THE PLUMBING: Six Mechanisms. 425 Years. The Answer to "How Is This Legal?"
"Every pipe was installed for a stated reason. Every pipe carries different water than advertised."
Post 1: The Oldest Pipe — 1601 to 2025. The full genealogy. ← YOU ARE HERE
Post 2: The 1921 Room — Stepped-up basis + 1031. Born together. Built to last.
Post 3: The Wildcatter's Gift — Carried interest. The lord's share of the harvest.
Post 4: The Race to the Bottom — Delaware LLC. Venice to Wilmington.
Post 5: The Invisible Subsidiary — Check-the-Box. The regulation nobody voted for.
Post 6: The Island — Cayman Islands. The offshore entrepot. $6 trillion.
Post 7: The Complete Stack — All six. One deal. Everything legal. Everything documented.
Post 8: July 4, 2025 — The OBBBA. The Magna Carta moment. The pipes made permanent.
The plumbing didn't begin in 1921, or 1954, or 1996, or 2025. It began in 1601, when Queen Elizabeth I signed a statute trying to regulate what wealthy English families were doing with charitable trusts — using the language of public benefit to protect private wealth from the obligations that fell on everyone else. Parliament's attempt to close the mechanism created the legal framework that the mechanism would use for the next 425 years. The oldest pipe in the American tax system was installed by a Tudor queen trying to stop a leak. She didn't stop it. She built the plumbing. What follows is the genealogy of six legal mechanisms that together form the infrastructure of wealth preservation in America — not designed all at once, not by one person, not in one room, but accreted layer by layer across four centuries by each successive generation of people who understood the existing structure well enough to add one more pipe to it. The mechanisms are old. The combination is what's lethal. And on July 4, 2025 — Independence Day — the combination was made permanent.
The Feudal Foundation: What the Plumbing Replaced
To understand why the modern tax system has the shape it has, you need to understand the system it replaced — and what the people who designed the replacement were trying to preserve.
Medieval feudal society was, at its structural core, a system for determining who owed what to whom. The king owned everything in theory. Lords held land from the king in exchange for military service and a share of agricultural production. Peasants worked the land in exchange for protection. Every relationship was a transaction, and every transaction carried obligations upward through the hierarchy.
The people at the top of the hierarchy spent enormous energy finding ways to reduce their obligations to the level above them — while maintaining the obligations of those below. This is not a cynical observation. It is the documented activity of every generation of the English landed class from the Norman Conquest through the Tudor period. Tax avoidance is not a modern innovation. It is as old as taxation.
The specific mechanisms they used — charitable trusts, entailed estates, nominee ownership, offshore trading posts — are the direct ancestors of the six mechanisms this series documents. Not metaphorically. Through actual legal lineage, case law, and statutory inheritance that American law imported directly from English common law at the founding.
"The history of taxation is the history of the powerful finding ways to ensure that the obligations they design for others do not fully apply to themselves."
— The through-line from the Domesday Book to the One Big Beautiful Bill, 1086–2025
1601: The Tudor Queen and the Leak She Couldn't Plug
The Statute of Charitable Uses, 1601 — 43 Elizabeth I, c. 4
The Statute of Charitable Uses was not charity legislation in the modern sense. It was an enforcement statute — Parliament's response to documented abuse of charitable trust structures by England's wealthy families. The abuses it was trying to stop: wealthy individuals using charitable trusts to shield assets from creditors, to avoid feudal inheritance obligations, and to transfer wealth across generations outside the normal channels of taxation and obligation.
The statute created a framework of commissioners empowered to investigate charitable trusts and ensure they were actually serving their stated charitable purposes. It defined what counted as legitimate charitable activity — relief of poverty, maintenance of sick and aged, education, repair of bridges and roads — and by implication, what didn't.
What Parliament could not have anticipated: the framework it created to regulate charitable trusts would become the foundation of Anglo-American charity law. Every definition of charitable purpose in American tax law traces directly to this 1601 statute. The framework built to police the abuse became the framework that legitimized it — and expanded it across four centuries.
The irony embedded in the Statute of Charitable Uses is the irony embedded in every reform attempt this series will document: the act of codifying what counts as abuse requires first codifying what counts as legitimate. And the definition of legitimate, once written into law, becomes available to the very people the law was designed to constrain.
