Selected Articles
While Bilderberg claims its annual conference is “to foster dialogue between Europe and North America”, the Worldwide monetary system as well as the US-NATO global war agenda are slated to be discussed behind closed doors.
According to Bilderberg expert Daniel Estulin, the group went as far as planning the 2008 economic crisis:
According to Estulin’s sources, which
have been proven highly accurate in the past, Bilderberg is divided on
whether to put into motion, “Either a prolonged, agonizing depression
that dooms the world to decades of stagnation, decline and poverty … or
an intense-but-shorter depression that paves the way for a new
sustainable economic world order, with less sovereignty but more
efficiency.”
The information takes on added weight
when one considers the fact that Estulin’s previous economic forecasts,
which were based on leaks from the same sources, have proven deadly
accurate. Estulin correctly predicted the housing crash and the 2008
financial meltdown as a result of what his sources inside Bilderberg
told him the elite were planning based on what was said at their 2006
meeting in Canada and the 2007 conference in Turkey.
Details of the economic agenda were
contained in a pre-meeting booklet being handed out to Bilderberg
members. On a more specific note, Estulin warns that Bilderberg are
fostering a false picture of economic recovery, suckering investors into
ploughing their money back into the stock market again only to later
unleash another massive downturn which will create “massive losses and
searing financial pain in the months ahead,” according to a Canada Free
Press report. (Paul Joseph Watson Leaked Agenda: Bilderberg Group Plans Economic Depression, Prison Planet.com 7 May 2009)
In light of the above, it is important to highlight the presence at
the 2014 meeting of the elite banking groups which benefited from the
2008 financial meltdown not to mention the generous bailouts. These
include the iconic “too big to fail” bank, Goldman Sachs, the “bank that
rules the world”.Goldman Sachs will be represented by: Peter D. Sutherland, Chairman of Goldman Sachs International, and Robert B. Zoellick, Chairman of the Board of International Advisors of The Goldman Sachs Group. Their presence is by no means accidental. Both Sutherland and Zoellick “in their previous lives” before joining Goldman played key roles in strategic trade negotiations including NAFTA and the WTO. The Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) is on the Bilderberg agenda and Goldman Sachs is intent upon playing a leading role.
“Too big to jail” HSBC will also have representatives, the Group Chairman of HSBC Holdings, Douglas J. Flint, and his senior advisor Sherard Cowper-Coles. These mega banks have a longstanding record of financial fraud:
“Goldman symbolizes master of the universe of financial manipulation (Reuters
April 16, 2011) It’s been involved in nearly all financial scandals
since the 19th century… In 2002, it was largely responsible for Greece’s
debt problems. It involved circumventing Eurozone rules in return for
mortgaging assets.
Using creative accounting, debt was
hidden through off-balance sheet shenanigans. Derivatives called
cross-currency swaps were used. Government debt issued in dollars and
yen was swapped for euros, then later exchanged back to original
currencies.
Debt entrapment followed. Greece was held
hostage to repay it. The country’s been raped and pillaged. Paying
bankers comes first. Doing it left Greeks impoverished, high and dry.
Goldman profited enormously by scamming an entire country and millions
in it.”(Stephen Lendman, Goldman Sachs: Making Money by Stealing It, sjlendman.blogspot.ca, 17 March 2012)
The
leaders of the “Too big to Jail Banks” not only mingle behind closed
doors together with Central Bank governors and the Managing Director of
the IMF Christine Lagarde, they also exchange pointed views on “War and
Economy” with the West’s top military brass, as well as the head of
Britain’s Secret Service and NATO Secretary General Anders Fog Rasmussen.Before the 2008 meltdown, Goldman Sachs made enormous profits out of products it sold knowing it was “crap”.
