The world has stood watching , NOT what the shit in D.C. (degenerate city) & "their" 'elites" who got "their' arms jammed up "their" asses like an ventriloquist dummy :o would do ....But the American People would DO ? There is a REASON that ALMOST ANY & I repeat ANY Person ...would give ALL 2 get to these shores ( & UNTOLD ??? have & still R trying ) ....Because for the most part WE THE PEOPLE are an Good, Kind ,Forgiving ,People who for the most part ,Look for the good in people ,who will give the shirts on our backs to ANYONE in NEED ......Thru OUT our History ... WE have bared OUR SINS 4 all the World to see ...THAT without all exceptions NO ONE , repeat NOT 1 single PERSON, IS beyond redemption ? ...if they will ask & seek it ! WE ALL want the best 4 each other ---the evil scum have used this so called 'weakness' against U.S. but soon ,very soon "they" R gonna find out IT is WE THE PEOPLES GREATEST strength !!! that who we are , IS who we were :)
Prof. John McMurtry
Global Research
One
further knew from past research that the U.S.’s strategic leadership
since 1945 had been Nazi-based in information and connections and the
dominant Central-European figures articulating it ever after across
Democrat and Republican lineshave a common cause. For over 40 years,
Henry Kissinger as Republican and Zbigniew Brzezinski as Democrat have
been protégés of David Rockefeller, selected as Trilateral Commission
and Bilderberg Group leaders, and capable of any mass-homicidal plan to
advance “U.S. interests”. The banker-and-oil imperial line through
David Rockefeller as paradigm case goes back to the Nazi period to John
Foster Dulles (an in-law) and his brother Allen Dulles (OSS and then CIA
Director), who Supreme Court Justice Arthur Goldberg called “traitors”
for their support of the Nazi regime. The Rockefeller Foundation
funded and developed German eugenics programs in the pre-war years,
Standard Oil supplied oil in collaboration with I.G. Farben, and so on.[iv]
Operation
Northwoods was not, however, okayed by President Kennedy – perhaps
another reason for his assassination and replacement by more pliant
presidents to represent “America’s interests” in accord with the supreme
morality. Underneath the stolen election of George Bush Jr.in contrast –
whose family made its money, in part, by serving the covert financial
requirements of the Nazi regime before and during the 1939-45 War – was a
domestic and foreign administration which would push further than any
in the past to advance “U.S. interests”to full-spectrum world rule. Its
project included reversing the Roosevelt New Deal and the social state
within the U.S. itself – “an anomaly” as Bush Jr. expressed the
historical perspective and ethic at work.
This plan was more explicit in the published Project for the New American Century
formed from 1997 on. It even supplied the need for a 9-11 event in its
2000 version, the year that Bush Jr. was elected and the year before
9-11. To indicate the “non-partisan” nature of the planning, Democrat
National security Adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski had already hinted at the
usefulness of a 9-11-style domestic attack to move policy forward in his
1998 book, The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and Its Geostrategic
Imperatives.[xi]
The
plan’s next decisive steps were in fact already in motion as
Rockefeller expressed gratitude for the media black-out. A new strategic
manifesto from the Pentagon was in preparation entitled “Defense
Planning Guidance on Post-Cold- War Strategy,” completed on February 18,
1992.[xvii]Prepared under the supervision of Paul Wolfowitz, then the Pentagon’s Undersecretary for Policy, it was disclosed in March of 1992 by the New York Times.After the first invasion of Iraq, it became known as the Project for the New American Century, publicly released from 1997 to 2000 prior to 9-11.
The genocide of Iraq, as the long-opposing “evil empire” was in
free-fall, is the most important strategic anchoring prior to “9-11”.
Covert strategic policy to forward the supreme goal is by now
self-evident, but the inner moral logic is assumed not penetrated. The
most influential of Rockefeller’s protégés in this regard is the
“philosopher king” of the U.S. covert state, Leo Strauss.
While he never worked in a philosophy department or has any training in
logic, his concept of “natural right” fits exactly to the
“supranational sovereignty” of private money-sequence rule of the world –
what “the intellectual elite” Rockefeller refers to invoke as “moral
anchor”, “right” and “justice”.
The
dispute was, in fact, over Kuwait’s drawing out oil from reserves
underlying Iraq as enabled by the colonial split of the oil-rich Kuwait
province from Iraq – the classic divide-and-rule policy holding also in
the division of oil-rich Kurdistan among four manufactured states.
Saddam had good reason to trust the U.S., not only by the long-term
official promise of neutrality but as blood-mix ally when he waged a
U.S.-supported war of aggression against Iran – which still remains the
target. Note the big lie to provoke the supreme crime of war has
remained without any glare of publicity that might derail the plan.
Denis
Halliday, United Nations Humanitarian Co-ordinator for the mission
finally called it “genocide” (Wikipedia calls it “the Persian Gulf War”)
when he resigned in 1998 to protest against “the crimes against
humanity”. But no-one knew until the U.S. Department of Defense
Intelligence got out that the first sweep of Iraq was planned down to
the mass killing of the infants and children. September 11 in 2001 is
better understood in this wider context of strategic planning by the
covert U.S. terror state. For years the non-stop bombing of the people’s
central life-water support system deliberately engineered mass dying
from diseases of children in the hundreds of thousands.
In
oil-rich Somalia, two-thirds of its territory had been leased out to
four transnational oil companies by 1993 – a condition of lost grounds
of life for Somalians behind the primeval civil war ever since. These
are merely expressions of the underlying logic of value and the plan for
its supranational rule beneath the lights of publicity as “discretion”.
The examples are myriad from Latin America to South-East Asia to
sub-Sahara Africa and the Middle East to Israel and Canada today. But a
descriptive law of the supreme moral goal holds across all diverse
instances of its expression.
The
strategic necessity of the 9-11 event for “global security order”can
even be asserted by the principal architects of the administration under
which it happened, and those who observe this can be dismissed as
“conspiracy theorists”. Reverse projection is, as always, the essential
psychological operation. The documented but shouted-down logistics
included V-P Cheney having control of the air-defence of NORAD six
months before the event to manage the relocation of the stand-by fighter
jets to Alaska and Canada on September 11, 2001, and more broadly, no
jet intervention for almost two hours until the full operation was
completed.
The Moral Decoding of 9-11: Beyond the U.S. Criminal State, The Grand Plan for a New World Order
February 21, 2013Global Research
The complete text published by the Journal of 9/11 Studies can be downloaded in pdf
* * *
I was sceptical of the 9-11 event
from the first time I saw it on television. It was on every major
network within minutes. All the guilty partieswere declared before any
evidence was shown.The first questions of any criminal investigation
were erased. Who had the most compelling motives for the event? Who
had the means to turn two central iconic buildings in New York into a
pile of steel and a cloud of dust in seconds?[i]
Other questions soon arose in the aftermath. Why was all the evidence at the crime scenes removed or confiscated?
Who was behind the continuous false
information and non-stop repetition of “foreign/Arab terrorists”when no
proof of guilt existed? Who was blocking all independent inquiry?
Even 11 years on these questions are still not answered.
But those immediately named guilty
without any forensic proof certainly fitted the need for a plausible
Enemy now that the “threat of the Soviet Union” and “communist world
rule” were dead. How else could the billion-dollar-a-day military be
justified with no peace dividend amidst a corporately hollowed-out U.S.
economy entering its long-term slide? While all the media and most of
the people asserted the official 9-11 conspiracy theory as given fact,
not all did.
A Bay Street broker with whom I was
improbably discussing the event in Cuba had no problem recognising the
value meaning. When I asked what he thought about the official
conspiracy theory, he was frank:
“You can call it what you want, but
America needs a war to pull the people together and expand into new
resource rich areas. That what it has always done from Mexico on. And
that is what it needs now”. When I wondered why none in the know said
so, he smirked: “It would be impolite”, adding, “It affects the entire
future prosperity of America and the West”. And all the deaths? “It had
to be done –far less than it could have been”. The 19 Arabs with
box-cutters reducing the World Trade Center buildings to powder in a few
seconds?He shrugged.
Thus everyone since 9-11 is prohibited
nail-clippers on planes to confirm the absurd – including 15 of the
19alleged hijackers being from Saudi Arabia and several apparently still
alive after crashing the planes into the buildings.[ii]As
for the diabolical mastermind Osama bin Laden, he is never linked by
credible evidence to the crime and never claims responsibility for the
strike since the videos of him are fakes. “Ground Zero” is a double entendre. All doubts are erased apriori.
