EXO-VATICANA
(Pt 18)
Petrus Romanus, PROJECT LUCIFER, and the Vatican's astonishing exo-theological plan for the arrival of an alien savior.
You only think you know what's coming...
Posted: March 5, 2013
8:00 am Eastern
A
few years ago one could have thought with some certainty that Cardinal
"Peter the Roman" Bertone would be a shoo-in for Petrus Romanus.
However, as we move into 2013, cracks have appeared in the foundation of
his sand castle, and not everybody in the Curia—including former Pope Benedict XVI, himself—may be as eager to support him as they once were.
Further
speculation about the
Masonic plot
originally spelled out
in the Alta Vendita
does seem related to
what went on in the
1958 and 1963
conclaves because it
was under these secret
meetings when the
popes were
“elected” that
would implement the
Second Vatican Council
and its Vendita-like
heretical decrees. Of
course we could cite
once again a plethora
of Church Fathers,
Marian apparitions,
and Catholic seers
down through time that
had forecast these
events as a pre-game
for the arrival of
Petrus Romanus. Even
Saint Francis of
Assisi—one of the
most venerated
religious figures in
history—gathered his
devotees shortly
before his death and
prophesied that: “At
the time of this
tribulation a man, not
canonically elected,
will be raised to the
Pontificate, who, by
his cunning, will
endeavor to draw many
into error and
death… Some
preachers will keep
silence about the
truth, and others will
trample it under foot
and deny it…for in
those days Jesus
Christ will send them
not a true Pastor, but
a destroyer.”[xi]
As we were writing our
book, the Vatican
entered the Golden
Anniversary of Vatican
II, a perfect time,
Illuminati would say,
to install Petrus
Romanus and to exact
their revenge. But we
are left, at least for
the moment, with a
quandary as to which
of the candidates we
have discussed in this
chapter (or perhaps an
as yet unidentified
contender) will
fulfill the dark
augury of the Prophecy
of the Popes amidst a
showdown that is set
to occur among the
College of Cardinals
inside the Sistine
Chapel in the Palace
of the Vatican during
the next few weeks.
The unpleasant reality
is that a conflict
over who will become
Petrus Romanus is
boiling beneath the
surface, largely
unknown to the public
but nevertheless
foresaw by Catholic
mystics such as Father
Herman Bernard Kramer
in his work, “The
Book of Destiny.”
Note his frightening
and strange
interpretation of the
twelfth chapter of the
Book of Revelation
concerning “the
great wonder”
mentioned in verse
one. Father Kramer
prophesied:
Contemporaneous to the
arrival of the False
Prophet (Petrus
Romanus?) is a
prophecy from what is
widely considered the
most important work of
Jewish Kabbalah, the Zohar, a collection of books written in medieval Aramaic over seven
hundred years ago
containing mystical
commentary on the
Pentateuch (five books
of Moses, the Torah).
In addition to
interpreting
Scripture, the
“Vaera” section
(volume 3, section 34)
includes “The signs
heralding Mashiach,”
or “The coming of
the Messiah.” The
fascinating date for
“his” appearance
is set in the Zohar in
2012-2013! Given
the rejection of Jesus
by orthodox Jews as
Messiah, Christians
understand this
“coming” would
herald the unveiling
of Antichrist.
Petrus Romanus, PROJECT LUCIFER, and the Vatican's astonishing exo-theological plan for the arrival of an alien savior.
You only think you know what's coming...
Posted: March 5, 2013
8:00 am Eastern
|
PART
18: GOD OF
LIGHTNING
|
Confirms HIS ArrivalBy Tom Horn & Cris Putnam |
A
few years ago one could have thought with some certainty that Cardinal
"Peter the Roman" Bertone would be a shoo-in for Petrus Romanus.
However, as we move into 2013, cracks have appeared in the foundation of
his sand castle, and not everybody in the Curia—including former Pope Benedict XVI, himself—may be as eager to support him as they once were.
