JFK: The Missing Shell Chicanery of Joseph Ball, Attorney at Law
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/10/11/jfk-the-missing-shell-chicanery-of-joseph-ball-attorney-at-law/
by Larry Rivera (with Jim Fetzer)
“As with Watergate, numerous lawyers were involved
with the Warren Commission; in neither case did these lawyers act as
lawyers. Rather, they participated in a cover-up and acted as
accessories in serious crimes.”–Howard Roffman, Presumed Guilty (1976)
“If it is not an act of God, it is a conspiracy.” Jim Marrs (“The Real Deal”, 5/28/13)
Joseph Ball spanned most of the 20th century as
one of the top lawyers in the country. He cut his teeth in the oil and
gas industry in the 1920′s and was a member of the firm Ball, Hunt and
Hart, from Long Beach and Santa Ana, California.
He also taught criminal law and procedure at the
University of Southern California. At one point in his career he was
offered, but turned down, a seat on the California Supreme Court.
Over the years, some of his clients included
John D. Ehrlichman of Watergate fame, automaker John DeLorean, and Saudi
financier Adnan Khashoggi. He died September 21, 2000.[1]
As Assistant Counsel, Joseph Ball was one of the most
prolific Warren Commission lawyers, leading and taking more than 100
depositions, most of them in Dallas, Texas.[2] For all of his
qualifications, distinctions and immaculate reputation, it seems Mr.
Ball was seduced by the dark side – the cabal that assassinated John F.
Kennedy November 22, 1963. It is time to put Joseph Ball’s Warren
Commission activities in the proper perspective, as they lay bare by the
record.
A Problem with the Evidence
One of the most fascinating aspects of the Warren
Commission’s inquiry was concealing the fact that only two spent and one
unspent shell casings were found at the alleged 6th floor “assassin’s
lair”. They were photographed by the DPD in Dallas and by the FBI.
Here, for example, is an FBI evidence photo showing two spent casings
and one unspent cartridge:
This photo is fascinating not only because it shows two
spent cartridge casings (1) and one unspent cartridge (6) but because it
also includes the paper bag (7) in which Lee Oswald is alleged to have
brought the Mannlicher-Carcano into the TSBD. Anyone with experience
with weapons knows that their parts are hard and unforgiving, where had
this bag actually been used for that purpose, it would have been torn
and oily, not clean and neat as though it had just come from a local
“Five & Dime”.
Insofar as the alleged assassin was supposed to have
fired three shots at his target, the Warren Commission had to figure out
how to obfuscate and work around the evidence that contradicted its
position, where Joseph Ball, Esq., would prove his value as an Assistant
Counsel. Here is the story of how it was done as another crucial
ingredient in the plot to frame an innocent man for the death of the
35th president of the United States.
The “Empty Shell” Game, Part I
Joseph Ball took the testimony of Luke Mooney, the Dallas Police Department Sheriff who first found the shell casings on the sixth floor of the Texas School Book Depository, which supposedly came from Lee Oswald’s Mannlicher-Carcano.[3] In Bloody Treason, Noel Twyman[4] established how Ball orchestrated the scenario where two empty shells and one live round, which had been found by Mooney, and documented by the FBI, was sanitized to officially become three empty shells, presumably left behind by Oswald in the sniper’s nest, and which would later become part of the official record [5].Exhibit (1): From Mooney’s testimony:
Ball converts two casings and a live round into three “empty shells”
Exhibit (2): From Bloody Treason, Noel Twyman:
“The answer was clear (a) the evidence of three empty
cartridge cases was fabricated, and (b) deputy sheriff Luke Mooney was
led into testifying that there were three empty cartridges when there
were in fact only two. I wondered how an honorable man such as Joseph
Ball could have gotten himself involved in such a transparent scheme.” [6]
Exhibit (3): Two spent, one unspent shell from CE 2003:
Exhibit (4): The live round does not come from an M-C:
Exhibit (5): Dougherty’s story comports with two spent shells:
From HAVE WE IGNORED THE KEY WITNESS TO THE DEPOSITORY SHOT OR SHOTS?
