A little different Fuku topic today              
The most important document ever produced by this web site is here: Nuclear Sabotage at Fukushima

To read the Fukushima report in German, Click here and for the original click here
I cannot find the super high res photos of reactors 1 and 2, I found good ones, but not the ones I remember. So until I find them (they are on backup somewhere) instead of proving the carbon was blown out of the reactor cores, I am going to today document and prove that the scenarios at reactors 1,2,and 3 were flatly impossible absent Israel remote administering Fukushima via the Stuxnet virus, and playing games with the control room readouts to baffle the Fuku engineers long enough to get away with destroying Fukushima entirely. Tomorrow's topic will likely be the cleanup of the fuel pellets expelled from reactor 3, and proof it threw it's fuel everywhere, thus vaporizing the hydrogen blast lie the rest of the way. Then it will be on to other things Fuku related, but today, take a look at this: This diagram shows the placement of the safety release valves at each of the reactor sites. Though only one valve is shown in this diagram, they are in fact redundant. This is the valve that is shown right where the pipe comes out of the side of the reactor, near the top. Reactors 1 and 2 had 11 of these valves each, according to the reactor engineer I interviewed, and reactor 3 had a ridiculously high safety margin with 17 of these valves installed.

The reactors were designed to run at 1150 PSI, and the valves release at 1160 PSI unless they get a command from the controller to stay shut, and if told to stay shut they never open. Since these valves function automatically unless they are told not to, I'd like to ask how 39 of them simultaneously failed at Fukushima.

The valve in the diagram is the first one out of the top of the reactor and is labeled "safety relief valve". These are redundant, there is more than one

In addition to these valves failing to open, which would have vented all the pressure from the reactors out the large smokestacks you see in all the Fukushima pictures in a spectacular fashion unlike anything ever seen in industry before, (27 gigawatts of energy coming out of two pipes with the reactors over 3,000 PSI if they had opened at that pressure, which would have been more than obvious in the Fuku videos) the facility operators were continuously fed control room readouts which indicated the reactor pressures were below the level that would cause the valves to automatically open.

Here is the smoking gun

The engineers knew the pumps were not running, and that no steam was being diverted from the reactors through the passive backup systems. Despite this, the pressure readings remained normal. But they knew the reactors needed water despite what the control room said, and sent people to inject water into the reactors via a special pipe that allowed external pumps to be hooked up from outside the containment structures, so like the generators that arrived on time but were refused by the virus to connect, auxiliary pumps also arrived on time to force water into the reactors even with everything in the facility disabled by the virus. With the pressure readings in the control room being normal, the people sent to pump water into the reactors soon discovered they could not, because contrary to what the control room was saying, the pressures in the reactors were above the 3,000 psi the external pumps could deliver. This proves sabotage all by itself, because if the mechanical safety release valves were supposed to let go at 1160 PSI and did not, all the while the control room was receiving normal pressure readings, something was seriously amiss.
Upon receiving word that the pressures in the reactors were approximately 3 times the normal operating pressure of 1150 PSI, the engineers gave the command to force all 39 safety release valves to open manually, rather than automatically, and at all 3 reactor sites this command was ignored by the virus infected controllers, which did the opposite and kept them shut. So with both automatic and manual release enabled, NONE of the 39 safety valves opened, and reactors 1 and 2 exploded. This was clearly outlined in the International Nuclear Regulatory Commission report (which to this day claims that hydrogen gas caused the explosions) but I am going to shred even that now -

SINCE THE ONLY WAY HYDROGEN COULD ENTER THE CONTAINMENT WOULD BE VIA A BROKEN PIPE HOOKED UP AFTER ONE OF THESE SAFETY VALVES, WHICH WERE THE FIRST THING OUT OF THE REACTOR, AND THESE SAFETY VALVES NEVER OPENED, THERE IS NO WAY IN HELL ANY HYDROGEN EVER GOT INTO ANY OF THE CONTAINMENT STRUCTURES AT ALL. It was physically impossible, hydrogen could only have been an issue if the safety valves had functioned, which they did not. AND ON TOP OF THAT, EVEN IF all the piping coming out of the reactors was broken, WHICH IT WAS NOT, nothing would have leaked into the containments to cause an explosion anyway because the valves were all forced shut. If there was any break in any pipe it would have dropped the reactor pressures to ZERO with none of the pumps running as the official story states, thus allowing easy injection of water from the external pumps that were never part of normal operation but available and working perfectly. The high pressures alone proved Fukushima got through the earthquake unscathed because it took perfectly intact systems to hold back such high pressures.

The fact that they could not get water into the reactors because the pressures were too high, all the while NO steam came out of those smoke stacks proves that ALL the reactors remained perfectly sealed until they exploded, and the only thing that could cause an explosion with the reactors sealed off, thus not allowing any hydrogen out, would be a reactor pressure vessel breach at pressures over 3,000 PSI, and THAT would be enough to do the damage we witnessed at reactors 1 and 2. So, to sum it up - The only way Hydrogen could have gotten out of any of the reactors is if one or more of the safety valves let it out, and if any one of those valves had opened enough to let it out there would not have been the extreme pressures inside the reactors, which prevented external water injection. This nails Israel's butt to the wall, the disaster at reactors 1 and 2 was STUXNET ALL THE WAY.
Stuxnet is the only way all the control rooms would have given normal readouts while everything went kablooey. Such normal readouts that the engineers sent people to put water in the reactors with external pumps, only to discover that the pumps could not overcome the 3,000 plus PSI in the reactors when in no case it should have ever exceeded 1160 PSI. Stuxnet is the only way 39 separate hair trigger safety release valves which were designed to go off with only a fraction of a single percent over pressure could have failed while in fully mechanical automatic mode, and then totally failed (all 39 of them) in forced release mode as well. Reactor pressure vessel breaches are the only way the containment structures could have been destroyed with all the safety valves shut, therefore blocking any way for the hydrogen to enter the containment structures. You cannot have a hydrogen release from inside the reactors, while having reactor pressures be through the roof because all the valves are jammed shut, the two situations cannot coexist

Catch 22, CHECK MATE.

You can forget talking about how hydrogen could never have destroyed the containments, when the real issue is the fact that with the safety release valves held shut by a virus, there is no way any hydrogen got out of the reactors anyway. The hydrogen explosion story is beyond laughable in more ways than one. You can thank Arnie Gundersen and the lying ziopress for the silence on this issue, it's no wonder why the press avoided interviewing real reactor engineers with regard to this topic, having only their little Arnie as the "expert". Why only Arnie? Is he the only one? Other than my interview of one of the engineers who designed unit 3, the press interviewed absolutely NO ONE ELSE. See anything fishy with that?
Of course. But with Fukushima and the entire earthquake and tsunami being an act of war, and that war being waged by Israel, the first casualty is the truth and there is no way on earth the ziopress would ever let the big secret go. That would be like trying to get CNN to tell the truth about building 7 on 9/11.

Censorship has destroyed the original references, but I found a few new ones that prove what is above.

Since the safety release valves automatically let go at 1160 PSI, a fraction of a percent over operating pressure, WHY ON EARTH were they remaining shut at 1.5X operating pressure on March 12, when this nuclear engineer talked about what was going on out there? He points out that the safety release valve story was very strange: Surviving evidence 1
Another piece of surviving evidence, though totally messed up now And I'd like to ask, why can't this be found easily anymore?
Here is a good one talking about the high pressure levels in the reactors, pressures NOT POSSIBLE if the safety systems were not disabled. high pressures in the reactors

Since practically everything regarding not being able to get water into the reactors due to ultra high presssures prior to the explosions has been censored, tomorrow's gem is going to be proof of reactor 3's core ejection, thus making the initial cleanup possible only with remote control and robots, all of which was documented but is totally expunged from the web except for one reference now. And what happened to the Fukushima 50? People died of radiation poisoning out there, WHERE ARE THEIR STORIES? I will post the remote control and robots link now, in case they kill it overnight. Read it while you still can, WHERE WAS THIS IN THE ZIOPRESS??!!??

_______________________________________________

I am getting airtime deleted again, and am now using Starbucks. I don't know what triggered it this time, but I know how to get even.

I said from the beginning that I had a lot more info on Fukushima that I never released in the initial report, because that report was too long as it was. I am releasing that info and clarifying the Fukushima report NOW.

The "hydrogen explosions" at Fukushima were not possible.

A few scientific points that prove it

People have the misconception that hydrogen can explode all by itself, when in fact it needs oxygen to combust at all. And during the time period when the blasts occurred out at Fukushima, the containment structures were all completely purged of oxygen and had nothing but nitrogen in the reactor containments. It is not a requirement to be able to purge a nuclear containment structure of all oxygen leaving only nitrogen and therefore no explosion potential from any fuel that needs oxygen to combust, but at Fukushima that is exactly how the Japanese set it up.

