Crime of the New Millennium

I pulled the following graphic off the site due to small errors that could be nit picked by shills, and FIXED IT for the printed Fukushima report. NO ONE CAN NIT PICK THIS, and if any reactor engineers see it, they will probably piss their pants. This diagram is the one that lays the truth bare, there is no conceivable way a little loose hydrogen could have done this to reactor 3 and if shown this way, every reactor engineer out there will know beyond all doubt that Fukushima had to have been an act of war. Awareness of what really went on out at Fukushima is the last thing Israel wants, because they want to be able to maintain a nuclear blackmail capability against governments with the people completely oblivious to the fact that their nation is under threat of a nuclear armageddon. Compliance is much easier when your victim population is clueless about what is being done to it and why.

I have no doubt that the huge "banker bailout" was forced on America because of precisely this threat. Japan did not take the threat to heart, got their pseudo 9.0 earthquake and devastating nuclear tsunami and destroyed nuclear facility, and THEN made an equally massive payout to the world bank to "end world poverty" when they were not in debt or defaulting or behind on anything AT ALL. Not a dime will go to anything other than poor elite Rothchild Zioscum who can't afford a 500 foot yacht. AND IF I AM WRONG, EXPLAIN HOW A LITTLE "LOOSE HYDROGEN" DID THIS:

Change the name and mail this around with NO MENTION of this web site. THAT is how we can circumvent the censors. Converting it to a smaller or larger size will also help it get around the censors.http://www.jimstonefreelance.com/index.html

LIARS NAILED. FORENSIC PROOF (THAT WOULD STAND UP IN COURT) THAT THE KEYLOWNA ARTICLE WAS POSTED THE NIGHT BEFORE

Digital camera exif data proves they released the article before they said they did

If the ziopress wishes to lie and "debunk" and modify things after the fact, I SUGGEST THEY STICK TO HIRING PROFESSIONAL LIARS. Make sure they actually work in the media, and are NOT JUST SYSTEMS TECHS DOING A JOB.

Here is how I nailed them in the lie. When I discovered the article was indeed posted early, I bagged about 40 shots of both it and the Google confirmation with a digital camera. The time stamp in the exif data confirms I took the picture before the date on their PDF, which they released later as evidence the article date was simply written wrong. At that time, (though I never posted the shots that had it because they lacked visual appeal, but I posted one now after their new round of lies) I also had the clock on the computer going on the screen. Both of these times, on the camera when I was doing it all and windows time, confirm that I took the pictures before the modified date on the PDF which was released later as a "correction" AND BY DEFAULT THEN, BEFORE THEY NOW ADMIT TO EVEN PUBLISHING THE ARTICLE TO BEGIN WITH. Screen grabs which are easily modified may work for the little stuff, but this was huge so I used a digital camera which produces pictures that are too hard to fake and be kept at full size, as well as embeds exif data to prove authenticity. The full size photos with intact exif are part of this update, which debunks the debunkers. Bottom line? The fact that the shooting was published a day early simply can't be debunked.

It is important to note that their new lie has an article date that is 24 hours after they posted it, and that many many people saw their article in that 24 hour period during which I photographed it because the genie was already out of the bottle. Their cover story is the weakest of paper thin lies.

And they can't back out of the second lie now that I have them cornered a second time, because I too perfectly documented THAT AS WELL.

Here's where it gets cute.

Because their story was that they just got the date wrong, ALL THEY DID WAS CHANGE THE DATE ON THE PDF, NOT THE TIME. SO HERE WE HAVE A PHOTOGRAPH WITH A TIME STAMP IN THE EXIF DATA THAT WAS TAKEN WITHIN A TIME WINDOW THAT PROVES THE ARTICLE WAS RELEASED TOO EARLY, AND THE PDF DID NOT EXIST YET. THE FACT THAT THE TIME ON THE PDF MATCHES THE TIME ON THE ARTICLE AND ONLY HAS THE DATE CHANGED NAILS THE LIE, BECAUSE IT LEFT A 24 HOUR OPPORTUNITY GAP DURING WHICH I NAILED THE SHOT, AN OPPORTUNITY GAP WITNESSED BY MANY THOUSANDS OF OTHER PEOPLE THEMSELVES, NOT JUST THROUGH MY ORIGINAL REPORT. Their current lie has them releasing the story to be read on Tuesday, not Monday. What about all the people who saw it on Monday? Idiots they are. AND NOW THEY ARE SAYING THAT THE SITE WAS SET TO AUTOFEED AP REPORTS. THAT EXPLAINS HOW THEY GOT NAILED THEN, IT DOES NOT EXCUSE THEM. THIS IS AN AP SCREW UP, AP RELEASED IT EARLY FOR A FEW MINUTES AND SITES SET TO AUTOFEED GRABBED IT. AND SINCE IT WAS AN AP AUTOFEED WHICH IS SUPPOSED TO BE UP TO THE MINUTE, WHY ARE THE FOLKS IN KEYLOWNA NOW CLAIMING TO HAVE RELEASED IT ON THE EVENING OF THE 16TH, WHEN THE NEWS WAS OLD IF THEY ARE ALSO CLAIMING IT WAS AUTOFEED? CHECK MATE 1.~
I photographed this before the PDF version of the same article ever existed according to it's own "corrected" date stamp. According to the cover lie, I also photographed the article BEFORE IT WAS EVER POSTED. CHECK MATE 2~~.

