THREE YEARS LATER AND THE MYSTERIOUS DISAPPEARANCE OF MH 370 JUST TOOK ...
March
8, 2014: Malaysia Air Flight 370 carrying 239 passengers from Kuala
Lumpur and Beijing disappeared off the radar. We all remember it. Within
the next two weeks, in the absence of a crash site, the conspiracy
theories abounded, and so did the hypotheses advanced to explain the
disappearance. Among the weirder hypotheses being advanced was my own
"it just went 'poof'" hypothesis, which I argued on George Ann Hugh's The Byte Show.
My reasons for doing so then were based, in part, on what had emerged
by way of explanations from other people pondering the same mystery:
(1)
there were eye-witnesses on the peninsula, and in the straits, who
heard and in some cases saw, a large jet flying low and to the south
east, headed toward the Indian Ocean, and definitely not China;
(2)
But then, no wreckage was found in any area corresponding to such a
flight path, though the Indian government and the Malaysian government
did conduct some early searches in those waters;
(3)
When wreckage failed to materialize at any likely crash spot, the
Chinese government then made available a satellite photo of what
appeared to be wreckage in the South China sea, while Chinese and
Vietnamese authorities conducted searches in those waters. The Chinese
quickly retracted their satellite photo, for reasons that still remain
unclear (at least, to this author);
(4) Then the first conspiracy theories began to appear:
(a)
The idea was quickly floated that the pilot of the flight was suffering
mental deterioration, and at one point, it was suggested that this was
an act of suicidal jihadist terrorism. This idea gained no traction, for
in the final analysis there was little evidence of either;
(b)
Next came the "hijacking" and the "bait and switch" scenarios: an
American general actually appeared on Fox news seriously suggesting the
flight had flown closely in the wake of another commercial airliner (to
confuse Indian radar and look like one object when it was really two)
over and through India, where it landed in Iran and became part of some
sort of plot (which was never made entirely clear) by Mr. Putin. This
story quickly fell apart when the Indian government released an Official
Guffaw and Belly Laugh, saying there was no way anything could enter
their airspace and they not know about it; this was followed by the
"bait-and-switch" scenario of various versions, where the flight landed
at the super-secret US base Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean, where the
plane was carefully repainted for use in yet another crazy scenario,
which eventually emerged when MH 17, flying from the Netherlands through
the Ukraine, crashed, and was, of course, blamed on Russia. This story
fell apart when Russia presented convincing evidence that they had
nothing to do with it.
(c) Then there
was the Rothschild computer-chip theory, which argued that several
passengers from an American computer chip company in Texas owned by
various Rothschild interests were flying to China, and they were taken
out by... well, whoever wanted to take them out to prevent secrets from
being sold, stolen, transferred, or whatever.
(5)
There were, of course, other hypotheses of accidental (or deliberate
but covert) missile strikes by everyone from the US Navy (which I doubt,
since they can't seem to steer ships to avoid collisions) to North
Korea (insert loud laughter here), to the Chinese, who had no motivation
for shooting down an aircraft with their own people aboard, and
presumably were going to get beaucoups computer chip secrets from the
Rothschilds;
(6) And finally, there were the "remote takeover" and "cyber-war" hypotheses, which, in the wake of the USS Donald Cook, Fitzgerald, and John McCain incidents, looks increasingly like a very viable hypothesis.
Throughout
this whole early initial period - and I grant you, my "review" is far
too short and missing many details - one nagging problem remained: No
debris... anywhere. My problem here was that if there was an explosion, a
missile strike (accidental or otherwise), or any similar sort of
scenario, then there would be debris, and somebody's satellites
would surely pick up on it. This led me (and, as it turned out, others)
to consider two scenarios: either somebody was covering up the
existence of a debris field because it might reveal secrets, either
about the means of MH 370's tragic end, or about the satellite
technology itself, or possibly both; or the satellites had detected nothing, and the aircraft had truly just simply vanished,
and the latter idea implied someone with some very sophisticated and
exotic technology, and was showing off, or sending messages, or
commandeering the craft. Then early in 2015 well-known American radio
talk show host George Noory, and well-known television actor Richard
Belzer, published a book with David Wayne considering the various
hypotheses titled Someone is Hiding Something: What Happened to Malaysia Airlines Flight 370?, which reviewed the various hypotheses and evidences, including the "exotic technology-it-went-'poof'" hypothesis( q.v. p. 193)
It
was the lack of debris that was so sobering, and suggestive, and I
recall suggesting to George Ann Hughs when we were discussing MH 370,
that a debris field should emerge soon, but that if it appeared in the
Indian Ocean, a very deep ocean, then any recovery of items on
the bottom would be problematic, since it would require advanced deep
diving technologies to do so. The problem as I saw it then, was that
such a debris field could be salted with debris not genuinely from the flight itself.
Sure
enough (and just in the nick of time, too! Whew!) debris began to wash
up in Africa and Madagascar two years later, and people held up parts
and pieces, pictures were taken, studies were done (which, you'll note,
conveniently avoided giving any real explanation as to what had happened
to the flight), and the result was "mystery over; it didn't
explode-wasn't
sabotaged/hit-by-a-missile/victim-of-a-bomb-didn't-just-g0-'poof'" and
obviously "didn't land in Diego Garcia/Iran/the Netherlands" which means
it was not "shot down by the Russians over the Ukraine." I'll bet Mr.
Putin breathed a sigh of relief when he received the news he was no
longer wanted for hijacking. This triggered searches that were already
under way off the coast of western Australia (!) to redouble their
efforts, but again, no debris field was found.
This
in turn has sparked a new journalism "meme": the "scientists think the
debris field is really here" meme, with this or that site being
proposed. To top all this off, when the "debris" began washing up in
Madagascar and the pictures were being taken, an Australian pilot and a
member of my website contacted me with analyses of the pictures. Now, of
course, this is purely anecdotal information on my part, so take it for
whatever it is worth, but his bottom line was that what was being shown
as debris had a few differences from the parts of the Boeing aircraft
of Malaysia flight 370. Well, I don't know, as I'm not a pilot. My
problem was and remains that a debris field can be salted. And even then, assuming that the debris we're being shown is
from MH 370, why is it so damnably far from any flight path that a
flight from Kuala Lumpur to Beijing would presumably take? It is this
that constitutes the problem for me with the "cyber-jack" hypothesis,
for presumably if one wants to cyber-jack an aircraft, one presumably
wants to do so because one wants to fly it somewhere in order to gain something
from the effort. But no, we're still being told the line that it
crashed somewhere in the eastern Indian Ocean west of Australia. This of
course, could all be just a "cover story" for the "cyber-jack" to Diego
Garcia story.
One might argue that the
cyber-jacki/Diego Garcia story gains some credibility here. But my
problem remains now what it was back when George Ann Hughs and I first
talked privately about the whole thing: Presuming the USA or UK wanted
to rec0ver something on that flight, or to intercept a delivery of
something to China, presumably they could have done so much earlier in the chain of delivery than they did, and could have done so in a much quieter and less obvious way than to make an entire civilian airliner disappear with no good explanation.
So the bottom line, before we proceed to part two of this story, is that (1) the
story or official narrative of Flight 370 is badly mangled, and began
to be so almost as soon as the flight was reported missing; this, to my mind, strongly suggests that someone knows something, and is covering it up; and (2) the debris showed up suspiciously late in the game, and wildly out of any area or reported flight path as reported by early eye witnesses,
suggesting that, for whatever reason, the flight was wildly displaced
from that path; (3) the fact that US Generals would appear on Fox news
offering (ridiculous) explanations means that, at some level, the US
knew or suspected what had happened, and was attempting either to divert
attention to the hi-jacking bait-and-switch theories, or to draw attention to the inadequacy of those theories by appearing to endorse them in a ridiculous way.
And
now, add to all this bizarre mix, this story, which many people sent to
me. I include all three versions, though they appear to be based
initially on the UK Daily Mail version:
Ponder
those as you sleep tonight, and we'll get back to them tomorrow, with
our own wildly geosynchronously "out there" high octane speculation... https://gizadeathstar.com/2017/09/three-years-later-mysterious-disappearance-mh-370-just-took-dark-turn-part-one/
No comments:
Post a Comment