell at me and don’t make me answer [sic]—so [nervous laughter]. I’ll let the police do that for you.
Reporter #2: Doctor can you tell us about the nature of the wounds. Were they at very close range? Were the children shot at from across the room?
Carver: Uhm, I only did seven of the autopsies. The victims I had ranged from three to eleven wounds apiece and I only saw two of them with close range shooting. Uh, but that’s, uh y’know, a sample. Uh, I really don’t have detailed information on the rest of the injuries.
[Given that Carver is Connecticut’s top coroner and in charge of the entire postmortem this is a startling admission.-JT]
Reporter #3: But you said that the long rifle was used?
Carver: Yes.
Reporter #3: But the long rifle was discovered in the car.
State Police Lieutenant Vance: That’s not correct, sir.
Unidentified reporter #4: How many bullets or bullet fragments did you find in the autopsy. Can you tell us that?
Carver: Oh. I’m lucky I can tell you how many I found. I don’t know. There were lots of them, OK? This type of weapon is not, uh … the bullets are designed in such a fashion that the energy—this is very clinical. I shouldn’t be saying this. But the energy is deposited in the tissue so the bullet stays in [the tissue].
[In fact, the Bushmaster .223 Connecticut police finally claimed was used in the shooting is designed for long range field use and utilizes high velocity bullets with a muzzle velocity of 3,000 fps, the energy of which even at considerable distance would penetrate several bodies before finally coming to rest in tissue.]

The inquiry of Allan Rees

I received an inquiry from Allan Rees of noliesradio asking if I could review a view he has archived showing an officer unloading a weapon from the trunk of the car:

Hi Jim,
Can you view the first video in our post here and determine whether or not the Bushmaster was retrieved from the trunk of Adam’s vehicle? If it was the Bushmaster, the official story hits the brick wall. I can see the clip in the video. Also what is the officer doing to the gun? Is what he is doing characteristic to a bushmaster rather than a shotgun or other rifle?

As a former Marine Corps officer who used to supervise marksmanship training, I studied the video and replied with my observations about what could be seen, in relation to the handgrip or magazine (which extend from the bottom of the weapon) as opposed to the carrying handle (which extends from the top):

Allan,
My observations:
(1) It looks like a Bushmaster, because the handgrip is visible in some of the frames.
(2) He is ejecting rounds from the chamber, which appear to be of a small caliber.
(3) Shotgun shells would be much, much larger and very obvious upon ejection.
I recommend obtaining confirmation, but this appears to have been the Bushmaster.
Jim
P.S. I am going to contact some friends confirm my observations.

Shotguns are more familiar than assault weapons, but here is a photograph to illustrate their typical size and shape, along with a sample of a few shells, which are obviously MUCH LARGER than .223 rounds:

The person I contacted for a second opinion was Dennis Cimino, with whom I have authored articles here on Veterans Today and elsewhere. Dennis has extensive military experience and is one of the smartest men I have ever known at sorting out what is really going on when it comes to covert ops:

I blew [some of these frames] up pretty large, going too much bigger yields too much pixellation to do much with the shot then but this is clearly an assault rifle not a shotgun. The ammo on the cement behind the vehicle looks to be most likely to be .223 ammo, but that’s just a guess as those surely are not SHOTGUN shells.
So, for what it’s worth, I decree this is the assault rifle here in the trunk, and if it was in the trunk, how could it have been used in any shooting unless the ‘dead’ shooter got up and put it into the trunk after he killed himself???

I was initially puzzled there was no carrying handle of the weapon in the trunk, so I checked it out and fond that Bushmaster makes several versions that do not have carrying handles, some camo, some not:

Police Lt. H. Paul Vance

Something is very wrong with the role of Connecticut State Police Lieutenant H. Paul Vance, who, as the extract from the interview reflects, denied that the Bushmaster was found in the trunk of the car rather than beside the body. I strongly suspect that he was the officer who unloaded the magazine at the time, which has raised additional questions about his competence and role, which Dennis has expressed:

If any of the so called ‘victims’ that died were with .223 rounds in them, that it’s impossible for the shooter who offed himself at the scene to have also carried this weapon to the car and put it into the trunk.The handling of the weapon is absolutely not being done by a trained law enforcement official, to be frank about it, they would not have handled the weapon like that before it got taken to a forensics lab and had the prints taken from all of the handled parts of it.
No cop investigating a crime scene would handle it like that. And it’s too thick to be a shotgun so it’s an assault rifle. whether it’s the same one in your pictures is not clear, the weapons has a multi round magazine, why didn’t the ahole eject that before cycling the rounds out thru the weapon like that, when pulling the mag out of it would have sufficed.
Very very very odd.
But handling the thing like that was outrageous. no cop would do that, which is more proof that was being done for the press, not for any investigation.

During his press briefing, a reporter asks about the mother of Adam Lanza. The question is whether she was related to the school or if she was. Vance pauses more than a moment, then speaks at some length about the man arrested in camouflage and released (no significant details are given there, either), with nary a word about the mother. The reporters then, cleverly distracted away from the fact they didn’t hear an answer, start shouting other questions. He has deflected them. Note his slight smiles at points while he discusses the camo guy not the mother.