Many people are under the misconception that hydrogen and oxygen were produced inside the reactors at the same time

That is not how the reaction works. The entire proposed reason for hydrogen to have been present is the assumption that the reactors did not have enough water in them, which allowed the reactor cores to exceed 2000 degrees celsius. If that happens, the zircon cladding which covers the nuclear fuel in each pellet will rob the oxygen out of the water molecules in the saturated steam inside the reactor, and release only the hydrogen. So there is no oxygen buildup at the same time because it all gets captured by the zircon, and therefore no explosion potential due to free hydrogen because there is no oxygen released for the hydrogen to react with. In addition to this, hard vent stacks were present at Fukushima which were specifically designed to vent any hydrogen produced. When you add the vent stacks to the equation, it introduces yet another layer of impossibility to the hydrogen explosion hoax.
1. There is never any oxygen produced inside ANY reactor of the type out at Fukushima even during the worst case scenario.
2. Hard vent stacks were in place to vent all hydrogen outside and release it 500 feet up in the air.
3. All the reactor containments had been nitrogen purged, thus eliminating entirely ANY hydrogen explosion possibility, even if it was being released in copious amounts directly into the reactor containments.
4. The reactor containments had solid concrete walls up to 12 feet thick in some places, which absolutely NO hydrogen explosion even at it's worst theoretical maximum could possibly do anything to AT ALL, yet they were mostly atomized to the finest dust at reactor 3, and whatever large pieces were left were blown to smithereens. To say a little loose gas could do that is the Hollywood equivalent of the Rambo arrow, where an ounce or two of explosive material can wipe out an entire enemy force.
Chemical reactions have their limits, and for anyone to have dreamed up hydrogen destroying ultra robust reactor structures is a foray into burn the witch ignorance. There is no doubt a Hollywood crew worked on this particular false flag, where events happened that were leaps of logic even Hollywood would seldom aspire to.
In reality, reactors 1 and 2 suffered pressure vessel breaches at 3000 PSI after being pushed to full thermal output with all the safety release valves closed by the Stuxnet virus, (a fact easily proven but I ignored because the Fuku report was getting too long anyway) and reactors 3 and 4 were destroyed by nuclear weapons because reactor 4 could not be destroyed with a virus while it was mothballed, and reactor 3 had too many additional safety systems in place to make it easy to kill, even with a virus. The pressure vessel breaches, and proof of virus sabotage will be tomorrow's topic. And there is absolute proof of pressure vessel breaches at ultra high pressure in droves at reactors 1 and 2, and that only a virus could have caused it, but I never discussed that because the real issue was reactors 3 and 4.
This is a portion of the additional information I said I had about Fukushima right from the beginning but did not discuss because the report was already too long for mass public consumption. Since my mailboxes are totally censored of all decent news tips, and the NSA has chosen to destroy the forums and comment sections everywhere on the web with that new supercomputer at that "data center" in Utah, the only thing remaining to convey truth is hard set web sites such as this one, where a comment cannot vanish into nowhere, and what else is there to talk about when damn near everything else is censored anyway?
And if multiple gigabytes of bandwidth are going to continue to be deleted from the cell modems, which I can't afford to repeatedly recharge, which prevents me from getting out onto the web anyway, I will work with the information I already have and clarify a few points regarding Fukushima and steal a few minutes here and there from open wifi connections to upload it. I don't need airtime AT ALL.

Tomorrow's topic: Carbon expulsion from the reactor cores at units 1 and 2. Proof of ultra high PSI pressure vessel breaches, which with the safety systems installed at those two reactors, would never have been possible absent willful destruction no matter what the scenario. Huge pressure vessel breaches where the pressure vessels contain saturated steam at 3000+ PSI absolutely WILL blow through huge thick concrete walls, to the extent we saw at reactors 1 and 2. Reactors 1 and 2 had 11 automatic safety valves at each reactor, and even one of those valves can totally depressurize a reactor. These safety valves automatically go off at 1,160 PSI unless they are told by a powered command to stay shut. These were hooked directly up to the hard vent stacks, (the big white ones in all the photos) which would have vented the reactors (absent willful sabotage) rather than allowing them to explode and compared to having the reactors explode, they release virtually no radiation.
IF the situation at Fuku happened as stated in the ziopress, ALL of the hard vent stacks should have been blowing steam like the gates of hell and beyond prior to anything happening to the reactors AT ALL. Cumulatively we are talking about having to release enough steam at a minimum (to match the ziopress scenario) to dissipate 12 gigawatts of power, and realistically, considering what happened, enough steam to dissipate 27 gigawatts. The fact no steam was released AT ALL when Tepco workers could not push water into the reactors against a head pressure in excess of 2600 PSI when the automatic safety release happens at 1,160 proves the safety pressure releases were receiving a command to stay shut from a SABOTAGED Siemens Scada controller, and the only way that could have been accomplished is with the well documented Israeli owned Stuxnet virus, delivered by Israeli "security firm" Magna BSP. The fact that the control room operators even considered it possible to inject water into the reactors proves they were getting normal pressure readouts when the pressures were in fact off the charts which made manual water injection impossible, a fact the engineers would have been aware of absent control room readout sabotage. That is specifically what Stuxnet is designed to do. That is tomorrows topic.
Go ahead. Censor all the forums and comment sections around the web, delete all my incoming e-mails and kill the modems more. I have plenty to write about and all the evidence is already here, on back up. I'll just snipe open wifi connections for a few brief moments each day to post what is typed offline.

