GERMANY HAS HAD IT, CONSIDERS SANCTIONS AGAINST USA ~hehe folks the so~called kooky natery inbred murder~u.s. sick fucks "we" got running/ruining OUR Country ... well IT's lookIn more & more & More like ....every~body IS geet~in fed up wit em ...still think we's go~in the right ...way ? doesn't look ...like it !
A
few days ago I blogged about a suspicion I've long entertained, namely,
that there appears to be some sort of covert war taking place between
Washington and Berlin, and that this covert war has been going on for a
while, most recently entering an "economic warfare" guise. I've also
advanced the hypothesis that American "rebasing" efforts in Eastern
Europe were part of a very old geopolitical game, first played by King
Edward VII, then by Clemenceau, Chamberlain and Daladier. Edward, of
course, helped engineer the Triple Entente, the alliance of France,
Russia, and Britain that was, of course, directed against Germany and
eventually "lay siege" to the Central Powers for four years during World
War One. Edward's ploy, of course, was also to prevent the
"geopolitically unthinkable": an alliance of Russia and Germany, long
the bug-a-boo of geopolitical thinking. After World War One, the formal
alliance system was replaced by the idea of the cordon sanitaire,
the "buffer zone" of small states created from the nationalities within
the old Russian Empire: Poland, Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania became
the "sanitary cordon" between Russia and Germany to prevent an alliance.
Of
course, the Treaty of Rapallo side-stepped all of this. Then came the
strengthening of that idea with the military guarantees given by
Daladier and Chamberlain to Poland...
... an idea that didn't work out too well for Poland, France, the UK, or ultimately, Germany.
The
most recent version of this game has been the "let's launch a coup in
the Ukraine, and, just to keep Merkel out of it, launch sanctions on
Russia (for its aggression in the affair, of course), which sanctions
will keep Germany and Russia from building all those pipelines and
cementing other lucrative deals). Part and parcel of my hypothesis about
this covert warfare also deals with the war of fines and sanctions
against German banks (Deutsche Bank) and German auto manufacturers.
Well,
it's beginning to look more and more like this hypothesis might have
some traction, for the gloves are increasingly coming off. The most
recent round of anti-Russia sanctions, I wrote a few days ago, was as
much directed against Germany as they were against Russia.
And now Kanzlerin
Merkel is making no bones about it, and pulling no punches: Germany is
considering economic sanctions on the USA, this time, against imports of
American energy, according to this Sputnik article shared by Ms. K.M.:
There are some important considerations and paragraphs here to note:
In a joint statement, Germany's Foreign Minister Sigmar Gabriel and Austria's Chancellor Christian Kern slammed the decision by the US Senate to impose new sanctions on Moscow over its alleged interference in the US presidential election as well as the ongoing situations in Ukraine and Syria."Threatening German, Austrian and other European enterprises with penalties on the US market only because they take part in the gas supply projects such as the Nord Stream 2 together with Russia or finance them, is adding an absolutely new and highly negative aspect in relations between the US and Europe," the joint statement reads.For his part, the leader of Germany's Social Democratic Party (SPD), Martin Schulz, lambasted US senators' move and called upon German Chancellor Angela Merkel to oppose it."We have seen that the US is pursuing a course in energy policy that is dangerous and is directed against Germany," Schulz told the Federal Association of German Industry (BDI). (Emphasis added)
Now, in my previous blog on this subject, I only suggested
that the perception of the new sanctions regime would backfire and be
seen as sanctions against Germany (which I also argued was the real
additional, though hidden, target of the sanctions). Here, the leader of
the opposition party in Germany, Herr Schulz, is now saying openly what
only a few days ago was mere suspicion. To put it country simple: the
situation is deteriorating quickly.
But there's more:
Germany and Austria suspect that Senate's anti-Russian bill is an attempt to "occupy" the European energy market on the part of US corporations."Germany and Austria went one step further, too — accusing the US of looking to promote the role of US LNG in Europe at the expense of Russian gas," the S&P Global Platts writer underscored, adding that the US apparently wants to kill two birds with one stone by exerting sanctions on Nord Stream 2: to "punish" Moscow and promote US LNG supplies in Europe, "which would have the knock-on effect of supporting domestic US gas industry."In this context, Danilov wrote, it is most likely that potential anti-American sanctions would be aimed not at inflicting any economic damage on the US but at sabotaging Washington's attempts to seize the European energy market."A ban on the import of American LNG into the EU countries could have become a very effective tool to prevent America's attempts to influence the European market," Danilov assumed adding that this measure could potentially attract wide public support. (Emphasis added)
This,
too, is a new admission in the growing and widening gulf between Berlin
and Washington, and like it or not, where Berlin goes on this issue,
Europe goes. That means we are fast approaching the point when Europe
will have to choose between the USA and Russia, a choice that has been
delayed for some decades, but which, now, with the USSA playing "world
cop," crawling into bed with radical Islamic terrorist organizations,
and interfering in the internal policies of several nations, in the long
term, I suspect that the choice will not be favorable to Washington,
regardless what Europe does in the short term.
The
reason: Washington has proven its growing instability and psychopathy
since 9/11. The last sentence of the article reminds us of this point:
"It appears that the US political elite have completely forgotten that
the interest of its European partners should be taken into account,
Danilov concluded."
Precisely, the
unipolar paradigm reigns in Washington, in the dominant party, and the
fake opposition party. And that unipolar paradigm has, since 9/11, seen
the following things be accomplished: (1) Japanese rearmament, (2)
Growing Russo-Japanese cooperation, (3) A fed-up Philippines, (4) more
bi-lateral currency-trade deals bypassing the US dollar, (5) an insane,
banana-republic political culture in Washington, (6) arms sales to the
(out)House of Saud, a prime contributor to Islamic terrorism, (7)
growing radicalism in Indonesia, and now, (8) the growing estrangement
between Washington and our most powerful ally in Europe.
Washington
has repeatedly asked its European "allies" to step up to the plate and
do more for its own defense. But I have to wonder, if that happened, and
Europe then demanded removal of ALL American bases in Europe because
they're sick and tired of being under Washington's thumb, what the
response would be.
I suspect we all know.
In
any case, I suspect we'll find out, after a few years of Japanese
rearmament, when they once again ask us to get rid of our bases there.
So,
if we want our allies to continue to be allies, then we need to stop
treating them as vassals and satraps, and we'd better do so quickly. The
trouble is, the idiots in Washington have not existed in a multi-polar
world since the beginning of World War Two. They no longer know how.
They're stupid.
And because they're stupid, everyone is in trouble.
No comments:
Post a Comment