A Century of Lies: The Rationales for Engaging in Foreign Wars, A Century-old White House Tradition

Indeed, being forthrightly dishonest to the American people concerning the rationales for engaging in foreign wars has become a century-old White House tradition.
The historical record of past presidents’ prewar and wartime hucksterism is unambiguous, greatly contributing to the immense bloodshed and destruction that continues under the country’s reckless international leadership to this day.
![]()
“It
is a war against all nations. American ships have been sunk, American
lives taken, in ways which it has stirred us very deeply to learn of,
but the ships and people of other neutral and friendly nations have been
sunk and overwhelmed in the waters in the same way. There has been no
discrimination. The challenge is to all mankind. Each nation must decide
for itself how it will meet it. The choice we make for ourselves must
be made with a moderation of counsel and a temperateness of judgment
befitting our character and our motives as a nation. We must put excited
feeling away. Our motive will not be revenge or the victorious
assertion of the physical might of the nation, but only the vindication
of right, of human right, of which we are only a single champion.” April
2, 1917
|
![]()
“Yesterday,
December 7th, 1941 — a date which will live in infamy — the United
States of America was suddenly and deliberately attacked by naval and
air forces of the Empire of Japan. The United States was at peace with
that nation and, at the solicitation of Japan, was still in conversation
with its government and its emperor looking toward the maintenance of
peace in the Pacific.It will be recorded that the distance of Hawaii
from Japan makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned
many days or even weeks ago. During the intervening time, the Japanese
government has deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false
statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.” December 8,
1941
|
![]()
“On
Sunday, June 25th, Communist forces attacked the Republic of Korea.
This attack has made it clear, beyond all doubt, that the international
Communist movement is willing to use armed invasion to conquer
independent nations. An act of aggression such as this creates a very
real danger to the security of all free nations. The attack upon Korea
was an outright breach of the peace and a violation of the Charter of
the United Nations. By their actions in Korea, Communist leaders have
demonstrated their contempt for the basic moral principles on which the
United Nations is founded. This is a direct challenge to the efforts of
the free nations to build the kind of world in which men can live in
freedom and peace. This challenge has been presented squarely. We must
meet it squarely. . . .” July 19, 1950
|
![]() |
![]()
“Tonight,
American and South Vietnamese units will attack the headquarters for
the entire Communist military operation in South Vietnam … This is not
an invasion of Cambodia … We take this action not for the purpose of
expanding the war into Cambodia but for the purpose of ending the war in
Vietnam and winning the just peace we all desire. We have made we will
continue to make every possible effort to end this war through
negotiation at the conference table rather than through more fighting on
the battlefield…. The action that I have announced tonight puts the
leaders of North Vietnam on notice that we will be patient in working
for peace; we will be conciliatory at the conference table, but we will
not be humiliated. We will not be defeated.” April 30, 1970
|
![]()
“In
all, Reagan said ‘I don`t recall’ or ‘I can`t remember’ 88 times in the
eight hours of testimony on Iran-Contra on Feb. 16-17, 1990,” the New York Times observes.
“I remember being told that there were certain levels of government
or agencies and so forth that were not prohibited by the Boland
Amendment, and I remember that. And this was in connection with my
telling us that we must stay within the law and so forth. And I never
challenged or questioned what I was told about that or something else
because, not being a lawyer myself, but being surrounded by a number of
them in government, I figured that I was hearing the truth when they
told me that something could be done and still be exempt from the Boland
Amendment.” February 16-17, 1990 |
![]()
“And
I am very much concerned, not just about the physical dismantling but
of the brutality that has now been written on by Amnesty International
confirming some of the tales told us by the Amir of brutality. It’s just
unbelievable, some of the things at least he reflected. I mean, people
on a dialysis machine cut off, the machine sent to Baghdad; babies in
incubators heaved out of the incubators and the incubators themselves
sent to Baghdad. Now, I don’t know how many of these tales can be
authenticated, but I do know that when the Amir was here he was speaking
from the heart. And after that came Amnesty International, who were
debriefing many of the people at the border. And it’s sickening.”
October 9, 1990
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
No comments:
Post a Comment