Pages

Wednesday, August 4, 2021

TRUST THE (BIG PHARMA) SCIENCE

Skull and Crossbones Free vector in Adobe Illustrator ai ( .AI ),  Encapsulated PostScript eps ( .EPS ) format for free download 434.42KB

Leave it to one of my favorite researchers, F. William Engdahl, to say what needs to be said, in this article shared by M.W.  And what he's saying is that Pg Pharma's "science" is no less dubious than the "science" of Big Agribusiness when the latter was touting the wonders of GMOs:

And We Should Trust ‘The Science’ of the Pharma Industry?

There's an unusual pattern here, and Mr. Engdahl states it right from the start of his article:

The forever-head of the US NIAID, Tony Fauci, has repeatedly demanded that the public “trust the science” as he shifts his own science opinion from one positon to another. What is never mentioned in mainstream media in the West or almost anywhere in the world is the scientific record of the major global vaccine making pharmaceutical giants. In short, it is abysmal and alarming in the extreme. That alone should prohibit governments from pushing radical untested experimental injections on their populations without extensive long-term animal and other testing to assure their safety.

What's the pattern? The utter lack of intergenerational long term testing, the exact same problem we saw with GMOs, and one of the main reasons that Russia, for example, has basically called a moratorium on GMO crops until those effects can be genuinely studied.

But as with GMOs, when results began to contradict the corporate narrative of "their complete safety", those results were buried by The Science's ever-complicit media (whose sponsors, uncoincidentally, are often Big Agriculture and Big Pharma). Mr. Endahl points out the complete silence, and therefore complicity and liability of every media network that has not given equal time to those scientists and doctors questioning the push for the quackcines, though if one has followed them closely, there are emerging signs that they've woken up, and are quietly beginning to backpedal. They are, after all, not immune from lawsuits, unlike the Big Pharma companies. Watch for them to slowly begin to give the adverse reactions greater time on their "news" programs.

And speaking of adverse reactions, Mr. Engdahl points out the CDC's own warnings:

According to the CDC such “adverse” events, post-vaccine, include anaphylaxis, thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome, Guillain-Barre Syndrome, myocarditis, pericarditis, and death. For the week of July 16 the CDC VAERS reported an alarming 9,125 reported deaths since late December from the COVID-19 vaccinations. Never in history have such high death totals been associated with any vaccine, yet the media is deafeningly silent about this.

Death is an 'adverse reaction'. And they're silent. And culpable.

As Engdahl points out, in dealing with Big Pharma, we might as well be dealing with I.G. Farbensanto. Johnson and Johnson has been found guilty of pushing opioid pain relievers knowing full well of their addictive properties. And Pfizer?

Pfizer, one of the world’s largest vaccine makers by sales, was founded in 1849 in the USA. It also has one of the most criminal records of fraud, corruption, falsification and proven damage. A 2010 Canadian study noted, “Pfizer has been a “habitual offender,” persistently engaging in illegal and corrupt marketing practices, bribing physicians and suppressing adverse trial results.” That’s serious. Note that Pfizer has yet to make fully public details of its covid vaccine studies for external examination.

The list of Pfizer crimes has gotten longer since 2010. It is currently engaged in lawsuits related to charges its Zantac heartburn medication is contaminated with a cancer-causing substance. As well, Pfizer received the biggest drug-related fine in US history in 2009 as part of a $2.3 Billion plea deal for mis-promoting medicines Bextra and Celebrex and paying kickbacks to compliant doctors. Pfizer pleaded guilty to the felony of marketing four drugs including Bextra “with the intent to defraud or mislead.” They were forced to withdraw their arthritis painkiller Bextra in the USA and EU for causing heart attacks, strokes, and serious skin disease.

Clearly in a move to boost revenue, Pfizer illegally paid doctors kickbacks for “off-label” use of more than one of its drug which resulted in patients being injured or killed. Among them were Bextra (valdecoxib); Geodon (ziprasidone HCl), an atypical antipsychotic; Zyvox (linezolid), an antibiotic; Lyrica (pregabalin), a seizure medication; its famous Viagra (sildenafil), an erectile dysfunction drug; and Lipitor (atorvastatin), a cholesterol drug.

...

A New York Times report disclosed in 2010 that Pfizer “…paid about $20 million to 4,500 doctors and other medical professionals in the United States for consulting and speaking on its behalf in the last six months of 2009.” It paid another $15.3 million to 250 academic medical centers and other research groups for clinical trials. In the US legal practice it is seldom that corporate executives actually doing the criminal deeds are prosecuted. The result is that court fines can be treated as “business costs” in this cynical milieu. In eight years of repeated malfeasance through 2009, Pfizer accumulated just under $3 billion in fines and civil penalties, about a third of one year’s net revenues.

What about Moderna? Get this:

The third covid vaccine producer today with FDA Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) is Moderna of Cambridge, Massachusetts. It has yet to be sued for illegal practices unlike J&J or Pfizer. But that fact is likely only because before its EUA for its mRNA experimental vaccine, in its ten years existence since 2010 it had failed to get FDA approval to market a single medicine, despite repeated failed attempts. However Moderna has a red neon sign that reads “conflict of interest” that should give pause.

Moderna and Fauci’s NIAID have collaborated on development of vaccines using Moderna’s mRNA platform and NIAID of Fauci on coronaviruses including MERS, since at least November, 2015. On January 13, 2020, before the first case of a supposed Wuhan, China “novel coronavirus” was even detected in the United States, Fauci’s NIAID and Moderna signed an updated cooperation agreement which described them as co-owners of a mRNA based coronavirus and that they had finalized a sequence for mRNA-1273, the vaccine now being given to millions for supposedly averting the novel coronavirus. That means that Fauci’s NIAID and perhaps Fauci personally (it’s allowed in the US) stood to reap huge financial benefits from emergency approval of the Moderna jab, yet Fauci has never admitted to the conflict publicly when he was Trump corona adviser, nor as Biden’s.

Ten days later on January 23, 2020 Moderna announced it was granted funding by CEPI, a vaccine fund created by Bill Gates’ foundation along with Davos WEF among others, to develop an mRNA vaccine for the Wuhan virus.

No conflicts of interest there (cough hack wheeze).

And then there's Mr. Trump's Operation Warp Speed, which developed a whole new set of conflicts of interest:

Up to its receiving EUA approval for its covid mRNA product in December 2020 Moderna had only made losses since its founding. Then curiously, following a March 2020 personal meeting with then-President Trump where Bancel told the president Moderna could have a vaccine ready in a matter of months Moderna luck changed.

On May 15, Trump announced creation of Operation Warp Seed to rollout a COVID-19 vaccine by December. The head of the Presidential group was a 30-year R&D veteran of the large UK drug firm GSK, Moncef Slaoui. In 2017 Slaoui had resigned from GSK and joined the board of none other than Moderna. Under Slaoui’s Warp Speed, some $22 billion of US taxpayer money was thrown at different vaccine makers. Moderna was a prime recipient, a brazen conflict of interest but nobody seemed to care. Slaoui funneled some $2 billion in government funds to his old company, Moderna, to develop the mRNA covid vaccine. Only under public criticism did Slaoui sell his stock in Moderna, making millions in profit from Moderna’s role as a covid vaccine leading candidate. Shortly after resigning at the end of the Trump presidency, Slaoui was fired by his old firm GSK from a company subsidiary following charges of sexual harassment of a female employee.

In February 2020 Trump Secretary of Health and Human Services, Alex Azar, invoked the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act (PREP) to exempt Moderna, Pfizer, J&J and any future covid makers from any and all liability arising from damage or death caused by their vaccines for the Wuhan coronavirus. The legal protection lasts until 2024. If the vaccines are so good and safe, why is such a measure needed?

It's that last question that hovers over this whole affair, and over every "public service" announcement and local country health official repeatedly urging people to get their injections  and perhaps suffer a lifetime of expensive health problems due to "adverse reactions." Big pharma, insurance, and the media networks complicit with them will not offer one penny of sympathy or support if that happens.

But when the lawsuits start to hit the networks - television and radio, national and local - then I imagine we'll see some major changes of emphasis in their reporting.

And oddly enough, I'm relatively optimistic that this will happen sooner rather  than later. And if states get involved in those lawsuits... well, wow!

No comments:

Post a Comment