What
happened on 9/11 was a horrific and unnecessary tragedy, and there are
multiple reasons why many victims’ families, along with half the
population of America (approximately 160,000,000 people, according to
the latest polls), don’t even believe the official explanation given to
them by the government. It’s called evidence, and there is an abundance
of it.
advertisement - learn more
One example, of a seemingly endless
number of ambiguities surrounding 9/11, is the topic of “false flag
terrorism.” False flag terrorism is the idea that a government would
stage a terrorist attack in their own country in order to justify war
and the infiltration of a foreign country for their own purposes. This
appears to have been the motivation behind 9/11, as well as several
other ‘terrorist’ attacks which have occurred around the globe.
The truth
is, there is no Islamic army or terrorist group called Al-Qaeda, and any
informed intelligence officer knows this. But, there is a propaganda
campaign to make the public believe in the presence of an intensified
entity representing the “devil” only in order to drive TV watchers to
accept a unified international leadership for a war against terrorism.
The country behind this propaganda is the United States. – Former British Foreign Secretary, Robin Cook
This notion of false flag terrorism has
become more substantiated for a few reasons. One of them is the
documents which show that Western intelligence agencies have been
funding and supplying the very same terrorist groups they claim to be
“fighting” against for years, documents which clearly establish
links between Al-Qaeda and the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). More
attention was brought to this possibility in the mainstream world when
the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) mentioned it in 2004. It’s a well known fact that the United States funded Al-Qaeda 20 years ago…
There is no shortage of information when
it comes to the CIA/Al-Qaeda connection, and a simple Google search
would suffice to show you that.
Most
terrorists are false flag terrorists, or are created by our own security
services. In the United States, every single terrorist incident we have
had has been a false flag, or has been an informant pushed on by the
FBI. In fact, we now have citizens taking out restraining orders against
FBI informants that are trying to incite terrorism. We’ve become a
lunatic asylum. – David Steele, a 20-year Marine Corps
intelligence officer, and the second-highest-ranking civilian in the
U.S. Marine Corps Intelligence (You can read more about David, and find
the source of that quote in this article.)
As soon
as that connection was exposed, a new threat emerged… ISIS. Then, Sibel
Edmonds, FBI whistleblower and founder of of the National Security
Whistleblowers Coalition (NSWBC), said what many people were already
suspecting, that the United States is simply reviving the terror scare
with ISIS to promote the “terror war industry.” (source)
The list literally goes on and on, and I
thought I would leave you with this video about ISIS, created by
award-winning journalist Ben Swann, which might give you something to
think about regarding the ‘terrorists’ that were supposedly responsible
for the events that happened on 9/11.
Another piece of information that people
are still waking up to regarding 9/11 is the fact that over 2200
architects and engineers who come from the top of the industry and
academia have crushed the ‘official’ 9/11 commission report.
“All three buildings were destroyed by carefully planned, orchestrated and executed controlled demolition.” –
Professor Lynn Margulis, Department of Geosciences, University of
Massachusetts at Amherst and National Academy of Science member, one of
many academics who has been very outspoken regarding 9/11 (source) (source)
Below is a video interview with Richard
Gage, the founder of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth, regarding
the scientific inconsistencies which have been reported as truth
surrounding all three buildings.
Don’t forget about building 7… the one
that collapsed, the one that was not hit by a plane at all (touched
upon in interview below).
Furthermore, the firefighters that were actually called to the scene on that day have spoken out many times. Here is
an article published earlier this year with a video of two firefighters
who were in the buildings at the time, having no doubt that what they
were hearing was multiple explosions.
Furthermore, the response (or lack
thereof) to questions about 9/11 from those within the government has
been quite revealing. Politicians are constantly cowering away, refusing
to answer any questions at all when confronted. Here is a great example of Vice President Biden being asked.
The list of reasons as to why people are
so suspicious is incredibly long, and for the interest of keeping this
article as short as possible, I encourage you to further your research
if you are just starting to wake up to this kind of information.
If you’re interesting in reading more articles that we’ve written regarding 9/11, please click HERE. hummm
100 years of patents reveal secret history of U.S. weather control programs
Thursday, July 30, 2015 by: J. D. Heyes ,http://www.naturalnews.com/050589_geoengineering_patents_weather_control.html#
(NaturalNews) Have the U.S. government and American researchers been
toying with the notion of controlling, changing or otherwise adapting
the weather? According to this comprehensive and exhaustive list of patents, the answer is yes.
In fact, researchers have spent the past century working to develop climate and weather control technologies. But a 1999 study by the U.S. Air Force nailed it: Within three decades, the report's authors concluded, the United States military should have perfected methods to control weather.
As reported at the time by WorldNetDaily, the Air Force study titled, "Weather as A Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather In 2025," which was commissioned by then-Air Force Chief of Staff Michael Ryan and first presented in 1996, authors predicted that the technology was within reach.
As noted by WND:
Military planners have often bemoaned the fact that during critical operations weather has been a mitigating factor. Though the U.S. military is generally considered superior to the forces of other nations and can wage war in most kinds of weather, Air Force operations traditionally have suffered the most from inclement weather like rain, fog, and other low-visibility conditions.
Click here to search GoodGopher.com for more information about geoengineering.
Weather control as a weapon
The Air Force is the branch of service tasked with most of the military's satellite and space surveillance; weather conditions can degrade the ability of sensitive surveillance equipment like infrared technology and imagery programs. As such, the Air Force has long sought to defeat natural phenomena because planners believe that without weather-modification capability, critical combat missions in the future would be hampered, to the detriment of U.S. forces.
"Achieving such a highly accurate and reasonably precise weather-modification capability in the next 30 years will require overcoming some challenging but not insurmountable technological and legal hurdles," the report said.
The authors added that altering weather patterns would eventually become an "integral part of U.S. national security policy with both domestic and international applications."
"Society will have to provide the resources and legal basis for a mature capability to develop," they wrote, signaling that the Air Force believes public reluctance and likely legal battles would be hurdles to the development and deployment of a global weather-modification system.
Today, one of the most widely pursued weather modification techniques is called cloud seeding, using in an attempt to cause rain or snow, generally to boost an area's moisture content.
"Weather modification, commonly known as cloud seeding, is the application of scientific technology that can enhance a cloud's ability to produce precipitation," says the web site Weather Modification, Inc., which says the company is able to provide aerial or ground-based cloud seeding.
The company's current projects listing includes federal and state governments, as well as academic institutes and private corporations (interestingly, the company's client list does not include the state of California, which is currently experiencing a historic drought).
Then there is HAARP, one of the better-known weather modification projects. Officially called the High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program, its aim is not simply weather modification but also electromagnetic warfare, according to Canada-based Center for Research on Globalization.
"It isn't just conspiracy theorists who are concerned about HAARP. The European Union called the project a global concern and passed a resolution calling for more information on its health and environmental risks. Despite those concerns, officials at HAARP insist the project is nothing more sinister than a radio science research facility," said a Canadian Broadcasting Corporation documentary, cited by Global Research.
HAARP is a U.S. military program; researchers at the Global Research center believe the technology is part of the Defense Department's "Joint Vision 2020," which seeks to achieve "full spectrum dominance" of battle spaces.
A history of covert military weather modification programs
Weather modification for military defense is not a new idea; in fact, the U.S. military attempted to create weather obstructions during the Vietnam War by dropping silver iodide particles in the clouds during the infamous Operation Popeye. Altheadlines.com describes the operation:
Between 1967 and 1972, the US air force carried out "Operation Popeye", the first use of weather as an instrument of war. Almost 3,000 flights were sent into the skies above the Ho Chi Minh Trail, where planes seeded clouds with silver iodide particles, causing storms and extending the monsoon season. "Popeye" turned the strategic pass into a bog -- and appalled the international community. In 1977, the Enmod (Environmental Modification Convention) treaty outlawed weather warfare.
Click here to find articles on GoodGopher.com about Operation Popeye.
HAARP as 'full dominance' weapon
According to a 2000 report by the American Forces Press Service:
Full-spectrum dominance means the ability of U.S. forces, operating alone or with allies, to defeat any adversary and control any situation across the range of military operations.
While full-spectrum dominance is the goal, the way to get there is to "invest in and develop new military capabilities." The four capabilities at the heart of full-spectrum dominance are dominant maneuver, precision engagement, focused logistics and full-dimensional protection.
Read the full Center for Research on Globalization's HAARP report here.
Sources:
http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org
http://mobile.ryan.test.wnd.com
http://www.weathermodification.com
http://www.defense.gov
http://www.globalresearch.ca
http://www.altheadlines.com
In fact, researchers have spent the past century working to develop climate and weather control technologies. But a 1999 study by the U.S. Air Force nailed it: Within three decades, the report's authors concluded, the United States military should have perfected methods to control weather.
As reported at the time by WorldNetDaily, the Air Force study titled, "Weather as A Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather In 2025," which was commissioned by then-Air Force Chief of Staff Michael Ryan and first presented in 1996, authors predicted that the technology was within reach.
As noted by WND:
Military planners have often bemoaned the fact that during critical operations weather has been a mitigating factor. Though the U.S. military is generally considered superior to the forces of other nations and can wage war in most kinds of weather, Air Force operations traditionally have suffered the most from inclement weather like rain, fog, and other low-visibility conditions.
Click here to search GoodGopher.com for more information about geoengineering.
Weather control as a weapon
The Air Force is the branch of service tasked with most of the military's satellite and space surveillance; weather conditions can degrade the ability of sensitive surveillance equipment like infrared technology and imagery programs. As such, the Air Force has long sought to defeat natural phenomena because planners believe that without weather-modification capability, critical combat missions in the future would be hampered, to the detriment of U.S. forces.
"Achieving such a highly accurate and reasonably precise weather-modification capability in the next 30 years will require overcoming some challenging but not insurmountable technological and legal hurdles," the report said.
The authors added that altering weather patterns would eventually become an "integral part of U.S. national security policy with both domestic and international applications."
"Society will have to provide the resources and legal basis for a mature capability to develop," they wrote, signaling that the Air Force believes public reluctance and likely legal battles would be hurdles to the development and deployment of a global weather-modification system.
Today, one of the most widely pursued weather modification techniques is called cloud seeding, using in an attempt to cause rain or snow, generally to boost an area's moisture content.
"Weather modification, commonly known as cloud seeding, is the application of scientific technology that can enhance a cloud's ability to produce precipitation," says the web site Weather Modification, Inc., which says the company is able to provide aerial or ground-based cloud seeding.
The company's current projects listing includes federal and state governments, as well as academic institutes and private corporations (interestingly, the company's client list does not include the state of California, which is currently experiencing a historic drought).
Then there is HAARP, one of the better-known weather modification projects. Officially called the High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program, its aim is not simply weather modification but also electromagnetic warfare, according to Canada-based Center for Research on Globalization.
"It isn't just conspiracy theorists who are concerned about HAARP. The European Union called the project a global concern and passed a resolution calling for more information on its health and environmental risks. Despite those concerns, officials at HAARP insist the project is nothing more sinister than a radio science research facility," said a Canadian Broadcasting Corporation documentary, cited by Global Research.
HAARP is a U.S. military program; researchers at the Global Research center believe the technology is part of the Defense Department's "Joint Vision 2020," which seeks to achieve "full spectrum dominance" of battle spaces.
A history of covert military weather modification programs
Weather modification for military defense is not a new idea; in fact, the U.S. military attempted to create weather obstructions during the Vietnam War by dropping silver iodide particles in the clouds during the infamous Operation Popeye. Altheadlines.com describes the operation:
Between 1967 and 1972, the US air force carried out "Operation Popeye", the first use of weather as an instrument of war. Almost 3,000 flights were sent into the skies above the Ho Chi Minh Trail, where planes seeded clouds with silver iodide particles, causing storms and extending the monsoon season. "Popeye" turned the strategic pass into a bog -- and appalled the international community. In 1977, the Enmod (Environmental Modification Convention) treaty outlawed weather warfare.
Click here to find articles on GoodGopher.com about Operation Popeye.
HAARP as 'full dominance' weapon
According to a 2000 report by the American Forces Press Service:
Full-spectrum dominance means the ability of U.S. forces, operating alone or with allies, to defeat any adversary and control any situation across the range of military operations.
While full-spectrum dominance is the goal, the way to get there is to "invest in and develop new military capabilities." The four capabilities at the heart of full-spectrum dominance are dominant maneuver, precision engagement, focused logistics and full-dimensional protection.
Read the full Center for Research on Globalization's HAARP report here.
Sources:
http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org
http://mobile.ryan.test.wnd.com
http://www.weathermodification.com
http://www.defense.gov
http://www.globalresearch.ca
http://www.altheadlines.com
No comments:
Post a Comment