As Pope Benedict stepped down like these authors predicted he would,
claims of mismanagement by Bertone have surfaced in Rome, leaked from
competing factions in the Church that are more than happy to seize
opportunity to cast aspersion on his leadership in order to elevate
their own standing among the College of Cardinals. This may include Archbishop Vigano, whose personal letters to Pope Benedict and Cardinal Bertone
concerning his reassignment as Nuncio were partially broadcast by an
Italian television news program in January 2012. The letters, confirmed
by the Vatican as authentic, exposed a blistering relationship between
himself and Bertone involving political jockeying and financial deal
making including charges of “corruption, nepotism and cronyism linked to
the awarding of contracts to contractors at inflated prices.”[i]
Most Vatican sources
agree that an internal
campaign involving
Machiavellian
manipulation and
maneuverings—what
Phillip Pullella
for Reuters called
“a sort of ‘mutiny
of the
monsignors’”[iii]—has
been playing out
behind the scenes
against Bertone. The
same sources say
“the rebels have the
tacit backing of a
former secretary of
state, Cardinal Angelo
Sodano, an influential
power-broker in his
own right and a
veteran diplomat who
served under the late
Pope John Paul II for
15 years.”[iv]
If Sodano truly is
behind a campaign to
undermine papal
possibilities for
Bertone, suspicions
deepen that something
may be lingering
between Fátima
cover-up conspirators
Ratzinger, Bertone,
and Sodano, as the
reader might recall
Antonio Socci’s
belief that when John
Paul II decided to
release the Third
Secret of Fátima, a
power-struggle of
sorts erupted in the
Vatican when future
Pope Benedict XVI
(Cardinal Ratzinger)
wanted to release the
Secret in its
entirety, but Cardinal
Sodano, then Vatican
Secretary of State,
opposed the idea.
Whatever the case may
be, the January 26,
2012 headline at The
New York Times
said it all:
“Transfer of Vatican
Official Who Exposed
Corruption Hints at
Power Struggle,”[v]
and
echoed the fact that, just like in American presidential politics,
today’s rising star at the Vatican can all-to-soon become crushed under
the juggernaut of ambitious and motivated men if one does not vigilantly
maintain every bit as much cunning as their challengers. Other dubious
movements in Rome also verified a game was afoot. This includes a hasty
appointment on January 11, 2012, by Pope Benedict XVI of another
Italian, Archbishop Lorenzo Baldisseri, as the new secretary of the
Congregation for Bishops (the branch of the Roman Curia that oversees
the selection of new bishops). Baldisseri is intriguing because his
Principal Consecrator during his 1963 ordination was Bertone predecessor
and Fátima deception accomplice, Cardinal Angelo Sodano. And
Baldisseri’s ordination to priesthood occurred June 29, 1963, eight (8)
days after Giovanni Montini (Pope Paul VI) was elected. This is
interesting on two levels. First, the number eight (8) is associated
with destiny, divinity, occult fertility rites, resurrection, and the
incarnation of Jesus (888), as any Bishop of Rome knows. But more
importantly, the exact date of Baldisseri’s ordination—June 29, 1963—is
the very day on which Malachi Martin swore the
“enthronement of the
fallen Archangel
Lucifer” took place
in the Roman Catholic
Citadel. This rituale,
as Martin had called
it, had two primary
objectives: 1) to
enthrone Lucifer as
the true Prince over
Rome; and 2)
to assure the
sorcerous inception
and embodiment in
flesh of that
immaterial spirit into
a priest was made,
one who would later
become Petrus Romanus.