By the 18th century, English courts had interpreted the 1601 statute's definition of charitable purpose so broadly that wealthy families were using charitable trust structures not just for genuine philanthropy but for tax planning, asset protection, and dynastic wealth preservation — precisely the abuses the statute was designed to stop. The law had been captured by the behavior it was regulating.
When American colonists brought English common law to the New World, they brought the 1601 statute with them. When the United States codified its charity law in the Revenue Act of 1917 — creating the charitable deduction — it built on a legal foundation that was already 316 years old, already thoroughly captured, and already carrying very different water than its stated purpose advertised.
🔥 The Founding Irony
The Law Written to Stop the Abuse Became the Law That Legitimized It — And Then Exported It to Every Former Colony
The Statute of Charitable Uses (1601) was Parliament's attempt to regulate wealthy families using charitable trust structures to avoid obligations. It created a legal framework defining charitable purpose. That framework became the foundation of Anglo-American charity law.
The 1917 War Revenue Act created the charitable deduction during World War I — ostensibly to encourage giving during wartime. It built directly on the 1601 framework. The deduction allowed taxpayers to subtract charitable contributions from taxable income — at their marginal rate. The richer you were, the more the government subsidized your giving.
The result, 425 years later: Harvard's $50 billion endowment grows tax-free. Donations to it are deducted at 37 cents on the dollar by the highest-bracket donors. The BlueTriton/Nestlé donation of bottled water to Flint — extracted from Michigan aquifers for under $1,000 per year — is deducted at retail value. The charitable framework that Elizabeth I's Parliament created to regulate elite abuse of charitable trusts now costs the U.S. Treasury $50 billion per year in foregone revenue, distributed most generously to the wealthiest donors.
Who benefits most from the modern charitable deduction: The top 1% of earners claim approximately 30% of all charitable deductions. The bottom 60% of earners — most of whom don't itemize — receive no charitable deduction at all. The subsidy is proportional to your tax bracket. The richer you are, the more the government matches your generosity with public money.
The Statute of Charitable Uses was written to stop wealthy families from using charitable trusts to avoid their obligations. It became the legal ancestor of a system that costs $50 billion per year in public subsidy, distributed most generously to the people least in need of subsidy. Elizabeth I's commissioners would recognize every mechanism. They would not be surprised by the outcome.
The 425-Year Timeline: Layer by Layer
1086
The Domesday Book — The First Inventory of Who Owes What to Whom
William the Conqueror commissions a complete survey of English landholding and taxable wealth. The purpose: determine what every lord owes the crown. Within a generation, the lords are finding ways to reduce what the survey says they owe. Tax avoidance begins the moment taxation is documented.
Feudal mechanism: Direct inventory of wealth and obligation. The template for every tax system that follows.
1215
Magna Carta — The Barons Codify Their Protections
King John signs the Magna Carta under pressure from the barons. Whatever its later reputation as a foundation of liberty, its original purpose was specific: protecting the nobility's existing privileges against royal interference. No taxation without consent. No seizure of property without due process. No interference with inheritance. The powerful codify their protections in permanent law. Post 8 of this series — July 4, 2025 — is this moment, modernized.
Feudal mechanism: Permanent codification of elite protections. The Magna Carta moment recurs in every era.
1400s
The Feoffee to Uses — The First Shell Entity
English landowners begin transferring land to "feoffees to uses" — trusted third parties who hold property nominally while the original owner retains all practical benefit. Purpose: avoid feudal inheritance obligations payable to the lord when land changed hands. The land appears to belong to someone else. The obligations disappear. This is the Emporia III LLC of the 15th century — a nominee holder whose name appears on the deed while beneficial ownership remains with someone else entirely.
Feudal mechanism: Nominee ownership. Direct ancestor of the Delaware LLC.
1535
The Statute of Uses — Henry VIII Tries to Close It. Fails.
