Sunday, July 20, 2014

DEA Insider Reveals How Agency Protects Drug Trafficking for the Elite

trey-gowdy
Ask Representative Gowdy about the SANCHEZ-Paredes cartel.
The information contained in this report is both stunning and frightening. However, to many in the DEA ranks and US intelligence community, this report will ring true and many of these personnel will be shocked at the revelations which will follow. Much of the material presented in the first part of this series is contextual in background in order to provide a high degree of legitimacy to the claims from a DEA whistleblower.
This material is the type of information that gets the Breitbart reporters of the world liquidated. Subsequently, I have taken careful steps to compartmentalize the material and distribute it to confidential sources. The information that I am going to reveal will see the light of day whether it comes from my column or someone else’s.
‘There are many good people, who are loyal to the United States, who work for the Drug Enforcement Agency. However, the DEA, as an entity is both complicit in the fall of this country and will be active participants in the process.

Contacted by DEA Special Agent

Some time ago, I was contacted by a DEA special agent who is still on active status with the agency. His stated reason for coming forward is that he will not be a participant in the planned demise of the United States in which the DEA, as well as other federal agencies, will be complicit by their covert and overt participation.
Much, not all, of what is about to be revealed in this report, has already been revealed in confidential reports to key Congressmen such as Issa and Gowdy. Yes, that would be the same Trey Gowdy who is grilling the IRS on missing emails. This is the same Trey Gowdy who “prosecuted the full range of federal crimes including narcotics trafficking rings, bank robberies, child pornography cases, and the murder of a federal witness. He was awarded the Postal Inspector’s Award for the successful prosecution of J. Mark Allen, one of “America’s Most Wanted” suspects… This is the same 7th Circuit Solicitor. Trey led an office of 25 attorneys and 65 total employees. During his tenure, he started a Violence Against Women Task Force and a Worthless Check Program, enhanced and expanded Drug Court, and implemented a Drug Mother Protocol designed to assist expectant mothers break the cycle of addiction. This is the same Congressman that champions himself, on his Congressional webpage as a champion in the war on drugs, but completely ignores verifiable notifications from my whistleblower source regarding DEA complicity in allowing drug trafficking into the United States, covering up both the trafficking and the subsequent money laundering operations.
Gowdy knows and Congressman Issa also knows the operational details that I am going to reveal both in this report, and in subsequent reports. Yet, neither Congressman will touch this issue with a 10 foot pole as they grandstand over a “pretend” Benghazi investigation and “gee, what happened to the IRS emails?”

A Cartel You Have Never Heard About

My DEA source was involved in drug interdiction in Peru, which is the leading cocaine producer in the world with 325 metric tons of operation. One of his main jobs consisted of developing confidential sources (CS) into actionable intelligence information which could be used toward to the retarding of the blossoming drug trafficking business in Peru.
The Peruvian police and military only intercept 3-5% of the gross drug traffic and that is by design. It gives the appearance that something is being done, while a drug trafficking empire is being established in this country to a degree never imagined in the past.
Senior DEA officials are running interference for a massive drug organization known as the SANCHEZ-Paredes drug cartel and it is based out of Peru. However, not many Americans will have heard of this cartel. Yet, they have been around since 1976 and are more massive that any of the Mexican drug cartels in terms of the size and impact of its operations.
This drug cartel is protected by the Peruvian military. Coincidentally, my source tells me that the U.S. military has increased training exercises with the Peruvian military. In yesterday’s article, I revealed that the Mexican military is also increasing its training activities with the American military in the same manner. This is a case of the same song second verse. We know the Mexican military is completely compromised by the Sinaloas . I have some independent confirmation of the same being true in Peru, exclusive of my source, that the Peru’s military is being trained on how to protect drug shipments and defend their drug turf by the U.S. military. I know of two other reporters who are working on different aspects of this story and they will soon be published, so I will defer to them until later next week after the expected reports are filed in the media.

The Peruvian Pattern Is the Same As the U.S.

The TSA would have you believe that there is a terrorist who wants to kill every American boarding an airplane, so we should allow our children and wives to be groped by the pot bellied perverts at the TSA. They would have you believe that al-Qaeda is everywhere. Any investigative reporter worth their salt knows that al-Qaeda is a CIA front and participates in regime change operations from Libya to Syria to ISIS in Iraq.
The forces of al-Qaeda are nothing but the “boogey man” designed to make us give up more and more of our rights on a progressive basis. The same strategy is being employed in Peru through an organization known as Sendero Luminoso. The activities from Sendero Luminoso serve to cover the drug trafficking and money laundering activities of the SANCHEZ-Paredes cartel.
Sendero moves the cocaine across the Andes to the Sanchez-Paredes.  Another CS stated the Sanchez-Paredes are now the primary source of supply for Sinaloa cartel  and the still ongoing Fast and Furious operations, which took the life of Border Patrol Agent, Brian Terry. That means that Eric Holder’s pet project is not dead.