By Frank A. Cellura (2000)
Exhibit (6): Focusing on Exhibit 10-14 rather than 10-15:
“One more important note in Joseph Ball’s questioning of deputy sheriff Mooney, he focused on Exhibit 10-14 (CE-510). Why did he choose Exhibit 10-14 instead of Exhibit 10-15 (CE-512), both of which are in the commission Report? The answer could be that Joseph Ball knew that Exhibit 10-14 was authentic and he could not understand Exhibit 10-15, so he avoided attracting attention to it.”[7]
Joseph Ball’s manipulation of Mooney’s testimony was
only the beginning of his involvement with the empty shell game. As we
move on, the stakes will move higher, and the shell game will rear its
ugly head later, when we cover African American witnesses Harold Norman,
Junior Jarman and Bonnie Ray Williams.
The “Empty Shell” Game, Part II
The presence of African American witnesses Bonnie Ray
Williams, Harold Norman and James Jarman, who were photographed at the
fifth floor windows by Tom Dillard right after the shots, has been
examined at length 
by researchers and investigators.[8]They
were brought to Washington on March 24, 1964, and were interviewed by
Joseph Ball in the presence of John McCloy, Allen Dulles, Gerald Ford,
and Earl Warren himself.[9] This should give the reader an
idea of the importance of the testimony of these three gentlemen – and
the degree of intimidation they must have been subjected to. Roy Truly
accompanied the three to Washington for his first deposition as well.[10]
All three of them had been thoroughly prepared and coached four days
earlier (Friday, 3/20/64) in Dallas, when they did photo shoots,
rehearsals, and re-creations with Joseph Ball on the 5th floor of the TSBD for the Commission.[11]
by researchers and investigators.[8]They
were brought to Washington on March 24, 1964, and were interviewed by
Joseph Ball in the presence of John McCloy, Allen Dulles, Gerald Ford,
and Earl Warren himself.[9] This should give the reader an
idea of the importance of the testimony of these three gentlemen – and
the degree of intimidation they must have been subjected to. Roy Truly
accompanied the three to Washington for his first deposition as well.[10]
All three of them had been thoroughly prepared and coached four days
earlier (Friday, 3/20/64) in Dallas, when they did photo shoots,
rehearsals, and re-creations with Joseph Ball on the 5th floor of the TSBD for the Commission.[11]
Of
the three, Norman was the only one who said he heard the sound of a
rifle bolt being operated in between shots, and the shells falling,
after being ejected, onto the wooden floor right above the three men.Alas, by December 4th, he was brought in to swear an affidavit where he now stated he heard the above mentioned sounds.[12]This document was used later on to buttress his Secret Service Interview of 12/7/63.
Patricia Lambert wrote about Secret Service Report (SS491) in The Continuing Inquiry 10/22/77 Vol 2, No 3 :[13]
Norman’s allegation that he heard the shells hit the
floor and the bolt action of the rifle surfaced in toto in SS491.
Twelve days after the assassination and eight days after his interview
by the FBI, Norman’s startling disclosure made its belated appearance.
Norman’s sworn affidavit to the Secret Service states:
“I knew that the shots had come from directly above me, and I could hear the expended cartridges fall to the floor. I could also hear the bolt action of the rifle. I also saw some dust fall from the ceiling of the fifth floor and I felt sure that whoever had fired the shots was directly above me.[7]“Missing entirely from this new version is the description of Norman putting his head out the window and looking up toward the roof, a gesture which was witnessed by at least four people. Norman permanently eliminated this event from this testimony at this point. Also, the particles of dirt, which he told the FBI fell outside the building and prevented him from seeing anything when he looked up, are changed in this version to “some dust.” This dust fell “from the ceiling” inside the building and the intended implication appears to be that it was dislodged by the shells hitting the floor of the sniper’s nest.
“This then is Norman’s new story. Not only are the
sounds of the gunman added for the first time, but one part of his
earlier statement to the FBI is excised and another part altered to
accommodate the new information. This new story transformed Norman from
an inconsequential witness to one of major importance who provided
firsthand evidence linking the shots that were fired at 12:30 to the
hulls that were found on the sixth floor 40 minutes later. This
important information became the focus of his interview three months
later before the Warren Commission.”
Jarman and Williams both “corroborated” that Norman said he heard these sounds but they did not hear anything themselves.[14]Once
again, an accomplished professor of law and veteran attorney such as
Joseph Ball, surely would have known both Jarman’s and William’s
statements about Norman telling them about shells hitting the wooden
floor above them would have been pure hearsay, and would have been
objected by any competent opposing counsel. So why did he pursue this
line of questioning and allow it to stand for the record?