Decoding the U.S. Theater of Wars and the Moral Driver Behind
One already knew that suspension of
belief is the first act of fiction, and that instant culture rules the
U.S. One already knew that monster technical events are America’s stock
in trade. And one already knew the long history of false U.S. pretexts
for war – so well established that a young strategic thinker a decade
after 9-11 advises the right-wing Washington Policy Institute on how to
create a crisis by deadly planned incident to make war on Iran – “it is
the traditional way of getting into war for what is best in America’s
interests”.[iii]
One
further knew from past research that the U.S.’s strategic leadership
since 1945 had been Nazi-based in information and connections and the
dominant Central-European figures articulating it ever after across
Democrat and Republican lineshave a common cause. For over 40 years,
Henry Kissinger as Republican and Zbigniew Brzezinski as Democrat have
been protégés of David Rockefeller, selected as Trilateral Commission
and Bilderberg Group leaders, and capable of any mass-homicidal plan to
advance “U.S. interests”. The banker-and-oil imperial line through
David Rockefeller as paradigm case goes back to the Nazi period to John
Foster Dulles (an in-law) and his brother Allen Dulles (OSS and then CIA
Director), who Supreme Court Justice Arthur Goldberg called “traitors”
for their support of the Nazi regime. The Rockefeller Foundation
funded and developed German eugenics programs in the pre-war years,
Standard Oil supplied oil in collaboration with I.G. Farben, and so on.[iv]
The supreme moral goal and strategic
methods governing U.S. covert-state performance have not only have been
very similar in moral principle, but have deeply connected Rockefeller
protégés Kissinger and Brzezinski, and more deeply still the theoretical
godfather of U.S. covert state policy, Leo Strauss, who was funded out
of Germany by David Rockefeller from the start.
The inner logic of covert and
not-so-covert U.S. corporate world rule since 1945unified under Wall
Street financial management and transnational corporate treaties for
unhindered control of commodities and money capital flows across all
borders is undeniable if seldom tracked. This architecture of the grand
plan for a New World Order
is evident in both strategic policy and global political and armed
action over decades that have seen the objectives increasingly fulfilled
with constructed deadly crises as pretexts for war the standard
technique.[v]Behind them as first post-Nazi historical turn lies the 1947 National Security Act (NSA) which created the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)and explicitly licensesdestruction of life, truth and other societies as institutional methods.
The CIA is charged with designing,
planning and executing “propaganda, economic war, direct preventive
action, sabotage, anti-sabotage, destruction, subversion against hostile
States, assistance to clandestine liberation movements, guerrilla
murders, assistance to indigenous groups opposed to the enemy countries
of the free world”. The linkage back to Nazi methods and world-rule goal
as the highest moral objective is not just one of corresponding
ultimate principles and strategic policy formation. It relied on Nazi SS
intelligence sources and means from the beginning of the covert terror
state.[vi]
There is no heinous means that is not
assumed as the highest morality by this long-standing covert
institutional formation linking to the presidential office.It is an
explicitly secret system involving at least the Defense Department and
the CIA, the former with many more operatives and offices.
The Special Activities Division (SAD) to
carry out NSA criminal operations, for example, also confers the
highest honors awarded in recognition of distinguished valor and
excellence – as did the earlier SS prototype in Germany. What people
find difficult to recognise is that these actions, whether by the SAD or
other system operations,are conceived as the highest duty, however
life-system destructive and mass murderous they are. All participants
are super patriots in their own view, as were the Nazis. Contradiction
between declared and actual values, however, is a central mode of the
covert system. For example, what can be considered a high duty in the
perpetual U.S.“war on drugs”, the most morally obligatory commitment of
the U.S. state,is at the same time a war against and with other drug
operations to transport illegal hard drugs into the U.S. itself.[vii]
We might see here a parallel between
foreign mass murder and domestic mass murder in 9-11, with both regarded
as high patriotism in this supreme morality. In the background of
America’s Reichstag Fire and likewise disclosing the unlimited
geo-strategic action that can be operationalized as necessary and good,
the post-1945 U.S. control of international sea-lanes made the covert
U.S. state the world’s dominant narcotics controller so as to fund
secret criminal war actions from South-East Asia to Latin America,
entailing the addiction of its own peoples.[viii]This
woeful method has been long known by experts, but came to be public
knowledge in the Reagan-state funding of the death-squad Contras of
Nicaragua as “the moral equal of our Founding Fathers” (a tribute he is
said to have given later to the drug-running warlords and jihadists of
Afghanistan).
These moral contradictions seem insane,
but this is so only if one does not comprehend the underlying supreme
morality of which they are all expressions.
Even U.S.-sponsored death squads
torturing and killing tens of thousands of poor people across Latin
America before 2000 and their return as direct covert U.S.-state method
from Iraq to Syria after 9-11 – called “the Salvador option”[ix]
– is regarded as necessary and obligatory to “defend the Free World and
our way of life”. They entail ever more total U.S. world rule and
self-maximizing position by strategic deduction from the supreme
morality’s first premises.
The covert nature of the mass-murderous
operationalization is never from moral embarrassment. It is solely to
ensure effectiveness of execution against “soft” and “uninformed” public
opinion, to terrorize people in situ from continued resistance, and to
annihilate its leadership and community agency all the way down.
Throughout the deciding moments of execution of the underlying supreme
value program, global corporate money demand multiplication is always
the ultimate value driver -as may be tested by seeking any covert U.S.
action or overt war which is not so regulated beneath saturating
propaganda of lawful intentions of peace and freedom.
These lines of underlying moral
institution, policy, strategic plan, and massive life destruction at
every level are indisputable facts of the covert and official faces of
the U.S. state, but are typically not connected to the September 11,
2001 attack. Since most people cannot believe their own government or
the “leader of the free world” could execute such a sabotage action as
“9-11” in which thousands of American themselves died, these behavioral
reminders forge the unifying meaning.
Worse still occurred in the last
“war”before 9-11. In the background providing graphic example of how the
covert U.S. state apparatus is structured to attack and murder U.S.
citizens themselves to strategically maximize implementation of its
supreme value program of transnational corporate money sequences over
all barriers, there is the now known Operation Northwoods. Very familiar
to the 9-11 truth movement, but unpublicized since its release under freedom of information laws, this Department of Defense
and Joint Chiefs of Staff plan proposed that the CIA and other
operatives covert operatives “undertake a range of atrocities” to be
blamed on Cuba to provide pretext for invasion.
“Innocent civilians were to be shot on American streets; boats carrying refugees fleeing Cuba were to be sunk on the high seas; a wave of violent terrorism was to be launched in Washington DC, Miami and elsewhere. People would be framed for bombings they did commit; planes would be hijacked”.[x]
All would be blamed on Castro the
Communist in place of bin Laden the Islamicist, and invasion of desired
resistant territory would be achieved as a triumph of American freedom
and interests over its enemies.
Operation
Northwoods was not, however, okayed by President Kennedy – perhaps
another reason for his assassination and replacement by more pliant
presidents to represent “America’s interests” in accord with the supreme
morality. Underneath the stolen election of George Bush Jr.in contrast –
whose family made its money, in part, by serving the covert financial
requirements of the Nazi regime before and during the 1939-45 War – was a
domestic and foreign administration which would push further than any
in the past to advance “U.S. interests”to full-spectrum world rule. Its
project included reversing the Roosevelt New Deal and the social state
within the U.S. itself – “an anomaly” as Bush Jr. expressed the
historical perspective and ethic at work.This plan was more explicit in the published Project for the New American Century
formed from 1997 on. It even supplied the need for a 9-11 event in its
2000 version, the year that Bush Jr. was elected and the year before
9-11. To indicate the “non-partisan” nature of the planning, Democrat
National security Adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski had already hinted at the
usefulness of a 9-11-style domestic attack to move policy forward in his
1998 book, The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and Its Geostrategic
Imperatives.[xi]
The Moral Compass of 9-11
As a moral philosopher with social value systems as my primary object of analysis,
my first thoughts in understanding “9-11” were of the system
motives,known methods, and objective interests driving the event which
could coherently explain it. Whatever the immediate
hold of the official conspiracy theory on the public mind,a rational
explanation is required which is consistent with the suppressed facts
and the organising geo-strategic plan on both sides of the event.
For over a decade before 9-11, there
were three U.S.-propelled global trends that almost never come into the
understanding of 9-11 itself. 9-11 truth seekers themselves have focused
on the foreground technics and the transparent motive for oil. But
these are undergirded by deeper sea-shifts of geopolitical and economic
wars of seizure and destruction by other name against which the world’s
people were rising. To compel books of analysis into one unifying frame,
transnational corporate-rights treaties from NAFTA to the Maastracht
Treaty to the WTO overrode all other rights across borders;the private
“financialization”stripping of social sectors and welfare states had
advanced across the world; and the totalizing movement of the system
across all former “cold war” and cultural borders was “the new world order”
in formation. Together these vast shifts towards transnational
money-sequence rule of all reversed centuries of democratic evolution.
And every step of the supreme value program was life blind at every step
of its global operationalization.[xii]
Yet states and cultures were so
sweepingly re-set into unaccountable transnational corporate and bank
rule that few recognised the absolutist value program being imposed on
the world. Fewer still recognised all was unfolding according to plan.
What has been least appreciated about
the long-term strategic plan unfolding on both sides of what was
immediately called “9-11” – CallEmergency!–is that supreme banker and
global money director David Rockefeller had summarized “the plan” to
fellow money-party elites across borders at the Bildersberg meeting in
Baden Baden Germany in June 1991 -exactly at the same time that the
Soviet Union and its resistant barriers fell.[xiii]
Bear in mind that Rockefeller among other initiatives appointed both
Kissinger and Brzezinski for the lead in both the supranational
Bilderberg and Trilateral strategic bodies of which he was the lead
patron, not to mention financed the unemployed academic Leo Strauss out
of Germany to be the godfather “philosopher” of the “new world order”.
Rockefeller speaks very precisely to his fellow “elite of the elite” of
the Western world where only Americans and Europe are invited and
reportage excluded:
“A supranational sovereignty of an
intellectual elite and bankers is surely preferable to the national
auto-determination practiced in past centuries”, Rockefeller said.[xiv]
Observe the foundational new concepts in
place of responsible government and democratic accountability. They are
now consigned to “past centuries”. A “supranational sovereignty”has
replaced them and is morally“preferable”. Rockefeller is not
exaggerating. By 1991 a “supranational sovereignty” had already
developed in the form of transnational treaties conferring override
rights of “profit opportunity” on transnational corporations and private
bank rule of government finances across borders – procedurally trumping
any elected legislatures and their laws which are inconsistent with
their thousands of treaty articles, even when the system eventually
leads to world depression as now.[xv] The source of the legitimacy of governments, ultimate sovereignty,
has now passed as preferable to “an intellectual elite and bankers”:
more exactly, academic strategy servants and transnational money
sequences overriding all human and planetary life requirements a-priori
by the supreme moral goal.
Ask which function of the world’s people
and means of life is not now in debt to Wall Street and the private
global banking system it leads. Ask which means of life from food and
water to autos and pension cheques is not thus ultimately controlled, or
which commodity is not under oligopolist corporate sway. The “surely
preferable” objective was already achieved by 1991 or in advanced global
institutional motion. Now supreme over all else so that all else is now
accountable to it, and it is not accountable to anything above it, “the
plan”seemed all but accomplished by Rockefeller’s own considered words.
But what if people resist the new world
rule with no life coordinate or constraint at any level of its
execution? We may recall that during the death-squad rule of the
Argentina generals at this time in which civilians were murdered and
tortured in the thousands, National Security Adviser Kissinger
congratulated the junta on their “very good results – – The quicker you
succeed the better.”Kissinger also heartily approved of the earlier
massacres and torture in Chile.
The resistance
was in this way pre-empted long before the Soviet Union fell, and after
1990 had no block in the Middle East and Central Asia either. “The
plan” has been very long term. Kissinger the geo-executer was originally
appointed to high office by Rockefeller (to lead the Council on Foreign Relations
back in 1954), and – to give a sense of the long-range trajectory of
the plan design –was,incredibly,the U.S. administration’s first choice
for an “independent 9-11 Commission”. The obviously not-independent
Kissinger was still not a problem for “the free press” and official
discourse. But when he was required to disclose his business
connections, he withdrew to stay covert in his ongoing backroom
capacities and enrichment.
The 9-11 sacrifice is better understood
within the deep-structural context of the unfolding plan. Thus David
Rockefeller gave special thanks to media like “the New York Times, Washington Post, Time Magazine and
other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and
respected their promises of discretion” in co-operating with the plan.
Rockefeller was again precise:
This plan for the world would have
been impossible for us to develop if we had been subjected to the light
of publicity during those years. [xvi]
The
plan’s next decisive steps were in fact already in motion as
Rockefeller expressed gratitude for the media black-out. A new strategic
manifesto from the Pentagon was in preparation entitled “Defense
Planning Guidance on Post-Cold- War Strategy,” completed on February 18,
1992.[xvii]Prepared under the supervision of Paul Wolfowitz, then the Pentagon’s Undersecretary for Policy, it was disclosed in March of 1992 by the New York Times.After the first invasion of Iraq, it became known as the Project for the New American Century, publicly released from 1997 to 2000 prior to 9-11.
Again we may note the long arc of
planning control, crisis and war as required. Item 6 of the strategic
plan defined the agenda in general terms: “In the Middle East and
Southwest Asia, our overall objective is to remain the predominant power
in the region and preserve U.S. and western access to the region’s
oil.”
Oil-rich Iraq had in fact been invaded –
not only to privatize its peerlessly high-quality surface oilfields but
to destroy its region-leading socialist infrastructure.Iraq became
accessible for invasion as the arms-bankrupted Soviet Union was in
collapse. We may observe that the covertly genocidal destruction of Iraq
bridged Republican and Democrat administrations over three changes of
government – disclosing how the covert state operates as a moral
constant across party fronts.
The actions confirm and express the one
supreme moral goal identified above. They bridge from Saddam himself as
CIA-payroll killer and war proxy against Iran to recapture lost Iran
oilfields dating from 1980 to 1988 to the fall of the USSR in 1991 as
the axis of the long-term strategic plan of global turnaround to
“America’s century” still to come before and after 9-11.But between 1990
and 2003 Saddam was transmuted from former ally to aggressor against
Kuwait in an invasion given an official green light from the U.S.
government, to “mushroom cloud”threat with invented “weapons of mass destruction”.
In fact, National Security Adviser
Wolfowitz explained after the invasion found nothing of the kind: “[We
had] virtually no economic options with Iraq because the country floats
on a sea of oil.”
Observe how the invasion is conceived as
obligatory for a reason that expresses the supreme value goal. Observe
that it occurs less than two years after 9-11, which gave the
open-cheque justification for the bombing and occupation which allowed
the expropriation of Iraq’s society’s oil resources.
The problem was not the evil Saddam or the “weapons of mass destruction”, the standard reverse projection.[xviii]The problem was the Iraqi people themselves and their developed oil-funded social life infrastructure between
the supreme oil-fields and their U.S. corporate control and
privatization. 9-11 was,thus, first the justification for invading
Afghanistan – to clear the way for pipelines into the former Soviet
republics from the Caspian Sea region– pipelines that prompted the U.S.
representative to predictively warn the Taliban:“Either you accept our
offer of a carpet of gold, or we bury you under a carpet of bombs.”[xix]9-11 was then the necessary basis of justification for the bombing of Baghdad for the unifying supreme objective.
In fact,seldom published in the
corporate media keeping the glare of publicity away from the supreme
moral objective, the publicly owned and managed oil revenues of Iraq had
been invested since the 1950’s in Iraq’s advanced social
infrastructure, leading the Middle East with free higher education, high
health standards, and near universal livelihood security. The world’s
oldest civilisation was robust in organisational capacities long before
the CIA-asset Saddam was installed.
Despite his murdering his way to the top
in this function, even Saddam could not destroy the system because
socialist government had been achieved decades earlier by a powerful
oil-workers’ union base and a population glad to have all education
free, an efficient low-cost foods delivery system, and the most advanced
public healthcare system in the Middle East. So there was not only the
“sea of oil” as a motive to assert U.S. control in the new
“supranational sovereignty” of the world. Just as important in this
ultimate moral cause, what the U.S. covert state always seeks to destroy
by any means, isa successful social infrastructure without private big
oil, bankers and transnational corporations free to control it towards
higher profit opportunities.
Unravelling the Supreme Moral Doctrine behind the U.S. Covert State
The genocide of Iraq, as the long-opposing “evil empire” was in
free-fall, is the most important strategic anchoring prior to “9-11”.
Covert strategic policy to forward the supreme goal is by now
self-evident, but the inner moral logic is assumed not penetrated. The
most influential of Rockefeller’s protégés in this regard is the
“philosopher king” of the U.S. covert state, Leo Strauss.
While he never worked in a philosophy department or has any training in
logic, his concept of “natural right” fits exactly to the
“supranational sovereignty” of private money-sequence rule of the world –
what “the intellectual elite” Rockefeller refers to invoke as “moral
anchor”, “right” and “justice”.
The moral thought system is not unlike that of Mein Kampf without the racist rant, camouflaged everywhere in practice by the method of big lies – “noble lies” as Strauss exalts them.[xx]
The innermost value driver is a perpetual war of dispossession of the
weaker for the private transnational money-capital multiplication of the
rich.
Nothing in this doctrine is too
mendacious, greed-crazed and murderous if it fulfills the plan of this
limitless private-capital rule as ultimate moral ground and
compass. In Strauss’s canonical teaching of U.S. national security
advisers and intellectual following, the ruling moral absolute is
expressed by the core master idea behind the “supranational sovereignty”
of an “intellectual elite and bankers”:
“limitless capital accumulation – — the highest right and moral duty”.[xxi]
This is the ethical absolute of the covert U.S. state and its strategic decision structure. And there is no internal
limit within this moral universe to life means seizure from poorer
societies and resource looting for the supreme goal. It is the natural
and absolute Good.
To justify its meaning, the Straussian
canon adopts a potted reading of Western moral and political philosophy
from Plato through Hobbes, Hegel, Nietzsche, Marx and Weber. This
impresses American political operatives of the faith, but Strauss is a
failed philosopher turned down by Paul Tillich for his post-doctoral Habilitation
and only saved from academic ruin in Germany by Rockefeller grant
money. While not taken seriously as philosophy anywhere else, it is
worth decoding its talmudic involution for the borrowed ideas that drive
its covert state disciples and neo-fascist public “intellectuals” in
America.
The ultimately organising idea is to commend all forms of conquering and limitlessly expanding private capital as “natural right and law”
with genocidal subjugations justified in glowing moral terms. For
example, “noble lies” is the moral category for limitless mendacity. One
may wonder how educated people can be so bent out of moral shape. So I
now concisely provide what cannot be found elsewhere: the inner logic of
the supreme doctrine as perversions of great thinkers.
Its framework of meaning and value helps
us to understand why the 9-11 event could easily follow for the
managers of the covert U.S. state and its Straussian planners as not at
all anomalous or evil within their moral logic. 9-11 follows as a
maximally rational and unique tool to achieve the objectives in fact
achieved by 9-11, and the geo-strategic cabal behind it is servilely
linked from the beginning to the dominant private transnational
corporate and banking interests exemplified by David Rockefeller.
To understand this brutal moral universe
and its connection to 9-11, the 9-11 wars and a globalizing police
state, we need to understand the deformations of its basic organising
ideas. Plato’s idea of “the noble lie” means, in fact, a myth or parable
to communicate an underlying truth about the triadic human soul of
reason, spirit and appetite which, Plato argues, should be reflected in
the construction of the ideal state (in which the rulers are communist
in their common property to keep them uncorrupted and true).
But through the prism of U.S. global
money-party rule a la Strauss this idea becomes the principle of lying
to the public to keep the vulgar herd – the people themselves – ignorant
and obedient. The philosophies of Hobbes and Hegel are also grist for
this mill. Hobbes argues that “man is moved by a restless desire for
power after power that ceaseth only in death”, but this brute desire in
the “State of Nature” is tamed by “the covenant of peace” ordered by the
internal sovereign as absolute.
Via Strauss and the U.S. covert state
this becomes right is might and the ultimate “natural right” is
limitless private capital power and empire with no end of totalization
across the peoples and lands of the world. Hegel too suits a
fascist-capitalist reading since he argues “the State is the march of
God through the world”, and war itself is history’s test of which State
is a higher realisation of “the absolute Idea”. But Hegel still
envisaged a “universal state”to supersede the competitive
private-property division of capitalism in the “universalization of
right and law on earth”.
Once again U.S. private money-capital
power with no bound, the supreme moral goal in the Rockefeller-Strauss
doctrine, is opposite to the classical philosophy it invokes. Once more
dialectical development of reason to more coherently inclusive
conception and life is reversed into one-way private money capital
sequences maximized to rule the world with the U.S. military as its
instrument of force and terror.
However it conceals its meaning, all
positions come down to this underlying value code – as may be tested on
whatever transnational money-sequence demand, right or war is launched
next. 9-11 construction in such a moral world does not violate this
value code. It expresses it in self-maximizing strategic turn to achieve
the ultimate goal.
Friedrich Nietzsche may provide the best
fodder for the doctrine when he advises that “life is essentially
appropriation, injury, overpowering of what is alien and weaker,
imposing of one’s own forms, and at its mildest exploitation” in his
superman vision of “beyond good and evil”. For philosophical
Nietzscheans, this is code for the inner meaning of the angst of
artistic creation. But this meaning is predictably lost on the U.S.
covert-state school seeking the “supranational sovereignty” of
“limitless capital accumulation” as the supreme good with the
“intellectual elite” as servants to it. Karl Marx’s link of
capitalism’s success to productive force development is the ultimate
equivocation upon which this ruling doctrine depends – making no
distinction between productive capital providing life goods and
unproductive money sequencing hollowing out the world by money-capital
multiplication. Marx, it must be acknowledged, did not made the
distinction himself since this mutation of capital came a century after
his death.[xxii]
Finally Max Weber’s Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism
does not ground this doctrine of “limitless capital accumulation as the
highest right and duty” with the state to serve it, as Strauss again
torturously suggests. In fact, Weber deplores any such perversion of
public authority. His capitalist model is a young Benjamin Franklin
speaking of money saved and invested as like having “a breeding sow”,
not a transnational money-sequence juggernaut of eco-genocidal
expansion. Revealingly, Benjamin Franklin and “the protestant ethic” in
general were most concerned about non-waste, which Strauss
explicitly excludes from the meaning of “limitless capital
accumulation”. For Leo Strauss and his U.S. “national security”
disciples, the capitalist may waste as much as he wants by “natural
right”.
Further, in complete inversion of
source, the greed worship of the U.S. state, its patrons and its academy
disciples reverses the model of the “spirit of capitalism” exemplified
by Benjamin Franklin in proprietary claim on knowledge and inventions.
He,in fact,refused to patent his famous Franklin Stove because he
believed that no innovation or new knowledge from which other people
could benefit should be denied them – just as he himself had benefitted
from the community of knowledge and science as the distinguishing
feature of being a civilised human being.
In short, it is important to recognise
how twisted the covertly ruling doctrine is. No element of it is life
coherent or true to the classical thinkers in which it costumes itself.
In the end, only the transnational U.S. money party has any place in its
rights and obligations, and any sacrifice of other life to its supreme
goal is legitimate – linking back to the Nazi-U.S. corporate axis that
nearly destroyed the civilised world once before.[xxiii]
Money-Capital Power UeberAlles: How Economic Rationality Leads the Plan
The U.S. culture of money-sequence
“rationality” is the underlying intellectual and moral disorder which
leads to “limitless money capital accumulation” as the supreme moral
goal. In formal terms, the equation of rationality to atomic self-maximization is assumed a-prioriacross
domains. With globalizing Wall-Street-led “financialization”, this
“rationality” becomes equated to private money-sequence multiplication
across all borders as the ultimate Good. This is the innermost mutation
of value logic and goal, the moral DNA, from which the cancerous world
system develops on both sides of 9-11.[xxiv]
This first principle itself is,in
fact,built into formal economics, decision and game theory, and
strategic science, as I explain step by step in “Behind Global System
Collapse: The Life-Blind Structure of Economic Rationality.”[xxv]
It is axiomatic but unexamined, life-blindly absolutist but not
recognised as morally problematic. To make a long story short,
competitive self-maximization in the market is assumed to produce “the
best of possible worlds” by mathematical proof. “Pareto efficiency” is
believed to demonstrate this by private money exchanges between
self-maximizing atoms apriori stripped of all life properties,
relations, society, conditions of choice, and all natural and civil life
support systems. Pareto himself recognised outside this formula what
has since been covered up.
Not only is the formula consistent with
most having remaining impoverished by the “optimum” of “no-one worse
off”, what none who cite “Pareto efficiency” as a standard academic
mantra ever acknowledge or even recognise. Pareto himself is in no doubt
of the implication. As the fascist party he belongs to rules Italy and
Rockefeller creates the Council of Foreign Relations,
he asserts with approval: “Very moral civilized people have destroyed
and continue to destroy, without the least scruple, savage or barbarian
peoples”.[xxvi]We glimpse here at the roots the supreme morality built into “economic science” itself.
Yet, as demonstrated in “Behind Global System Collapse”, even the most liberal canons of America, including John Rawls’ classic A Theory of Justice, are grounded in the same meta principle.[xxvii] Rationality and value are equated to
self-maximizing gain with no limit within game-theoretic interactions
as the sole limiting framework of “limitless money capital acquisition”.
The generic equation defines, indeed, the dominant intellectual and
economic mind-set of America and the global system in action
since 1980. The cabal internal to U.S. national security strategic
planning follows the moral logic to its most radical conclusions with no
constraints by life or law.
The one absolute moral meaning is the
spread of U.S. economic, military and political power as good for all,
or, more exactly in Straussian language, limitless private transnational money-capital expansion as the highest right and moral duty. Only
what is consistent with or serves this supreme morality, it follows,
deserves to exist. This is the alpha and omega of the covert doctrine
and state, and careful reading can find no disconfirmation beneath the
rhetoric of “noble lies”.
The Iraq Paradigm: Genocide Strategy From 1990 On
The Iraq line of the geostrategic plan
from 1990 to 2001 and after is a paradigmatic articulation of the
covertly ruling moral logic. It launches into the theatre of war as
direct war attack when U.S. Ambassador to Iraq, April Glaspie, is
instructed to green-light Saddam’s already known plan to invade Kuwait
in 1990: “The US. has no opinion on your Arab-Arab conflicts, such as
your dispute with Kuwait”, she advises. To formalize the lie as official
and traditional, she reports: “Secretary Baker has directed me to
emphasize the instruction, first given to Iraq in the 1960s, that the
Kuwait issue is not associated with America”.[xxviii]
The
dispute was, in fact, over Kuwait’s drawing out oil from reserves
underlying Iraq as enabled by the colonial split of the oil-rich Kuwait
province from Iraq – the classic divide-and-rule policy holding also in
the division of oil-rich Kurdistan among four manufactured states.
Saddam had good reason to trust the U.S., not only by the long-term
official promise of neutrality but as blood-mix ally when he waged a
U.S.-supported war of aggression against Iran – which still remains the
target. Note the big lie to provoke the supreme crime of war has
remained without any glare of publicity that might derail the plan.
When Saddam did exactly as planned by
invading Kuwait, Bush Sr. raved about the Nazi-like aggression against a
weaker country in the reverse projection that always defines the covert
U.S. state before, through and after 9-11. So in the same name of
“preventing aggression” U.S. “defense” forces invaded Iraq to destroy
any life capacity it had to defend itself – always the strategy since
the defeat in Vietnam. The genocide began by the massacre of many tens
of thousands of fleeing soldiers. Recall the weeping young woman, the
Kuwait ambassador’s daughter, planted next to baby incubators falsely
claiming the monster Saddam had murdered the babies. This reverse
projection was soon to be made real thousands of times over inside the
victim society of Iraq.
Reverse projection of evil is the meta
law of U.S. psy-ops propaganda in the deadly conflicts and wars it
covertly starts. This is the supreme moral program in action as “noble
lies”. In this case, the air-bombing after surrender continued
from U.S. and “special ally” Britain as “sanctions of Iraq” to “prevent
aggression” – again the reverse projection. In fact the bombs
continually fell on the water and electricity infrastructures of the
defenceless people and against all lines of repair to restore either –
“the line in the sand against Iraq aggression”. We might bear in mind
that Wolfowitz was Undersecretary of Defense under Secretary Cheney at
this time, their positions not unlike those at the time of 9-11.
Air-bombing, as Bertrand Russell long
ago pointed out, is inherently fascist in erasing the killed and maimed
from sight while ensuring impunity for the bombers of defenceless
people. But all such mass murder is only collateral damage to the
supreme moral goal as “natural right and law”. The air bombing of
Iraq’s water and electricity supplies dressed in one big lie after
another continued in slow mass-murderous destruction of the people and
their social life infrastructures years on end.
Denis
Halliday, United Nations Humanitarian Co-ordinator for the mission
finally called it “genocide” (Wikipedia calls it “the Persian Gulf War”)
when he resigned in 1998 to protest against “the crimes against
humanity”. But no-one knew until the U.S. Department of Defense
Intelligence got out that the first sweep of Iraq was planned down to
the mass killing of the infants and children. September 11 in 2001 is
better understood in this wider context of strategic planning by the
covert U.S. terror state. For years the non-stop bombing of the people’s
central life-water support system deliberately engineered mass dying
from diseases of children in the hundreds of thousands.
What was predicted by Harvard Medical
School researchers from the continuous civilian infrastructure bombing
by the U.S. military – the deaths of over 500,000 children- was verified
by the counts scientifically taken at the risk of researchers as the
bombing continued month after month with NATO support.[xxix]
Full-spectrum corporate money-sequencing
through Iraq under the Comprehensive Privatization Program would only
be enabled by “9-11”down the road. But first the bases of advanced
social life organization needed to be destroyed. The later-leaked U.S.
Defense Intelligence document entitled “Iraq Water Treatment
Vulnerabilities” expresses the moral DNA at work. I cite the key lines
of U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency reports because they reveal the
character of the supreme moral goal and its strategic planning.“With no
domestic sources of water treatment replacement or chemicals like
chlorine”and “laden with biological pollutants and bacteria”, the leaked
Defense Intelligence Agency report says (italics added), “epidemics of
such diseases as cholera, hepatitis, and typhoid” will “probably take
six months before the [drinking and sewage water] system is fully
degraded”.
The document continues, Conditions are favorable for communicable disease outbreaks [by
the one-way air bombing] with the “most likely diseases during next
sixty-ninety days of diarrheal diseases (particularly children) acute
respiratory diseases (colds and influenza); typhoid; hepatitis
(particularly children); measles, diphtheria, and pertussis
(particularly children); meningitis including meningococcal
(particularly children), cholera”. “Medical Problems in Iraq”, dated
March 15, 1991, reports that the “water is less than 5 percent of the
original supply – – diarrhea is four times above normal levels – –
Conditions in Baghdad remain favorable for disease outbreaks”. The fifth
document in June reports “almost all medicines in critically short
supply” and “Gastroenteritis killing children – – in the south, 80
percent of the deaths are children”.[xxx]
In short, no limit to covert U.S.
planning of indiscriminate mass murder for the supreme goal exists. The
number who died in 9-11 suddenly pales in comparison. In all cases, it
lets “those inimical to U.S. interests” know that there is no limit to
how far the covert terror state will go for the supreme moral code not
yet decoded. Combined with wars of aggression before and after 9-11,
raining fire and explosions on civilians from the air so that no defense
or escape can be made, saturating the fields of public meaning with big
lies civilly dangerous to unmask, and bringing vast enrichment and new
powers to transnational corporate conglomerates and their past and
present CEO’s of the acting U.S. state – all become clear in their
ultimate meaning once decoded. As the Democrat U.S. Secretary of State
responded to the question of the 500,000 killed children, “we think the
price was worth it”. No price is too much to pay for fulfilment of the
transcendent project of the global U.S. state and its private capital
rule as “the Free World”. “Those inimical to our interests” are those
who oppose or are in the way of it, and thus “hate our freedom”.
The Strategic Logic of Value through 9-11
By 2000 it was very clear to the U.S.
strategic planners that the opening up of the Middle East and Central
Asia after the fall of the Soviet Union had to be further pursued before
it was too late.The great regret for the planning personnel of the
coming Bush Jr. administration such as Paul Wolfowitz was that Iraq had
not been taken over on the first invasion. The need for “full spectrum
dominance” across the Middle East and Central Asia was thus the
essential argument of the Project for the New American Century (PNAC),
with the prescription that no other “regional power”was able to contest
this dominance.
The PNAC more explicitly recognised the strategic necessity for what Zbigniew Brzezinski had already called for in 1998 in The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives
– namely,“the circumstance of a truly massive and widely perceived
direct external threat” to ensure public support for “the United States,
as the sole and, indeed, the first truly global power”. The now once
untouchable Central Asia, formerly of the USSR, was thus targeted as
essential not only for its vast oil reserves, but to complete rule of
the “first truly global power”.
The Project for the New American Century
was more explicit than Brzezinski in 2000, the year before 9-11. As
former Defence Minister of Canada, Paul Hellyer, lucidly puts it in a
recent address (italics added):
“The authors of this American ‘Mein Kampf’ [the PNAC] for conquest recognized the difficulty of persuading sophisticated Americans to accept such a gigantic change in policy. So they wrote the following (subsequently removed from the record): ‘Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary changes, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor.’”[xxxi]
Excepting the Vietnam War ending in
military defeat – but vastly enriched armaments and connected private
bank and corporate interests – the hitherto favoured strategic-plan mode
had been local death squads along with pervasive American media
propaganda against the victims as “communists” and “sponsored by the
USSR”. But once there was no remotely equal opponent in mass-kill
capacities and transnational trade treaties now bound
governments within corporate-rights law as overriding domestic laws and
policies, anything became permissible. The plan for the “supranational
sovereignty” of “limitless capital accumulation” in “full-spectrum
power”required only 9-11 to derail world-wide peace, environmental and
anti-corporate globalization movements growing into uncontrollable
civilian capacity across borders and continents.
People were waking up to the one-way
destruction of life systems at all levels. Iraq was not alone in the
genocidal clearance of formersocialist infrastructures uniting peoples
across ethnic lines. A far more democratic Yugoslavia was set up and
destroyed by financial means in the same year by the 1991 U.S. Foreign
Operations Appropriations Law after the 1980’s multiplication of public
interest rates to over 20percent primedevoured social life support
structures across the world.
This was the unseen financialization
base of a global war against public and worker economic and political
powers that was reaping a cumulative global civilian reaction of
opposition to “the plan”. 9-11 ensured against the fightback of
financially dispossessed peoples with the signature reverse operation –
diversion to an external “terrorist threat” that stood in the way of more sweeping
transnational corporate wars on more peoples being dispossessed. Civil
war in Yugoslavia long targeted by Reagan’s secret National Security
Directive 133 as early as 1984 was predicted and occurred after the
underlying employment and welfare structure of multi-ethnic Yugoslavia
collapsed under deliberate financial destabilization. (The villain of
the piece, Slobodan Milosevic, was himself a major banker).
In
oil-rich Somalia, two-thirds of its territory had been leased out to
four transnational oil companies by 1993 – a condition of lost grounds
of life for Somalians behind the primeval civil war ever since. These
are merely expressions of the underlying logic of value and the plan for
its supranational rule beneath the lights of publicity as “discretion”.
The examples are myriad from Latin America to South-East Asia to
sub-Sahara Africa and the Middle East to Israel and Canada today. But a
descriptive law of the supreme moral goal holds across all diverse
instances of its expression.
Strategic planning for the
destruction of social life infrastructures of peoples for private money
capital gain without limit is the ultimate value program throughout from
the U.S. to China.
The people of the U.S. are not exempt
from their own system of covert state rule, although democratic heroism
here joins with the larger world against it. This is the ultimate moral
struggle on earth today. The moral politics of the disorder are the
enforcement of the descriptive law. This is the ruling meta program,
and it is carcinogenic by its nature. The supreme motive force it
multiplies by is privately self-maximizing money possession (individual
and corporate)seeking to be limitlessly more.More = Better. Less =
Militant Demand for More.
The “9-11” event is the epicentre of the
supreme moral objective seated in Wall Street. Itis best understood as
an ultimate strategic maximizer of the italicized formula. Exactly
expressed, its ultimately regulating axiology is private money inputs
through all life to maximally more private money outputs in ad infinitum
progression: Money à Life as Means à More Money or, formally, $àLasMà$1,2,3,4— N.
At the highest level of anchoring moral
meaning, this private money-demand rule seeks to be absolute and total
across borders with no quarter. “Full spectrum dominance” is its
military method. Yet what distinguishes it from the Nazi rule it
connects with as prior transnational corporate partner in war making is
that in the U.S. private money demand multiplication at the top is the only organising
value meaning. 97% of its money command is produced by private bank
notes of others’ debt to the private bank system centred in Wall Street.
Yet despite this very narrow centre of control,almost no global
territory or field of life is outside its rule and strategic plan.
The “Trans-Pacific Partnership” is but
its latest expression – focusing on private knowledge-patent money
sequencing to rule out generic pharmaceuticals and other life-and-death
knowledge commons from which higher profits cannot be made. The one
underlying common principle throughout all phases is transnational
corporate and bank money sequencing to more. Its converse is to
overrideall life requirements at all levels, and strategically planned
crises and wars are the advancing lines of control and enforcement.
What is not recognized through all the
genocidal wars,ecocidal results, collapsing social life support systems
and falling wages, however,is that this ruling value sequence rationally leads to“9-11” as maximal strategic payoff progression.“Absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event”, the Project for the New American Century declared before 9-11,
“ – – the U.S risks the loss of a global security order that is uniquely friendly to American principles and prosperity”.
Decoded, this meant in theory and
practice more transnational private money sequence progression to ever
more control over all still-uncontrolled assets for more and richer
returns without limit of take or life destruction. But these are
unspeakable lines of value meaning, and that is likely why, for example,
Wikipedia keeps altering the entry of my name with conspiracy theory
attributions and smears to ensure that such deep-structural diagnosis
does not gain currency. That is how this system works, and analysis will
provide more variations of this gagging method on 9-11 ahead.
The
strategic necessity of the 9-11 event for “global security order”can
even be asserted by the principal architects of the administration under
which it happened, and those who observe this can be dismissed as
“conspiracy theorists”. Reverse projection is, as always, the essential
psychological operation. The documented but shouted-down logistics
included V-P Cheney having control of the air-defence of NORAD six
months before the event to manage the relocation of the stand-by fighter
jets to Alaska and Canada on September 11, 2001, and more broadly, no
jet intervention for almost two hours until the full operation was
completed.
The tell-tale signs that it was not the
“foreign act of war” which was trumpeted were that President Bush Jr.
continued exposed in set-up photo ops with school children during the
“attack on the U.S.” Not a wheel turned in U.S. jet intervention or
homeland protection. No evident defensive action or response whatever
occurred.Until strategic security from public uprising and awareness was
established, the blame on foreign terrorists was repeated non-stop
around the clock with no-one raising a question.
Weeks thus passed in inaction. As the
future director of the 9-11 Commission said years before 9-11: “The
effort and resources we devote to averting or containing this threat
now, in the ‘before’ period, will seem woeful, even pathetic, when
compared to what will happen ‘after’.”[xxxii]And
so one war of invasion after another was made upon entirely unproven
sources of the “attack” who were, in fact,states and peoples standing in
the way of vast publicly owned oil-fields. These had to be taken for
control by U.S. and allied state armies for the private transnational
corporations employing their leaders in and out of office.
Money-sequence oil to quadruple-plus more has been the story ever since.[xxxiii]If
80% of the 19 claimed suicide agents were from oil-ally Saudi Arabia,
if none of their identity paperscould have survived the destroyed
buildings, and if several of these “hijackers” were apparently still
alive, why did none of the vaunted “free press” ever investigate 9-11?
The “noble lie” is built into every step.
The total demolition of the buildings on
9-11 was professionally executed – impossible to manage except by a
technologically sophisticated state with intelligence support, as former
State Secretary for Defense of Germany, Andreas von Bülow,has concisely
observed at the first-order level: “To hijack four big airliners within
a few minutes and fly them into targets within a single hour and doing
so on complicated flight routes! That is unthinkable, without backing
from the secret apparatuses of state and industry”.[xxxiv]Turning
huge fireproofed steel-girded buildings in the centre of New York into
fuming debris in a few seconds and melting car bodies nearby extends the
problem of physical impossibility by jet fires. That is why the firemen
were killed by being “falsely told it was a fire, not military
ordnance”.The fire-squad commander who told me this asked me not to name
him because of the harm that might come to him “from the media” – the
9-11 gag again. Yet the core and deciding issue is strangely avoided by
all:
Whatever the technics, every step
before and after 9-11 took place in accordance with the supreme moral
objective and covert-state strategic methods to execute it.The
smoking gun is incinerated buildings. Every step “before” and “after”
goes back to the motive, the crime syndicate, the plan, the payoffs, the
seizures and dispossessions.
Reducing the Auto-Determination of Nations Requires the Plan
To reduce the “auto-determination of
nations practised in past centuries” for the “supranational
sovereigntyof an intellectual and banker elite”could only be made
possible through “full spectrum dominance” on the groundas the Project
for the New American Century had independently explained, and“the
catastrophic and catalyzing event” required was “9-11”, however it was
accomplished.
Nicholas Rockefeller was already
speaking of “the plan”eleven months before the “9-11” call for emergency
help when he said to his close friend, Aaron Russo:
“There’s going to be an event Aaron…We are going to go into Afghanistan so we can put a gas pipeline to the Caspian Sea…We are going to go into Iraq to take the oil and to establish a base in the Middle East and we’re going to go into Venezuela and try and get rid of Chávez – – -Through it, you fight the War on Terror and then you go into Iraq – – the media can convince everybody that it’s real – -”[xxxv]
Lest the reader doubt this witness, it
has nowhere been disavowed any more than the patriarch’s disclosure of
“the plan” itself which is also available on the right-wingCato
Institute website. All express the underlying but observable moral law
of motion of this ruling value system -to acquire maximally more
money demand for private use and control with no public or other barrier
across internal and external borders by war, trade treaty or any other
means whatever the sacrifice of others’ lives.They do not count in
the calculus. All life is an “externality”. There is no step of the
covert U.S. state that does not obey the formula.
The legality of international treaty was
and remains the transnational legal method already established in the
decade before 9-11 to provide the supranational framework of private
transnational money-sequence rule as the moral absolute to which all
conformed. Coded as “the global free market”, it is neither free nor a
market, but oligopolist corporate control of supply, demand, and
inert-state policy. In fact, the supreme morality as defined overrides all
economic interests themselves by absolute protection of private
transnational “profit opportunity” alone -with thousands of regulations
across borders governed by this moral absolute. This too is testable by
examination of the articles of any transnational trade treaty in the
NATO control zone.
Policy structures follow in line. Tax,
financial, natural resource and investment policies are structured by
law and right to ignore all destruction of social and natural life and
life capital bases to grow transnational private money sequences to
limitlessly more.This is why the self-multiplying money sequencing with
no committed life function has expanded in accordance with this moral
absolute through and after “9-11”. Observe how the ultimately regulating
principles of value prescription and description all conform to one
axiological syntax across controllable theoretical, economic,
political, and other levels of the global system.[xxxvi]
Thus whatever the world uprisings
against it and however destructive of the planet’s social and ecological
life bases, this law of motion remains the ruling constant. Not even
the life impoverishment of the growing majority and the collapsing of
the biosphere itself are allowed to modify its supranational ruling
form. Even a tenth of one percent tax on its ruinous money-sequence
tides or fraction of legal tender to back them is off-limits.
Not only 9-11 itself, but global policy
locks of every kind are the expressions of this ruling moral absolute as
inviolable and supreme, however much they destroy people’s lives
without any committed life function – the normalization of private-bank
compound-interest debts bleeding peoples dry, destabilizing speculations
in sovereign currencies and bonds, asset-stripping buyouts and
disemploying mergers, predatory repossessions of homes and loan-shark
rates on poor debtors including college students with no limit, endless
takeovers of productive firms by foreign multinationals with only
banknotes, ecologically devastating mega-projects and loot-mining with
no environmental or social criteria, lethal armaments manufacture led by
bribery for sales to despots, Wall Street intermediations in every
project with no life commitment, huge hauls of financial lifeblood from
public privatizations to equity capital multiplying outside of
securities regulations, stock-market derivatives exploiting fabricated
money-sequence tides and futures at the cost of hundreds of millions
more hungry people, and- in general – limitless corporate predation of
societies’ domestic resources, home markets, worker pay and benefits,
and public tax revenues. 
With all regulating life standards thus
erased and repelled,a direct question arises: Why would the sacrifice of
a few thousand mixed-nation people and two iconic buildings count
against this covert value calculus if it reaped the world in payoff to
the under one percent and could always be blamed on the Enemy to
achieve even more full-spectrum dominance of the ultimate objective over
all life and life systems that limit its growth and universalization?
Conversely, and in particular at the
geostrategic armed force level, if any society does not yet fit into the
world system as function of it, armed invasion can now follow as
“defense against the terrorists” who have “attacked America” in 9-11. As
U.S. General Wesley Clark has also reported for the
public record,this strategic line of war has been explicit in “U.S.
defense” strategic planning for Iraq, Libya, Sudan, Somalia, Iran, and
Syria since 9-11.
The second part of this essay is forthcoming on Global Research.
Professor John McMurtry
is a moral philosopher specializing in social value systems and
life-value analysis. His many articles and books have been
internationally published and translated, and include multi-volume work
for UNESCO’s Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS). He is
University Professor Emeritus at the University of Guelph, and an
elected Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada.
Notes
[i]Understandably,
the improbable physics of the official account of the destruction of
the WTC buildings by jet-plane impact and office fires has drawn
increasing interest. The ejection outwards of steel columns and
assemblies, the severing of fireproofed steel columns, the evidence of
molten metal in the building remains, the acceleration rates of the
descending buildings, the presence of nanothermite in the dust and the
statements of numerous eyewitnesses are some of the obvious signs of
controlled demolition. Detailed discussion of these and other
difficulties with the official account can be found in the Journal of 9/11 Studies and on the website of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth.
http://www.journalof911studies.com/
http://www.ae911truth.org/
My analysis of the official U.S.National Institute of Technology and Standards (NIST) accounts goes further: I argue that we have been given non-explanationby erasure.
http://www.ae911truth.org/
My analysis of the official U.S.National Institute of Technology and Standards (NIST) accounts goes further: I argue that we have been given non-explanationby erasure.
[ii] One of the best sources of critical information about the 9/11 crimes is The 9/11 Toronto Report: International Hearings on the Events of September 11, 2001, edited by James Gourley (International Center for 9/11 Studies, 2012)
[iii]http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2012-09-26/guest-post-globalist-think-tank-suggests-using-engineered-event-excuse-war-iran//
[iii]http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2012-09-26/guest-post-globalist-think-tank-suggests-using-engineered-event-excuse-war-iran//
[iv] See Charles Higham, Trading with the Enemy: An Expose of the Nazi-American Money Plot 1933-1949 ( New
York: Dell Publishing Co , 1983), the classic documentation and
historical account. Transnational corporations involved after war was
declared in 1942 included IBM (concentration camp identification
system), Dupont (chemical gases), General Motors, Ford (armoured
vehicles) and Union Banking (in which George Bush Jr.’s grandfather was a
Director, making the family’s fortune). All ended up not only with
their property intact or returned, but most with reparations for damages
caused to it.
[v]
An anonymous reviewer of this journal has kindly pointed out that the
concept of “New World Order,” was known in Nazi-occupied Europe as
“l’ordre nouveau,” (France and Belgium), “nieuweorde” (Dutch), and
“nyordre” (Norwegian) in collaborationist discourses during the early
1940’s.
[vi] After the massive defeat of the German armed forces in the Battle of Stalingrad in January 1943, Martin Bormann, the Deputy Fuhrer and the main linkage of the Nazi party with the industrial and financial cartels that ran the German economy, conceived a plan for post-War organization of German Nazis in Latin America, South Africa, Egypt and Indonesia called the “Organization of Veterans of the S.S.,” or Odessa by acronym. A main element of the Odessa was led by General ReinhardGehlen who was head of the Foreign Armies East in German Army Headquarters. He was responsible for all intelligence operations through East Europe and the Soviet Union, and in the remaining months of the war deposited the extensive files in a hiding place in the Bavarian Alps. After the war was over, he negotiated a secret treaty to work “jointly with the Americans” on the basis of the detailed files and the services of some 4000 agents. “By one estimate, some 70 per cent of the total intelligence flowing into NATO’s military committee and Allied headquarters (SHAPE) on the Soviet Union, the countries of East Europe, the rest of Europe and indeed the rest of the world was generated [from this source].” (Carl Oglesby, “The Secret Treaty of Fort Hunt”. Covert Action Bulletin, 35, Fall 1990, pp. 8–16.) Corroborating this heavily researched account, Lake Sagaris reports in her detailed study of Pinochet’s Chile (Sagaris, op. cit.) that Nazi activity and influence in Chile was particularly widespread during Pinochet’s military dictatorship from 1973–90 (cited in Graeme Mount, “The Long Shadow of Chile’s Fascism”, Literary Review of Canada, October 1996, pp. 8–10). Pinochet’s coup occurred on September 11, 1973.
[vi] After the massive defeat of the German armed forces in the Battle of Stalingrad in January 1943, Martin Bormann, the Deputy Fuhrer and the main linkage of the Nazi party with the industrial and financial cartels that ran the German economy, conceived a plan for post-War organization of German Nazis in Latin America, South Africa, Egypt and Indonesia called the “Organization of Veterans of the S.S.,” or Odessa by acronym. A main element of the Odessa was led by General ReinhardGehlen who was head of the Foreign Armies East in German Army Headquarters. He was responsible for all intelligence operations through East Europe and the Soviet Union, and in the remaining months of the war deposited the extensive files in a hiding place in the Bavarian Alps. After the war was over, he negotiated a secret treaty to work “jointly with the Americans” on the basis of the detailed files and the services of some 4000 agents. “By one estimate, some 70 per cent of the total intelligence flowing into NATO’s military committee and Allied headquarters (SHAPE) on the Soviet Union, the countries of East Europe, the rest of Europe and indeed the rest of the world was generated [from this source].” (Carl Oglesby, “The Secret Treaty of Fort Hunt”. Covert Action Bulletin, 35, Fall 1990, pp. 8–16.) Corroborating this heavily researched account, Lake Sagaris reports in her detailed study of Pinochet’s Chile (Sagaris, op. cit.) that Nazi activity and influence in Chile was particularly widespread during Pinochet’s military dictatorship from 1973–90 (cited in Graeme Mount, “The Long Shadow of Chile’s Fascism”, Literary Review of Canada, October 1996, pp. 8–10). Pinochet’s coup occurred on September 11, 1973.
[vii]See
note 8, and for ongoing exposure of the moving nexus of
narco-terrorist-covert-U.S.-state operations across continents, see
continual reports by globalresearch.ca.
[viii]McCoy, Alfred W.; Cathleen B. Read, Leonard P. Adams II.The Politics of Heroin in Southeast Asia.CIA complicity in the global drug trade. New York: Harper & Row. 1972 and Jonathan Quitny, The Crimes of Patriots — A True Tale of Dope, Dirty Money, and the CIA.New York: Simon and Shuster, 1986.
[ix]
See Michel Chossudovsky, “Terrorism with a ‘Human Face’: The History of
America’s Death Squads/Death Squads in Iraq and Syria. /The Historical
Roots of US-NATO’s Covert War on Syria, http://www.globalresearch.ca/terrorism-with-a-human-face-the-history-of-americas-death-squads/5317564
[x]US Joint Chiefs of Staff, “Justification for U.S. Military Intervention in Cuba (Top Secret), US Department of Defense,
13 March 1962, published online in a more comprehensive form by the
national Security Archive on 30 April 2001, months before 9-11. (I am
indebted to James Bamford, Body of Secrets. New York: Doubleday
from which the text quotation comes, and to Jeremy Keenan, “How the
U.S. Has been sponsoring terrorism in the Sahara”, New Internationalist,
December 12, 2013, p. 35). Lest one wonder why this mass-murderous plot
to terrorize and kill American and other citizens was not kept secret
by the covert U.S. state, and indeed released just before 9-11, one
needs to bear in mind that Rockefeller and the Right do not object to
elite knowledge of “the plan” to liquidate national sovereignty and
self-determination for private banker world rule with the collaboration
of the U.S. corporate media in not reporting it. Supreme arrogance and
helplessness of opponents to do anything about it are part of the
supreme morality, and freedom of information at the top long after the action of seems internal to the design of U.S. supreme power. It validates it as de facto reality.
[xi]Zbigniew Brzezinski, The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives. New York: Basic Books, 1998 :“Moreover,
as America becomes an increasingly multi-cultural society, it may find
it more difficult to fashion a consensus on foreign policy issues, except
in the circumstance of a truly massive and widely perceived direct
external threat.” (p. 211). On the international front, Democrat
national security adviser Brzezinski advised : “The defeat and collapse
of the Soviet Union was the final step in the rapid ascendance of a
Western Hemisphere power, the United States, as the sole and, indeed,
the first truly global power.” (p. xiii) and“To put it in a
terminology that harkens back to the more brutal age of ancient empires,
the three grand imperatives of imperial geostrategy are to prevent
collusion and maintain security dependence among the vassals, to keep
tributaries pliant and protected, and to keep the barbarians from coming
together.”(p.40). The 9-11 event managed to fulfil all these objectives at once.
[xii] I document and diagnose these world trends and their economic value doctrine and its bases in depth in Unequal Freedoms: The Global Market as an Ethical System, Toronto: Garamond/ University of Toronto Press, 1998.
[xiii]
While this analysis does track the David Rockefeller thread of “the
plan”, it by no means restricts explanation to this dominant thread of
moral meaning. Many other dominant money-sequence interests are in
interlocked involvement with the supreme value purpose and its system
enactment. In this interlock, for example, Bank of America, JP Morgan
Chase, Citigroup and Wells Fargo own Exxon Mobil, Royal Dutch/Shell,
BP and Chevron Texaco along with Deutsche Bank, BNP, and Barclays,
these corporations in turn having heavy involvement in supranational
armaments and media systems. We may observe the wider interlocking
system of transnational money-sequence control of global industry across
domains in the Rockefeller portfolio of Exxon Mobil, Chevron Texaco, BP
Amoco, Marathon Oil, Freeport McMoran, Quaker Oats, ASARCO, United,
Delta, Northwest, ITT, International Harvester, Xerox, Boeing,
Westinghouse, Hewlett-Packard, Honeywell, International Paper, Pfizer,
Motorola, Monsanto, Union Carbide and General Foods. (See concise
summary at http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-federal-reserve-cartel-the-eight-families/2508). Wherever the U.S. state goes in demand, crime and war it is to enforce this private transnational money sequence system.
[xiv] Cited by <http://freedom Cited by <http://freedomlaw.com/coffee.html> which lists among its sponsors the Cato Institute, the Heritage, and the Mackinac Centre for Public Policy.
[xiv] Cited by <http://freedom Cited by <http://freedomlaw.com/coffee.html> which lists among its sponsors the Cato Institute, the Heritage, and the Mackinac Centre for Public Policy.
[xv] This complex point is spelled out in the second edition of The Cancer Stage of Capitalism/ From Crisis to Cure. London: Pluto and Palgrave-Macmillan, 2013.
[xvi]
The most developed account of this and the above citation and their
context is by Daniel Estulin, The True Story of the Bilderberg Group.
Walterville:Trine Day. 2007 (also translated in Spanish). Estulin’s
grandfather was a senior KGB agent and his father was expelled from the
Soviet Union for his activities on behalf of free speech.
[xvii] I am indebted to Paul Hellyer, former Minister of Defence of Canada, for this fact and its disclosure.
[xviii] I define reverse projection as attributing to others what you are doing yourself as the reason for attacking them.
U.S. foreign policy is defined by this generic reversal operation. The
reversals have five standard operations: i. claiming humanitarian
assistance to victims of a regime when in fact bombing or attacking
them; ii. standing up to terrorism when by far the greater terrorism is
perpetrated by doing so; iii. covertly supporting the very terrorist
organisations as a justification for these dominant terrorist
activities; iv. imposing the extremest form of terror, torture, to “stop
the terrorists”; v. planning, organising and waging the supreme crime
of humanity, a war of aggression, to compel the other society to “comply
with the laws and norms of the community of nations”.
[xix] Cited in archive.democrats.com/view.cfm?id=5166 – United States.
[xx] Social science report of the Leo Strauss school of thought and its national security disciples is provided by Shadia Drury, Leo Strauss and the American Right. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 1999.
[xxi] Leo Strauss, Natural Right and History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1953, p. 60.
[xxi] Leo Strauss, Natural Right and History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1953, p. 60.
[xxii]Cancer Stage, ibid, spells out this great aporia in Marx’s theory at both life capital and money capital ends.
[xxiii]Rich introductory overview of these connections is provided by physician Dr. Jim Macgregor, “Fascism in America” http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Fascism/Neo-fascism_America.html.
I originally spelled out the principles and behaviours in common in
“Fascism and Neo-Conservatism: Is There a Difference?” (1983) Praxis International (1983) 1, 86-102.
[xxiv] This historical pathogenesis is tracked in depth in McMurtry, The Cancer Stage of Capitalism: From Crisis to Cure. Ibid, in both first and second editions, 1999/2013.
[xxv] I spell this meaning out in formal depth in “Behind Global System Collapse: The Life-Blind Structure of Economic Rationality”, Journal of Business Ethics (2012), 108:1, 49-61.
[xxvi] Pareto, Vilfredo, (1971 [1906]), Manual of Political Economy, New York: A.M. Kelley, p. 12.
[xxvii] John Rawls assumes the self-maximizing principle as the ultimately regulating principle of rationality in A Theory of Justice when he says: “From the standpoint of the original position, it is rational for parties to suppose that they do want a larger share – – The concept of rationality invoked here – – is the standard one familiar in social theory” – - ” (A Theory of Justice
. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1971, p 143). As to how this
first premise shared by “social theory” as “standard” leads to
entailments that are not tracked is spelled out step by step in John
McMurtry, “Human Rights v. Corporate Rights: Understanding Life-Value,
the Civil Commons, and Social Justice,” Studies in Social Justice, 5(1) (Summer, 2011), 11-61.
[xxviii]NYT, Sept 23 1990.
[xxix]
The fuller description and documentation of the war crimes and crimes
against humanity by the U.S. in Iraq from 1990 on can be found in Value Wars: The Global Market versus the Life Economy . London: Pluto, 2002, pp. 30-36.
[xxx] Originally available on <www.gulflink.osd.mil>, but the information has been since removed from this site since it was cited in Value Wars. See also:
http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/routledg/mcs/2004/00000020/00000002/art00002
http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/routledg/mcs/2004/00000020/00000002/art00002
[xxxi]
“Rebuilding America’s Defenses: Strategy, Forces and Resources for a
New Century. A report of the Project for the New American Century,
September 2000.” The description of this “new Mein Kampf” is
from Hon. Paul Hellyer, “The G20 Fiddles While The Planet Burns”, Global
Breakthrough Energy Conference, Sunday, November 11, 2012.
[xxxii] See note 47 and page context for the bright idea from the Executive Director of the “9/11 Commission” long before 9-11.
[xxxii] See note 47 and page context for the bright idea from the Executive Director of the “9/11 Commission” long before 9-11.
[xxxiii] The average price of oil was $24.08 per barrel in August 2001, $28.27 in 2000, and $10.20 in 1998.
[xxxiv]Tagesspiegel, 13.
Jan. 2002. Andreas von Bulow is an especially relevant analyst on this
score as almost uniquely a renowned scholar in covert-state activities
and a former minister of defence.
[xxxv]<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MGF6DDd8Uto>. I am indebted to software engineer Kip Warner for this reference.
[xxxvi] This framework of diagnosis of the system 9-11 expresses is spelled out in systematic depth in The Cancer Stage of Capitalism / From Crisis to Cure forthcoming April 2013, the second edition of the original 1999 study.
No comments:
Post a Comment