Henry VIII, losing enormous revenue to the feoffee-to-uses mechanism, pushes Parliament to pass the Statute of Uses — legally collapsing the distinction between nominal and beneficial ownership, making the feoffee's obligations fall back on the real owner. It partially works. Within decades, lawyers have developed the "use upon a use" — a second layer of nominal ownership that escapes the statute entirely. The reform creates the mutation that survives it. Henry VIII tried to close this in 1535. The Treasury opened it back up in 1996 with Check-the-Box. Post 5 tells that story.
Reform mechanism: Failed closure. The pattern that repeats in every subsequent reform attempt.
1601
Statute of Charitable Uses — Elizabeth I Builds the Plumbing
Parliament attempts to regulate charitable trust abuse. Creates the legal framework defining charitable purpose. That framework becomes the foundation of all Anglo-American charity law. The attempt to close the mechanism writes the mechanism into permanent law. The oldest pipe in the American tax system. Still carrying water in 2026.
The founding irony: every reform attempt codifies what it's trying to stop.
1780s
American Founding — The Plumbing Crosses the Atlantic
American law imports English common law wholesale, including the charitable trust framework, the property law doctrines, and the legal logic of the feoffee to uses. The founders — most of whom were wealthy landowners — bring their understanding of how wealth protection works in English law and build it into the new republic's legal structure. The plumbing arrives in America before the Constitution does.
The inheritance: 180 years of English wealth-protection law, imported intact at founding.
1899
Delaware General Corporation Law — The Race to the Bottom Begins
Delaware rewrites its corporate charter laws to attract businesses from New Jersey, which has stricter regulations. Maximum corporate protection, minimum disclosure, competitive franchise fees. Within two years, more corporations incorporate in Delaware than anywhere else. The merchant republic model — Venice's competitive offer to attract capital by minimizing obligation — transplanted to a small American state that found it could fund 25% of its budget by becoming the most permissive incorporation jurisdiction in the world. Post 4 tells this story in full.
Venetian mechanism: Compete for merchant wealth by offering maximum protection, minimum obligation.
1913
The 16th Amendment — Income Tax Becomes Permanent
The federal income tax is ratified. For the first time, accumulated wealth faces a systematic annual obligation to the state. The people who have just become subject to income tax begin immediately writing their exits into the law. They have eight years until the Revenue Act of 1921. They use every one of them.
The new obligation triggers the new evasion. The pattern is as old as the Domesday Book.
1917
War Revenue Act — The Charitable Deduction Is Born
To encourage wartime giving, Congress creates the charitable deduction — allowing taxpayers to subtract contributions from taxable income. Built on the 1601 framework. Regressive by design: the deduction's value is proportional to your tax bracket. A donor in the 37% bracket receives 37 cents of public subsidy for every dollar given. A donor in the 12% bracket receives 12 cents. The mechanism that Elizabeth I's Parliament created to regulate elite abuse now subsidizes it at $50 billion per year.
316 years from 1601 to 1917. The framework travels intact. The abuse travels with it.
1921
Revenue Act of 1921 — The Twin Mechanisms Are Born
The same Congress, in the same act, creates both stepped-up basis and the 1031 exchange. Not coincidence. The people writing the first major tax code since the income tax became permanent are the same people who just became subject to it. They write their exits into the first draft. Stepped-up basis: the feudal entail, modernized — accumulated gains disappear at death. The 1031 exchange: the lord's right to swap manors — exchange one property for another without triggering the obligation. Post 2 documents the 1921 Room in full.
The entailed estate + the manor swap, modernized. $230B per decade if reformed. Still intact in 2026.
1954
Subchapter K — The Wildcatter's Share Becomes Law
The Internal Revenue Code of 1954 codifies partnership taxation under Subchapter K. Oil and gas wildcatters — who contribute expertise rather than capital to drilling ventures — successfully argue their profit share should be taxed as capital gains rather than ordinary income, because they are "at risk." The lord's share of the harvest — compensation for providing the framework within which others do the work — receives preferential tax treatment. By the 1980s, private equity managers have borrowed this logic entirely. Post 3 documents the migration.
Feudal rent, modernized: the lord takes 20% of what the peasants produce. He pays the preferred rate.