Vance also says to another reporter in a personal interview that the investigation will take months. But if the official story (of a lone shooter killing 20 kids and six adults) is in fact correct, why should it take “months”? Why don’t we already know? It reminds me of the Warren Commission’s having sealed its documents and records for 75 years on the grounds of “national security”, since, if its conclusion were correct (and a lone gunman had assassinated JFK), there would have been no national security issue. Before that, we hear him say the most difficult thing is when a reporter has a question that he’s not prepared to answer, “for whatever reason”.

In a subsequent post, Dennis elaborated on the important points that he was making here:

Needless to say, it makes ZERO SENSE that the best weapon for the killing was left in the trunk of the vehicle. and could NOT possibly have been used at the school because the dead shooter couldn’t have put it back into the trunk.
Which raises the all important question: “Say, this kid shot mommy in the face 6 times with this thing that day, how many rounds did the stupid moron [officer at the trunk] eject from the still inserted magazine onto the pavement behind the weapon?”
I’m presuming that the magazine was ‘full’ though no gun owner would ever allow any weapon to be so stored as this puts a preset into the magazine feed spring, which is a bad idea all the way around. IF the magazine was ‘full’ at the house, and the kid didn’t calmly sit down and reload it again after killing mommy, that magazine would have a total capacity minus ’6′ or however the guy fired into mommy’s face.
Another good reason for the trunk of the vehicle to have been ‘sealed’ immediately for the vehicle to be processed properly at the State’s crime laboratory for fingerprints and other clues. Once the trunk was opened on the car and it was ascertained that the trunk did not contain any obvious booby traps of any kind, the trunk should have been shut again very carefully, the trunk lid sealed by special evidence anti tamper tape across the trunk lid seal to the body, and indeed over the key opening, and the vehicle put on a flatbed and towed to the crime lab for extensive analysis.
My guess is that that was not done. But that’s exactly what should have been done when the police determined the car contained weapons not used in the shooting, obviously, least not at the SCHOOL. That car would have gone to the central crime lab there in Hartford for processing, not mucked with on location by morons.

Anti-Gun Propaganda

As I explained in “Did Mossad death squads slaughter American children at Sandy Hook?” (Veterans Today, 23 December 2012),

(1) The most likely scenario, given what we know now, is that Adam Lanza and his mother killed the day before. Adam’s body picked up by local police. He was attired in a SWAT outfit, including body armor, and stored in the school.

(2) A three-man team entered the school, one was arrested in the school–cuffed and put on the lawn–two went out the back door, one was arrested, the third appears to have escaped. You can find this on helicopter videos.

(3) Those arrested are currently not in police custody; their names were never released. That is a telling sign that we are being sold a story that is based on fiction, not on fact. What else are the local police concealing?

It now appears that they were also concealing that the Bushmaster was still in the car’s trunk, which of course means that it cannot have been the weapon responsible for slaughtering 20 children and 6 adults. If they were killed by .223 rounds, therefore, then those must have come from other assault weapons used by other shooters, which is precisely what appears to have taken place.

Nothing stands between DHS and complete domination of American than a population that is heavily armed and capable of resistance. Undermining our 2nd amendment rights by fabricated attacks–which can be arranged at will by those who control the cover operations of this nation–must be understood to be the real threat that we confront, not bizarre incidents like this one, which–even if we were to take it as the press has been reporting it–could not have been prevented by gun control.

For those still in doubt

This very peculiar event has been followed by a massive propaganda campaign to promote gun control and the confiscation of assault weapons, followed by a stunning act of censorship for pro-gun accounts:

“Facebook purges pro-gun accounts” posted on Fuk Facebook and “Facebook purges pro-gun accounts” on inforwars.com:

Facebook Purges Pro-Gun Accounts

• Posted by James Φοίνιξ on December 27, 2012 at 5:13pm in Fuk Facebook
• Back to Fuk Facebook Discussions

Facebook Purges Pro-Gun Accounts

The following is a list of Facebook accounts operated by individuals in the alternative media that have been shut down by Facebook staff over the past 24 hours. Infowars writer Aaron Dykes and political dissident Brandon J. Raub have also had their accounts deleted. Raub was snatched by police and forcibly imprisoned in a psychiatric ward earlier this year for posting political content on Facebook. Infowars editor Kurt Nimmo also had his account suspended this morning.

1. Kurt Nimmo (account suspended)
2. Aaron Dykes (account inactive)
3. Brandon J. Raub (account inactive)
4. Michael F Rivero (account inactive)
5. Anthony J Hilder (account inactive)
6. William Lewis (account inactive)
7. Richard Gage (account inactive)
8. William Rodriguez (account inactive)
9. Infowar Artist (account inactive)
10. We are Change (account inactive)
11. Wacboston At Twitter (account inactive)
12. Michael Murphy Tmp (account inactive)
13. Robert M Bowman (account inactive)
14. Peter Dale Scott (account inactive)
15. Jason Infowars (account inactive)
16. Mike Skuthan (account inactive)
17. Packy Savvenas (account inactive)
18. Sean Wright (account inactive)
19. Katherine Albrect (account inactive)

It is important to stress that most of these accounts have not simply been temporarily suspended, they have been shut down completely. What could be more telling of the true significance of Sandy Hook? The American people are not even going to be allowed to debate the merits of gun control.