How the DEA is Facilitating Drug Trafficking

DEA senior officials are fully complicit in these operations. Let’s examine the leadership of Patrick Stenkamp who formerly served as the Regional Director (aka Special-Agent-In-Charge) in Peru. Peru now serves as the regional headquarters for the DEA since Bolivia kicked the DEA out. Also, Peru has taken over the title of “King on Cocaine” from Columbia.
As Regional Director, Stenkamp decided what cases to pursue and which to conveniently ignore. According to my source, Stenkamp fired the last three special agents who dared to investigate the SANCHEZ-Paredes cartel. This group operates with impunity under the watchful eye of DEA leadership and if DEA special agents want to prolong and advance their careers, they better play along or they will end up like the three agents who tried to investigate the SANCHEZ-Paredes cartel, out of a job.
My previous investigation into looking at the role that Sinaloa’s played with regard to the present immigration revealed three significant details:
1. As reported yesterday, the Sinaloa’s have been connected to terrorist organizations since 2007 as reported in the MSM.
2. The Sinaloa’s, along with MS-13 have received paramilitary training at camps outside of San Salvador along with military grade hardware (e.g. RPG missile launchers, AK-47′s and anti-tank weapons). This is all supplied by the terror organization of Hamas and Hezbollah.
3. The Sinaloa’s and Los Zetas drug cartel are using MS-13 gang members as assassins in removing political and law enforcement obstacles in Mexico. The Border Patrol has repeatedly said that MS-13 members are being processed into the United States by the thousands by the Border Patrol who are being told to look the other way, by DHS directives, when it comes to processing MS-13 gangsters into the United States.

The Goal Is to Turn the U.S. Into a Narco-Terrorist State

America is in the process of being transformed into the same type of narco-terrorist state as we see in Mexico. Let’s consider the public drug trial of Jesus Vicente Zambada-Niebla.
Jesus Vicente Zambada-Niebla, the Sinaloa cartel’s “logistics coordinator” and son of a principal Sinaloa leader, asserted in court documents that Guzman is a U.S. informant and Sinaloa was “given carte blanche to continue to smuggle tons of illicit drugs into Chicago.”
“Niebla also alleged that Operation Fast and Furious was part of an agreement to finance and arm the cartel in exchange for information used to take down its rivals”. The details of the unholy agreement between the DEA and the Sinaloa cartel was that the DEA would allow 80% of all drug shipments into the United States in exchange for intelligence information on the other drug cartels. Why would the DEA want intelligence on the other cartels, yet, they would allow the Sinaloa cartel to continue with their drug operations right under the noses of the DEA. “The agents stated that this arrangement had been approved by high-ranking officials and federal prosecutors,” the Zambada-Niebla lawyer wrote”.
After being extradited to Chicago in February 2010, Zambada-Niebla argued that he was also “immune from arrest or prosecution” because he actively provided information to U.S. federal agents.
Niebla also alleged that Operation Fast and Furious was part of an agreement to finance and arm the cartel in exchange for information used to take down its rivals. This resurfaces the issue that Attorney General Eric Holder knew about the gun-running arrangements in Fast and Furious as we all knew he did.
The only plausible explanation serving to underlie this operation would be that DEA is protecting the drug trafficking corridors for the banking elite that has hijacked our government.  The information supplied by the Sinaloa’s about their rivals protects the elites shipments from competition. Part Two of this series will explore the details of the money laundering arrangements which will expose this unholy arrangement.

Conclusion

In summary, drugs are supplied from the SANCHEZ-Paredes cartel, who in turn ship the drug to their middle men, the Sinaloa cartel. The DEA is completely aware of this relationship and actively protects the business arrangement
My source also informed me that the members of the SANCHEZ-Paredes cartel travel freely to and from the United States where they own homes and do not pay taxes to the American government. Meanwhile, we continue to get felt up at the airport by the TSA in order to protect us from these kinds of terrorists. This should make your blood boil.
And what happened to Patrick Stenkamp? According to my source, he was implicated in a hit and run accident involving a Peruvian national and was removed from his position. Stenkamp eventually went to work for Chevron which is very interesting in itself. If you recall the Anthony Sutton and Patrick Wood book, Trilaterals Over Washington, you will remember that Chevron is an old guard mainstay of the Rockefeller empire. The more things change, the more they stay the same.
Part Two will reveal money laundering details connected to these arrangements which involves major U.S banks and senior level government officials.
May I suggest that the readers write to Issa and Gowdy and ask them what they are afraid of?
Dave Hodges is the Editor and Host of The Common Sense Show.