1966
Cayman Islands Banking Law — The Offshore Entrepot Opens
American and British banks help draft a Cayman Islands banking law creating a zero-tax jurisdiction for financial activity. No income tax. No corporate tax. No reporting requirements. Medieval Mediterranean traders used Rhodes, Malta, and Livorno as offshore entrepots — jurisdictions of minimal obligation where wealth could accumulate beyond the reach of kings and tax collectors. The Cayman Islands is the same institution, updated for the jet age. $6 trillion in assets. $100 billion per year in U.S. tax loss. Post 6 documents the island.
The offshore entrepot: Venice → Malta → Cayman Islands. The island has always been there.
1996
Check-the-Box — The Regulation Nobody Voted For
The Treasury Department — not Congress — issues a regulation allowing companies to elect their own tax classification. A subsidiary can be "checked" into nonexistence for U.S. tax purposes, making its income disappear from the U.S. tax base. The feoffee to uses of the 15th century held land nominally so the real owner's obligations disappeared. Check-the-Box makes income disappear using the same logic. Henry VIII tried to close the feoffee mechanism in 1535 with the Statute of Uses. It took 461 years for the Treasury to reopen it. Nobody voted on it. Post 5 documents this in full.
The feoffee to uses, modernized: the nominee holds the asset, the obligations disappear. Still works in 2026.
July 4, 2025
The One Big Beautiful Bill — The Pipes Made Permanent
P.L. 119-21, signed on Independence Day 2025. Estate exemption raised to $15 million per person, $30 million per couple — no sunset. Carried interest: intact. 1031 exchange: intact. Corporate rate of 21%: permanent. The mechanisms that have been accreting since Elizabeth I's 1601 statute are locked in — permanently — on the Fourth of July. The Magna Carta moment of the modern plumbing system: the codification of privileges that had been accumulating for 424 years, made permanent against future reform attempts. The barons got their charter. The pipes were soldered shut. On Independence Day.
The Magna Carta moment: the powerful codify their protections in permanent law. 1215. 2025. Same mechanism.
What "Accretion, Not Conspiracy" Actually Means
The phrase matters because it changes what reform requires. If the plumbing is a conspiracy — designed in one room by one group with one purpose — then the solution is to find and expose the conspirators. Reform becomes an act of revelation: show the design, and the design loses its legitimacy.
But the plumbing is not a conspiracy. It is accretion. And accretion is harder to fight than conspiracy, for three reasons.
First: Each layer was installed for a stated reason that was at least partially legitimate. The 1601 statute was trying to regulate genuine abuse. The 1917 charitable deduction was trying to encourage wartime giving. The 1921 Revenue Act was trying to prevent double taxation of farmers. The 1954 Subchapter K was trying to fairly characterize the economic contribution of expertise to a venture. Each pipe had a purpose. The purpose was real. The purpose was also insufficient to justify what the pipe became.
Second: Each layer was defended by the people who built it — and the returns from the layer funded the defense. Carried interest generates enough margin that defending it is trivially cost-effective for the funds that benefit from it. Delaware generates $2 billion in franchise revenue — 25% of its state budget. Reforming Delaware anonymity is fiscal suicide for Delaware legislators. The Cayman Islands has no incentive to adopt reporting requirements. The mechanism funds its own protection.
Third: Each layer fits seamlessly into the layers already there. The 1031 exchange and stepped-up basis were designed in the same legislative moment because they solve the same problem — permanent deferral — from two different angles. Check-the-Box works because Cayman Islands entities can be checked into nonexistence. Delaware LLC anonymity works because it hides the ownership of the Cayman fund. The mechanisms interlock. Reform one and the others compensate. This is why every reform attempt since 2007 has produced partial results at best.
The Finding — Post 1
"The plumbing wasn't designed. It was inherited, expanded, and defended — by each successive generation of people who understood it well enough to use it, and used it well enough to fund its defense. The oldest pipe is 425 years old. The newest was installed on July 4, 2025. They all carry the same water."
What the water carries: the accumulated advantage of people who were advantaged to begin with, compounding across generations at preferential tax rates, through anonymous entities, in offshore jurisdictions, via mechanisms that each generation adds one more layer to — because they can, because it's legal, and because the returns from the system fund the defense of the system. The plumbing is self-maintaining. That is its most important characteristic. Not that it was designed. That it maintains itself.
