MH370 $MultiBillion Patent Passengers: Pilot Warned About Crisis, Gagged, Speaks Out
Wednesday, March 19, 2014
Corporate or
government terrorists remotely hijacked Malaysian Airlines MH370 for
military technology intellectual property of the 20 Freescale
passengers, is what listeners have heard a seasoned pilot and prominent
aviation whistleblower recently say. He had warned this crisis would
happen since Boeing quietly installed auto uninterruptible autopilots in
every one of its jets, but government officials have repeatedly gagged
him.
Uninterruptible Autopilot
Numerous
aviation industry personnel who joined a fight to expose TSA and
high-level aviation corruption have experienced retaliatory actions. Airline insiders fired for testifying before the 911 Commission or for reporting other security issues continue to be suppressed, persecuted in worst ways as targeted individuals, leaving flying passengers at risk.
More than one
airline employee lost his job for tryting to keep airline passengers
safer. One of these, however, has fought avaiation officials’ since 911
and even more so, since Boeing installed on all of its
jets auto uninterruptible autopilots without provisions to train pilots
how to use them, making this technology a terrorist weapon. This man is former Delta/Northwest pilot Field McConnell.
All Boeings
have been modified with an uninterruptible autopilot, according to
McConnell. Pilots, however, are not trained to use them, making
aircraft a weapon for terrorists to access and deploy, he says.
“The
significance is that pilots are not aware of this, feature, and
therefore they cannot comply with aviation regulations, namely FAR
121533,” he says.
McConell has
warned government officials and the public that a crisis such as the
Malaysian hijacking would occur, due to lack of pilot training regarding
uninterruptible autopilots. In his attempt to save lives, he has been
repeatedly gagged by United States officials.
In a
remarkable Voice of Russia interview, McConnell detailed how the plane
was equipped to be flown remotely. When pilots are unaware this new
feature has been installed, the pilots are incapable of properly
managing it in case of an emergency that would meet federal aviation
regulations, he says.
Boeing’s uninterruptible
autopilot modification makes it impossible for hijackers to hijack,
supposedly – if pilots understand what to do. Pilots in general were not
even aware of this new installation until McConnell blew the whistle on
it. Within 4 days of his doing this, Boeing admitted having this
modification. On March 3, 2007, Boeing said within two years, all
Boeings would have this type of autopilot.
Had the
auto-uninterruptible autopilot been available on 911, it couldn’t have
happened, he said, adding pilots must be trained to use them.
As it is, however, “someone on the ground could fly the plane and override the pilot’s decisions.”
.
“If a
physical pilot hijacker tried to get into the cockpit, the pilot could
trigger the autopilot. Then, officials on the ground could remotely gain
control and direct it to a safe landing. This has been known since
2007,” McConnell said. “Once operating, it cannot be turned off by
anyone in the plane.”
It should be a
safety feature, he says, but in the case of Malaysia Airlines, it
might be proven that one entity tried to take control of it, or both
pilots may have flown it west. The plane could have been taken to any
one of 108 places in the world, according to McConnell.
“The problem
is none of the American pilots in the U.S. have been educated regarding
the existence of this Boeing uninterruptible autopilot, which by
Boeing’s own words, have been deployed since 2007 and deployed on every
Boeing airliner since 2009,” he said. “So is it possible a terrorist
group could hack into this system like on the Malaysian plane and fly
the plane remotely.”
McConnell followed that, saying what this reporter has highlighted repeatedly, such as in the article You Won’t Believe What Spies On Malaysia Plane Were Doing, published March 12 on Before It’s News.
“Keep in mind
there were 20 software engineers, Chinese nationals working for
Freescale in Austin Texas, and some of the patented material they were
working on were stealth cloaking of airliners and chips that can be installed in these exotic weapon systems. (Emphasis added)
Who Took Control Of Malaysia Airlines Boeing?
“And at the
end of the day, every airliner that has an auto-interruptible
autopilot, making planes a very complex remotely controlled flying
vehicles, but it should only be remotely controlled if there’s a threat
against the aircraft or the people on board.
“I presume
that it’s possible that someone on board the aircraft, if they are a
software engineer for instance could trigger the remote control of it,
but I think its more likely that someone at a ground station, or even an
Air Force AWACS aircraft or the Navy aircraft could gain authority from
the operating company, in this case Malaysia.”