I have uploaded the original shot, STRAIGHT OUT OF THE CAMERA. I took 32 shots because the camera was being finicky due to the way an analog monitor refreshes, so I have a whole pile of evidence photos. I am in the Central Standard time zone, in the state of Guanajuato Mexico. This photo then, was taken FOUR HOURS before the PDF ever existed in Vancouver Canada AND ACCORDING TO THEIR NEW LIE, BEFORE THEY EVER POSTED THEIR ARTICLE.

Download THIS PHOTO and right click it. You will get the option to view the exif data under the files property tab, or line, or whatever for whatever operating system you have. All file systems will allow you to view the exif date of a photograph.

And if that won't do it for you, I also have here another photo where I opened windows time and date to provide double confirmation with Google's time stamps. I did not use this photo in the original report, because it could not be embedded with visual appeal.

Google time stamp "GMT TIME" lie which was used to "debunk" my report easily disproven

Too easy. You see, NONE OF THE OTHER VANCOUVER PAPERS GOT THE TIME STAMP ON GOOGLE A DAY EARLY. WHY WAS KEYLOWNA THE ONLY ONE? CHECK MATE 3. on top of that, IT WAS INDEXED WAY TOO EARLY, FAR TOO EARLY FOR ANY GMT ERROR TO CAUSE SUCH AN ANOMALY. 14 hours after the "shooting", Google was saying the article was two days old. If it was a GMT error, and one did indeed exist, Google would have said it happened 1 day ago on the day of the shooting, not 2. And when google puts it's time stamp, the current day is listed in hours - 4 hours a go, 12 hours ago, and only after it rolls past a certain number of hours does it say 1 day ago. So the GMT time error would only make it 1 day, NOT TWO. CHECK MATE FOUR. NAILED YOU A FOURTH TIME, WHICH IN JUDAISM IS THE FINAL CHANCE not that it was necessary because the exif data in the photos PROVE THE DATE ANYWAY. The Google time stamp error in fact has Keylowna posting the article on the 14th, a double disaster for the debunking shills. I now place a lot less credibility in alternative media sites that are "debunking" this, sure, anyone can "debunk" but a debunk has to be done correctly to hold water, YOU CANNOT BATTLE WHAT IS HERE, I ABSOLUTELY NAILED IT. This time I got lucky simply because of the procedures I used to document this. Learned a lesson - it won't be luck next time.

The linked photograph which is straight out of the camera has exif data that proves it was never modified. This photo was not ever opened in photoshop or any other editor. That is why it is forensic proof that would hold up in court. You can prove it is the original shot and was never tampered with.

My original reason for using a camera rather than doing screen captures was because pictures from a camera are not easy to modify undetectably (and I'd say impossible when it's a computer screen) because of issues such as lens vignetting, compression artifacts, color variances and other factors that make a picture from a camera totally unpredictable. Had I done screen captures, the photos would have gone to absolute bits that are easy to fake later. So a picture of a monitor is far better proof than a screen capture, and this particular story which absolutely FRIED THEIR ASSES had to be done the best possible way.

They won't go down easy

Their lie machine has been perfectly and irrevocably exposed by this. They HAVE TO have a solid smash down on this topic or they will die. SO NOW IS THE TIME TO FIND OUT WHICH ALTERNATIVE NEWS SITES ARE REALLY LIMITED HANG OUTS PROTECTING ZIONIST INTERESTS. No one who can think can look at this and not see it for what it is, only alternative parrot sites will make this error honestly and they are not usually worth much anyway. DO NOT EXPECT THEM TO GO DOWN EASY, the wolves HAVE TO come out of the closet for this one. I am not even going to discuss how there are so many photographic inconsistencies with this story, as well as article re-writes re-describing the scenario many different ways, because it is ALL A BAG OF LIES, THIS SHOOTING DID NOT HAPPEN AND WAS POSTED A DAY EARLY SO WHY DISCUSS IT AT ALL? I won't feed the trolls. BUT I WILL AT LEAST POST THIS. If they just witnessed a horrible shooting, WHY ARE THEY LAUGHING? Why is the woman in the background smiling too? And since Youtube lies and censors, I cached a backup copy of this video on my own site

aah yes, - the shills and liars can front a little B.S. about how someone who according to the engineer who designed reactor 3 had an unbelievable understanding of reactor and industrial control systems WOULD BE TOO STUPID TO UNDERSTAND TIME STAMPS AND DATE ZONES AND SCREW THIS UP. GET A LIFE A-HOLES, YOU HAVE BEEN NAILED.

I am not alone with this

Other people are nailing this too, with their own lines of reasoning. Here is another take:

Hi again Jim, Please stay on this topic THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO EVIDENCE that there is anything wrong with the clock creates the date stamp for the Kelowna Daily Courier!
Check different Kelowna Daily Courier articles with Google and get the creation dates. You can see that there's nothing wrong with date stamps! (check mate five)
Even if it's true that there's no manual input, it doesn't change the fact that the "wire copy" article flowed through and posted on Sunday, Sept 15, and Google records it as being posted on Sept 15. If you try to google the URL itself, http://www.kelownadailycourier.ca/world-news/police-fbi-shooter-reported-in-military-building-at-washington-navy-yard-multiple-victims.html, and do a date range for Sept 14, and sept 16, it doesn't come up. But for Sept 15, it does come up.
I think that we can be very comfortable that it was posted on the 15th.
Also, all that Jon Manchester said was that his staff didn't know about the crime in advance. We don't care so much about Jon Manchester and the staff of the Kelowna Daily Courier, what we care about was that the AP automatically sent out the shooting story in advance and that it automatically posted to the Kelowna Daily Courier's website. THERE IS NO EVIDENCE THAT THERE IS ANYTHING WRONG WITH THE DATE STAMP OF THE KELOWNA DAILY COURIER!!!
My comment - Keylowna is in North America, not Tajikistan, YOU ARE RIGHT, this is as plain as vanilla. AP totally screwed this up by releasing it beforehand and Keylowna autofed it out because they are a small time paper and don't check everything. As a result WE KNOW DAMN WELL THIS SHOOTING NEVER HAPPENED. Thank you for additional perspective.

George, get over to Keylowna, get your hands on this paper and mail it to James

I don't care if you have to take a rain soaked one off of someone's front porch

This picture is 1600 pixels wide. It is a link. Click it to open it larger, save it, CHANGE THE FILE NAME AND MAIL IT TO EVERYONE.

Why have it be real?

The media is not required to tell you the truth

That's one of the things freedom of the press allows - the freedom to fabricate news and get away with it. And if you want to affect public opinion to push an agenda, WHY would you commit a crime you could go to prison for when you own the entire media from start to finish, can tell a lie and have no one hold you accountable? That is the state of the Jewish owned American press, and if you are new to this web site and think I am anti semitic, I suggest you dig deeply into the topic of who really owns the media on your own. The fact that the zionist front owns all the mainstream news networks in America by itself can hold the Jewish community accountable for lies like this shooting in DC. Wanna know who the liars are? Just look who owns the media.
And they won't be held accountable. They murdered thousands on 9/11, and could actually go to jail for it. But since they own the press, why risk going to jail? If using their media dominance to front a lie will work as well, WHY RISK JAIL BY COMMITTING A FELONY when they are free to lie all they want without an ounce of consequence? In stable societies such a lie would land the perpetrators in jail for a very long time. Lying at this level is the most serious of crimes, and societies that have a chance of surviving will punish it harshly. If anything shows the extent to which we have lost America to the Jewish front, THIS IS IT
They may like their own weapons, but they hate ours. So there are plenty of them out there that will say they want their guns. Don't fall for their come ons - as 9/11 showed with the dancing Israelis, the law will NOT be equally applied.
And there were many more lies, Bengasi, where the Department of State openly admitted there was no consulate in Bengasi, Sandy Hook, where a drill was taking place, complete with electric signs saying so and giving the actors instructions on where to go - only to have the children all get buried closed casket so NONE the parents EVER got to see ANY of their dead children afterwards Just perfect for Molech and the sex slave trade, Right along to Holmes, where the blood spatters went towards the door rather than away, the theater was subsequently bulldozed rather than show that there were no bodies, blood, or bullet holes (no pictures from the theater AT ALL) and Jessica Ghawi's damning tweet. Cute stuff from the ziopress, along with Boston's drill and obvious staged actors.

Arab "terror" failed. And Americans are decent people. Far too good to be pulling this crap. The king of lies - the zionist - has to tell lies about Americans to get them to turn against themselves and destroy their own selves. AMERICANS DO NOT BEHAVE LIKE THIS, do not let the ziofront use their press to spin lies to make you think so, CHANGE THE FILENAME OF THAT PHOTO ABOVE TO CIRCUMVENT THE CENSORS AND MAIL IT TO EVERYONE. DAMN THEM.

A little question for the shills

Since you are now in a frenzy bashing my latest World Nuclear Association rip, may I please pop yet another juicy question? Obviously as well informed shills, you know that the harmless hydrogen explosion at Three Mile Island was ignited by a contactor in an electrical box, which makes a spark. And also, as well informed shills, you know that no flames of any sort are allowed in nuclear facilities after that cute little episode at Browns Ferry.

-SO-

If no flames are allowed, and NO electricity was available according to your story, WHAT WAS THE SOURCE OF IGNITION FOR EACH OF THE FOUR HYDROGEN BLASTS? An incense smoking GENIE??!!??
Check mate. With no power out there, according to your lies, NOTHING COULD HAVE IGNITED THE HYDROGEN EVEN IF IT EXISTED, IT WON'T GO OFF ALL BY ITSELF, ESPECIALLY TIMES FOUR.

If hydrogen is so nasty in open air, why did the Hindenberg, which had 300X what ANY reactor could possibly do, NOT LEVEL THE ENTIRE STATE?

Fukushima history EXPUNGED

World Nuclear Association expunges critical Fukushima info from key report

The following is a little extensive on the caps, but I can't help it, I am pissed. The following is more or less an open letter to the World Nuclear Association. Please bear with me over the next couple days while links are filled in and the letter is made even more damning. I have to use public wifi because of cell modem kills and my battery won't last (it is mostly gone now and I have to answer mails) so a lot of links are going to have to wait. I am going to open this letter with the closing comment, because it's a beaut.
"One last comment:
Reactor decay heat after shutdown can only destroy a reactor in the first three hours after shut down. If safety systems function for even three hours, there is no way any serious melt down type of disaster can happen. These systems functioned for a full 8 hours at all reactors, regardless of what the scamming newly modified World Nuclear Association report now says. The fact that the reactors blew and shattered the inner containments at 1 and 2 over a day after shut down, when decay heat would have been statistically gone compared to operating output can mean only ONE THING - WILLFUL SABOTAGE and you can thank the Israeli Defense Forces for that."
Now on to the letter which addresses the World Nuclear Association's scam report, which was used to sabotage the Fukushima report for five full months because I did not know they destroyed it and I kept it linked.
No one died out there? Well, what about THIS report.
You state that no one got any radiation burns. Then what about THIS report.
You state that loss of power is why the valves would not open, WELL THEN, HOW DID MAGNA BSP'S CAMERA KEEP RUNNING WITHOUT POWER? - the real reason why Fukushima melted down was because control power was never lost, and control power kept the valves SHUT. The valves are steam actuated above 1180 PSI and need power only to REMAIN SHUT. Beyond 1180 PSI steam pressure will force them OPEN in the absence of power. Anyone in the nuclear industry would know this, and you are up against the testimony of Ripley here, the guy who designed reactor 3. Why are the lies so brazen? IT WAS NOT ABSENCE OF POWER THAT DESTROYED REACTORS 1 AND 2, IT WAS THE PRESENCE OF CONTROL POWER PREVENTING THE AUTOMATIC STEAM ACTUATED VALVES FROM OPENING.
Tepco is being forced to go along with the lie, and hatched a stupid story about employees running around with car batteries to open valves. But this did not happen, because the correct procedure would have been to simply cut the wires.

A safety enhancement added after Three Mile Island made the hydrogen blasts flatly impossible

The hard vent pipes (the red and white smoke stacks) which were installed to vent hydrogen after Three Mile Island were directly coupled to the reactor venting valves and needed no power to work. The World Nuclear Association's own report even in hacked form clearly states that the reactor systems sustained no quake damage. If the hard vent pipes are the only way for any gases from the reactors to escape because all the venting valves are routed through them, how did hydrogen ever get into ANY of the containments to begin with, if nothing was damaged by the quake as you say and all the venting valves vent directly out the smokestacks outside? The hard vent stacks by themselves made the hydrogen blasts at fukushima flatly impossible. The entire lie about Fukushima rests on public ignorance of this venting system, which made the hydrogen blasts a fantasy. Even if you can find a way to front a weak lie about reactor 4, no lie can conceal the fact that without any physical damage to the piping, as you say, the explosions at the other three reactors could never have happened because of hydrogen.
After things exploded, no one could get close to the valves or into the containments at all BECAUSE THE RADIATION WAS LETHAL. THEY WANTED TO GET IN TO CUT THE WIRES TO THE VALVES SO THE STEAM FROM THE REACTORS COULD OPEN THEM, BUT RADIATION STOPPED THEM. The high pressures in the reactors that were spoken of PROVES THE VALVES NEVER OPENED, and if the valves did not open, how would hydrogen escape to create an explosion hazard even if the hard venting pipes were all broken? Nailed you TWICE on the SAME TOPIC. Now onto the NEXT easily shredded lie in your new report

ALL inner containments were completely breached, despite the lies in your report saying they all remained intact, and this is your weakest thinnest LIE

THE WEAKEST THINNEST LIE IS: All reactor sites only lost the outer containments. REALLY? Then why were robots needed to enter the outer containments? If the inner containments remained intact,any melt down would have been fully contained, thus leaving the operators free to go anywhere they wanted in the outer containments but the last step, the inner containment which is the reactor chamber. All the valves are in the OUTER CONTAINMENT away from the reactor. Why then did radiation levels prevent the operators from reaching the valves in the outer containments if the inner containments were never lost? I WILL TELL YOU WHY "NONE OF THE THREE INNER CONTAINMENTS WERE LOST". IT'S BECAUSE THE STORY IS HYDROGEN BLASTS, AND TOO MANY NUCLEAR PROFESSIONALS KNOW THAT THE INNER CONTAINMENTS ARE TOO SOLID TO BE DESTROYED BY HYDROGEN. WHAT NUCLEAR PROFESSIONALS DON'T KNOW IS THAT FUKUSHIMA WAS DRASTICALLY OVERBUILT AND THAT THE OUTER CONTAINMENTS MET THE INNER CONTAINMENT STANDARDS AS WELL AND COULD ALSO HAVE NOT POSSIBLY BEEN DESTROYED BY HYDROGEN.
But since nuclear facilities such as Browns Ferry, (a fuku clone) did not overbuild, their engineers are walking around looking at sheet metal in their own little fuku thinking YEAH, A LITTLE HYDROGEN MIGHT DESTROY THAT, all the while they don't realize that at Fukushima 2,3,and 4 there was no sheet metal at all other than the outer roof above the cranes and that all floors of the outer containments had walls that were at a minimum four feet thick solid concrete with support columns 12 feet thick. They are being kept ignorant about Fukushima ON PURPOSE - to hide from them the threats that exist to their own facilities compliments of Israel.

Proof of Stuxnet virus usage at Fukushima:

All the while the radiation readings proved the inner containments were lost, the control rooms kept saying inner containment was there. How could that happen? How about a little virus authored by Israel called Stuxnet, which fakes sensor readings to spoof the operators into thinking all is well when it is in fact completely destroyed? You CANNOT have inner containment be intact AT ALL while the outer containment is spiked with instantly lethal radiation levels. Intact inner containment means NOTHING CAN GET TO THE OUTER CONTAINMENT. How then did the radiation levels get high enough in the outer containments to be instantly lethal?

The reactors breached far too quickly for decay heat to do it

Unlike the lie in your report, which states the reactors were only breached after a long time ALL 3 reactors were melted and gone in the first three days, if not blown to kingdom come with full on pressure vessel breaches caused by high temperatures and pressures AND THE RADIATION READINGS IN THE OUTER CONTAIMENTS PROVE IT. IT WOULD TAKE AT LEAST A PRESSURE VESSEL BREACH AT FULL THERMAL OUTPUT TO BLOW THE INNER CONTAINMENT STRUCTURE. YOU CANNOT LIE THAT AWAY.

