Putin set to drop “truth bomb” on USA
Posted by Kevin
Barrett on February 12, 2015 http://www.veteranstoday.com/2015/02/12/putin911bomb/
Will Russia blow 9/11 wide open?
Thurs 02/12/2015 False Flag Weekly News
As Gordon Duff reported here Tuesday – and as discussed on today’s
False Flag Weekly News (posted above – click here
for story links) – Russian President Vladimir Putin is preparing the
release of Russian satellite photos and other evidence showing that 9/11 was a
false-flag operation by treasonous elements of the American national security
community.
The original story
reporting Putin’s threat was published by Pravda on February 7th.
According to Duff, that story has been confirmed by a reliable source who has
actually seen some of the photos during a visit to Moscow. VT sources insist
that this is NOT merely a shot across the bow of the US government. Putin,
these sources say, is genuinely planning to release the 9/11 material.
These historic photos are expected
to show:
* That none of the passenger airliners allegedly used as weapons
on 9/11 actually crashed where we were told they did; and:
* That the World Trade Center
demolitions were conducted using extremely high-energy weapons.
“The sh*t has hit the fan!”
exclaimed one highly knowledgable VT source.
Russia’s classified 9/11 dossier has
been held in reserve against the day the Russians feel a vital national
interest – such as their survival as a free and independent nation – is at
stake. That day, it appears, has either finally come, or is approaching so fast
that the impending launch of the “truth bomb” is being prepared.
Russia’s satellite photos and other
evidence are currently serving a strategic role analogous to that of
nuclear weapons. They are primarily a deterrent – a last-ditch ace-in-the-hole
whose main role is to deter and dissuade the enemy from going too far.
But unlike nuclear weapons, the
“truth bomb” will not kill anyone; and its use against the US would first
and foremost harm the 9/11-complicit faction of the American power
structure, while helping the non-complicit faction regain control and adjust
the course of the ship of state away from the icebergs. While risky (the 9/11
bomb could indirectly lead to Israel contemplating or even exercising its
Samson Option) and therefore anathema to risk-averse elites, Putin has
apparently decided that the benefits outweigh the potential drawbacks.
If and when the Russians finally
release their 9/11 dossier, the cataclysm that ensues will stand as a
milestone in the march of one of the signal trends in modern warfare and
geostrategy: the weaponization of truth. While lies have been weaponized since time
immemorial, in the form of propaganda, disinformation, false signals, and so
on, truth has rarely been in a position to fight back.
Today, the weaponized big lies of
the Zio-American Empire – like the empire itself – are over-extended and
vulnerable. The stage is being set for a David’s slingshot of truth to bring
down a Goliath of lies. To understand how 9/11 has backfired, let’s review the
past few decades of history.
During the 1990s, the
neoconservatives (and even some realists like Zbigniew Brzezinski, who has
since repented of the way his views were used to justify 9/11)
believed a New Pearl Harbor would bring invaluable benefits
to American geo-strategy. According to their analysis, famously
expressed in Brzezinski’s The Grand Chessboard (1997) the US
was “too democratic at home to be autocratic abroad.” In The Grand
Chessboard, Brzezinski stated that the US would increasingly find it
“difficult to fashion a consensus on foreign policy issues, except in the
circumstances of a truly massive and widely perceived direct external threat.”
He ominously noted: “The public supported America’s engagement in World
War II largely because of the shock effect of the Japanese attack on Pearl
Harbor.”
The obvious solution: A New Pearl Harbor that would convince the American
people they were under massive external threat. The neoconservatives, with
their Israeli friends, were glad to oblige. The result was 9/11: The event that
was supposed to enable a “New American Century.”
"September 11 - The New Pearl Harbor" - Full version (1/3)
But the New Pearl Harbor backfired,
for several reasons.
First, the “direct external threat,”
alleged Arab and Muslim extremism, was bogus. The Arab and Muslim world, with
its vast energy reserves and economic growth potential, should have been a US
ally, not an enemy. And the religious element in Arab-Muslim civilization was
especially conducive to friendship with the US, since the US and the Islamic
nations are the last monotheistic cultures on earth. It would have been in
the US strategic interest to be a strong ally of the Muslim world against
European secularism, Russian and Chinese post-communism, and Hindu extremism.
The deal should go something like this: America protects the genuine
independence, including the religious values, dignity and autonomy, of its
fellow monotheists; and in return gets a say (though not total control)
in oil pricing and policy.
But thanks to a false flag that
turned the US against Islam and Muslims, America chose precisely the wrong
enemy. While Israel has benefitted mightily from the US war on Islam,
America has been digging its own grave by wasting its substance, even its
sanity, on a fight against a phantom.
Secondly, rather than uniting
Americans behind their leaders in a “good fight” against the nation’s enemies,
9/11 has greatly exacerbated the fractiousness and mistrust of leadership
that makes it hard for the US to conduct foreign policy. Polls show that 36% of Americans (over 100 million people) think 9/11 was an
inside job, while a whopping 84% or so don’t believe they are getting the full
truth about 9/11 from their government. Confidence in government is at record lows, and the sickening feeling of
having been lied to is largely responsible for the US military’s inability to
win wars – and for the rash of troop and veteran suicides that are far more
lethal than any enemy army.
So 9/11, the neoconservative New
Pearl Harbor, has hollowed out America, not strengthened it. The false-flag
attack on New York and Washington has left the US morally and financially bankrupted, without a functioning Constitution,
fragmented in every conceivable way, lacking domestic and international
legitimacy, and no longer in a position to be even a first among equals, much
less a self-styled sole superpower.
The neoconservatives, whose top
priority has always been Israel, are in a panic. Their only hope is to flee
forward into ever-bigger wars. That is why Netanyahu is so desperately lobbying
for a war on Iran that would set the Middle East, and perhaps the whole world,
on fire. And that is why such neoconservatives as Victoria Nuland are pushing for a war with Russia
that would in all likelihood go nuclear.
World War III is the last desperate
hope for the neoconservatives and their Likudnik allies. Such a war would usher
in martial law, enable the suppression (or at least continued obfuscation) of
the truth about 9/11, and save the neocons from treason trials, and Israel from
dismantlement.
Though Putin doesn’t want to play
his ace in the hole, the 9/11 truth card, until he absolutely has to, the
moment of truth may have finally arrived. As soon as it becomes absolutely
clear that the US is never going to back off from its attempt to turn
Ukraine into a hostile NATO base; that the economic war on Russia has
reached a point of no return; that the neoconservative “flight forward” into
World War III is inevitable…
…at that point, no sooner and no
later, Putin will slap his 9/11 truth card down on the table and let the chips
fall where they may.
If he plays it too soon, he is
taking unnecessary risks.
But if he waits too long, the move
will lose its impact. (Once World War III is underway, 9/11 truth from the
Russian government will be dismissed as propaganda, and censorship under
martial law will turn the truth bomb into a dud.)
I believe the moment of truth is at
hand. Strategically, Putin needs to play his 9/11 truth card now.
The Pravda story, confirmed by VT’s
inside sources, suggests that the card is about to be played.
Dr. Kevin Barrett, a Ph.D.
Arabist-Islamologist, is one of America’s best-known critics of the War on
Terror.
No comments:
Post a Comment