In
his book, Windswept
House, Martin
wrote:
The
Enthronement of the
Fallen Archangel
Lucifer was effected
within the Roman
Catholic Citadel on
June 29, 1963; a
fitting date for the
historic promise about
to be fulfilled. As
the principal agents
of this Ceremonial
well knew, Satanist
tradition had long
predicted that the
Time of the Prince
would be ushered in at
the moment when a Pope
would take the name of
the Apostle Paul [Pope
Paul VI]. That
requirement—the
signal that the
Availing Time had
begun—had been
accomplished just
eight days before with
the election of the
latest Peter-in-the-Line.[vi]
The
big problem with Baldisseri is that he does not yet appear papabile, so
his role may be coincidental or that of a carrier collaborator, for the
mystery of the 1963 conclave,
which began June 19 and ended June 21 with the election of Pope Paul
VI, carries a secret most in the public are completely unaware of but
that Malachi Martin most courageously took on. It is called in
investigative circles, “The Siri Thesis,” and involves whispered
evidence that Cardinal Giuseppe Siri of Genoa actually received the
majority vote in both the 1958 and 1963 conclaves but under mysterious
pressure 
(presumably
from Masonic
influences) refused
the papal office. When
asked twenty years
later if in both
conclaves he had
initially been elected
as pontiff, Siri
responded, “I am
bound by the secret.
This secret is
horrible. I would have
books to write about
the different
conclaves. Very
serious things have
taken place. But I can
say nothing.”[vii]
Malachi Martin
wasn’t so silent. He
claimed to be an
eye-witness of the
1963 Conclave and in
his book, The
Keys of This Blood,
said that Siri was in
fact elected pope in
both 1958 and 1963,
but that his election
was “set aside”
because of
“interference” by
an “emissary of an
internationally based
organization” (the
Freemasons).[viii]
Given that our
bestselling book, Petrus
Romanus: The Final
Pope is Here, is based in part on the prophecy attributed to St. Malachy called “The Prophecy of the Popes,”
we would be remiss not to also point out how, in 1958, the
inevitability of Siri’s election was believed so strongly that in Italy,
“the prophesy of Saint Malachy, describing Pius’ successor as ‘Shepherd
and Sailor’ [#107 in the Prophecy of the Popes] (Pastor et Nauta), was
commonly attributed to the illustrious Archbishop of Genoa [Siri]. The
maritime city had been his life-long home, where he was born the son of a
dockworker. It was the most important seaport in the country, and
birthplace of Christopher Columbus. A Genoan newspaper would write: ‘No
one better than Siri could symbolize this motto: he is a pastor of
highest virtues, a captain of the ship, born and raised on the sea.’”[ix]
(presumably
from Masonic
influences) refused
the papal office. When
asked twenty years
later if in both
conclaves he had
initially been elected
as pontiff, Siri
responded, “I am
bound by the secret.
This secret is
horrible. I would have
books to write about
the different
conclaves. Very
serious things have
taken place. But I can
say nothing.”[vii]
Malachi Martin
wasn’t so silent. He
claimed to be an
eye-witness of the
1963 Conclave and in
his book, The
Keys of This Blood,
said that Siri was in
fact elected pope in
both 1958 and 1963,
but that his election
was “set aside”
because of
“interference” by
an “emissary of an
internationally based
organization” (the
Freemasons).[viii]
Given that our
bestselling book, Petrus
Romanus: The Final
Pope is Here, is based in part on the prophecy attributed to St. Malachy called “The Prophecy of the Popes,”
we would be remiss not to also point out how, in 1958, the
inevitability of Siri’s election was believed so strongly that in Italy,
“the prophesy of Saint Malachy, describing Pius’ successor as ‘Shepherd
and Sailor’ [#107 in the Prophecy of the Popes] (Pastor et Nauta), was
commonly attributed to the illustrious Archbishop of Genoa [Siri]. The
maritime city had been his life-long home, where he was born the son of a
dockworker. It was the most important seaport in the country, and
birthplace of Christopher Columbus. A Genoan newspaper would write: ‘No
one better than Siri could symbolize this motto: he is a pastor of
highest virtues, a captain of the ship, born and raised on the sea.’”[ix]
So
how and for what
purpose could the
election of Siri have
been set aside and
covered up so
completely? William G.
