Look behind the Iran warships headed to U.S. borders
9 February 2014: It’s easy to
downplay or even dismiss the threat by Iranian warships said to be on
their way to sail close to U.S. maritime borders if one merely looks at
this move as taking place in a geopolitical vacuum. The problem is that
we are not residing in such a vacuum, and the majority of Americans are
not understanding the significance of events that have been taking place
since the planning phases of the “Arab Spring.” The American public is
not getting the truth from the White House or the Western media that
appears to be covering for, if not facilitating the Obama agenda.
How is this relevant to Iranian warships
reportedly planning to prod the U.S. maritime borders? To understand
why this is happening, we’ve got to understand the bigger picture.
The Obama agenda, as it is for now and
as it has been since day one is the Saudi agenda. That agenda calls for
the toppling of various governments and the installation of an Islamic
Caliphate under the control of the Muslim Brotherhood.
As an aside, I might ask whether the
selection of Barack Hussein Obama is starting to make more sense now,
and whether the mystery funding by foreign (Saudi) interests to his
campaign also is beginning to make sense. Might this not place the
Muslim Brotherhood infiltration of the U.S. government into appropriate
context as well? But I digress.
To understand why Iran seems to be
suddenly stirring things up, you’ve got to understand the “back-story.”
Not the fairy tales manufactured by the Obama regime or it’s media
sycophants, but the real, difficult to accept accounting of our
involvement in the Middle East. If you’ve read my numerous reports about
Benghazi, you’ll already understand that our continued push to rid
Syria of Assad would be answered through asymmetrical means.
Through this movement of Iranian war
ships, we are witnessing the movement of chess pieces in this game of
global, 3-D chess. We must keep in mind that this game has different
boards, layers and pieces. The Iranian ships are but one piece on one
board. There are many others, each inter-related.
Simply put, Iran is a proxy nation of
Russia, much like North Korea is a proxy nation of China. Both Russia
and China have military and economic interests in Syria, which is the
back door to Iran. Under Obama, the puppet attached to Saudi strings,
this agenda played a central role in unceremoniously dispatching Gaddafi
to his final reward under the pretext of freeing an oppressed Libyan
people. You might recall the glee expressed by former Secretary of State
Hillary Rodham Clinton when given the news that Gaddafi was finally out
of the way.
At the same time, the U.S. NATO, the
U.S., and several other allies, including Saudi Arabia, were already
engaged in a proxy war with Russia and Iran in Syria. Key to toppling
Assad was, and still is, supplying arms and trained fighters to assist
the “anti-Assad rebels.” This was the purpose of the CIA compound in
Benghazi. As I pointed out along with Michael Reagan in his article Building on a kernel of truth,
northern Africa, and specifically Libya served as a virtual Ho Chi Minh
trail of Muslim Brotherhood supply lines arming the rebels.
Before the operation could wind down in
Benghazi, the logistics hub for the planning and staging these arming
operations, the CIA compound was the site of a coordinated, pre-planned
attack by groups affiliated with Iran and by proxy, Russia. Syria held
and continues to hold military and economic importance to Russia, and
Putin made it clear that meddling in Syria could start World War III.
That’s what we were doing then, and that’s what we are still doing now.
After exposing to the world (except for
the media lapdogs who continued to provide cover for Obama and his
handlers) what the U.S., the British, French, the Saudis and others were
up to in Libya, plans had to be altered. The Kerry State Department,
under orders from Obama, gave the green light to the Islamic State of
Iraq and Syria (ISIS) to open a new front to arm the anti-Assad rebels
in Syria through the western portion of Iraq—the al Anbar Province. You
might recall that Kerry announced that the U.S. would not provide any
military assistance in Iraq to stop ISIS and their affiliates. As such,
the objective to topple Assad continues, just not in the manner
initially desired.
As I reported in my previous columns and
on my radio show, Putin is not about to allow our covert assistance to
oust Assad and destabilize Syria to go unanswered. While he might feel
temporarily restrained by the potential influence of Saudi controlled
terrorism at games at Sochi, we can expect him to come out swinging
after the Olympic games at Sochi conclude.
While the Iranian warships are certainly
no match for our navy, it is important to understand that we are seeing
a geopolitical game of 3-D chess play our before us. Like chess, moves
are calculated far in advance and often, moves are made for purposes
other than direct confrontation. Sometimes, moves are made to spread out
the other player’s pieces. Make no mistake, the Iranian ships are
pieces on this board and under Putin’s control.
Related: Benghazi – Compendium of reports
No comments:
Post a Comment