Legacy of Nazis in America |
Tuesday, 28 December 2010 http://www.ahrp.org/cms/content/view/747/9/ | |
Project Paperclip was the largest and longest-running operation involving Nazis in the history
of the United States, and its effects are still being felt today.
After four years, the Justice Department finally released a report by the Office of Special Investigations about the secret safe haven US officials gave Nazi criminal scientists--in direct defiance of President Harry Truman's policy. The report details the secret government policy, Project Paperclip, which gave Nazi scientists a safe haven in the U.S. as well as high level employment after World War II. While official American policy after the war was to prosecute war criminals for the atrocities committed under Adolf Hitler, many sectors of the U.S. government--in particular, the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)--concealed incriminating evidence in order to bring these individuals into the U.S. The New York Times, which first reported about the OSI report, refrained from touching upon the lasting insidious influence that morally debased Nazi scientists have had on various U.S. officials and public agencies that approved unethical human experiments in America. Below, we post the entire commentary, Nazis in America, by John Whitehead of the Rutherford Institute who focuses on the insidiuous influence the Nazi scientists have exerted on US officials. The Paperclip masterminds brazenly had the German scientists' records changed to expunge evidence of war crimes and ardent Nazism and secure permanent immigration status for them in the U.S. "Many of the 1,600 scientific and research specialists and their dependents brought to America under Project Paperclip had been deeply involved in Nazi society during the war. However, some U.S. officials, determined to recruit these men, sidestepped the problem of their Nazi backgrounds by “cleansing” and re-writing their information files to eliminate incriminating evidence. As a way of identifying the German scientists, American officials put an ordinary paperclip on their personnel files—thus the origin of the operation’s name."Under Project Paperclip not only rocket scientists were recruited, but convicted war criminals-- including doctors who had conducted medical atrocities on concentration camp inmates, such as: experiments with plague vaccines, experiments that force fed chemically altered seawater to starved Dachau concentration camp inmates... American democratic principles were subverted by officials who adopted the Nazi utilitarian philosophy which posits that the ends justify the means. "Nazi attitudes toward research on human subjects were imported and adopted by various U.S. officials."MKULTRA, the notorious CIA mind control experiments with LSD and other chemical agents, were the brainchild of Nazi Paperclip scientists: "Nazi science that was reminiscent of concentration camp experimentation was used as the basis for research in the US on Americans." “The Machiavellian attitude behind these operations was born when a World War II ally became a new enemy and the world axis shifted…[but] no matter how necessary intelligence activities may be, they cannot be allowed to operate unchecked, in secrecy and darkness, shielded from the democratic process of accountability. Otherwise, in the end we become our own worst enemy.” Vera Hassner Sharav ~~~~~~~~~~~~
THE NEW YORK TIMESNazis Were Given 'Safe Haven' in U.S., Report Says
November 13, 2010
WASHINGTON — A secret history of the
United States government’s Nazi-hunting operation concludes that American
intelligence officials created a “safe haven” in the United States for Nazis
and their collaborators after World War II, and it details decades of clashes,
often hidden, with other nations over war criminals here and abroad.
The 600-page report,
which the Justice Department has tried to keep secret for four years, provides
new evidence about more than two dozen of the most notorious Nazi cases of the
last three decades.
It describes the government’s
posthumous pursuit of Dr. Josef Mengele, the so-called Angel of Death at
Auschwitz, part of whose scalp was kept in a Justice Department official’s
drawer; the vigilante killing of a former Waffen SS soldier in New Jersey; and
the government’s mistaken identification of the Treblinka concentration camp
guard known as Ivan the Terrible.
The report catalogs both the
successes and failures of the band of lawyers, historians and investigators at
the Justice Department’s Office of Special Investigations,
which was created in 1979 to deport Nazis.
Perhaps the report’s most damning
disclosures come in assessing the Central Intelligence
Agency’s involvement with Nazi émigrés. Scholars and previous
government reports had acknowledged the C.I.A.’s use
of Nazis for postwar intelligence purposes. But this report goes
further in documenting the level of American complicity and deception in such
operations.
The Justice Department report,
describing what it calls “the government’s collaboration with persecutors,”
says that O.S.I investigators learned that some of the Nazis “were indeed
knowingly granted entry” to the United States, even though government officials
were aware of their pasts. “America, which prided itself on being a safe haven
for the persecuted, became — in some small measure — a safe haven for
persecutors as well,” it said.
The report also documents divisions
within the government over the effort and the legal pitfalls in relying on
testimony from Holocaust survivors that was decades old. The report also
concluded that the number of Nazis who made it into the United States was
almost certainly much smaller than 10,000, the figure widely cited by
government officials.
The Justice Department has resisted
making the report public since 2006. Under the threat of a lawsuit, it turned
over a heavily redacted version last month to a private research group, the
National Security Archive, but even then many of the most
legally and diplomatically sensitive portions were omitted. A complete version
was obtained by The New York Times.
The Justice Department said the
report, the product of six years of work, was never formally completed and did
not represent its official findings. It cited “numerous factual errors and
omissions,” but declined to say what they were.
More than 300 Nazi persecutors have
been deported, stripped of citizenship or blocked from entering the United
States since the creation of the O.S.I., which was
merged with another unit this year.
In chronicling the cases of Nazis
who were aided by American intelligence officials, the report cites help that C.I.A. officials provided in 1954 to Otto Von Bolschwing, an associate of Adolf
Eichmann who had helped develop the initial plans “to purge Germany of the
Jews” and who later worked for the C.I.A. in the United States. In a chain of
memos, C.I.A. officials debated what to do if Von Bolschwing were confronted
about his past — whether to deny any Nazi affiliation or “explain it away on
the basis of extenuating circumstances,” the report said.