Indeed, according to the latest report, Sen. Diane Feinstein (D-CA) and her allies in the gun control movement are “going for broke”: “The definition of an “Assault Weapon” in this bill is so broad you can drive a truck through it! They’re targeting EVERYTHING — rifles, shotguns and even handguns…. If passed, Feinstein’s so-called “Assault Weapons Ban” would:

• Ban the sale, transfer, importation, and manufacturing or 120 specifically named rifles, shotguns and handguns;
• Ban the sale, transfer, importation and manufacturing of ALL firearms with a detachable magazine and at least one “military characteristic” — which could mean just about anything that makes a gun “look scary.”
• Bans the sale, transfer, importation, and manufacturing of magazines holding more than 10 rounds;
• Force owners of ALL “grandfathered” weapons to undergo an intrusive background check and unnecessary fingerprinting;
• Force owners of ALL “grandfathered” weapons to federally register their guns after obtaining permission slip from local law enforcement showing their guns are not in violation of state or local law. That’s right. If you own a $10 magazine that’s more than 10 rounds, you’ll have to register it with the BATFE in their National Firearms Registry.

It appears that even the owners of supposedly “grandfathered” firearms will be treated like common criminals, which leaves little room for doubt that Sandy Hook is being used to as a snare to confiscate “guardians of men”.

The Incoherence of Sandy Hook

My [Dennis Cimino's] thoughts on this whole thing go in this direction: given all of the ‘fakery’ and ‘faked dead identities’ of the 9/11 fiasco, one thing comes to mind about the teachers telling the children being led out of the school: “Cover your eyes and close them” or something to that effect. Granted, you would not want children to see that kind of death, but had that been the case, it would have been possible to cover some of the more ‘messy’ victims up so that the exiting children didn’t have to see them as they walked out of the school.

Furthermore, a staged shooting event would even to a child seem ‘nonsensical’ and ‘surreal’ say if any of the so-called ‘dead’ just happened to be breathing or moving still, as it is fully possible that IF this was staged, they didn’t just use crash test dummies for corpses.so there is some doubt in my mind about the veracity of the ‘deceased’ children and the teachers. We know many dead from 9/11 never existed…were created by the government to get people to feel so sorry for them.
This thing possibly was either one of these two possibilities: (i) fully staged and faked, based on the press conference and the ‘read the card’ and the smirking [grieving father's] face in that video; or (ii) was done by the moss*d with EFF BEE EYE help and the State Police helping, because the handling of the weapon in the trunk of the car is totally COUNTER to what any REAL law enforcement people would have done with that weapon.
Per the comments, you don’t wipe down or manhandle a murder weapon under any circumstances, and if you must pick it up you do so in a fashion that ensures that minimal interference with fingerprints will occur when you do lift it up. using wire or other means to bring it out of the trunk would be the preferred method, certainly with latex gloves on so as to not impart the officer’s prints at the very least.
So based on the [grieving father] at the press converence being told ‘just read the card’ and all the other nonsense, this was staged. How staged is anyone’s guess. My gut tells me that there could be truth in the fact that the shooter killed his mom and himself at the house and then treasonous scum decided to exploit it and then stage the rest in the following day to make it a GUN GRAB EXTRAVAGANZA here, [which, between Obama and those who salivate over gun-control, even though it makes us completely vulnerable to DHS, as I have explained in "Homeland Security: Preparing for Massive Civil War".]
Moreover, if this was the weapon MOMMY had that son killed mommy with, before going to the school, it certainly would have a paper trail that shows MOMMY BOUGHT THIS gun. And if sonny boy toted it to school, he intended to use it. it had a much higher firing rate than any semi-automatic pistol would have, much more deadly and accurate to kill with [assuming he had the physical ability to handle it and aim and fire with accuracy], and to be honest, under any coat easily concealed if the barrel were allowed to be tucked under a waist band of pants before going into the building.
The semi-automatic pistols, for which a round is automatically loaded with each shot fired, but where, unlike automatic weapons, rounds are not continuously fired as long as the trigger is depressed and the magazine remains loaded] would have been backups, one in each coat pocket with the assault weapon being the main weapon for the killing. Being that this, the Bushmaster, of all the guns had to have had a federal background check involved, as do all guns in most states, MOMMY had to have purchased it. even if she paid cash for it there should be a store record. But those records have not surfaced and the latest we have is Adam Lanzo was not out practicing the use of the Bushmaster or any other firearm.

Postscript on Mind Control

Here are some resources on mind-control and other psy ops in this gun-control saga: