NSA Attacks US, the People

truther December 21, 2013 

Among the minority of Americans that heard about the December 16, 2013 ruling of a Federal Court on the Klayman v. Obama lawsuit, the vast majority said “So what?” Judge Richard J. Leon of Federal District Court for the District of Columbia ordered the government to stop collecting data on the personal calls of the two plaintiffs in the case and to destroy the records of their calling history. “I cannot imagine a more indiscriminate and arbitrary invasion than this systematic and high-tech collection and retention of personal data on virtually every single citizen for purposes of querying and analyzing it without prior judicial approval, Surely, such a program infringes on ‘that degree of privacy’ that the founders enshrined in the Fourth Amendment,” Judge Leon wrote in his ruling.

Klayman v. Obama The Shadow Factory: The NSA from 9/11 to the Eavesdropping on America

Even fewer Americans know that on the day after, the Presidential Advisory Committee’s for N.S.A published its recommendations, urging President Obama to impose major oversight and restrictions on the National Security Agency.

“So what, it is Christmas season,” most of the few that heard the news said while running to the nearest shopping mall.

“Divide and Rule” says the USA

“So what,” they say and keep shopping while talking on their mobile phones and being recorded by the NSA. They do so not because they don’t care, but because they don’t understand the implications of their indifference.

Washington MetroBus displays an anti-State surveillance advertisement sponsored by the Partnership for Civil Justice Fund The Shadow Factory: The NSA from 9/11 to the Eavesdropping on America

Not knowing the implications is not their fault. “Divide and Rule (Violently)” is the unofficial policy of the USA Government. NSA collects the data; others use it to attack the people. Divide and Rule; try nailing such an attack in court and the violent government will violate you again.

About three weeks ago, I reported Israeli Intelligence-Tabloid opens in New York. Named Vocativ, the enterprise is based on technologies borrowed from Israeli Intelligence Unit 8200.

The spooky company, which is civilian and legal in the USA, can scan private messages on social media, like Twitter. Showing its power to the Israeli media, Vocativ tracked down in real time the source of an item that had become highly popular at that moment.

“So what,” they say chewing pistachio while reading this page in line to the movie theater.

Vocativ reads social networks without a permit, having got access through the internet backbone and avoiding proper access through a regular public account. The victims have registered in order to get access. The violators bypassed the step of their own identification so that prosecuting them would be impossible.

This is one law for the people and another for government and corporations officers.

Fiber-optic cables form the internet backbone. USA Government accessed Google and Yahoo infrastructure through it. The main backbone operators are Verizon Communications, BT Group, Vodafone Group, and Level 3 Communications. Level 3 is the largest one. Internet companies’ data centers are locked down with full-time security and state-of-the-art surveillance, which includes heat sensors and iris scanners. However, between the data centers the information passes on Level 3′s fiber-optic cables which are unencrypted and an easy target for government illegitimate intercept efforts. Related: It is not Terror if We do It Did you know? Israeli Intelligence-Tabloid opens in New York

“So what! Let them read my infantile tweets!”

In March 2009, I formally complained to the Bolivian Government on similar surveillance on me since year 2005. The formal complaint came after a long string of documents I have filed since that year detailing specific events.

Google and Yahoo were attacked by NSA The Yahoo! Style Guide

This included a March 2005 event in which I showed to an officer how I sent him an email. In 2009, the person acknowledged that the email has never arrived to her mailbox. It is safe to assume it will never arrive. It was censored. “You must get used to State agents following you from time to time,” a lawyer answered to me, but refused to give me his official statement in writing.

“No,” I answered, “this data-collection is the first step of an attack.” The lawyer laughed and dismissed my assessment.

The following July, I was brutally attacked by Israel with the cooperation of the corrupt Bolivian police,^* maimed and my documents robbed. Since then, I have become a political prisoner⁺ of Evo Morales.

This is the meaning of data-collection by the State. It gives it attack capabilities that were never sanctioned by the People.

Data generated by tweets and emails include their delivery location and time, what is known as metadata. This facilitates tracking and attacking. Simple, frightening, and criminal. Terror in the service of fake Democracy.

Rambo Fighting with an NSA Prism

American State Surveillance is on for a long time now. Yet, since it reached headlines on June 6, 2013, when the Washington Post** and the Guardian++ disclosed details about PRISM, an NSA surveillance program authorized by a court order (See It is not Terror if We do It). PRISM conducts overwhelming surveillance on Microsoft, Yahoo, Google, Facebook, Paltalk, YouTube, AOL, Skype, and Apple. The USA Government is violating three main principles. First, it is violating the Right to Privacy, protected by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights which has become international law in 1994.

In 2013, Rambo is evil and fights with an NSA Prism Rambo

Second, it assumes the violated people were about to commit a crime. Under the Criminal Law ruling the American legal system, it is the absolute right of any person to commit a crime (though he would be punished if caught).

Criminal Law, also known as Penal Law, the law pertaining to crimes and punishment. The laws comprising this topic regulate the definition of offences found to have a sufficiently deleterious social impact and impose punishments on them. However, the law does not impose restrictions on society that physically prevents people from committing a crime in the first place.

Then there is the extra-territorial issue; would you accept a Laotian law sentencing Americans chewing bubble-gum in Honduras to death? Can the USA violate the private mail of an American citizen tweeting in Zambia to his friends in Zimbabwe?

The USA Government actions are illegitimate.

“You fool!” would the NSA Chief utter under his withered moustache if he cared about reading me. “We do not violate privacy because we do not disseminate the material.”

Wrong again. The mere observation is the crime. The secrecy afterwards is intended to defend the surveillance criminals.

A closely related fact is that governments often rely on the ignorance of their citizens; this ignorance is easily supported by an irrelevant educational system controlled by the same governments. How can they expect the People to obey laws that are not taught? Are we still living in the days of the Roman Empire and its obsolete legal principles? I refer to ignorantia iuris non excusat (a.k.a. ignorantia legis non excusat and ignorantia legis neminem excusat) a legal principle whereby ignorance of a law does not allow one to escape liability. It sounds like the ultimate state-entrapment technique (“I legislated that two minutes ago! You are guilty!” The government said to the citizen who stepped on a cockroach).

The USA Government assumes that it can safely fool the People.

In the Court ruling opening this article, the judge said that he the government failed to cite “a single instance in which analysis of the N.S.A.’s bulk metadata collection actually stopped an imminent attack, or otherwise aided the government in achieving any objective that was time-sensitive.” The naive judge failed to understand that he was watching an attack weapon, not a defensive one. The government will never be able to answer the request, unless it stages a false flag attack.

President Obama, you are too busy reading my emails; thus I don’t want to steal more from your time with this article except for reminding you a few words from the Preamble to the United States Declaration of Independence: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness….But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government…“