Should robots count in a minyan? Rabbi talks Turing test

A 'Bot-Mitzvah' depicted on the TV show Futurama (Hulu)
A “Bot-Mitzvah” depicted on the TV show “Futurama.” (Via Hulu)
NEW YORK (JTA) — Robots can hold a conversation, but should they count in a minyan?
A chatbot at Britain’s University of Reading was heralded this week as passing the Turing test, showing a conversational ability that managed to fool people into thinking it was human.
Using the fictional identity of a 13-year-old Ukrainian boy with the name Eugene Goostman, the robot convinced a third of a panel’s members that they were interacting with a fellow human being.
While some have expressed skepticism about the achievement’s significance, the advance of artificial intelligence raises profound questions.
“From the practical legal perspective, robots could and should be people,” Rabbi Mark Goldfeder wrote in an article published on CNN’s website in response to the robot’s feat. “As it turns out, they can already officially fool us into thinking that they are, which should only strengthen their case.”
Goldfeder, a fellow at Emory University’s Center for the Study of Law and Religion, is working on a book on robots in the law tentatively titled “Almost Human.” An Orthodox rabbi, Goldfeder spoke via online chat with JTA about whether robots could some day be welcomed as members of the Jewish community and what the Jewish tradition has to say about this issue.
JTA: What got you so interested in the topic of robots in Jewish law?
Goldfeder: It was a natural evolution from apes actually. I started off looking at the line between humans and non-humans in Jewish law, and realized that the demarcation was not as clear cut in ancient times as appears to be now.
Throughout the discussions in rabbinic literature we find creatures like Bigfoot, mermaids, centaurs, etc., and yes the golem, who in many ways resembles a robot.
Once you assume it may not be a strictly speciesist argument, the move from great apes to robots is quite understandable — given, of course, the caveat the robots may not be technically alive in the classical sense.
What are the basic criteria that would make a robot/monkey/mermaid Jewish?
Well, we start with the Talmud in Sanhedrin, which tells us the story of Rava sending a golem to Rabbi Zeira. Rabbi Zeira ends up figuring out that the golem was not human — it couldn’t communicate effectively and couldn’t pass the Turing test, apparently — and so he destroys it.
The halachic literature asks why this was not considered “ba’al tashchis,” wasteful, since maybe the golem could have counted in a minyan.
While they conclude that this golem at least was not able to be counted — they leave open the possibility of a better golem counting — it seems then that creation by a Jewish person would give the golem/robot presumptive Jewish status. For living things there is always parentage and conversion.
I should of course clarify that this entire discussion is “l’halacha v’lo l’maaseh,” a theoretical outlaying of views.
Good clarification, though being a robot seems like a convenient excuse to opt out of a bris.
In halachic terminology we would consider him “nolad mahul” (i.e., it is like he comes from the factory pre-circumcized).
Theoretically speaking, say a robot walked into your office and said, “Rabbi, I want to count in the minyan.” Would that be enough evidence for you to count him?
Not necessarily. For the purposes of this discussion, I would accept the position of the Jerusalem Talmud in the third chapter of Tractate Niddah that when you are dealing with a creature that does not conform to the simple definition of “humanness” — i.e. born from a human mother or at least possessing human DNA, but it appears to have human characteristics and is doing human things — one examines the context to determine if it is human. When something looks human and acts human, to the point that I think it might be human, then halachah might consider the threshold to have been crossed.
This makes sense from a Jewish ethical perspective as well. Oftentimes Jewish ethics are about the actor, not the one being acted upon. If I see something that for all intents and purposes looks human, I cannot start poking it to see if it bleeds. I have a responsibility to treat all that seem human as humans, and it is better to err on the side of caution from an ethical perspective.
In your opinion — more sociological than halachic — what’s your read on how seriously should Jewish institutions be preparing for the eventuality of artificially intelligent congregants or constituents?
I think the difference between science fiction and science is often time. If you were to ask me now, I don’t think Jewish institutions need to start worrying about it quite yet. Even with the Turing test officially passed, we are quite far from the situation of having a robot capable of walking among us unsuspected. But I do think that Jewish thinkers should start tossing around the questions because we’re probably 30, not 100, years away.

Read more: http://www.jta.org/2014/06/12/life-religion/should-robots-count-in-a-minyan-rabbi-talks-turing-test#ixzz382SUPkyI

Saturday, July 19, 2014

The Flight Path of MH17 Was Changed. July 17 Plane Route was over the Ukraine Warzone

In-depth Report:
ukrainemap
This report –which remains to be fully corroborated– was sent to us by slavyangrad.wordpress.com
The maps below clearly indicate a change in flight path for Malaysian airlines MH17 on July 17. They also indicate on the map the two regions of Ukraine which are part of the warzone, namely Donetsk and Lugansk.
The first dynamic map compares the two flight paths:
It indicates the regular flight path on July 16th which takes the plane in a Southeasterly direction across the Sea of Azov.
The second flight path which is that of July 17th take the plane over the Donesk oblast warzone, bordering onto Lugansk oblast. 
The four static images  indicate screen shots of the Flight Paths of MH17 for July 14-17, 2014
The information conveyed in these maps suggests that the flight path on July 17 was changed.
MH17 was diverted from the normal South Easterly route over the sea of Azov to a path over the Donetsk oblast.
Who was behind the change of  the flight path?
Michel Chossudovsky, July 19, 2014

CLICK IMAGES TO ENLARGE

Changing MH17 Route From July 14, 2014 to July 17, 2014
IngoGraph
Screenshots of Flight Paths of MH17 for July 14-17, 2014
14th July Route15th July Route  16th July Route17th July Route

