http://www.pakalertpress.com/2012/12/27/who-were-the-other-shooters/ yep ???
Who Were the Other Shooters?
December 27, 2012
Michael ShrimptonVeterans Today
Sandy Hook involved multiple shooters.
The mainstream media calls for gun control are a mindless, knee-jerk
reaction. Since a hostile intelligence agency
was clearly involved how would gun control affect matters? Firstly, if
the guns could not be acquired lawfully they would be supplied.
Secondly, we do not know whether all the weapons used so outrageously at
Sandy Hook were legally acquired. It is highly probable that most were
not.
Wayne LaPierre’s courageous comments on
the need for armed wardens were a good call, with respect. It is good
to see the NRA contributing to the debate with reasoned argument. Bad
Guys with guns can only be stopped Good Guys with guns. Unarmed primary
school teachers can only shelter their charges behind them but however
courageous – and the teachers of Sandy Hook Elementary School
will be remembered in a century’s time – they cannot stop them being
murdered after they themselves have been cruelly gunned down. Larry
Pratt, President of Gun Owners of America, got it right, with respect,
when he emphasized that gun control supporters have the blood of little
children on their hands. The kids at Sandy Hook needed somebody to fire
back on their behalf.
Politicians should stop allowing their
judgment to be clouded by emotion. Yes, it is distressing when the Bad
Guys murder little children, but caving in to their agenda will just get
more children killed. One of the reasons the selected targets were so
young was to get us to lose control of our emotions. Once you’ve lost
control of your emotions it’s easy to lose control of your judgment.
Obama has clearly lost his.
Emotions are a good thing. I am not
ashamed to say that I cried for the little ones murdered in Newtown. I
was particularly moved during a magnificent performance at the Royal
Albert Hall on Monday by the Royal Choral Society of Gabrieli’s lovely O Magnum Mysterium. As
an intelligence analyst however you cannot indulge in the luxury of
wallowing in emotion when you are applying your mind to a problem.
Apart from anything else your conclusions, if wrong, may lead to the
wrong Bad Guy being taken down, although as a barrister there is always a
Chinese Wall between your analysis and any kinetic application of force
based upon it.
A number of us on Veterans Today
have been thrashing around the issues, so apologies if you’ve seen this
elsewhere. Some of these points are not mine, but arguments made to me
which I consider to be sound. As always I am happy to give credit
where it is due, so if anybody wants an acknowledgement I shall be happy
to give it. The trolls no doubt will say ‘but you can’t accept anybody
else’s argument!’ Oh yes I can, if it’s a good one. I’m not such an
egotist to think I know all the answers – if I were I’d be working for
Thames Valley Police (it must be nice to have a job where you can leave
your brain at home!). Where I accept an argument however I am always
willing to give credit to whoever came up with it. I also respect the
confidentiality of communications to me.
There were clearly multiple shooters.
Consensus in INTELCOM seems to be moving towards three. There is NO
consensus that Adam Lanza was one of the shooters. There is no solid
forensic trail between him and any of the murders. Gordon may tell you
his body was brought in. I incline to the view that he was there, and
participated, but I retain an open mind. At least one other shooter
appears to have been briefly in custody, before being released. The
public statements of the police do not match the radio intercepts.
This does not mean that every officer
involved is happy with the cover-up. So far to the contrary it is clear
that some of INTELCOM’s intelligence is coming from within the local
police and possibly also CSP. Someone is also talking to NYPD, to judge
from the leaching of information to the New York Fire Department.
There is awareness in New York that they are fighting the same enemy as
on 9-11. Well done by the way to the firemen for paying their
respects. That was good to see.
I am NOT buying the idea that Lanza
killed his mother, on whom he was very dependent. Again the evidence is
very weak and consists of little more than statements to that effect. A
press release is not evidence, except of the intent of the person
pushing out the statement. Her survivalist credentials are a little
thin too, although not as paper-thin as Breivik’s ‘extreme right-wing’
credentials.
It is now clear that Lanza was not
mentally ill, although he was a loner and an introvert. That is not the
same thing as being mentally ill. If he did carry out some of the
murders he was clearly not the major player, or the planner of the
operation. I am told the SATINT is particularly helpful, but if you
want the good stuff word is you’ll have to talk to the Russians. If the
President’s Administration in Moscow, or the excellent Russian SVR,
could brief in the Russian media that would be extremely helpful. There
is NO chance of anyone in Washington or Hartford telling the media the
truth. It would not be usual even in the most normal of circumstances,
and these circumstances are far from normal.
The evidence that Lanza committed
suicide is also pretty thin. It is clear he was shot – the issue is, by
whom? There does not seem to have been an independent autopsy.
The poor parents are desperate to
prevent this murderous nonsense happening to other families, but with
respect they are not thinking straight. The more they go down the line
of pushing gun control, the more they play into the COREA Group’s
hands. At this time the chances of COREA not being involved are pretty
slim. There are deeper things at work here however than pushing gun
control.
The Germans may have been sending a
message to the Administration over the stolen funds sitting in New York
which are being traded to prop up the euro. There was a lot of activity
around that in the run-up to the shootings. Whether Lanza’s father was
in the loop on the trading, possibly in trying to stop it, could be a
legitimate line of inquiry (he comes across with respect as a decent
man). Lanza was chosen for this operation for a reason, and it was
nothing to do with his allegedly being a pupil at Sandy Hook.
Some one in the Administration must have
been in the loop. We may get a clue as to who it was over the next few
years. You would be surprised how much damage being involved in the
murder of children can do to the mind of even the most evil man or
woman, even if they come from Chicago.
The two shooters who survived will
almost certainly have been taken down by their own side already. The
Good Guys however will want to hunt down and eliminate those higher up
the food chain. I have no doubt they will be identified and will find
themselves on the wrong end of a Big Sig, in God’s good time. As a
lawyer I wish I could say that there was a better way, and I am bound to
advise against kinetic methods.
Our legal systems however lack the
sophistication to understand a black-op of this nature and the moral
fiber to deal with it. Just look at the way Norway’s legal system
rolled over for the mass shootings there. Breivik’s trial, with respect
(and I take no pleasure in saying this) was little more than a
propaganda exercise for the absurd mad, lone gunman theory. It was
Norway’s answer to the deeply discredited Warren Commission.
Again, Merry Christmas to one and all. If you’re a Mayan, don’t forget to buy your new calendar.
No comments:
Post a Comment