Thursday, December 10, 2015

BLUT UND BODEN: WHY HIDE THE INEVITABLE         ~ hehe nazis ,nazis,nazis al~ways leads back ....2  ...nazis Oops




The season of Christmas is full of fantastic fairy tales of ghosts, gnomes, elves, sprites, magical reindeer and of course, a jolly old man that represents the cold and wintery nights of Saturnalia.
The ancient name of Saturn was EL. It is the reason why those that were chosen by EL, were called Elites. The elites had knowledge of the secret histories. Secret Societies were formed as fraternities to Saturn. Saturn evolved from praised Lord of Time to the horned God of the underworld, Satan.
Saturn is the planet of greatest misfortune and is responsible for catastrophes conjured in the sanctuary of the sky. Dubbed the planet of devastation and delay, it is the common notion that Saturn simply enhances our agonies and creates bewildered darkness in our lives.
Saturn rules the Winter and not surprisingly, is an ancient harbinger of peril.
Last night, I shared with my audience a German myth about a demonic shadow of Santa Claus called Krampus. Tonight, I have another German myth to tell you about. It is a myth about the science behind climate disruption; something once called “anthropogenic global warming” and much earlier “Blood and Soil” or “Blut Und Boden,” adopted by the Nazis.
Today, we are being told that due to climate disruption, Earth is awaiting peril, and only certain individuals are responsible for the destruction of the environment, when the reality is directly connected to resource depletion and geo-engineering.
We are told the vast majority of the people on the planet are contributing to global warming by using fossil fuels and coal. However, the so-called science of global warming does not include the possibility of resiliency which is a factor in all Earth science. Those who question the motive the climate science movement are meant with derision and threats.
We have been admonished that the science on global warming is settled and it should no longer be debated as to its validity.
The scientists have become so hostile and militant about those who question their data that 20 of them are asking President Barack Obama to prosecute people who disagree with them on the science behind man-made global warming.
Scientists from several universities and research centers even asked Obama to use the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) to prosecute groups that “have knowingly deceived the American people about the risks of climate change, as a means to forestall America’s response to climate change.”
RICO laws were designed to take down organized crime syndicates, but scientists now want it to be used against scientists, activists and organizations that voice their disagreement with the so-called “consensus” on global warming.
The scientists repeated claims made by environmentalists that groups, especially those with ties to fossil fuels, have engaged in a misinformation campaign to confuse the public on global warming.
This type of suggestion shows how desperate the United Nations and its minions of scientists are in developing a bogeyman that will give them a reason to redistribute wealth and to control vital resources needed for global sustainability.
When the powerful elite decide who gets what, when it comes to food, fuel and water, a system will have to be in place that directs and otherwise limits the intake of resources by certain individuals.
Now, it seems that not only are the climate science militants willing to suggest jailing what they call deniers, they are also going after another big gun for support and that is, God himself.
In the first five days of climate negotiations, interfaith activists came, fasted, talked to media, cornered leaders and prayed. In a downtown Paris chapel, hundreds of people, many of them prostrated on the ground, sang and prayed for the climate negotiators and mostly for the world.
Interfaith leaders recently handed top United Nations negotiators a petition with 1.8 million signatures begging for meaningful climate action.
According to Joe Ware of the Christian Aid Foundation, the environment movement, which has primarily been a secular movement, has realized that over the last 30 years or so it’s not been that successful in achieving its goals.
Now we are seeing that its goals are to convince the entire planet that with enough money and support, they can geo-engineer the planet that has a climate that is warming – or cooling depending on who you ask.
Joe Ware wrote in an e-mail “Increasingly Climate Science pundits have looked to faith groups for help in mobilizing a broader movement of people calling for action on climate change. They are actually natural allies as almost all faiths have a theology of creation care at their heart.”
Pope Francis, called a rock star by young religious climate activists, was not in Paris. But as he spoke to faithful in St. Peter’s Square on Sunday, he appealed to those deciding on climate change measures to show courage by also fighting poverty, saying “the two choices go together.”
He asked for prayers so that those making decisions on climate measures receive “the courage to always use as their criterion of choice the greater good of the human family.”
Leaders of the interfaith movement believe the world will not act enough on climate change unless it is taught in every church, every mosque, every synagogue, and every temple.
It is unfortunate what is happening is quite simply history repeating itself; it is a history that included the deaths of millions of people.
Guenther Schwab, an Austrian Nazi who had been a strong nature lover since boyhood and by the 1920’s, became very active in the emerging environmental movement in Austria. Many greens or environmentalists joined the Nazi party and pushed for the hereditary idea about the environment. Schwab was a firm supporter of Hitler’s Blut und Boden or “blood and soil.” Blood and soil ideologies consisted of a mixture of eugenics and environmental resource claims of Aryan stewardship.
By 1935, Nazi Germany had passed three landmark green laws at the federal level that were the most environmentally progressive of the era. They were all signed by the Fuhrer and considered to be his personal pet projects. The first was an animal rights protection law passed in 1933, followed by a very friendly environmental hunting law called the Reich Game Law in 1934. The capstone of Nazi ecology, however, was the Reich Nature Protection Law passed in 1935 called the RNG. This particular law was well ahead of its time as it promoted green social engineering schemes over private property along holistic, totalitarian lines. The Nazi slogan for the RNG was all encompassing, “it shall be the whole landscape!” Here is seen the birth of environmental effects reports and permits. Though seldom used, private property could also be expropriated without compensation for environmental reasons. That this was born in Nazi Germany is not an insignificant fact.