A LITTLE FLIGHT MH 17 ROUNDUP

I had fully expected to begin this week’s blogs with a review of some of the geopolitical stories of the past month, but after my News and Views from the Nefarium and yesterday’s blog, I’ve been virtually flooded with news and articles about the subject of the shootdown of Malaysia Air flight 17, none of which I have had any time to check out.  So why am I trying to summarize some of the recent finds here? Well, for one thing, as a kind of cultural mirror of what we’ve become: we’ve become a world that no longer buys easy official stories about anything, and in a way, that’s a good thing. But it’s also a bad thing, because it demonstrates how low the standing of western institutions has fallen. And they have only themselves to blame.The second reason I’m sharing all these stories is to show how quickly people now begin to gather data and analyze, and how each such event does seem to have a multi-leveled nature, as if several motivations or objectives were being accomplished all at once. Here’s what some of that snooping and sniffing has already found out, along with my usual high octane speculation commentary:
Mama Merkel is (Pretending to be?) Out of Her Chancellorial Mind
Yea, you guessed it: the West’s organs of mass disinformation and hypnotism are already pointing the finger of suspicion at Russia, and Mama Merkel wants to be part of the fun:
World Leaders Match Anger With Calls for Inquiry Into Ukraine Plane Crash
OK, so maybe Mama Merkel wasn’t pointing the finger of suspicion as loudly at Russia as everyone else seems to be (after all, she knows that Russia has nothing to gain, and Russia knows she knows, and she knows that Russia knows that she knows, and they both know that the NSA knows that she knows that Russia knows that she knows). But she does seem to be cheerily goosestepping along with Washington’s line that Russia is to blame for the whole Ukrainian fiasco, which most people also know is nonsense, and Mama Merkel knows this, knows that Russia knows it, and knows that Russia knows that she knows that Russia knows &c. And she knows Germany gets a lot of its energy from Russia. We’ll get back to Germany in tomorrow’s blog, by way of a stopover in France. The bottom line here to remember is that it’s an old chancellorial tradition, since Bismarck, for German chancellors to say one thing to keep London and Washington happy (notice I left out Paris, which is currently very unhappy), while quietly setting out to do very different things, like absorb Austria and Czechoslovakia, or expel CIA station chiefs.
Blame Russia, for it is the Home of Moustache Twirling Evil:
As if on cue, the current sock puppet-in-chief has weighed in to denounce Russia with a string of somersaulting non sequiturs truly breathtaking in its scope and intensity:
Monitors find confusion, hostility at Malaysia Airlines crash site
The “logic” here is truly a wonder to behold: (1) Russian missiles did it (2) the rebels had Russian missiles, (3) Russians had to train them (4) Russia is guilty, (5) we need more sanctions against Russia (hidden text here: “Will you guys over at the CIA pleeaase find those poison cigars that you were going to use on Castro and send some to Putin?”) Now, what’s missing in this whole analysis is the very annoying problem of why Russia, or for that matter, Ukrainian rebels, would want to scuttle their prospects in world opinion by shooting down a civilian airliner, either by accident or by intention. It makes no geopolitical sense. Then there’s the little teensy weensy problem of point number 3 above. Russian missiles don’t necessarily have to come directly from Russia, and even if they did, they don’t necessarily have to have Russians train the rebels. Pretty much anyone who’s kept up their subscription to Jane’s Defence Weekly would probably have some idea how to do it (we assume, of course, for the sake of argument here, that Msrs. Poroshenkorruption, Soros and Brzznsk are regular readers).
Was the Flight Deliberately Diverted over the Donetsk Region?
This one pretty much speaks for itself:
Was Flight MH-17 Diverted Over Restricted Airspace?
Except for another teensy problem: if it was diverted, who did the diverting? Given the West’s rather low standing in the aftermath of the Ukraine fiasco  not even the West has anything to gain by staging such an event(yes I know I know, you’re supposed to say “Ukraine” now without the definite article, but I’m sorry, I refuse to butcher the English language just for the sake of being “PC”, it’s still the United Kingdom, and in my obsolete grammar book, it’s still the Ukraine, Ketchup Kerry’s droning pronouncements notwithstanding). Of course, if it didn’t, then who did? (And no, for the Israel-is-behind-everything-bad-that-happens crowd, I don’t think they did either. Just because they exploited the crisis in Gaza doesn’t mean they’re behind the shootdown.) I’m still waiting for someone to blame _____ (Fill in the blank with your favorite “evil nation”, Iran, China, Syria, Mon(ster)santo, &c).
Then there was that Italian Airliner Thing…
Now, this one is one of those “memory recall” moments, sent to me in an email, so I don’t have an article to share, but Mr. S.D., a regular reader here, sent me an email reminding me about the NATO/French attempts to shoot down Qadaffi’s airplane with French fighters, until, according to some reports, Italy, with ties to Libya dating from before World War Two, quietly informed Qadaffi of the effort. Then, you’ll recall, an Italian airliner was shot down…. accidentally of course.
And then finally, there are the Passengers…
This one comes courtesy of The Huffington Post, whose headline says it all:
Malaysia Airlines MH17 Flight Carried Up To 100 AIDS Researchers – ‘The Cure For AIDS Could Have Been On That Plane’
True enough, like flight 370, this flight seems more than suspiciously loaded with people with “unusual interests and expertise” that, in the typical modus operandi of the sorts of evil people that do such evil things, could have been a corollary objective, for it’s a favorite technique of mounting such operations that several operational goals or objectives are combined. So again, the question of cui bono is relevant.
But it seems clear who does not benefit from such an operation: none of the countries or major powers mentioned really has anything to gain by planning and executing such an operation (in my opinion), neither the Ukraine, nor Russia, nor Germany, Great Britain, France, Italy, and yes, not even Iran or Israel or China or Mon(ster)santo or any of the usual “bad guys”. To be sure, it is the rule of geopolitics that if an event occurs that you haven’t orchestrated or engineered, then if it is possible to do so, you exploit it for your own purposes.
Which leaves an interesting question, doesn’t it? For if all that is the case, then who did do it? From the threadbare bits of data thus far gathered, it certainly appears that this was someone’s deliberate act. The real question is, whose?
See you on the…
Oh yea, one more thing: there are also some saying that the bodies were already dead, and some, of course, are already saying that the bodies of MH 17 are in reality the bodies of MH 370… Just had to mention it for the sake of completeness:
Bizarre Account of Malaysian ‘Plane Crash’
Rebel Leader Gives Bizarre Account of Plane Crash

