https://gizadeathstar.com/2019/08/epstein-again/
By
now you've probably all heard the news: alleged human trafficker
Jeffrey Epstein died last Saturday, apparently of suicide. And as one
might expect, my email inbox was stuffed with this or that article
analyzing all the problems with what (little) we've been told. As one
might also expect, I also have some high octane speculations to offer.
But before we get to those, I for one have little difficulty in
understanding or seeing how someone like Mr. Epstein might be driven to
such despair, or fear, or both, as to take his own life. By any
accounts, it was a thoroughly debauched and depraved life if we are to
believe the allegations surrounding him (and I do), and as such, a
profoundly empty life. There was little of virtue, beauty, goodness, or
any sort of transcendent truth in it or light of God in it. He was
surrounded by wealth, power, privilege, sex, and narcissism and
psychopathy in all its forms. I think for all these reasons he may have
been, underneath it all, a profoundly sad, and profoundly fearful man. I
do not have difficulty believing that suicide is possible.
However, I don't have difficulty believing
that he was "suicided" or "Arkancided" either. In his "suicide" and
the blatantly obvious circumstances surrounding it, Epstein joins Vince
Foster and Danny Casolaro (the reporter who was investigating the
Inslaw-Promis scandal for Inslaw chief, Bill Hamilton), and indeed, many
people have already pointed out the parallel. And with that, we come to
just a few of the articles that flooded my email inbox when the news
broke.
One report from the UK Daily Mail suggests that Epstein had tried to warn guards that someone was trying to kill him, and that Epstein was taken off a suicide watch:
And of course, there is the story already floating around the internet - already abuzz with theories - that Epstein did not
commit suicide, is not really dead, and that a "double" was substituted
while Epstein was spirited away to Israel in a secret deal between
Trump and the Mossad:
And yet another version:
And of course, US Attorney General
William Barr is predictably appalled and outraged that such a thing
could happen and has ordered an investigation:
And last but not least, Amazing Polly immediately recorded this video which pretty well covers all the dots:
The New York Times has reported that Epstein was not
on suicide watch when he allegedly committed suicide. In any case, you
get the idea: most people are very skeptical of the story, including me.
In fact, imagine my total (lack of) surprise when I heard the news
Saturday. Most of us, I'll wager, were shocked by the news, but not
surprised by it. It fits the Vince Foster-Danny Casolaro pattern.
For the purposes of today's high octane
speculation, I am going to assume two things: (1) that Epstein is really
dead, and (2) that he was murdered in a fashion as to make it look like
suicide. The real questions then become the standard ones in any crime:
who had the means, motive, and opportunity or means to do so? Given Mr.
Epstein's associations - consider that he knew both the Clintons and
Mr. Trump, and various British royals, Robert Maxwell, the Bronfmans,
and so on, the strong whiff of intelligence agencies surrounding the man
- the "who" is fairly straightforward, for any number of people are
implicated in his "network". The "who" part of this question more or
less answers itself: it would take an intelligence operation to
penetrate a jail staff, and carry out an "Arkancide". Whose
intelligence? That's hard to say, for indications are that Epstein had
some sort of connections at least to MI-6, the Mossad, the CIA, and
possibly a few others. Any one, or combination of them, would be capable
of carrying it out. Money can buy a lot of things, including a few
guards willing to look the other way.
The real question of "who" is contingent upon "why", the motive.
Here things get dicey, because here is where my high octane speculation
comes in. Regular readers here, or people that are regular listeners to
my interviews over the years, will be aware that my hypothesis has
always been that each of these stories of human trafficking or sex slave
rings or pedophilia, from the Franklin Scandal, to the Saville affair,
to the Penn State scandal, to the "Finders" scandal, and even in my
opinion as far back as the California Wineville Chicken Coup murders and
all the way back to the case of Oscar Wilde in the 19th century, and
perhaps further back even than that, are interrelated. We are, in my
opinion, looking at something that has been in the criminal underground
for a very long time, and it is a global network. It is an occult
network, in the fullest senses of the word. It has been and is being run
to obtain and maintain power, and its commodity is human bondage and
misery. The template of the Franklin scandal is the clue, for by
catering to the wealthy and powerful, and recording their deeds,
"control files" could be built. It required "Lolita expresses" and
remote islands and cameras and secret recording equipment, all of which
appeared in the Franklin scandal, and which again appear in the
circumstances surrounding Mr. Epstein. We all know the stories, and have
seen the pictures.
If one scrutinizes these separate stories, they all have one thing in common: they're all analogue
networks, up to and including Mr. Epstein's, with one important
exception in Epstein's case, as we shall see. By "analogue" I mean they
required Lolita expresses, two way mirrors, hidden cameras, secret
recordings, and a network of rich and powerful people interfaced with
factions within various intelligence agencies. What is unique in Mr.
Epstein's case, as I pointed out in a previous blog, was the connection
to the Inslaw-PROMIS software scandal. It's that connection
that may be a profound clue, perhaps, into this latest in a long list of
Arkancides, for it may be the indication that the network was in the
process of "going digital", that it was in transformation when
Mr. Epstein became a part of it, and that this process may now have been
completed. With the means of tracking anyone and everyone through such a
network via sophisticated software, people like Mr. King of the
Franklin scandal, or Joe Paterno of the Penn State scandal, or Gordon
Northcutt of the Wineville Chicken Coup murders, or, now, Mr. Epstein
with his very analogue "black book," are no longer needed to maintain
the network, for its "capital" and "collateral" have been perfected by
the current surveillance capabilities. In such a system, the Epsteins,
Northcutts, Paternos and Kings are no longer assets, but liabilities to
the operation. The important people in such a network are no longer the
Epsteins, in other words, but the technocrats with their databases and
computers. And perhaps, that too, is another reason Mr. Epstein was
Arkancided, for he did cultivate scientists and technocrats, and perhaps
he knew who some of them were.
In short, it's a way of cutting overhead costs...
On the other hand, let's
assume for the sake of a different speculation that the "substitution"
theory is true, and that another person was substituted for the suicided
Epstein while the latter was spirited away. The standard version of the
theories out there is that we was whisked away to his Mossad masters in
Tel Aviv. That's one possibility. But there's another: what if the
whole thing was staged, and Epstein was indeed whisked away, but whisked
away not to a safe house with his erstwhile masters, but to a facility
where he can be more safely watched... far from Arkanciding hands, until
he testifies, or perhaps strikes another deal, and sings like a
canary...
No comments:
Post a Comment