Line itemed Fukushima report to be done

Since I have been banned from receiving meaningful whistleblowing mail, and the forums and blogs are now almost completely devoid of content since the new NSA data center went online, I am going to get even with their worst nightmare, the report that caused all the problems to begin with.

Here is the first clarification of the Fukushima report

Many people were not able to read through the entire Fukushima report, let alone understand it. So many people do not know that even according to the International Nuclear Regulatory Commission, the generators were never submerged, and never failed.

That's right, the generators were NEVER submerged, and NEVER failed

Here is what really happened - All of the backup generators located at units 1-4 were inside the turbine building, which flooded to a depth of 4 feet at it's lowest level in the basement which was not enough water to cause trouble for the generators, which were higher than that, and on top of it, were giant industrial generators with huge footings that kept them out of any water that did enter the turbine building.
In addition to this, the fuel tanks were never compromised by the tsunami. After I clearly pointed out that the generators never got submerged, a lie was hatched that the tsunami washed the fuel tanks away. And that is a bold faced lie.

Here is what really happened

All of the backup generators for units 1-4 came online after the earthquake, and before the tsunami arrived, 7 out of 8 mysteriously shut off all by themselves. The only one that remained running was the final emergency reserve that was never hooked up to a Stuxnet infected Siemens Scada controller, so it never received a virus command to shut down. This one generator was enough to run all the cooling pumps at ALL 4 reactor sites at that section of Fukushima Diiachi. The big question is then, since it remained running throughout the entire disaster, why was it not able to run any cooling pumps? ANSWER: Because despite not being hooked up to the Scada system, the electrical switch gear (which was also inside and never got flooded) was hooked up to the SCADA system and with Israel's cute little Stuxnet virus in place that switch gear refused to transfer power to the plant from the outside feed lines to the one generator that was still running. Further examination revealed that outside power was never lost as well, and that all that happened was the virus also shut down the outside feed. So with 7 out of 8 generators shut down by the virus, on top of the outside feed being cut, and the one remaining generator not being allowed to provide power, a lie was hatched that the tsunami took out the generators, when in fact it did not.

But wait, there's more!

There were six units out at Fukushima, not 4 as most people think. Reactors 5 and 6 had their own back up generators which never received ANY water of any sort. These generators, 7 in total, were perfectly able to be switched on to provide power to reactors 1-4, and functioned perfectly throughout the entire disaster, but were never allowed to divert their power to reactors 1-4 because the virus infected electrical switches were never allowed to divert power from reactors 5 and 6 to reactors 1-4.

And now, here is where it really gets crazy.

Despite the lies told about ruined roads leading into Fuku, all were perfectly intact, and the International Nuclear Regulatory Commission made it a clear point in their own Fuku report that Tepco successfully brought in emergency backup diesel generators on flat bed semi trucks, hooked them up to the main power feed within 8 hours, (a full day before anything went kablooey) and for a "technical reason" they were denied the ability to feed back up power to the reactors because the electrical switch gear refused to connect the cooling pumps (the real technical reason being Magna BSP and the Stuxnet virus) even after the switch gear was replaced multiple times to clear the "failures".

And the punch line, which will be covered more clearly later:

All of the affected reactors had completely non electrical backup systems which used steam from the reactors themselves to turn the cooling pumps, but because the entire system was infected with a virus, all of the valves, which automatically open to actuate the passive backup system absent a command from the controller to stay shut, stayed shut and this is what really caused the disaster. Since it is well documented that Stuxnet is specifically designed to interfere with the activation of valves and pumps, it's a no brainer what really caused the Fuku disaster. A little hint - Don't let Israeli security companies handle ANY security for you, most of them are branches of the IDF.

If you want to know what is coming next, I suggest you try to read the Fukushima report in full, but I know it's a tedious and technical read. These little blurbs I am going to put up will be a lot easier to understand. And all the links to everything discussed in these little blurbs are in the Fuku report so don't look for them here.

I'd like to throw in here that it was really cool to censor everything being sent to this web site through the mail, because now the only rational response to get news is to line item the Fuku report, which could go on ad nauseum because it is such a huge topic. And with all of it perfectly documented, I'd like to see what kind of a boost this gives to the zionist image. And if you manage to kill this web site off worse than you have, I won't shut up anyway. I find it curious that the Israelis can nuke at will and none of it makes news, but proven mushroom clouds and whited out sensors from miles away will be the downfall of the lying ziopress, you can't stop every Iphone, and if you do, what about Motorola? The fact that you manage to keep the truth about this out of your ziopress only lends creedence to the Fukushima report, if you can sit straight faced and mute with a mushroom cloud on the horizon, WHAT ELSE can you bury under a lie of silence?           http://jimstonefreelance.com/index.html