Malaysia MH17 crash: 10 questions Russia wants Ukraine to answer

Published time: July 18, 2014 
Russia’s Deputy Defense Minister Anatoly Antonov (A still image from RT video)
Russia’s Deputy Defense Minister Anatoly Antonov (A still image from RT video)
Some Western states and Kiev rushed to find Russian involvement in the MH17 crash having no evidence to back their claims, Russia’s Deputy Defense Minister told RT. He invited Ukraine to answer 10 questions to prove their commitment to an impartial probe.
Speaking to RT, Russia’s Deputy Defense Minister Anatoly Antonov has criticized Western countries for jumping to conclusions just “24 hours after the crash” while there is no evidence.
“They try to show to the whole world that we are responsible for the crash. It is very strange that without any evidence my colleagues from western media would like to find somebody who is responsible for the crash,” Antonov said. “It seems to me that this is part of information warfare which has been started against the Russian Federation and armed forces.”
READ MORE: Unverified tape released by Kiev presented as ‘proof’ E. Ukraine militia downed MH17
Instead of using the incident as the pretext for groundlessly blaming one of the sides, the catastrophe over Ukrainian sky should be used as a possibility to restart cooperation to “prevent such tragedies in the future.”
“As for me, I don’t want to use this opportunity to blame anybody. I would just like to raise few questions for my colleagues from the armed forces of Ukraine,” Antonov said. “I hope they try to answer the questions, it will be a good opportunity for us to realize where we are, whether there is a possibility for us to restart cooperation and to find who is really responsible for the tragedy.”
“Answers for these questions could help us find an opportunity to prevent such tragedies in the future,” the Deputy Defense Minister said.

A picture taken on July 17, 2014 shows the wreckages of the malaysian airliner carrying 295 people from Amsterdam to Kuala Lumpur after it crashed, near the town of Shaktarsk. (AFP Photo / Dominique Faget)
A picture taken on July 17, 2014 shows the wreckages of the malaysian airliner carrying 295 people from Amsterdam to Kuala Lumpur after it crashed, near the town of Shaktarsk. (AFP Photo / Dominique Faget)

TEN QUESTIONS FOR THE UKRAINIAN AUTHORITIES

1. Immediately after the tragedy, the Ukrainian authorities, naturally, blamed it on the self-defense forces. What are these accusations based on?
2. Can Kiev explain in detail how it uses Buk missile launchers in the conflict zone? And why were these systems deployed there in the first place, seeing as the self-defense forces don’t have any planes?
3. Why are the Ukrainian authorities not doing anything to set up an international commission? When will such a commission begin its work?
4. Would the Ukrainian Armed Forces be willing to let international investigators see the inventory of their air-to-air and surface-to-air missiles, including those used in SAM launchers?
5. Will the international commission have access to tracking data from reliable sources regarding the movements of Ukrainian warplanes on the day of the tragedy?
6. Why did Ukrainian air traffic controllers allow the plane to deviate from the regular route to the north, towards “the anti-terrorist operation zone”?
7. Why was airspace over the warzone not closed for civilian flights, especially since the area was not entirely covered by radar navigation systems?
8. How can official Kiev comment on reports in the social media, allegedly by a Spanish air traffic controller who works in Ukraine, that there were two Ukrainian military planes flying alongside the Boeing 777 over Ukrainian territory?
9. Why did Ukraine’s Security Service start working with the recordings of communications between Ukrainian air traffic controllers and the Boeing crew and with the data storage systems from Ukrainian radars without waiting for international investigators?
10. What lessons has Ukraine learned from a similar incident in 2001, when a Russian Tu-154 crashed into the Black Sea? Back then, the Ukrainian authorities denied any involvement on the part of Ukraine’s Armed Forces until irrefutable evidence proved official Kiev to be guilty.

