Nine Reasons To Question The Paris Terror Attacks ~ hehe folks their "PLAYBOOK" hasn't "changed" for fucking what ! how long ? over & over& over & fucking on &on &on On ON ????? ....isn't "it" just fucking get~tin OLDDDDDDDDDDDDD ..yet fuck me man aren't ya getttting a lil ...tired of it ...just a lil , man the same "scrip" "played" out ...fuck
This article first published on November 9, 2015 in the immediate wake of the Paris attacks is of relevance in analyzing the nature of both the Paris and Brussels events.
As France finds itself in the grips of martial law and its first mandatory curfew since it was occupied by Germany during world War II, there exists a number of questionable details surrounding the recent terrorist attacks in Paris.
Only hours after the first shots were fired, stories and reports are beginning to change and contradict one another. Considering the history of the French government, French Intelligence agencies and the Anglo-American/NATO Intelligence apparatus, particularly the recent events surrounding the Charlie Hebdo attacks that were exposed as false flags, one would be justified in wondering whether or not these recent attacks in Paris were of the same variety.
Below are a number of reasons to question the official story of the Paris terror attacks.
1.) How many gunmen? Already,
the number of individuals involved in the Paris attacks is in question.
While some reports suggested four shooters were involved, others
suggested three. The majority of mainstream reports seem to be only
acknowledging two shooters. So how many shooters were there? Two, three
or four? One witness, Pierre Marie Bertin, a 36-year-old who was at the
theater when the shooting began, stated that there were as many as four gunmen.
Bertin described some male hostages who “went onto the balcony and
tried to negotiate for the life of their wives with one of the guys
[terrorists]. It was sickening.” Bertin recounted somewhat more detail
than some other witnesses and was clear that there were as many as four
gunmen. Australian news media is reporting that three gunmen have been killed.
This might seem inconsequential to many
readers, but in informed researching circles it is well-known that the
information that comes out shortly after the event is usually the most
reliable. This is not to discount the existence of confusion related to
panicked reports coming from eyewitnesses and the like. However, the
information coming out early on has not yet been subjected to the
top-down media revision that will inevitably take place as the story
becomes molded to fit the narrative pushed by the individuals who either
directed the attack at the higher levels or at least have connections
with those who are able to control the manner in which various media
outlets report the event. For instance, in times of false flag attacks,
the initial reports may point to 5 gunmen. Very shortly after, reports
may only mention two. Only a few hours after the attack, however, all
references to more than one gunmen are removed entirely, with only the
“lone gunman” story remaining. Any other mention of additional gunmen
after this point is ridiculed as “conspiracy theory.”
2.) The types of weapons used – While some reports suggest that the attackers were using AK-47s, other reports are suggesting that shotguns were used.
While the contradiction in reports can certainly be attributed to
victims and witnesses simply not being aware of the type of weapons
being used in the attacks and panic in the heat of the moment, there is
none the less contradiction in the reports being issued. As of the time
of the writing of this article there has been no clarification as to
what type of weapons were used. Since the assailants were supposedly
killed by police it should be clear what weapons they used.
3.) Were the gunmen killed or arrested? While
the number of gunmen itself is in doubt, news reports coming from Fox
and Sky are suggesting that a suspected gunmen was actually arrested. In
fact, the suspect allegedly stated to police, “I am from ISIS” giving
us all the information we need as for who is responsible for this
attack.
4.) Gunmen connected to ISIS, gunmen connected to Syria –
Along with the very convenient and immediate statement by an allegedly
arrested suspect that he was from ISIS, we also have screams of a
shooter that “This is for Syria!” This gives us all the information that
we need regarding the motivation of the alleged attackers. They are
from ISIS. They hate the French because the French are “attacking” ISIS
and because somewhere in France in a very darkened corner, under the
sofa, there are freedoms. ISIS hates freedoms. This is quite
coincidental considering the fact that a Russian airliner was recently
bombed, allegedly by ISIS – at least according to the West.
5.) The timing of the event –
Aside from the obvious connotations derived from the attacks occurring
on Friday the 13th, the Paris massacre has taken place shortly before a
major climate summit that was set to take place in France. The French
government was expecting massive protests they alleged could potentially
become violent, by activists opposed to globalization and energy
austerity. Interestingly enough, France had already planned to impose
border controls starting on November 30th in anticipation of the U.N.
Conference on Climate Change in Paris “because of the terrorist threat
or risk of public disorder.” Needless to say, there will be no massive
protest now considering the fact that 2015 France resembles the 1943
version of itself more than anything else.
6.) Security – Considering the fact that the security had been so heightenedboth
on the heels of the Charlie Hebdo attacks and the anticipation of
disorder for the U.N. Conference on Climate Change, how on earth did
such a major terror attack slip through the hands of the DGSE? After
all, France is nothing if not a police state. It is also giving the
United States a run for its money in the contest for how much
information it is able to nab up on its citizens. No doubt, we will be
sold the line of “pre-civilized savages outsmarted first-world high end
military surveillance states.”
7.) Drills – One hallmark of the false flag operation is
the running of drills shortly before or during the actual attack. Many
times, these drills will involve the actual sequence of events that
takes place during the real life attack . These drills have been present
on large scale false flags such as 9/11 as well as smaller scale
attacks like the Aurora shooting.For instance, as Webster Tarpley documents in his book 9/11 Synthetic Terror: Made In USA,
at least 46 drills were underway in the months leading up to 9/11 and
on the morning of the attack. These 46 drills were all directly related
to the events which took place on 9/11 in some way or other. Likewise,
the 7/7 bombings in London were running drills of exactly the same scenario that was occurring at exactly the same times and locations.
Although one reason may take precedence
over the other depending on the nature and purpose of the operation
drills are used by false flag operators for at least two reasons. One
such purpose is the creation of intentional confusion if the drill is
taking place during the actual attack. The other, more effective aspect,
however, is using the drill as a cloak to plan the attack or even “go
live” when it comes time to launch the event. Even more so, it gives the
individuals who are involved in the planning of the event an element of
cover, especially with the military/intelligence agency’s tight chain
of command structure and need-to-know basis. If a loyal military officer
or intelligence agent stumbles upon the planning of the attack, that
individual can always be told that what he has witnessed is nothing more
than the planning of a training exercise. This deniability continues
all the way through to the actual “going live” of the drill. After the
completion of the false flag attack, Coincidence Theory is used to
explain away the tragic results.
All of this must be considered, when one
reads reports suggesting that the UK conducted counter-terrorism drills
earlier this year that included scenarios that involved terror attacks
in Paris similar to those that took place on the Charlie Hebdo massacre.
As the reports surrounding the UK drills were
released, a number 10 spokesman confirmed “it had been agreed that
future exercises, which take place on a regular basis, should seek to
learn from events in France.” David Cameron himself stated that there
was a need for police “to call on military help if there was a major
emergency.”
8.) Charlie Hebdo – The
recent Paris attacks were similar to the Charlie Hebdo massacre that
occurred earlier this year. The Charlie Hebdo attacks, however, were
largely revealed as a false flag operation. Evidence for which can be
seen in my article “15 Signs the Charlie Hebdo Attack Was a False Flag.” Thus, there exists a clear precedent for such attacks in France, albeit on a much larger scale.
9.) Who controls ISIS? For
many, claims that the attackers belong to ISIS is a deal breaker. For
these individuals, ISIS is a shadowy terrorist organization that
supports itself and has created a caliphate in eastern Syria and western
Iraq that can scarcely be defeated (except when the Russians bomb it).
However, the facts do not support such a shallow understanding of the
ISIS terrorist organization. ISIS was entirely created, funded and
directed by the United States, Britain, France and other NATO countries.
Its actions have been coordinated by the Anglo-American Intelligence
apparatus for geopolitical purposes all across the world both at home
and abroad. For this reason, the declaration that ISIS committed a
terrorist attack in Paris is by no means a get-out-of-jail-free card for
the Western Intelligence apparatus. Instead, it is the trademark of
their handiwork. Please see these articles for more information on the
nature of ISIS: here, here,here and here.
While the information presented above may not be enough evidence to
conclude that the Paris attacks were false flag attacks, it is reason
enough to question the official story thus far. If these attacks are
indeed placed in the lap of ISIS, however, all fingers should
immediately point to NATO and the Atlanticist Intelligence apparatus. It
is they who control ISIS and they who bear the responsibility for its
actions.Emergency Drills Took Place on Morning of Paris Terror Attacks: Report
Brandon Turbeville – article archive here –
is an author out of Florence, South Carolina. He has a Bachelor’s
Degree from Francis Marion University and is the author of six books, Codex Alimentarius — The End of Health Freedom, 7 Real Conspiracies, Five Sense Solutions andDispatches From a Dissident, volume 1 andvolume 2, The Road to Damascus: The Anglo-American Assault on Syria, and The Difference it Makes: 36 Reasons Why Hillary Clinton Should Never Be President.
Turbeville has published over 500 articles dealing on a wide variety of
subjects including health, economics, government corruption, and civil
liberties. Brandon Turbeville’s podcast Truth on The Tracks can be found
every Monday night 9 pm EST atUCYTV. He is available for radio and TV interviews. Please contact activistpost (at) gmail.com.
The original source of this article is Activist Post
Copyright © Brandon Turbeville, Activist Post, 2016
No comments:
Post a Comment