But Goldman is above the law. In 2012 the US justice Department issued a statement saying that after an exhaustive investigation, they “concluded that the burden of proof to bring a criminal case (against Goldman) could not be met based on the law and facts as they exist at this time”. James Hall explains:
The Department of Justice functions to
discipline the other guy. Goldman Sachs is the hub of the financial
pyramid. When partners are installed on the Federal Reserve or are
appointed to Treasury, the money elite contain their grip on their
control of the fiat money system. This model dominated by bureaucratic
technocrats, runs roughshod over the regulators. The mere notion that
any Attorney General will enforce statues is naive, when every
administration is bought and paid for by the same moneychangers.
Using the distinctive absurdity of legal rationalization, RT reports:
“The Justice Department said that it had conducted an “exhaustive investigation”
into allegations of fraud during the crisis from 2008 to 2009. The
probe reportedly uncovered email conversations between employees of
Goldman Sachs branding mortgage securities sold to investors as “junk”
and “crap”.
Moreover, the probe writes that the bank
“used net short positions to benefit from the downturn in the mortgage
market, and designed, marketed, and sold CDOs [collateralized debt
obligations] in ways that created conflicts of interest with the firm’s
clients and at times led to the bank’s profiting from the same products
that caused substantial losses for its clients.” (James Hall, Goldman Sachs Above the Law, Batr.org, 15 August 2012)
As for “too big to jail” HSBC, on December 10, 2013 the US Justice
Department “announced a settlement with the British-based HSBC bank
regarding charges of money laundering Mexican drug funds that allows the
bank to admit to wrongdoing and pay a fine without being criminally
charged.”
[T]he US authorities decided, despite
ample evidence that HSBC had laundered billions of dollars for major
drug cartels in Mexico and Colombia, not to press criminal charges
against the bank or any of its executives because the bank was “too big
to indict.” (Barry Grey, Sweetheart Settlement for HSBC Bank on Drug Money Laundering Charges, World Socialist Web Site, December 13, 2012)
It
is worth noting the presence of two major personalities responsible for
the 2008 financial meltdown, Robert Rubin and Lawrence Summers, both
part of the “Wall Street-Washington consensus”.Here’s a few interesting facts about Robert Rubin, who, lest we forget, was the one who had the Glass-Steagall Act abolished, a move that paved the way to the Wall Street casino and lead to the 2008 collapse:
Rubin, a 26-year veteran of Goldman Sachs,
was rewarded by Citibank for his service to the banks while Treasury
Secretary with a $50 million compensation package in 2008 and
$126,000,000 between 1999 and 2009. Dr. Paul Craig Roberts, The Money Changers Serenade: A New Bankers’ Plot to Steal Your Deposits, .TrendsJournal.com, November 22, 2013)
Robert Rubin was Secretary of the Treasury from 1995 to 1999… Later, hand in hand with the IMF, he enforced shock therapies
that actually worsened the crises that occurred in South-East Asia in
1997-98 and in Russia and Latin America in 1999. Never for a moment did
Rubin doubt the benefits of liberalisation and he contributed to
imposing on the populations of developing countries the very policies
which have caused their living conditions to deteriorate and social
inequality to deepen. In the United States he insisted on the abrogation
of the Glass Steagall Act – officially named the Banking Act –
voted in 1933 to ensure that deposit banks and investment banks were
not in the same hands. Its abrogation opened the door to all sorts of
excesses on the part of finance people greedy for more profits, and
eventually led to the current international crisis. To come a full
circle, the repeal of Banking Act made it possible for Citicorp to merge with Travelers Group and become the banking giant Citigroup. Rubin was later to become one of the main executive officers of Citigroup… which the US government recently bailed out in November 2008 in that it guaranteed over 300 billion dollars of assets! And in spite of his record, Rubin is one of Obama’s main advisors. (Damien Millet and Eric Toussaint, Economy: Obama chooses those who have a record of failure, Committee for the Abolition of Third World Debt (CADTM), December 2, 2008.)
Lawrence Summers, another fan of the IMF-World Bank shock therapy, also played his part in the 2008 financial crash.
Harvard University Economics Professor
Lawrence Summers served as Chief Economist for the World Bank
(1991–1993). He contributed to shaping the macro-economic reforms imposed on numerous indebted developing countries. The social and economic impact of these reforms under the IMF-World Bank sponsored structural adjustment program (SAP) were devastating, resulting in mass poverty.