It was Nazi Germany’s wild romantic belief in an Aryan cultural superiority based on nature’s laws, all dressed up in political; pseudo-scientific biology and often encouraged with ecological apocalyptic ideas of global warming and cooling because certain people “Jews” were a burden on resources and the environment. Some will argue that many people believed in order to bring balance to nature that was out of control, Jews and Slavs needed to be murdered.
This was the “green” ideology that was embraced and with the apocalyptic rantings of “green” Germans, the pogroms were carried out. This according to them, would ensure a healthier planet and ease the resource depletion on the rest of the world.
In 1958, Guenther Schwab wrote the book Dancing with the Devil, a pseudo religious allegory about global warming. The book actually illustrated the ideas of modern day anthropogenic global warming as outlined by Nazi green party members during the days of the push for Blood and Soil laws.
In the story, Schwab has Satan take a group of potential recruits on a time machine through Spanish history. Moving fast forward from ancient times, the passengers watch as forests melt into sheep pastures. One passenger remarks, “It is as if a dangerous bacillus were eating the skin of a living body.” The Devil laughs, gloating over his progress. In describing the destruction of nature as a Satanic plot, Schwab counted on his readers to respond with anger rather than resignation.
He then presumed that the Devil’s plan can be thwarted, even in Spain. God, in this story, has sympathy for the forests, meadows and untamed rivers. Perhaps this is an unusual role for the God of the Bible, but Schwab assigns it to him anyway.
It was one of the first attempts at illustrating the idea of the possibility that minor global warming comes from industrial pollution.
Schwab’s opinions ring all too familiar with the propaganda of today’s global warming theorists that there is a fragile relationship between oxygen and carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. Schwab had written that he believed the Earth would only have 100 years left and industrial pollutants would cause the continuing rise of carbon dioxide in the air.
According to Schwab, “This will absorb and hold fast the warmth given out by the earth. This will cause the climate to become milder and the Polar ice will begin to thaw. As a result, there will be a rise in the level of the ocean and whole continents will be flooded.”
All of these same “theories” were presented by Green Nazi’s of the Third Reich to justify human culling in order to preserve resources.
In every historical account, the idea of using agrarian scares, whether it be climate, or consumption always seems to end with genocidal or eugenics directives where only certain ethnicities or bloodlines are entitled to food, water or shelter.
Many people are unaware that Geunther Schwab, the grandfather of global warming theory, survived the war and went on to be on the advisory panel of The Society of Biological Anthropology, Eugenics and Behavior Research. Schwab was especially concerned with over population and espoused eugenics as a way to prevent an environmental crisis and reduce the strain on resources.
Schwab lived to be 101. He died in 2006. He was able to see his principles of global warming be presented by Al Gore.
The militant nature of the so-called climate science presented, the urging of jailing individuals who question and the recent interfaith leanings to support climate change, is now taking on a serious satanic or Nazi-like totalitarianism.
Hitler stated in Mein Kampf that it is important to “sift the human material” for those who support decisions of the leaders and those who do not support these decisions. He also believed in culling those who were a burden on society.
The agenda of “sifting human material” is also found hidden in the policies of Global Warming Sustainability. Jonathon Porritt, who chairs the Sustainable Development Commission, says curbing population growth through contraception and abortion must be at the heart of policies to fight global warming. He says political leaders and green campaigners should stop dodging the issue of environmental harm caused by an expanding population.
Porritt, a former chairman of the Green Party, says the government must improve family planning, even if it means shifting money from curing illness to increasing contraception and abortion. Do these policies sound familiar?
These policies sound similar to eugenics policies that existed in the United States prior to World War II and were then adopted and practiced by the Nazis in order to purify the blood lines of race in Germany.
Many of these policies were part of the charter of the Trilateral Commission. Zbigniew Brzezinski, Barack Obama’s foreign adviser, was the co-founder of the Trilateral Commission along with David Rockefeller.
The original stated purpose of the Trilateral Commission was to create a “New International Economic Order.” Its current statement has morphed into fostering a “closer cooperation among these core democratic industrialized areas of the world with shared leadership responsibilities in the wider international system.
The global plan is for all countries to live on the level of third world nations. Economic sustainability can be achieved through a process known as “end game” strategies, which include controls on ecological systems such as food, water and air. The agenda would severely limit water, electricity, and transportation – even deny human access to our most treasured wilderness areas, it would monitor all lands and people through tracking and scientific measures such as biometrics and eugenics.
The United Nations has already established a “global police force” that will probably have to duties of enforcing global sustainability laws. The Strong Cities Network was proposed during the 2030 Summit.
The Strong Cities Network is a program hatched by the Department of Justice wherein control of local law enforcement is handed over to a London-based think-tank called the Institute for Strategic Dialogue.
There are now four major American cities that have handed over control of their law enforcement policy and practice to the U.N. and The Institute for Strategic Dialogue, who in turn is controlled by a who’s who of top tier globalist, one-world government, Council on Foreign Relations, Trilateral Commission and other power elite.
While it is common sense that we should be responsible for our environment and keep it free of pollutants from combustion and industrial waste, it is also common sense to recognize despotism that uses religion to disguise a political movement.
It seems that climate science has learned something from Satan, Hitler and radical Islam.