How US satellites pinpointed source of missile that shot down airliner

Satellite technology built to detect ballistic missile launches caught Buk’s signature.

An artist's rendering of the SBIRS "High" geosynchronous infrared surveillance satellite, one of the newer additions to the DOD's constellation of missile launch detection satellites.
Lockheed Martin
President Barack Obama today said without hesitation that the missile that shot down Malaysia Airlines Flight 17 was launched from within territory controlled by pro-Russian separatists in Eastern Ukraine. While he didn’t go into the sources the US used to pinpoint the launch, early reports say that US intelligence had identified the infrared signature of a missile launch just before contact with the airliner was lost.
That information likely came from one of a network of satellites operated by the Air Force and the National Reconnaissance Office (NRO), the US intelligence community’s spy satellite operations agency. Using highly sensitive infrared sensors and other electronic intelligence gathering sensors, these satellites can detect a variety of ground-based missile systems, as well as some aircraft, by their infrared signature. They also carry sensitive electronic intelligence sensors that can detect radar signals associated with anti-aircraft missile systems like the Buk launcher that has been widely pointed to as the culprit in the MH17 downing.
The latest of these satellite systems is the Space Based Infrared System (SBIRS), the successor to the long-running and euphemistically named “Defense Support Program” (DSP) satellite system. The DSP started in the late 1960s and continued in various forms through the last decade. A portion of the DSP constellation of satellites continues to function today and has been considered for use in tracking forest fires and potentially forecasting impending volcanic eruptions.

The unblinking eyes in the sky

DSP satellites were built with Cold War specifications to detect Soviet and Chinese ballistic missile launches. They needed to be able to detect even the relatively low infrared signature of submarine-launched missiles. Because their sensors were so sensitive, they frequently picked up forest fires and refinery fires from space. In December of 1975, a message was sent from the Ford administration’s Deputy National Security Advisor William Hyland to Hal Sonnenfeld, Secretary of State Henry Kissenger’s adviser, about a potential Soviet attempt to blind a DSP satellite with a strong infrared signal. It turned out to be a pipeline fire. During the Iran-Iraq War of the late 1980s and the Persian Gulf War in 1991, DSP satellites detected the launch of Iraqi “Scud” missiles and even surface-to-air missile batteries. And a capability called “Slow Walker” developed in the 1980s allowed satellites to track aircraft afterburner exhaust, a capability pushed by the US Navy to help it defend against potential attack by Soviet Tu-22 “Backfire” bombers.
In 1995, as the Cold War came to an end and the demands on satellite infrared systems increased, the Air Force launched the SBIRS program. Built under the direction of the US Air Force’s Space and Missile Systems Center’s Infrared Space Systems Directorate, SBIRS was designed for four mission areas:
  • Strategic ballistic missile launch warning for the president and the Defense Department leadership
  • Theater and strategic missile defense information, to provide early targeting data to systems such as the Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense system aboard US Navy cruisers
  • Collecting technical intelligence on potential adversary’s missile systems
  • “Battlespace awareness”—real-time information provided to military commanders about infrared “events” that could affect forces in the field and provide data for strike planning against launch systems.
The Air Force’s SBIRS program was intended to have two components: “SBIRS High,” the geosynchronous portion of the surveillance network, and “SBIRS Low,” a low-orbit system that could track ballistic missiles from launch through mid-course of their flight.
Enlarge / A slide from a 1998 Air Force Space Command presentation sells SBIRS' capability to detect artillery flashes to understand where the enemy's real attack objectives are.

Plan B

But the SBIRS High program ran into repeated trouble. To verify the functionality of SBIRS Low, two NRO signals intelligence satellites launched into highly elliptical orbits in 2006 and 2008. However, a geosynchronous NRO satellite launched in 2007 failed after only 7 seconds in orbit, resulting in further delays.
The Air Force SBIRS Low program had similar problems. It was cancelled and resurrected as the Space Tracking and Surveillance System (SSTS) and handed over to the Missile Defense Agency (MDA) as the Bush administration pushed ahead with ballistic missile defense research. Two SSTS satellites were put in orbit in September of 2009. But the MDA decided not to take SSTS any further. A month after the SSTS launches, the MDA kicked off the Precision Tracking Space System program—a program that was killed in 2013.
All the while, existing infrared satellites were expiring, and the Air Force started to explore alternatives to SBIRS. The service continued to launch DSP satellites until 2007, at which point its leadership started looking for a SBIRS alternative. That plan B, the Alternate Infrared Surveillance System (AIRSS) was later renamed the Third Generation Infrared Surveillance (3GIRS) program and was led by Raytheon and defense contractor SAIC. It quickly picked up steam as a lower-cost alternative—it used a “full earth staring sensor” that could watch an entire hemisphere of the planet for infrared plumes. But despite being on track and on budget, 3GIRS was cancelled in 2011 as the first SBIRS geosynchronous satellite was successfully put into orbit.
So far, the DOD has spent $2.35 billion on the SBIRS High satellite program, and it has two satellites in orbit. The SSTS satellites and NRO satellites have exceeded their expected lives but still remain in orbit—as do some later DSP satellites. And they have all been pressed into service for monitoring emerging potential threats, such as the flashpoints on Ukraine’s eastern border.
It's for that reason that NRO and Air Force satellite assets were most likely watching the area near Donetsk, Ukraine, yesterday as an anti-aircraft battery launched a single missile at the Malaysian Airlines Boeing 777, bearing witness to a tragedy that no missile defense system was ever intended to thwart.

Friday, July 18, 2014



TRIQUETRA III: MARK OF THE MONSTER TRIDENT

MNSTER

TRIQUETRA III: MARK OF THE MONSTER TRIDENT

This morning my phone rang early. It was a call from a colleague that told me that a Malaysian flight from Amsterdam was shot down over the Ukraine. I could not believe what I was hearing, the shock moved slowly as I rubbed my eyes and pretended to be alert.
In some haphazard brain phase I started to think that what I was hearing was that the missing Malaysian jet MH370, the plane that the media spent almost a month reporting about how came from some concealed locale in the twilight zone and wound up being targeted in the Ukraine.
Eventually I was slowly coming out of my sleep state and the reality of the tragedy became a creepy part of my morning routine. I realized that it was one of those days where something so real seemed so unreal all at the same time at that every paranormal coincidence that I reported prior to this moment seemed to be duplicating exponentially.
It wasn’t until my first gulp of coffee and a search of numbers dates and synchronicity I realized that something peculiar was a foot and that it all needed to be addressed. I want everyone to know that while coincidence and synchronicities happen around tragedies, this does not mean that what I am trying to do is paint the event with a conspiracy brush.
I know that for some people bringing up high weirdness surrounding tragedies is seen as an attempt to prove a false flag or some other conspiracy yarn, however there is something to be said about patterns of chaos in a world where it seems the trickster is making his mark and the symbolism and numerical randomness does not appear as being that random.
Ground Zero has reported since the Superbowl of different symbols that were shown and that the words “prepare to strike” were flashed on the screen during the performance of Bruno Mars and those similar words were uttered by a young girl during an aired Maserati commercial. The known symbol that represents the Maserati is the trident or spear of Neptune.
Neptune is the Roman Equivalent of Greek the god of the waters Poseidon.
The three-pronged pitchfork is the trident of Poseidon, the Greek god of water. It is also considered the symbol of Neptune, both are the gods of water and eventually both Poseidon and Neptune have been associated or have eventually evolved into the Christian devil that lives in depths of the earth.
Neptune also has a relationship with the great Dragon or Leviathan of prophecy that rises from the sea in the final days before judgment. Neptune and Poseidon have been called the Quinotaur— both associated with destroying earth, both called the Kings of terror or wrath. The triple pronged spear is also the weapon of Shiva the Hindu god of destruction.
In Numerology Neptune resonates with the moon nodes and is represented by the dragon Ketu or kethu. The dragon and tail Leviathan and Ouroboros and Neptune in circumference of completion also resonates and vibrates to the Number 7.
The Trident, Neptune and the symbolism all resonate and vibrate with number 7. 7 vibrates to the planet Neptune. It represents spirituality, sensitivity, sympathy, and mystery. 7 is the number of illusion and delusion, sometimes deception.
Today is July 17, 2014. July is the 7th month of the year 2014. Reduce down 2014 by adding 2+0+1+4 and you get the sum of 7. The 17th day 10+7 of the 7th month of 2014 reduced down to 7, all resonating with the trident and all resonating and vibrating with Neptune. The triplicate 7 or 777 is known as the Trident of Pisces. 777 also represent the Flaming sword according to the kabala. Aleister Crowley even wrote of the Trident of Pisces as Liber 777 the symbol of human mortality over divinity
In the bible 777 is associated with the 7th seal, 7th trump and the 7th vial. It is then that Christ returns.
777 is a trigger triple number, meaning that it is a number that triggers events, actions, wealth, poverty, tragedy and happiness. 777 represent the threefold perfection of the trinity. The antithesis of 777 is the triquetra (Satanic trinity) number 666.
On July 17, 2014, at 10:00 am EDT, Malaysia Airlines Flight Number 17, a Boeing 777 passenger plane from Amsterdam to Kuala Lumpur was shot down over eastern Ukraine.
The plane used for MH17 had its first flight 17 years ago on July 17, 1997, and now is apparently shot down on July 17, 2014.
Is it synchronicity at how all the numbers have been used up in the report of the tragedy of Malaysian flight 17 over the Ukraine. This is uncanny.
It is also uncanny that for 3 days Ukraine has been hosting a joint war exercise with the United States and other NATO countries called Rapid Trident.
Rapid Trident is the only military exercise the United States is participating this year, according to U.S. Army spokesperson Col. Steven Warren, since the U.S. cancelled upcoming Atlas Vision bi-lateral U.S.-Russia military exercises in response to Russia’s actions in regard to Crimea. Atlas Vision had been scheduled to begin in the same month in the northeastern Russian city of Chelyabinsk.
Rapid Trident will be led by the U.S., who will send the majority of the participating troops–the number has not been disclosed by the U.S. government. Units from Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bulgaria, Canada, Georgia, Germany, Moldova, Poland, Romania, UK and host Ukraine will also participate.