Ball shamelessly leads Williams’ hearsay and in the
process allows Williams to declare Oswald the shooter! Law students
should use this as an example of what NOT to do when taking depositions
and testimonies, unless of course, you have an ulterior motive.
The onus of proof here obviously lies with Harold
Norman. How could he specifically hear the shell casings hitting the
floor, but he nor the others not hear the footsteps of a person running
on the wooden floor right above him,[15]and which had empty
spaces where flooring was in the process of being laid? Ball tried to
sucker him into this and Norman refused to go along:[16]
As pointed out above, the Warren Commission conducted a
re-creation, placing Norman on the fifth floor and working a rifle bolt
right above him and letting empty shells hit the floor. Obviously, the
Warren Commissioners were not convinced with Harold Norman’s testimony,
and they later made three different trips to Dallas to re-enact the shell game and find out for themselves if it was possible.[17]
This illustrates how desperate they were to establish three shots,
three shell casings and one patsy in a sling. Regrettably, and with
Joseph Ball leading the way, three blue collar African Americans got
caught in this intricate web of deception, having to go along with a
very vital part of the Warren Commission’s railroad of Lee Oswald.
We close the shell game with this from Shirley Martin: [18]
The Missing Shell Chicanery
The commission confronted a problem. According to the account they were advancing, a lone gunman fired three shots from the 6th floor of the Texas School Book Depository, scoring two hits and one miss. The first hit allegedly entered the base of the back of JFK’s neck, passed through without encountering any bony structures and exited his throat, then entered the back of Gov. John Connally, shattering a rib, exiting his chest and hitting his right wrist before lodging itself in his right thigh.They hoped that Arlen Specter’s skillful interrogation with hypothetical questions–”If we assume that the bullet entered here (at the back of the neck) and passed through without hitting any bony structures, would it be consistent with those assumptions to describe the wound here (at the front of his neck) as a wound of exit?”–without noticing the trajectory is not even anatomically possible.[19]
But only two spent shell casings and one unspent cartridge had been found at the alleged scene of the crime. If there were not three spent shell casings, then their case fell apart. They counted on Joseph Ball to perpetrate the charade, first by a series of interrogatories with Deputy Sheriff Luke Mooney, which he performed by citing the shells as “A”, “B”, and “C”, where “A” and “B” were spent and “C” was unspent. But by omitting that crucial point, he concluded by referring to “the empty shells ‘A’, ‘B’, and ‘C’”, instead of referring to “the empty shells ‘A’ and ‘B’ and the unspent shell ‘C’”.
Given that verbal sleight-of-hand, which obfuscated the facts that two spent and one unspent shells had been recorded in evidence photographs, including one by the FBI, and that the one unspent shell was not even a Mannlicher-Carnao bullet, it was not that difficult to arrange confirming evidence from three young black men, whose own testimony was sufficiently malleable or subject to manipulation to make the case the commission wanted to make–regardless of the quantity and quality of the evidence that contradicted it.
Larry Rivera, the son of a career military man who served as CID officer in the Army and a Certified Network Engineer, has made a lifelong study of the JFK assassination. He has given interviews on the assassination to Spanish media and has the most complete dossier on Billy Nolan Lovelady ever done.
References:
1. http://www.innsofcourt.org/Content/InnContent.aspx?Id=31142. JFK Assassination Debate, Mark Lane vs Joseph Ball (12/04/64) 2:04 YouTube. He also wrote Chapter 4 of The Warren Report which happens to be the most important chapter that railroads Lee Oswald.
3. WC3H281
4. Bloody Treason, Noel Twyman pgs 91-97
5. CE 510 & CE 512
6. OpCit pg 94
7. Ibid pg 97
8. The Continuing Inquiry Vol. V #7 2/21/81 pg 3
9. WC3H140
10. HSCA Norman interview by Day also WC3H140
11. CE482, CE490
12. CE493
13. SS491 (CD87 pages 775-797)
14. WC3H161 and WCH198 (Jarman and Williams)
15. The Continuing Inquiry, Vol. 7 (2/21/81), p. 3
16. WC3H191 How could Norman have heard spent shells and rifle bolt action over the report and reverberation of the shots themselves?
17. Warren Commission Report (1964), p. 71
18. Martin letter 1/25/67 (Item 03) From “The Weisberg Collection, Hood College, Frederick, MD,USA”
19. James Fetzer, “Reasoning about Assassinations” (2005-06)
No comments:
Post a Comment