von Peters, Ph.D.,
explains in The Siri Thesis:
Most
Catholics today,
simply cannot
comprehend why or how
such a crime could
have been so
successfully carried
out almost undetected
by the outside world,
with the active
participation of high
princes of the Church,
over the span of a
generation, as alleged
by the “Siri
thesis”. Surely such
a long, drawn-out
conspiracy would be
beyond the ability of
even the most evil of
men. But 130 years
ago, Pope Pius IX
explained that: “If
one takes into
consideration the
immense development
which [the]…secret
societies have
attained; the length
of time they are
persevering in their
vigor; their furious
aggressiveness; the
tenacity with which
their members cling to
the association and to
the false principles
it professes; the
persevering mutual
cooperation of so many
different types of men
in the promotion of
evil; one can hardly
deny that the SUPREME
ARCHITECT [the god of
Freemasonry] of these
associations (seeing
that the cause must be
proportional to the
effect) can be none
other than he who in
the sacred writings is
styled the PRINCE OF
THE WORLD; and that
Satan himself even by
his physical
cooperation, directs
and inspires at least
the leaders of these
bodies physically
cooperating with
them.”[x]
Further
speculation about the
Masonic plot
originally spelled out
in the Alta Vendita
does seem related to
what went on in the
1958 and 1963
conclaves because it
was under these secret
meetings when the
popes were
“elected” that
would implement the
Second Vatican Council
and its Vendita-like
heretical decrees. Of
course we could cite
once again a plethora
of Church Fathers,
Marian apparitions,
and Catholic seers
down through time that
had forecast these
events as a pre-game
for the arrival of
Petrus Romanus. Even
Saint Francis of
Assisi—one of the
most venerated
religious figures in
history—gathered his
devotees shortly
before his death and
prophesied that: “At
the time of this
tribulation a man, not
canonically elected,
will be raised to the
Pontificate, who, by
his cunning, will
endeavor to draw many
into error and
death… Some
preachers will keep
silence about the
truth, and others will
trample it under foot
and deny it…for in
those days Jesus
Christ will send them
not a true Pastor, but
a destroyer.”[xi]
As we were writing our
book, the Vatican
entered the Golden
Anniversary of Vatican
II, a perfect time,
Illuminati would say,
to install Petrus
Romanus and to exact
their revenge. But we
are left, at least for
the moment, with a
quandary as to which
of the candidates we
have discussed in this
chapter (or perhaps an
as yet unidentified
contender) will
fulfill the dark
augury of the Prophecy
of the Popes amidst a
showdown that is set
to occur among the
College of Cardinals
inside the Sistine
Chapel in the Palace
of the Vatican during
the next few weeks.
The unpleasant reality
is that a conflict
over who will become
Petrus Romanus is
boiling beneath the
surface, largely
unknown to the public
but nevertheless
foresaw by Catholic
mystics such as Father
Herman Bernard Kramer
in his work, “The
Book of Destiny.”
Note his frightening
and strange
interpretation of the
twelfth chapter of the
Book of Revelation
concerning “the
great wonder”
mentioned in verse
one. Father Kramer
prophesied:
The
“sign” in heaven
is that of a woman
with child crying out
in her travail and
anguish of delivery.
In that travail, she
gives birth to some
definite “person”
who is to RULE the
Church with a rod of
iron (verse 5). It
then points to a
conflict waged within
the Church to elect
one who was to “rule
all nations” in the
manner clearly stated.
In accord with the
text this is
unmistakably a PAPAL
ELECTION, for only
Christ and his Vicar
have the divine right
to rule ALL NATIONS…
But at this time the
great powers may take
a menacing attitude to
hinder the election of
the logical and
expected candidate by
threats of a general
apostasy,
assassination or
imprisonment of this
candidate if
elected.”[xii]
While
we disagree with
Kramer’s
interpretation of the
book of Revelation,
the idea that a
specific “person”
was born and is now of
the appropriate age to
fulfill the
incarnation of St.