The Justice Department, after
learning of Von Bolschwing’s Nazi ties, sought to deport him in 1981. He died
that year at age 72.
The report also examines the case of
Arthur L. Rudolph, a Nazi scientist who ran the Mittelwerk munitions factory.
He was brought to the United States in 1945 for his rocket-making expertise
under Operation
Paperclip, an American program that recruited scientists who had
worked in Nazi Germany. (Rudolph has been honored by NASA and is credited as the father of the Saturn
V rocket.)
The report cites a 1949 memo from
the Justice Department’s No. 2 official urging immigration
officers to let Rudolph back in the country after a stay in Mexico, saying that
a failure to do so “would be to the detriment of the national interest.”
Justice Department investigators
later found evidence that Rudolph was much more actively involved in exploiting slave
laborers at Mittelwerk than he or American intelligence officials
had acknowledged, the report says.
Some intelligence officials objected
when the Justice Department sought to deport him in 1983, but the O.S.I.
considered the deportation of someone of Rudolph’s prominence as an affirmation
of “the depth of the government’s commitment to the Nazi prosecution program,”
according to internal memos.
The Justice Department itself
sometimes concealed what American officials knew about Nazis in this country,
the report found.
In 1980, prosecutors filed a motion
that “misstated the facts” in asserting that checks of C.I.A. and F.B.I. records revealed no information on the
Nazi past of Tscherim Soobzokov, a former Waffen SS soldier. In fact, the
report said, the Justice Department “knew that Soobzokov had advised the C.I.A.
of his SS connection after he arrived in the United States.”
(After the case was dismissed,
radical Jewish groups urged violence against Mr. Soobzokov, and he was killed in 1985 by
a bomb at his home in Paterson, N.J. )
The secrecy surrounding the Justice
Department’s handling of the report could pose a political dilemma for President
Obama because of his pledge to run the most transparent
administration in history. Mr. Obama chose the Justice Department to coordinate
the opening of government records.
The Nazi-hunting report was the
brainchild of Mark Richard, a senior Justice Department lawyer. In 1999, he
persuaded Attorney General Janet Reno
to begin a detailed look at what he saw as a critical piece of history, and he
assigned a career prosecutor, Judith Feigin, to the job. After Mr. Richard
edited the final version in 2006, he urged senior officials to make it public
but was rebuffed, colleagues said.
When Mr. Richard became ill with
cancer, he told a gathering of friends and family that the report’s publication
was one of three things he hoped to see before he died, the colleagues said. He
died in June 2009, and Attorney General Eric
H. Holder Jr. spoke at his funeral.
“I spoke to him the week before he
died, and he was still trying to get it released,” Ms. Feigin said. “It broke
his heart.”
After Mr. Richard’s death, David
Sobel, a Washington lawyer, and the National Security Archive sued for the
report’s release under the Freedom of Information Act.
The Justice Department initially
fought the lawsuit, but finally gave Mr. Sobel a partial copy — with more than
1,000 passages and references deleted based on exemptions for privacy and
internal deliberations.
Laura Sweeney, a Justice Department
spokeswoman, said the department is committed to transparency, and that
redactions are made by experienced lawyers.
The full report disclosed that the
Justice Department found “a smoking gun” in 1997 establishing with “definitive
proof” that Switzerland had bought gold from the Nazis that had been taken from
Jewish victims of the Holocaust. But these references are deleted, as are
disputes between the Justice and State Departments over Switzerland’s
culpability in the months leading up to a major report on the issue.
Another section describes as “a
hideous failure” a series of meetings in 2000 that United States officials held
with Latvian officials to pressure them to pursue suspected Nazis. That passage
is also deleted.
So too are references to macabre but
little-known bits of history, including how a director of the O.S.I. kept a
piece of scalp that was thought to belong to Dr. Mengele in his desk in hopes
that it would help establish whether he was dead.
The chapter on Dr. Mengele, one of
the most notorious Nazis to escape prosecution, details the O.S.I.’s elaborate
efforts in the mid-1980s to determine whether he had fled to the United States
and might still be alive.
It describes how investigators used
letters and diaries apparently written by Dr. Mengele in the 1970s, along with
German dental records and Munich phone books, to follow his trail.
After the development of DNA tests,
the piece of scalp, which had been turned over by the Brazilian authorities,
proved to be a critical piece of
evidence in establishing that Dr. Mengele had fled to Brazil and had
died there in about 1979 without ever entering the United States, the report
said. The edited report deletes references to Dr. Mengele’s scalp on privacy
grounds.
Even documents that have long been
available to the public are omitted, including court decisions, Congressional
testimony and front-page newspaper articles from the 1970s.
A chapter on the O.S.I.’s most
publicized failure — the case against John
Demjanjuk, a retired American autoworker who was mistakenly
identified as Treblinka’s Ivan the Terrible — deletes dozens of details,
including part of a 1993 ruling by the United States Court of Appeals for the
Sixth Circuit that raised ethics accusations against Justice Department
officials.
That section also omits a passage
disclosing that Latvian émigrés sympathetic to Mr. Demjanjuk secretly arranged
for the O.S.I.’s trash to be delivered to them each day from 1985 to 1987. The
émigrés rifled through the garbage to find classified documents that could help
Mr. Demjanjuk, who is currently standing trial in
Munich on separate war crimes charges.
Ms. Feigin said she was baffled by
the Justice Department’s attempt to keep a central part of its history secret
for so long. “It’s an amazing story,” she said, “that needs to be told.”
This article has been revised to
reflect the following correction:
Correction: November 14, 2010
An earlier version misspelled the
given name of Adolf Eichmann as Adolph.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment