USS FITZGERALD THE VICTIM OF AN ELECTROMAGNETIC WARFARE ATTACK
If you've been following the developing theories about the USS Fitzgerald ramming in Japan, you'll be interested in this article shared by Mr. D.F.(copy and paste into your browser:
The
article reiterates many of the points I argued in my own previous
comments on this incident, namely, that I find it difficult to
rationalize a collision with a US Navy frigate due to simple
incompetence for a variety of reasons. Ships just don't "sneak up" on
other ships. Collisions of ships do happen, of course, on occasion. And
the results can be tragic (think only of the Andrea Doria). But in the main, a ship venturing into the "danger" zone of any nation's warships would be hailed, warned off, quarters sounded, and evasive action taken.
But as far as I am able to tell, none of this apparently happened with the Fitzgerald, if the various internet reports, such as the above, are to be believed.
Assuming
that they are, the report argues more or less as I did previously, that
in the absence of clear explanations, we must assume that the steerage
and other operational and communications systems of the vessel were not
operational, for whatever reason. Why, for example, was the captain
still apparently asleep? Under circumstances of a potential collision or
threat to the ship, again, evasive action would have been ordered and
the captain woken up and notified. This implies that it was not possible to move the ship nor wake the captain through the internal communication system.
But
toward the end of this strange article - and again, I am not familiar
with this website, nor its reliability. I am presenting it for your
consideration, as I know many readers here are following this story - we
have the following:
The first time the container ship approached the USS Fitzgerald, the Fitz was still fully functional.
An airplane or drone flying overhead was responsible for the energy pulse that killed all electricity on the warship. (the whole event took place in the wee hours of the morning from 1:30 to 2:20 AM)
The container ship was required to turn back toward the Fitzgerald to do its job as commanded by whoever EMPulsed the ship.
In turning back to do the “job” the container ship did not have great positioning to destroy the vessel and so ended up only disabling rather than sinking the thing.
Thus, the CIA-planned story (aka false flag attack) could not be used as many on board the Fitzgerald saw what really happened, and survived.The CIA plot was probably an attack by Russia or China or NK. A contingency plan was then quickly implemented; one that they could feed to those present as a legitimate story.The bottom line here is that this attack was quite likely a false flag operation in the tradition of the USS Maine (“Remember the Maine!”), the RMS Lusitania (World War I false flag), and the USS Maddox (aka the Gulf of Tonkin incident).
Conclusion
Either someone wants war. Or, someone else seeks to prevent war.While this attack on the USS Fitzgerald appears to be a typical CIA-coordinated false flag attack designed to start a war, it appears to have been a real attack perpetrated to prevent one.In other words, it was an conspiracy within a conspiracy, and/or a false flag within a false flag. Yes, it’s really that complicated. As it frequently when one camp is trying to start a war as aggressively as the other side is working to avert one.
To
my knowledge, no one from government, or corporate controlled media,
has yet even stated that this was an attack: the "attack" hypothesis
seems to be largely concentrated - at present - in the free and
independent media.
The
scenario is, however, worth noting, because as the article itself
avers, the incident could be seen as a part of a wider pattern of such
electromagnetic interference with US forces, beginning with the now
infamous Donald Cook incident, to the alleged Russian defeat of
NATO communications systems in Syria shortly after that nation's
intervention there, to a repeat of the Donald Cook incident, involving the Donald Cook
once again, this time, in the Baltic Sea with yet another Russian
Sukhoi-22 fighter-bomber. While I have not seen corroboration of the
allegation that there was an airplane overhead during the incident,
there would not need to be, if indeed this was an electromagnetic
attack, which for the reasons outlined above I believe it to be. Such an
attack could have come from the container ship itself or other nearby
vessels, and perhaps even from the shore.
For my two cents' worth of high octane speculation, however, I have difficulty believing this was a CIA plot that was also,
as the article states "an attack by Russia or China or (North Korea)."
This would imply the CIA is in cahoots with those nations in an overly
complicated plot to start a war. While I don't put anything past the
departments and agencies of the federal swamp and believe they're pretty
much capable of anything in spite of the many good people in
government, I just find that one a bit too much to swallow.
What I don't have difficult swallowing, however, is the possibility that those nations may have learned
of a plot, or course of action. After all, the US Navy has recently
deployed three carrier battle groups to that region, which is an
enormous concentration of naval power usually presaging some sort of
American action.
Then...
... the electronics system, and maybe even the steerage system, of an expensive frigate fails...
...completely.
And
that translates into the message that the article begins with: "your
navy may not be in as solid control of the sea lanes as you think it
is." And that means the same might go for (1) aircraft, and more
importantly (2) space-based assets, if a similar electromagnetic
platform exists in space, or on the ground capable of reaching space.
And that means in turn, those "smart bombs" may not work too well, and
it may be rather difficult moving troops and supplies to deal with
"threats."
Of course, for years, there
have been rumors that the Russians have very advanced electronic warfare
systems, rumors which the Russians from time to time have "stoked."
Shortly after the first incident with the Donald Cook,
Russian television aired a one hour review of some of those systems -
no doubt for the deliberate attention of analysts in the Pentagram - and
the effect of that broadcast was that it gave the impression that this
electronic warfare interference with missile systems would make them
behave like wildly misfiring bottle rockets, going off crazily in all
directions... everywhere, but on target.
It's
a very Russian sort of approach to such things. The American
anti-missile system is, we've been told, one of the approach of hitting a
bullet with a bullet. The Russian anti-missile system approach is
simple to interfere with the flight path by whatever means, including
scrambling the electronics and turning expensive American rockets into
crazy bottlerockets.
In any case, messages are being sent, and it's interesting to note that, for a brief moment, things quieted down after the Fitzgerald incident. https://gizadeathstar.com/2017/07/uss-fitzgerald-victim-electromagnetic-warfare-attack/
No comments:
Post a Comment