Larry Summer’s stint at the World Bank
coincided with the collapse of the Soviet Union and the imposition of
the IMF-World Bank’s deadly ” economic medicine” on Eastern Europe, the
former Soviet republics and the Balkans.
In 1993, Summers moved to the US
Treasury. He initially held the position of Undersecretary of the
Treasury for international affairs and later Deputy Secretary. In
liaison with his former colleagues at the IMF and the World Bank, he played
a key role in crafting the economic “shock treatment” reform packages
imposed at the height of the 1997 Asian crisis on South Korea, Thailand
and Indonesia.
Larry Summers became Treasury Secretary in July 1999. He is a protégé of David Rockefeller. He was among
the main architects of the infamous Financial Services Modernization
Act, which provided legitimacy to inside trading and outright financial
manipulation. (Prof Michel Chossudovsky Who are the Architects of Economic Collapse?, Global Research 9 November 2008)
The Financial Post also reported last August that Summers “collected more than US$2.7-million in speaking fees, including from companies such as Citigroup and Goldman Sachs Group Inc. that later received taxpayer funds in the economic bailout, according to his disclosure forms.”Now here’s a piece of history illustrating the role of Goldman Sachs in the eyes of Summers:
Joseph Stiglitz couldn’t believe his
ears. Here they were in the White House, with President Bill Clinton
asking the chiefs of the US Treasury for guidance on the life and death
of America’s economy, when the Deputy Secretary of the Treasury Larry
Summers turns to his boss, Secretary Robert Rubin, and says, “What would
Goldman think of that?”
Huh?
Then, at another meeting, Summers said it again: What would Goldman think?
A shocked Stiglitz, then Chairman of the
President’s Council of Economic Advisors, told me he’d turned to
Summers, and asked if Summers thought it appropriate to decide US
economic policy based on “what Goldman thought.” As opposed to say, the
facts, or say, the needs of the American public, you know, all that
stuff that we heard in Cabinet meetings on The West Wing. (Greg Palast, Larry Summers: Goldman Sacked, Global Research September 16, 2013)
What these various examples portray is the revolving doors between
the politicians and banksters. The banking industry is criminalized. But
at the same time the judicial system which turns a blind eye to
financial fraud is also criminalized.
TARP was designed to bail out the insolvent banks. Goldman Sachs transformed itself into a BANK so that the firm could borrow from the Fed window.
The revolving door cycle of government regulators, opting for a
promotion as an investment bankster and compensatory profit well earned
from previous service, hardly gets the attention of the financial
community or government oversight. The entire obscene relationship of
crony favoritism inevitably leads to a society where the rule of law
only applies to the competition. (Hall, op.cit.)
It comes as no surprise that the derivatives bubble is now twenty percent bigger than it was before the 2008 collapse.
It is a financial bubble far larger than
anything the world has ever seen, and when it finally bursts it is going
to be a complete and utter nightmare for the financial system of the
planet. According to the Bank for International Settlements,
the total notional value of derivatives contracts around the world has
ballooned to an astounding 710 trillion dollars ($710,000,000,000,000. (Michael Snyder, The Size of the Derivatives Bubble Hanging Over the Global Economy Hits a Record High, Economic Collapse, 27 May 2014)
And guess which banks have “experienced tremendous growth in this area in recent years”? Goldman Sachs and Citibank.
Goldman Sachs has been increasing its
derivatives volumes since the crisis, and it had a portfolio of
about $48 trillion at the end of 2013. Bloomberg Businessweek recently reported that
as part of its growth strategy, Goldman plans to sell more derivatives
to clients. Citibank, too, has been increasing its derivatives
portfolio, despite the numerous capital and regulatory challenges, In
fact, its portfolio has risen by over 65 percent since the crisis — the
most of any of the four banks — to $62 trillion. (Ibid.)
Also on the Bilderberg guest list this year are very influential
figures from the financial press, Martin H. Wolf, The Financial Times’
Chief Economics Commentator and John Micklethwait Editor-in-Chief of The
Economist. While they are not allowed to report on what happens behind
closed doors, they will no doubt play a key role in sustaining the
legitimacy of the Bilderberg elites and their destructive neoliberal
agenda.
IMF chief Christine Lagarde will also be attending. She was recently interrogated in France in regards to a corruption case. She allegedly
“allowed 270 million pounds Bernard Tapie, a convicted football
match-fixer and tax dodger who supported her governing UMP party”. She
was then accused by the opposition “of ‘dipping into the taxpayers’
pocket for a private beneficiary.’”But we might wonder: how could the elite exist without “dipping into taxpayers pockets for private beneficiarie(s)?” The 2008 global economic crisis is probably the most glaring example of this now very well-known scheme: socializing debt and privatizing profits, using taxpayer money to bailout the criminal banks.
Is it a “conspiracy” when financial fraudsters meet behind closed mingling with politicians, oil execs and NATO military strategists? Does Bilderberg bear a responsibility for the 2008 crisis?
Italian Member of the European Parliament Mario Borghezio blamed the organization “for Italy’s economic crisis… causing unemployment, poverty, and high taxes.”
Borghezio is supported by Italian lawyer Alfonso Luigi Marra, who last year requested that
the Public Prosecutor of Rome investigate the Bilderberg Group for its
role in “criminal activity.” Marra accused the group of plotting to
install Mario Monti as Prime Minister of Italy at Bilderberg’s 2011
meeting in Switzerland, labeling the organization a “unique, illegal
brotherhood” of elitists who consider themselves to be “above the law.” …
In 2010, former NATO Secretary-General and Bilderberg member Willy Claes admitted that
Bilderberg attendees are mandated to implement decisions that are
formulated during the annual conference of power brokers. If this is the
case, it would violate laws in numerous countries that forbid
politicians from being influenced by foreign agents in secret. (Paul
Joseph Watson, Italian MP Blames Secretive Bilderberg Group for Wrecking Italy’s Economy, Infowars 19 May 2014)
Bilderberg is a powerful entity compared to the Davos World Economic Forum:“Those sentences which really matter are being spoken out (at Bilderberg). You learn an incredible amount. Davos in comparison is pure PR talk.” (Paul Joseph Watson, Bilderberg Member Admits Secretive Confab More Powerful than Davos, Infowars, May 22, 2014)Although we don’t find much information on its web site, Bilderberg acknowledges that the “hospitality costs of the annual meeting are the responsibility of the Steering Committee member(s) of the host country.”
This year, the only member “responsible” for hospitality costs is Ulrik Federspiel, former Foreign Minister (1991-93, 2005-09) and Danish Ambassador to the United States of America (2000-2005). He’s now Haldor Topsøe’s Executive Vice President and Chief Strategy Officer. Haldor Topsøe is a company specialized in catalysts used in various industries and which won the 2014 World XTL award, “given annually to a company that has made an outstanding contribution” to the oil, power and gas industry. This award is given by the CWC Group “world expert in the oil and gas, power and investment sectors, with particular expertise in emerging markets.” It is worth noting that their sponsors include, among others, Shell and BP, two companies which will attend this year’s conference. It’s a small world.
It is hard to imagine how much this kind of event for kings and queens, world state officials and business leaders can cost, but it is very unlikely that Mr. Federspiel will be himself paying the bill for a four day stay of over 140 elites in a five star hotel under high safety and surveillance.
Where will he get the money? Will his company or the Danish government be paying the costs? We don’t know. But the Danes will most likely and unwillingly be paying part of the bill collectively, at least for the security apparatus of the meeting. This is not a public meeting. The media is not even allowed to report on it.
Last year the security costs for the Bilderberg meeting in Watford England cost over half a million pounds to British taxpayers:
The security operation surrounding the
secret Bilderberg meeting in Watford, England, last week cost a whopping
£1 million according to police, and British taxpayers are set to foot
at least half the bill.