The U.S. has already sent 12 warplanes and some 300 troops to Poland. The force was dispatched shortly after the Russian invasion of Crimea, and was intended partly as a reassurance to Poland and America’s Baltic allies that the U.S. was willing to protect them from any aggression similar to that seen in Crimea, according to U.S. Vice President Joe Biden, who visited Poland last week. The U.S. also decided to maintain its aircraft carrier, the USS George H.W. Bush, in the Mediterranean Sea “to reassure its allies” after the events in Crimea.
Rapid Trident in an exercise designed to improve interoperability with America’s military partners, such as its NATO partners, Ukraine and others in Europe.
The coat of arms symbol for Ukraine is known as the Tryzub. Literally, the Tryzub is the trident.
The Trident has been known as a symbol of power in Central Ukraine since the 6th century. In Kyivan Rus the Trident was used by the great princes. Some interpret the Trident symbol as the tip of a weapon, others a preying falcon, an arched bow with arrow, or the Holy Trinity (Father, Son and Holy Ghost). However, most scholars do agree that the Trident is a symbol of the highest power.
The first image of a trident appeared in the 1st century AD. When Ihor, Prince of Kyivan Rus’ from 912 to 945AD, sent ambassadors to sign a treaty with the Byzantine emperor, they sealed the document with a trident.
As the official emblem of the Kyivan princes, the trident was stamped on coins, seals; it was depicted on porcelain and in frescoes.
It is thought that the trident represented the division of the world into three spheres: the earthly, the celestial, and the spiritual as well as the union of the three natural elements of air, water and earth. The trident was endorsed as the official emblem of Ukraine; the blue and yellow flag as the national flag of Ukraine by the Supreme Rada in 1992.
It is also a coincidence that the Malaysian airlines kite symbol in their logo is a double Trident. The Double trident is emblazoned on the tail, a detail that was provided by the mainstream media back when the world was looking for a missing 777 that also was Malaysian Jet. There was a lot of speculation about that Jet and many compared the situation to what happened 18 years ago on this date, when TWA flight 800 exploded over the Atlantic on July 17th, 1996.
At this time there is speculation that the downing of this jet may be a trigger event for World war III. Well it was 100 years ago this month that Archduke Francis Ferdinand and his wife were gunned down by a Serbian assassin. The tragedy fomented over the last few weeks of July of 1914 and by August World War I began.
According to Reuters, of the nearly 300 people on board, 23 were U.S. citizens. Two separate Dutch travel agencies have said that in total 55 of their clients were on board the flight. Other Dutch sources indicate there were 154 Dutch citizens on board. French officials have identified four of the victims as citizens of France. There were 27 Australians and 23 Malaysians also on the flight.
One passenger, calling himself Cor Pan, from the Netherlands, left an ominous Facebook message just prior to boarding:
screen-shot-2014-07-17-at-2-41-52-pm
The message joked that he was posting a photo of the plane in case it “disappeared,” a reference to the missing Malaysia Airlines flight 370. Cor Pan was on the flight with his wife.
With all of the glaring synchronicities the question that we have to ask is why this plane was flying into a war zone. It did not fly into Russian airspace and crashed near the border in an area of civil unrest.
Both the Ukrainian government and Russian separatists deny having shot down the plane, however isn’t it a bit of a coincidence that the A Malaysian plane was shot down in a region where a Ukrainian military fighter jet and a military transport plane were both shot down in the past week.
Months ago we warned you that things associated with the Triune, Triquetra and Trident symbolism have suddenly overtaken the zeitgeist.
Mon May 1st 2014 I appeared on the VERITAS radio program with Mel Fabrigas and I mentioned that the Ukraine is appearing to be a geopolitical point of convergence where east meets west. During the program I drew parallels with the original Malaysian MH370 tragedy and the symbolism of the trident. I was saying that there would be a trigger event ( at the time I did not say it was flight 370) that would ignite World War III and drew comparisons with MH370 and the Lusitania being attacked along with Archduke Ferdinand’s 100 year assassination anniversary.
The more things change the more they go full circle and the problems of the past need to be recognized as similar problems today and that warning signs point once again to “experimental times” where our morals will be tested for the so called New dawn of the global order.
The attempt at world oligarchy in 1914 gave us impetus to “wake up” to the same struggle; however, we are now being asked not to fight against the globalist overreach, but accept it as the only solution to the perils that await us in a nebulous and dangerous future.
I know we are all told that we have a choice in our futures, but the new attempt at world Oligarchy is fueling the tragedy of repeating the cycle of 100 years of war.
It is a part of a monstrous synchronistic order that brings all of the chaos into perspective.