“All three buildings were destroyed by carefully planned, orchestrated and executed controlled demolition.”
– Professor Lynn Margulis, Department of
Geosciences, University of Massachusetts at Amherst, and National
Academy of Science member, one of many academics who has been very
outspoken regarding 9/11 (source) (source)
Are the government, its allies, and the
ones who who sit above governments and dictate most decisions and
government policy (corporations and financial institutions, comprising
the Deep State),
lying to us? It’s far from a conspiracy to think so. If we look at 9/11
(one of many examples), approximately 50% of Americans don’t believe
the official explanation of their government, and why should they? Since
9/11, several pieces of evidence have emerged suggesting that something
fishy happened here, and “the powers that be” may have been
responsible. In fact, if we look at just how much information and
evidence has emerged, it’s almost impossible to say there was not any
foul play. Perhaps this is why the U.S. government continually refused
to re-open the investigation. The type of information and evidence
mentioned, by the way, receives very little if not zero attention from
mainstream media.
What really happened that day? Who
really knows for sure, but imagine your own government creating an event
in order to justify the invasion of multiple countries in the Middle
East. This is what seems to have happened, and it’s called false flag terrorism, something more and more people are becoming aware of.
What also lends more credence to the
theory of false flag terrorism is the fact that terrorism organizations
like Al-Qaeda and ISIS have had a long history of relationships with
Western intelligence agencies. These groups are commonly funded and
armed by Western intelligence agencies. This was one of the topics of
discussion a few years ago at the International Conference on the New
World Order, which was organized and sponsored by the Perdana Global Peace Foundation, where academics and politicians discussed these ties.
A couple of years ago at the G20 summit,
Russian President Vladimir Putin revealed 40 different countries that
have ties to, or are directly funding the terrorist organization known
as ISIS (read more about that here),
and multiple high ranking United States Defence personnel have come out
and said they have absolutely no reason to invade Iraq. General Wesley
Clark stated that it’s the perception of the United States that they
have a powerful military and can “take down governments.”
The global elite tend to call this
globalization, but it’s really infiltration and invasion. Our own
intelligence agencies have infiltrated multiple elections and
governments, installing a presence that best fits their own needs back
home. The Middle East is littered with U.S. military bases.
“The statesmen will invent cheap
lies, putting the blame upon the nation that is attacked, and every man
will be glad of those conscience-soothing falsities, and will
diligently study them, and refuse to examine any refutations of them;
and thus he will by and by convince himself the war is just, and will
thank God for the better sleep he enjoys after this process of grotesque
self-deception.”
– Mark Twain (source)
But the citizenry are not stupid. There
are reasons why so few Americans believe what their government says on
several different matters, and that’s evidence.
“The easiest way to carry out a
false flag attack is by setting up a military exercise that simulates
the very attack you want to carry out. As I’ll detail below, this is
exactly how government perpetrators in the US and UK handled the 9/11
and 7/7 ‘terror’ attacks, which were in reality government attacks
blamed on ‘terrorists.’ ”
– Eric H. May, a former U.S. Army intelligence and public affairs officer (source)
The latest piece of evidence comes from
the University of Alaska Fairbanks, by Dr. J Leory Husley and his team
of researchers, who have confirmed that the official explanation
surrounding World Trade Centre Building 7 and why it fell is completely
false. He is the Civil and Environmental Engineering Department Chair at
the University, and he made a presentation of the findings of the study
live on September 6, 2017, at the University of Alaska Fairbanks. It
included the detailed findings and conclusions he and his team found as
well as the next steps for the study, which included peer review as well
as an open period for feedback and criticism.
It was claimed in the official
explanation that the building fell due to fire, and this new study
remodelled and recreated the entire day’s events around building 7 and
proved very eloquently that the explanation is impossible and that the
only logical and physical explanation is controlled demolition.
This was the expected outcome, given the
fact that the building was only experiencing fires on a couple of
floors — it was not hit by a plane. It’s the same building that multiple
mainstream media outlets reported as having collapsed before it
actually did. See one example from the BBC here.
You can access the full study here.
Below is our interview with Richard Gage about these new findings and more. You can watch this FULL INTERVIEW in our Explorer Lounge tomorrow.
Richard has had great success in
presenting a scientific and logical case to support the fact that the
official story around 9/11 is false and has attracted more than 2,900 architects and engineers
with verified academic degrees, and in most cases professional
licenses, to sign the petition calling for a new investigation into the
destruction of World Trade Center Towers 1, 2, and 7. http://www.collective-evolution.com/2017/12/15/studies-show-wtc-building-12-7-could-not-have-fallen-why-does-the-us-still-lie-about-911/
Another Fairly Recent Study
Steven Jones is a former Professor of
Physics at Brigham Young University. His major research interests have
been in the areas of fusion, solar energy, and archaeometry. He has
authored or co-authored a number of papers documenting evidence of
extremely high temperatures during the WTC destruction and evidence of
unreacted nano-thermitic material in the WTC dust.
Robert Korol is a Professor Emeritus of
Civil Engineering at McMaster University in Ontario, Canada, as well as a
fellow of the Canadian Society for Civil Engineering and the
Engineering Institute of Canada. His major research interests have been
in the areas of structural mechanics and steel structures. More
recently, he has undertaken experimental research into the post-buckling
resistance of H-shaped steel columns and into the energy absorption
associated with pulverization of concrete floors.
Anthony Szamboti is a mechanical design
engineer with over 25 years of structural design experience in the
aerospace and communications industries. Since 2006, he has authored or
co-authored a number of technical papers on the WTC high-rise failures
that are published in the Journal of 9/11 Studies and in the International Journal of Protective Structures.
Ted Walter is the Director of Strategy
and Development for Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth
(AE911Truth), a nonprofit organization that today represents more than
2,500 architects and engineers. In 2015, he authored “AE- 911Truth’s
Beyond Misinformation: What Science Says About the Destruction of World
Trade Center Buildings 1, 2, and 7.” He holds a Master of Public Policy
degree from the University of California, Berkeley.
Together, they recently published a paper titled “15 Years Later: on the physics of high-rise building collapses” in the European Scientific Journal.
We know this for a fact now, yet there’s been no retractions in the
media. There not even willing to re-open the investigation. Why isn’t
someone Richard Gage brought on mainstream media to talk about what
happened.So many things were build off of 9/11, basically the entire war that followed and what we see of it today.
No comments:
Post a Comment