McConnell explained the protocol for that to happen: “If
Malaysia realized they lost control of the aircraft, if their SOC,
System Operations Center, cannot electronically recapture the control of
their own aircraft, they could contact a variety of nations that might
be able to remotely control it — if Malaysia contacted them and said
there was a problem.”
He followed
that saying, “One nation that I’m confident could do that is the United
States of American and if there was an AWACS in that area, they could
have taken control of it.”
There are 108 airports around the world that could remotely guide an airplane to a safe stop – a category 3 landing.
Why not just fly it right back to Kuala Lumpur or Beijing?
“I think the
most likely scenario is a rogue player whether a front end crew doing it
manually or malicious external mode doing it remotely – took the plane
off its flight plan and headed to another destination. McConnell said.
“Once the rogue controllers got control of it, some benign positive
safety conscious remote control was established and the aircraft was
landed at one of these many airports that can land a plane.”
Whether the
plane could be controlled after a rogue terrorist organization takes
control and flies it to another destination, and whether the system
allows the airline to override the rogue controller cannot be answered
“with any degree of certainty” but these questions need to be asked of
Malaysia Airlines and .the Federal Aviation Association, according to
McConnell.
Different kind of terrorism: Billions and billions of dollars of intellectual property onboard
“Keep in mind
there were billions and billions of dollars worth of intellectual
technology property of an open patent on that plane in the form of
Freescale and others on the plane, so it could be corporations or
nations willing to hijack for that plane for that intelligence,” he
said.
McConnell
says that until that patent is granted, and the ownership of that patent
is 20% for five parties, four to individuals and one to Freescale.
Four days after the missing flight MH370, a highly valusble patent
was approved by the Patent Office. Four of the five patent holders are
Chinese nationals working for Austin-based Freescale Semiconductor,
owned by Blackstone, for which Rothschild is a board member.
On April 27, 2013, Bloomberg published
an article confirming Freescale is a Blackstone
venture: “Blackstone-Owned Freescale Rises as Forecast Tops Estimates:
Freescale Semiconductor Ltd. (FSL), the chipmaker mostly owned by a
private-equity group including Blackstone Group LP (BX) and TPG Capital,
rose after predicting second-quarter sales that may exceed some
analysts’ estimates.”
The patent holders are: 1) Peidong Wang, Suzhou, China, (20%), 2) Zhijun Chen, Suzhou, China, (20%) 3) Zhihong Cheng, Suzhou, China, (20%) 4) Li Ying, Suzhou, China, (20%) 5) Freescale Semiconductor (20%). According
to the March 8, 2014, passenger manifest(original) of Malaysia Airlines
flight 370 these were not on that plane. If they were, their names
were not listed.
What
officials initially said, however, was as many as seven people on board
were using passports other than their own. Officials also reported at
one point that there were four other passengers aside from the two
Iranians whose identities were unclear. Then, officials made no more
public statements about this.
“Until that
patent is granted, their patent income would go to their survivors – but
the ownership would go back to Freescale in Austin TX,” McConnell said,
adding, “I’m not suggesting that Freescale is behind this.”
This is a different kind of terrorism, by organizations or nations who want cutting-edge military technology.
Sources: Voice Of Russia, illuminatireview.com, Before It’s News, Examiner.com, YouTube
Follow Deborah Dupré on Twitter @DeborahDupre
Related articles by this author
Malaysia Jet Seen In Maldives! Where Drug Dealers’ Boeing Refueled, Left Unannounced, Near Diego Garcia Base
Pilot Reveals Malaysian Plane: ‘No Further Looking’
Why Did Military Hide Malaysia Plane Radar Data 10 Days?
Malaysia Plane False Flag Military Operation
2nd Boeing Untracked, Same MH370 Region
MH370 Plane Search Region Infernos Close Int’l Airports
Malaysia Plane Hijacked: Navy Nat’l Security Expert
You Won’t Believe What Spies On Malaysia Plane Were Doing
Malaysia 370 Sound Of Life: Heard But Invisible, Police Reports Say
Malaysia Airlines 370 In New Location, Military Intel Adds Puzzle Piece
Malaysia Plane CoverUp: Passengers’ Cell Phones Ringing, GPS Information Kept Secret
Malaysia Plane Hidden With Electronic Weapon? 20 Hi-Tech EW Defense Passengers
Missing Malaysia Plane: 20 All-Electric Car-Linked Passengers On Board, Names Released
No comments:
Post a Comment