Are These Remnants Of A 9,000 Year Old Stonehenge At The Bottom Of Lake Michigan? ~hehe folks! we "think" we know ALL there IS, on Our World ???
Have scientists
stumbled across a structure similar to Stonehenge at the bottom of Lake
Michigan? Insanely this story is not new, it’s actually old but it went
so under reported that nobody knows about it. In 2007, 40 feet below the
surface of Lake Michigan where the Grand Traverse Bay Underwater
Preserve is, Mark Holley, a professor of underwater archaeology at
Northwestern Michigan University College, found the site with his
colleague Brian Abbot after voyaging across the lake in a ship that
contained sonar equipment, which is generally used to examine old
shipwrecks.
After several passes they found a row of
stones that piqued their interest. When they sent down divers to visit
the site and obtain photographs, they were left somewhat discouraged.
“It was really spooky when we saw it in the water,” Holley said. “The
whole site is spooky, in a way. When you’re swimming through a long line
of stones and the rest of the lake bed is featureless, it’s just
spooky.”
In order to satisfy Grand Traverse Bay’s
American Indian community, whose interests are to minimize the number
of visitors to the site, and to preserve the location of his research,
Holley has kept its exact location a secret.
One of the objects photographed from the
site is a boulder which is believed to feature a prehistoric carving of
a mastodon — an animal believed to have gone extinct about 10,000 years
ago. Researchers shown pictures of the carving have asked for more
evidence before they will confirm that the markings are in fact an
ancient petroglyph. The trouble is that the boulder is underwater, and
experts in petroglyphs aren’t necessarily expert divers.
Holley hopes that a computer model of
the carving in the mastodon rock will help petroglyph experts determine
whether the features were somehow natural workings or whether they were
the work of ancient humans.
A skeptical Charles Cleland, retired
curator of Great Lakes archeology and ethnology at Michigan State
University, says that petroglyphs are rare int he Upper Midwest but have
been seen. Although he is skeptical he does see the value in
investigation.
“But I think this is certainly
something that needs to be investigated,” Cleland said. “It would be
unthinkable to leave it alone and not try to figure it out.”
Interestingly enough, if this structure
is authenticated, it may not be all that out of place. Other stone
circles and other petroglyph sites have been located in the great lakes,
and ancient structures underneath large bodies of water in general are
not unusual. There have been over 100 cities at the bottom of the
Mediterranean Sea recorded alone, and many more at the bottom of the
oceans.
According to geographical history, the
submerged site would have been tundra when humans of the hunter-gatherer
era roamed it 6,000 to 9,000 years ago. Is is possible the stones came
from a massive fishing weir laid across a long-gone river? Or could they
maybe mark a ceremonial site? Only time will tell.
But let’s bring up an interesting question… where did all the water come from that covered so many underwater structures?
Think about this for a second: less than 5%
of the ocean has been explored and only around 5% of the ocean floor
has been mapped! This is truly remarkable when you consider the world’s
oceans cover around 70% of the Earth’s surface! Just imagine what we
still have left to discover — many ruins, ancient cities, and even pyramids
have already been found and we have barely even looked. It seems like
the future holds many more amazing discoveries in store for us.
Much LoveSource:
http://anthropology.msu.edu/anp264-ss15/2015/03/25/lake-michigan-stonehenge/
http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2009-02-08/news/0902070444_1_stones-mastodon-archeologists
No comments:
Post a Comment