The Watford Observer reports that
Hertfordshire Constabulary revealed the figures today, noting that the
Bilderberg Group made a “donation” of £500,000 following media scrutiny and complaints from activists and local residents. (Steve Watson, Bilderberg Security Op Cost £1 Million, Prison planet, June 2013)
The irony is that, each and every year, a police security apparatus
whose mandate is to protect citizens “against crooks and criminals” is
being deployed to ensure the security of the Bilderberg elites, i.e.,
using public funds to “protect crooks and criminals against citizens”.
War criminal Henry Kissinger, architect of the 1973 Chilean coup that put Pinochet in power, the man “who oversaw the slaughter in Vietnam, Cambodia and Laos” leading to millions of civilian deaths, will also be at the Marriott this weekend, to “foster dialogue”. Former CIA Director and US Forces Commander David H. Petraeus,
another notable war criminal, who knowingly used drones to bomb Afghan
civilians at funerals and civilian rescuers, will be among the
distinguished guests.In a bitter irony, Petraeus, “who now works at the Manhattan-based private equity firm Kohlberg Kravis Roberts (KKR)” specialized in leveraged buyouts is now developing ties with the shale gas industry.
In this regard, North Dakota Treasurer Kelly Schmidt facilitated a field trip for Petraeus and said to journalists that “the
blurred lines existing between the North Dakota government, the oil
industry and private equity firms like KKR (are) ‘not unusual.’” On his
trip, Petraeus gave a speech to the National Guard. “In introducing
Petraeus at the National Guard event, Schmidt thanked the troops in
attendance for fighting in a war ‘over there for the oil we all need.’”
(Steve Horn, Red Carpet Rollout for General Petraeus Shale Gas Fracking Field Trip, DeSmogBlog, May 30, 2013)The 2014 Bilderberg meeting is another example of those “blurred lines” between government, big oil and the financial sector, the three pillars of war. According to some reports, the topics of discussion at this year’s meeting will include the situation in Ukraine and the Russia-NATO relationship, as well as the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP), an agreement which, according to Stop TTIP, “is in fact a corporate coup that will take us to a ‘corporatocracy’, a corporate-run world.”
The list of participants clearly indicates that war and the economy will be key topics discussed by fraudulent bankers and corrupt politicians who are above the law and who have little concern for the rights of ordinary people.
It is scary to say the least.
But for the mainstream media, very influential and powerful criminals meeting for 4 days in a 5 star hotel and vowing secrecy about their discussions does not raise an eye lid. If you think they are meeting for a purpose that might have a significant impact on world politics and the global economy, you’re just a nutcase.
Selected articles:
“The True Story of the Bilderberg Group” and What They May Be Planning Now, Stephen Lendman
Bilderberg Agenda Revealed: Elite Desperate to Rescue Unipolar World, Paul Joseph Watson
Beyond Bilderberg. The Annual “New World Order Meeting” behind Closed Doors, James Corbett
Barack Obama: The Change that Did Not Happen…. The Plight of Neoliberal Economic Policy, Eric Toussaint and Daniel Munevar
Bilderberg 2014: List of Participants: Mingling of Military-Intel, Politicians, Finance, Oil, Media, Academia and Neocon Think Tanks
Bilderberg Member Admits Secretive Confab More Powerful than Davos, Paul Joseph Watson
The World’s Most Powerful Private Club, Bilderberg’s Silent Takeover of Britain’s $60bn Defense Budget, Tony Gosling
Bilderberg 2013: Hillary Clinton, Bill Clinton, David Rockefeller and Henry Kissenger in attendance, 21st Century Wire
Bilderberg: Who Manages the World?
The Bilderberg, Google and the G8: New Global Tax Regime Already in the Works, Patrick Henningsen
BILDERBERG CONFAB, Climate Change Alarm, Fake Environmentalism, Worldwide Social Engineering, Paul Joseph Watson
For more on Bilderberg click here.
No comments:
Post a Comment