✓ The Full Account: What These Mechanisms Have Actually Built
A fair accounting of the plumbing requires acknowledging what it has produced alongside what it has cost. The charitable deduction, for all its regressivity, has funded hospitals, universities, museums, scientific research, and social services that would not exist without private philanthropy. The question is not whether philanthropy has value — it clearly does — but whether a $50 billion annual public subsidy distributed most generously to the wealthiest donors is the most equitable way to fund it.
The 1031 exchange has enabled real estate investment that has built housing, commercial property, and infrastructure at a scale that purely equity-financed development might not have achieved. Stepped-up basis prevents the forced sale of family farms and small businesses at death — a genuinely regressive outcome that reformers must address if they want a coalition broad enough to succeed.
Delaware's corporate law has created legal stability and predictability that has made the United States one of the most attractive places in the world for business formation. Whatever its anonymity problems, corporate law certainty has real economic value.
The honest accounting: these mechanisms have produced real economic activity alongside their distributional consequences. The argument against them is not that they produce nothing — it is that what they produce is distributed in ways that compound existing advantage, at a public cost measured in hundreds of billions of dollars per decade, in a system that has made itself increasingly difficult to reform. Both things are true simultaneously. The series acknowledges both.
What the Next Seven Posts Document
Post 1 has established the genealogy — the 425-year lineage that runs from Elizabeth I's Tudor court to a bill signed on Independence Day 2025. Posts 2 through 8 document each mechanism individually: its feudal ancestor, its legislative moment, its current operation, every reform attempt since 2007, and exactly what it cost to defend it against each one.
Post 7 does something no individual post can: it takes one documented deal — from the public record, using real entities and real transactions — and runs all six mechanisms through it simultaneously. The same $100 million water rights acquisition from Series 5. The Delaware LLC. The Cayman fund. The carried interest for the managers. The 1031 for the exit. The stepped-up basis for the heirs. One position. Six pipes. Every one of them ancient. Every one of them legal. Every one of them documented.
Post 8 closes the series where the plumbing itself closed: July 4, 2025. Independence Day. The day the mechanisms that had been accreting since 1601 were locked in — permanently, with no sunset — by a Congress that had been warned, by reformers who had been trying since 2007, that the cost of these mechanisms is measured not just in revenue foregone but in the consistency with which the communities bearing that cost are the communities that can least afford it.
The question Series 6 asks is not "how is this legal?" The question Series 6 answers is: who made it legal, when, for stated reasons that were at least partially true, and what has it cost in the 425 years since Elizabeth I accidentally built the first pipe while trying to stop a leak?
METHODOLOGY — POST 1: All historical claims primary-sourced. Statute of Charitable Uses (1601), 43 Elizabeth I, c. 4: legal text confirmed via English Reports and subsequent legal scholarship. Feoffee to uses and Statute of Uses (1535), 27 Henry VIII, c. 10: confirmed via Blackstone's Commentaries and primary legal history. Magna Carta (1215): primary source. Domesday Book (1086): primary source. Revenue Act of 1921 (simultaneous creation of stepped-up basis and 1031 exchange): confirmed via Tax Policy Center historical analysis and IRS history documents. 16th Amendment ratified 1913: confirmed. War Revenue Act 1917 (charitable deduction): confirmed via IRS history and Tax Policy Center. Subchapter K, Internal Revenue Code of 1954: confirmed via IRC primary text. Delaware General Corporation Law 1899: confirmed via Delaware Division of Corporations history. Cayman Islands banking law 1966: confirmed via Cayman Islands Monetary Authority. Check-the-Box regulations 1996 (Treasury Decision 8697): confirmed via IRS Federal Register. OBBBA signed July 4, 2025 (P.L. 119-21): confirmed via Congress.gov. Estate exemption $15M/person, no sunset: confirmed via OBBBA text. $50B annual charitable deduction cost: confirmed via Joint Committee on Taxation. $230B/decade stepped-up basis cost if reformed: confirmed via Congressional Budget Office. $2B Delaware franchise revenue, 25% of state budget: confirmed via Delaware Department of Finance. $6T Cayman assets, $100B annual U.S. loss: confirmed via U.S. Treasury and OECD estimates. Top 1% claiming 30% of charitable deductions: confirmed via IRS Statistics of Income data.
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment