THE GEOENGINEERING SCRAPBOOK: CIA AND NASA WANT TO SPRAY THE ATMOSPHERE

Posted on July 26, 2015 by Joseph P. Farrell • http://gizadeathstar.com/2015/07/the-geoengineering-scrapbook-cia-and-nasa-was-to-spray-the-atmosphere/

The chemtrails and geoengineering issue is not something I have talked about a great deal on this website, but not for lack of interest. My reticence to do so is simply due to the fact that there are many others who have followed this issue much longer, and much more thoroughly, and who are more familiar with it, than I. I first became aware of the geoengineering issue years ago listening to an interview on Art Bell of Dr. Nick Begich and his co-author of Angels Don't Play this HAARP, Jeanne Manning, when they raised the possibilities of that type of use of ionospheric heaters. Indeed, it is difficult not to see geoengineering possibilities for such devices, since they "play around" with the Earth's ionosphere, an activity bound to have effects in the Earth's ecosphere.
But there were and are personal and anecdotal factors in play in my interest in the subject as well. This may be purely a misconception, or perhaps a "mis-remembered" thing upon my part, but I have the distinct impression that in my youth, the sky was slightly bluer than it is now. That's the first little bit of anecdotal information for my personal interest in the subject of geoengineering. The second is that, years ago, while visiting my mother, I stepped outside to smoke a cigarette, and was stunned by what I saw when I looked up, for there in the sky high above were cirrus clouds. But these were no ordinary clouds. They exhibitted a distinctive cross-hatch pattern of genuine rectilinearity, as if I was looking at a huge checkerboard or spider's web made of clouds.
And clouds just don't do that, not with such linearity, perpendicularity, and over a vast area, all on their own.
Now there's this(shared by Mr. S.D.):
CIA And NASA Back Proposals To Spray Aerosols Into Earth’s Atmosphere
What I found disturbing - if true - are these paragraphs:

Geoengineering incorporates strategies to battle and cut the effects of climate change and global warming. It’s a deliberate intervention in the Earth’s climatic system. During the lectures, one method for doing this was illustrated, called Solar Radiation Management (SRM). SRM is the act of spraying stratospheric aerosols into the atmosphere. They outlined how SRM would involve aircraft spraying atmospheric aerosols over decades.
The spraying of aluminum into the atmosphere is also considered within the programs.
“There might be some good reasons to think about aluminum. Aluminum has four times the volumetric rate for small particles as does sulphur. That means you have roughly 16 times less the coagulation rate, and that’s the thing that really drives removal.” – David Keith, Canadian Environmental Scientists, Professor of Applied Physics at Gordon McKay, Professor of Public Policy, Harvard University and President of Carbon Engineering.
Aluminum contains aluminum oxide and thorium oxide, which have high emissivity and are considered harmful. The question remains, why does the Department of Defense and the CIA have a hand in backing these geoengineering projects? Is climate and geoengineering a national security issue?

And we may add the following paragraph into the mixture:

An observation made by Rosalind Peterson, President and Co-Founder of the Agriculture Defense Coalition (ADC), identified at a 2007 United Nations inquiry on global warming:
“One of the things that’s affected by climate change is agriculture, but some of what we are seeing is man-made, but man made in a different way than what you may guess. Weather modification programs, experimental ones done by private companies, the US government, are underway and there are more than 50 operations underway across the United States. All of these impact agriculture because they change the micro-climates needed for agriculture to survive. None of these programs are done with oversight. International corporations are modifying our weather all the time, and modifying it in ways that cover thousands and thousands of square miles. Most of it is chemically altered, so what happens is that we are putting ground based chemicals that are shot into the air that change and modify our weather.” (Emphasis in the original)

So what, again, do we have (and again, assuming all these things are true):

1. The spraying of dangerous chemicals into the atmosphere in the form of aluminum oxide (aluminum has been linked to Alzheimer's in some estimations), and thorium oxide;
2. The advocacy of the CIA and NASA for these activities, which strongly suggests:
3. A national security component to the effort, and hence, the high octane speculative possibility that "they" know something they're not telling "us"; and finally,
4. international corporations are also allegedly involved in the activity, raising the political and legal question: who gave them the right (and do they even have the right to engage in activities affecting the entire planet. I would argue no, that this is an egregious over-stepping the bounds of any possible corporate charter).

What interests me are the potential reasons behind any such implied national security motivation. These might range from concerns about protecting the planet in the face of possible magnetic pole shifts, during which period the planet could conceivably be exposed to dangerous levels of solar radation, to knowledge of potential "interventions" from "others", and the need to make the planetary environment as inhospitable as possible. Yet another possibility is that such engineering might be required for certain types of directed energy technologies or weaponry, or various types of communications systems. At this stage, it is anyone's guess.
And that's the problem, for at this stage, if the powers that be do not come forward with more plausible explanations for their climate and geoengineering projects than "climate change", it will continue to be a field day for all sorts of theories.