IF only one reactor melted through a little bit early on as you say, HOW DID RADIATION GET OUT SO BADLY AT ALL 3 THAT ROBOTS WERE NEEDED TO ENTER THE CONTAINMENTS RIGHT FROM THE BEGINNING? LETHAL RADIATION ONLY OCCURS WITH SOLID MATERIAL EXPOSURE, ALL 3 REACTORS MELTED DOWN AND THROUGH YOU DAMN FOOLS, HOW DO YOU EXPECT PEOPLE TO BE STUPID ENOUGH TO BELIEVE ONLY ONE DID "A LITTLE" when all 3 inner containments are totally inaccessible due to high radiation levels, and on top of that blown away so badly that the outer containments were lethal as well? WHY ARE YOU LYING ABOUT THIS? I'll tell you why you are lying about this, as if you did not know. And it is because after Magna BSP took control of a virus infected Fuku via their cute little internet connection to that stinking camera they were always able to see, which is a huge violation of security, they put reactors 1 - 3 at full thermal output, FULL OPERATIONAL OUTPUT WITH ALL VALVES SHUT UNTIL THEY BLEW, it's the only way this disaster could have happened. Decay heat would have NEVER DONE IT SO QUICKLY. DECAY HEAT WOULD RESULT IN VENTING, THAT ALONE WOULD HAVE HANDLED DECAY HEAT. THE FULL ON MELT DOWNS AND EXPLOSIONS AT 1 AND 2 SO QUICKLY COULD ONLY HAVE BEEN CAUSED BY CRANKING THE REACTORS UP TO FULL THROTTLE AND LETTING THEM SIT WITH ALL THE VALVES COMMANDED TO STAY SHUT AND PROVIDE NO PRESSURE RELEASE. REACTOR 3 NEEDED A LITTLE ASSISTANCE FROM THAT NUKE CAMERA BECAUSE RIPLEY DID A GOOD JOB DESIGNING IT AND THERE WAS NO WAY TO KEEP THE SAFETY SYSTEMS FROM KEEPING IT IN LIMBO.

Your earthquake stats are B.S.

You stated spuriously accurate ground accelerations of 0.54 G's for the magnitude that hit at Fukushima (a 6.03) and then harped about how they exceeded the design specifications for Fukushima, when in reality Fuku was designed to take an 8.8, which would have had ground accelerations of at least 3.0. And here is where things start to check mate between liars in a web of lies. Erol Kalkan of the USGS stated that the top ground acceleration for the quake was 12.9 g's and YOU stated that the top ground acceleration for the quake was 2.0 G's (both of which were lies) and that the 2.0 g's happened in some sediment elsewhere in Japan. That's a pretty big disparity, WHO WAS PAID MORE TO LIE, YOU OR EROL?
AND YOU ARE STILL CHANGING THAT REPORT. AT FIRST, YESTERDAY, you said the hard vent stacks malfunctioned because the pressure was so high when the valves were finally opened that something blew out and released the hydrogen into the containments and AFTER I GOT ON YOUR BEHINDS later in the day you said that the hard vent malfunctioned because a valve was stuck due to the loss of power, all the while THERE ARE NO VALVES ON THOSE STACKS OTHER THAN THE PRESSURE RELEASES ON THE REACTORS, THEY ARE OPEN PIPE.

The destruction of the facility was far too severe for hydrogen blasts, but because the design was far beyond the original G.E. specs, reactor engineers working in facilities built to normal specs don't know how impossible the hydrogen story really is

