Home automation technology: is it an asset or a liability? Alternately referred to as “The Internet of Things,”
such systems allow homeowners to control multiple devices within their
house, which communicate with each other via wireless technology.
However egalitarian this may sound, it’s worth noting that such systems
do pose multiple security risks.
Part of what’s alarming about this situation is that Google recently acquired the home automation tech developer Nest.
On the one hand, Google has done a tremendous amount to create an
experience for internet browsers that weeds out marketing ploys and,
ideally speaking, takes users to the sites which are most relevant to
their search queries. On the other hand, because so many people use
Google, they have comprehensive data about virtually everyone in the
developed world, and they’ve also been working, rather pro-actively,
towards increasing internet availability in remote corners of the United States, as well as underserved communities in Africa.
The company has come under scrutiny in recent years for selling data
about Google users to various third parties. If Google is working
directly in tandem with home automation experts, what does this mean
about the precision of the data that they’ll have about our day-to-day
lives? The fear is that Google will now have a direct window into our
homes…
It’s disconcerting also because of how rapidly the technology field is advancing . For instance, the latest iteration of the Brinks home automation system enables homeowners to control some of the central functions of their home from a smart device app;
it has basically converted smart phones into compact, universal remote
controls which can do everything from adjusting lighting and heating to
setting up locks and receiving surveillance video feeds. You recall
reading about the “telescreens” in George Orwell’s 1984? Here we are,
twenty years behind schedule.
The recent NSA scandal, and all of the shocking information that has come to surface because of Edward Snowden
has done little to provide comfort. What are the potential implications
of the government working so closely with tech giants in the private
sector? We can at least be thankful that Orwell, and many of the other
classic science-fiction writers who made predictions about how
technological advances could seriously harm us, didn’t have to live in
the world where many are left to ponder things like, “Did they get it
right? Is the dystopian nightmare breathed to life?”
Home automation does have its
supporters, however. Some claim that it could help reduce energy
consumption if homeowners have constant and precise control over what
appliances are running in their house. Critics contend that home automation leaves homeowners much more vulnerable to home invasions.
For instance, if you are capable of locking and unlocking doors, and
turning on and off lights and security equipment with the phone itself,
consider for a moment what you’re leaving yourself vulnerable to. All a
burglar needs to do is gain access to your IP, and then they can control
everything just as easily.
There is greater emphasis
being placed on instant gratification and convenience with every passing
year. The key today is remaining attentive as a consumer. Remember: if
it sounds too good to be true, there’s a good chance that it is, and
convenience should not come at the expense of basic security.
No comments:
Post a Comment