Malachy’s Prophecy
of the Popes and to
produce the Man of
Sin, is without
question. Kramer’s
fear that “great
powers may take a
menacing attitude to
hinder the election of
the logical and
expected candidate”
also reverberates the
sentiment of other
priests, past and
present, including
Cardinal Archbishop
Paolo Romeo, the
leader of Sicily’s
Catholics, who made
headlines February 10,
2012 when the Italian
newspaper Il Fatto
Quotidiano (which is
famous for breaking
exclusives) published 
parts
of a secret communique involving the Cardinal and a criminal conspiracy to
assassinate Pope
Benedict XVI before
the end of 2012.[xiii]
Evidently
at the center of the Mordkomplott
(or contract to kill
the pope) was
political machinations
in Rome involving
Vatican Secretary of
State Cardinal
Tarcisio Bertone,
whose growing thirst
for power Benedict had
come to hate according
to the leaked
document, and another
Italian now favored as
successor by Benedict,
Cardinal Angelo Scola,
currently the
Archbishop of Milan.
The contract against
the pope and the
prediction by Cardinal
Paola that was
allegedly made in
secret to his Italian
and Chinese business
partners in Beijing
concerning Benedict
not living past the
end of 2012 was
apparently believed
serious enough that
somebody among
Paola’s listeners
“suspected that he
himself was involved
in a specific plot to
assassinate Pope
Benedict XVI. At least
one of those present
therefore reported the
Cardinal’s words to
Rome, and a special
report on the
incident—complied by
Cardinal Darío
Castrillón Hoyos and
written in German in
an attempt to stop it
from being
leaked—was presented
to the Pope on 30
December last year.”
[xiv]
Was Benedict's
decision to step down
(which he did secretly
and officially in 2012
right when we said he
would but waited until
2013 to make public)
made as a result of
pressure from those
who had threatened his
life?
parts
of a secret communique involving the Cardinal and a criminal conspiracy to
assassinate Pope
Benedict XVI before
the end of 2012.[xiii]
Evidently
at the center of the Mordkomplott
(or contract to kill
the pope) was
political machinations
in Rome involving
Vatican Secretary of
State Cardinal
Tarcisio Bertone,
whose growing thirst
for power Benedict had
come to hate according
to the leaked
document, and another
Italian now favored as
successor by Benedict,
Cardinal Angelo Scola,
currently the
Archbishop of Milan.
The contract against
the pope and the
prediction by Cardinal
Paola that was
allegedly made in
secret to his Italian
and Chinese business
partners in Beijing
concerning Benedict
not living past the
end of 2012 was
apparently believed
serious enough that
somebody among
Paola’s listeners
“suspected that he
himself was involved
in a specific plot to
assassinate Pope
Benedict XVI. At least
one of those present
therefore reported the
Cardinal’s words to
Rome, and a special
report on the
incident—complied by
Cardinal Darío
Castrillón Hoyos and
written in German in
an attempt to stop it
from being
leaked—was presented
to the Pope on 30
December last year.”
[xiv]
Was Benedict's
decision to step down
(which he did secretly
and officially in 2012
right when we said he
would but waited until
2013 to make public)
made as a result of
pressure from those
who had threatened his
life?
Whether
or not the threat whispered by Paola was actually formulated, the
report illustrates once again how efforts were being made by at least
some members of the College of Cardinals to align themselves as
candidates for Petrus Romanus. Besides Francis Arinze, Tarcisio Bertone,
Peter Turkson,
and Angelo Scola, last year we rounded out our top ten candidates for
the Final Pope in descending order with Cardinals Gianfranco Ravasi,
Leonardo Sandri, Ennio Antonelli, Jean-Louis Tauran, Christoph
Schönborn, and Marc Quellet.
Time
will tell if any of
these are elected or
if another candidate
will become Petrus
Romanus, but with
these in mind, a
finishing thought each
of these papal
contenders may want to
consider is how many
Catholics believe the
sixteenth-century seer
Nostradamus was
actually the author of
“The Prophecy of the
Popes.” If that is
so, the
popular West African
Cardinal Peter Turkson
being “young” in
terms of electability
at age sixty-three may
have a way of coming
back around. The
“dark horse”
candidate Turkson—and
his ideas for a
one-world financial
and political
authority housed in
the United
Nations—could become
a remarkable and
unexpected fulfillment
of both the Prophecy
of the Popes and
Nostradamus’s
prediction of an
end-times “young
black pope” who
seizes control of the
Roman Hierarchy with
the assistance of
conspirators during
times of darkness and
war. In Quatrain 6.25
Nostradamus wrote:
Through
Mars adverse [a time
of war] will be the
monarchy
Of
the great fisherman
[the pope] in trouble
ruinous
A
young black red [a
young black Cardinal]
will seize the
hierarchy
The
predators acting on a
foggy day
One
final thought for this
entry...
Contemporaneous to the
arrival of the False
Prophet (Petrus
Romanus?) is a
prophecy from what is
widely considered the
most important work of
Jewish Kabbalah, the Zohar, a collection of books written in medieval Aramaic over seven
hundred years ago
containing mystical
commentary on the
Pentateuch (five books
of Moses, the Torah).
In addition to
interpreting
Scripture, the
“Vaera” section
(volume 3, section 34)
includes “The signs
heralding Mashiach,”
or “The coming of
the Messiah.” The
fascinating date for
“his” appearance
is set in the Zohar in
2012-2013! Given
the rejection of Jesus
by orthodox Jews as
Messiah, Christians
understand this
“coming” would
herald the unveiling
of Antichrist.
J.
R. Church of Prophecy
in the News called
our office a couple
years back and led us
through verses
476–483 of this part
of the Zohar
to point out what
nobody in the 2012
research community had
written before—that
the time of Jacob’s
trouble (the Great
Tribulation, which
some Catholic scholars
say begins with the
election of Petrus
Romanus) will commence
according to this
ancient text in the
year 2012-2013 when
the “kings of the
earth” gather in
Rome, possibly during
a papal conclave, and
are killed by fiery
stones or missiles
from the sky.
The
prophecy in the Zohar,
given by Jews hundreds
of years separate from
the divination of
“the last pope,”
is amazing when
compared with the
Catholic prediction.
The final pope,
“Peter the Roman,”
whose reign ends in
the destruction of
Rome, will assume
authority during a
time of great
tribulation, and then
“the
City of Seven Hills
will be destroyed, and
the terrible and
fearsome Judge will
judge his people.”
But Dr. Church pointed
out how in the Jewish
Zohar, this vision of
the destruction of
Rome is repeated,
though one prophecy
connects it to the
coming of the False
Prophet, and the
other, the Antichrist:
This
ancient rabbinical
dissertation claims
that Rome will be
destroyed in the
Jewish calendar year
5773, which, in our
calendar begins with
the new moon of
September 2012 and
concludes a year later
in 2013:
“In
the year seventy-three
[2012/2013] the kings
of the world will
assemble
in the great city of
Rome, and the Holy One
will shower on them
fire and hail and
meteoric stones until
they are all destroyed,
with the exception of
those who will not yet
have arrived there.”
Is
he hinting at the
destruction of Mystery
Babylon? He notes that
not all kings will be
destroyed. Of those
remaining, he says:
“These will commence
anew to make other
wars. From that time
the Messiah will begin
to declare himself,
and round him there
will be gathered many
nations and many hosts
from the uttermost
ends of the earth.”[xv]
Thus
the false messiah
(antichrist) was
predicted in a
seven-hundred-year-old
Jewish prophecy to
appear in 2012-2013.
Similarly, the
nine-hundred-year-old
Prophecy of the Popes
looks to be unfolding
in parallel fashion to
provide Petrus Romanus--the
Final Pope. It won't
be long now before we
know if these Jewish
sages were correct.
Coming
up next:
The God
of Lightning Confirms
HIS Arrival
No comments:
Post a Comment