Look at the pictures of the destroyed facility - there is concrete blown away that is easily twelve feet thick. YOU CAN'T LIE THAT OFF WITH A LITTLE HYDROGEN GAS. I remember, even in High School we made hydrogen and set it off with flame. And the chemistry instructor said if we screwed up and did not cap things off right to capture it so we could play with it we could get a flash fire in the chemistry lab, and it happened before. That chemistry lab had light weight ceiling tiles and none of them moved when it happened before. Three Mile Island had a hydrogen blast also, and NOTHING HAPPENED AT ALL. So how do you explain how nothing happened at three mile island, and nothing even happened in a public school full of students when hydrogen exploded in an airspace there, when at Fukushima hydrogen was suddenly granted mythical powers that blew away twelve feet of solid concrete? YOU ARE LYING. WHY? Why was reactor 3's plume the color of the reactor core? You at least aknowledge that loaders were brought in to clear debris, HOW DID YOU MISS THE FACT THAT THEY WERE REMOTE CONTROLLED BECAUSE THE RADIATION WAS TOO HIGH FOR PEOPLE?
SUMMARY:
YOU SAID PEOPLE NEVER DIED. THEY DID.
YOU SAID THERE WERE NO CASES OF RADIATION INJURIES, THERE WERE
YOU SAID THERE WAS NO POWER, HOW DID MAGNA BSP'S CAMERA KEEP RUNNING, AND VALVES THAT NEEDED POWER TO STAY SHUT REMAIN CLOSED?
HOW DID VALVES THAT NEED POWER TO STAY SHUT, NOT TO OPEN, STAY SHUT IF THERE WAS NO POWER?
WHY ARE THERE EXTREME AND INSTANTLY LETHAL RADIATION READINGS IN THE OUTER CONTAINMENTS IF THE INNER CONTAINMENTS ARE INTACT? INTACT INNER CONTAINMENTS EQUAL NO WATER LEAKS AND A RADIATION READING OF ZERO IN BOTH THE OUTER CONTAINMENTS AND THE SURROUNDING ENVIRONMENTS.

There is a universal constant with all liars, WHEN THE LIE GETS TOO BIG, THERE ARE JUST TOO MANY HOLES TO PLUG, JUST LIKE ALL THE HOLES IN THOSE "INTACT INNER CONTAINMENTS" YOU STILL SPEAK OF WHICH ARE LEAKING WATER INTO THE OCEAN LIKE CRAZY.

YOU SAID THE PEAK GROUND ACCELERATION WAS 2 G'S, AND THE USGS SAID 12.9, BOTH ARE LYING. YOU SAID THERE WAS NO EXPULSION OF SOLID MATERIAL, THEN EXPLAIN THE COLOR OF REACTOR 3'S BLAST WHICH PRECISELY MATCHED THE CORE MATERIAL AND THE INSANELY HIGH RADIATION READINGS IN THE OUTER CONTAINMENTS, LET ALONE THE SURROUNDING ENVIRONMENT.

AND YOU ARE STILL CHANGING THAT REPORT. HOW DID YOU GET THE WAYBACK MACHINE WIPED, LITTLE OLD YOU, NUCLEAR WATCH DOG? THAT TAKES A GOVERNMENT, A SCAMMING ZIO CLAN, A WEB ASSOCIATION CANNOT GET THAT DONE. AND WHY WOULD YOU HAVE IT WIPED ANYWAY? WHY WAS THE WIPED REPORT TRUTHFUL, AND YOUR NEW REPORT AN EASILY PROVEN LOAD OF CRAP?

WHY WAS THERE NO MENTION OF FLAT BED LOADED GENERATORS IN YOUR MODFIED SCAMMING LIE REPORT AT ALL, WHEN TEPCO AND OTHERS AT LEAST AKNOWLEDGE THEY WERE THERE? YOUR REPORT WAS INITIALLY TRUTHFUL AND SAID THE SWITCH GEAR WOULD NOT ENGAGE EVEN AFTER BEING HOOKED UP TO PORTABLE GENERATORS ON FLAT BED TRUCKS AND REPLACED. YOUR ORIGINAL REPORT WAS TRUTHFUL ABOUT HOW MULTIPLE GENERATORS WERE AVAILABLE AND RUNNING AT REACTORS 5 AND 6, AND THEN YOUR SCAMMING LIE REPORT REDUCED THAT TO ONE, WHAT THE HELL? YOUR ORIGINAL REPORT CLAIMED MORE THAN FIVE RUNNING GENERATORS AT REACTORS FIVE AND SIX, AND ONE RUNNING GENERATOR AT REACTORS 1 through 4. AND CORIUM? ARE YOU KIDDING? ARNIE GUNDERSEN PROBABLY RE WROTE THAT REPORT. CORIUM IS AN ARNIE PHRASE, AND THE NUCLEAR INDUSTRY HATES ARNIE. THE NUCLEAR INDUSTRY WAS HONEST AND SAID SOLID MATERIALS GOT EXPELLED AND THAT IT WAS NOT JUST A LITTLE GAS. THEY WOULD NEVER HAVE LET ARNIE REWRITE THAT REPORT AND DISHONOR THE DEAD AND INJURED WILLFULLY, WHAT HAPPENED TO THE WORLD NUCLEAR ASSOCIATION?.

A call to arms.

I want TEPCO employees to get ahold of me and give testimonies of what really happened out there. Honor your dead. If you don't get through initially, TRY AGAIN WHEN MY MAIL BOX IS HOSTED IN ICELAND. If anyone cached the original World Nuclear Association report, I want it here. I am doing a deep dredge of my hard drives to see if that report is anywhere, and if I find it in my own backups I am going to stick it to them. People died out at Fukushima. And 100 percent of the destruction happened because CONTROL POWER WAS NEVER LOST AND WAS USED TO SCREW WITH THE VALVES AND DESTROY THE FACILITY. It took powered commands to destroy 3 reactors. Let me explain something about industrial systems here -
Industrial systems have two levels of power. They are control power and main power. Giant battery backups and generators are used for main power, which is measured in megawatts of consumption. Main power is massive THESE BATTERY BANKS ARE THE ONES THEY SPOKE OF.
Control power is measured in milliamps. And smaller battery banks, which are kept separate from the main battery banks, can keep control power functional FOR MONTHS. Valves take virtually no power to run. THEY RUN ON CONTROL POWER. So the entire story about valves malfunctioning due to lack of power and causing the disaster is a fallacy, THEY HAD POWER FOR THOSE VALVES THE ENTIRE TIME, AND MAGNA BSP'S CAMERA, WHICH WOULD HAVE ALSO RUN ON CONTROL POWER PROVES IT. EVEN IF I WAS WRONG ABOUT THE VALVES AUTOMATICALLY OPENING WITHOUT POWER, CONTROL POWER WAS ALWAYS THERE REGARDLESS OF HOW YOUR NEW REPORT LIES ABOUT IT, AND COULD HAVE OPENED THEM RATHER THAN KEEP THEM SHUT IF THAT WAS THE CASE. EVER HEARD OF A DAMN UPS? AUNT EDNA HAS ONE, AND FUKU HAD ENORMOUS ONES IN EACH REACTOR CONTROL ROOM TO KEEP THE CONTROLS RUNNING FOR DAYS.
I guess YOU, the new LIAR at the World Nuclear Association (AND I KNOW YOU ARE READING THIS) can sit there and lie a new scenario to counter everything I come up with to prove your LIES. That's the power that tweaking the wayback machine and re-writing history grants the zio scammer. GOOD. But you have been nailed as a liar because you said no one died. That alone screws your credibility. You have been nailed as a liar because you said there were no radiation injuries. That alone screws your credibility. You committed a lie of omission about the off site generators by removing them from the report - that alone ruins your credibility. MANY OTHER THINGS RUINED YOUR CREDIBILITY AS WELL AND I CACHED YOUR LIE AS WELL AS THE TRUTHFUL REPORTS FROM OTHERS THIS TIME, SO WHEN YOU CHANGE IT, IT'S GONNA END UP RIGHT HERE, ON THIS FRONT PAGE THAT YOU OBVIOUSLY FEAR, - TO HAUNT YOU. Israel is a proven nuclear rogue, and I hope the Fuku report DESTROYS THAT ROGUE.
Restore the original report, YOU CANNOT LIVE THIS DOWN. ISRAEL HURT TOO MANY PEOPLE FOR THIS LIE TO PREVAIL, MANY PEOPLE TOLD THE TRUTH, IT WAS NOT JUST THE WORLD NUCLEAR ASSOCIATION THAT DID BEFORE YOU TOOK THEM OVER.
I used the World Nuclear Association report at first for ONE REASON - it had everything needed to prove Fukushima was a Stuxnet disaster in one spot. Now the report can't be nearly as neat because it has to quote single items from multiple locations. That will take time to fix.
And ONE LAST COMMENT -
Reactor decay heat after shutdown can only destroy a reactor in the first three hours after shut down. If safety systems function for even three hours, there is no way any serious melt down type of disaster can happen. These systems functioned for a full 8 hours at all reactors, regardless of what the scamming newly modified World Nuclear Association report now says. The fact that the reactors blew and shattered the inner containments at 1 and 2 over a day after shut down, when decay heat would have been statistically gone compared to operating output can mean only ONE THING - WILLFUL SABOTAGE and you can thank the Israeli Defense Forces for that.                 http://www.jimstonefreelance.com/index.html