New Zealand Supreme Court Says DOJ Doesn't Have To Provide Its Evidence In Megaupload Extradition Case
from the blind-justice dept
Despite two earlier rulings that the US Justice Department needed to provide
Kim Dotcom and others involved in Megaupload with the actual evidence
being used against them for the extradition trial, an appeals court
overturned those rulings and now the New Zealand Supreme Court has agreed in rejecting the request.
While the chief judge dissented, the majority found that the
extradition treaty does not require the country that has filed the
charges against the individuals to provide the information and that the
New Zealand courts have no real authority to order the US DOJ to provide
the evidence. It does seem rather ridiculous that someone can be sent
halfway around the world to face criminal charges without first being
able to see the evidence against them, but that's apparently the law in
New Zealand. They might want to fix that.
Either way, the actual extradition trial was recently pushed back until July (it had been scheduled to start in a few weeks). Seems quite bizarre that they're only just getting to the trial over extradition nearly two and a half years after Megaupload was seized and shut down. The judicial process isn't exactly known for its speed, which is kind of crazy when you realize how quickly (and with such flimsy evidence) DOJ and New Zealand officials acted to arrest Kim Dotcom and his colleagues.
Either way, the actual extradition trial was recently pushed back until July (it had been scheduled to start in a few weeks). Seems quite bizarre that they're only just getting to the trial over extradition nearly two and a half years after Megaupload was seized and shut down. The judicial process isn't exactly known for its speed, which is kind of crazy when you realize how quickly (and with such flimsy evidence) DOJ and New Zealand officials acted to arrest Kim Dotcom and his colleagues.
No comments:
Post a Comment