---BREAKAWAY CIVILIZATION ---ALTERNATIVE HISTORY---NEW BUSINESS MODELS--- ROCK & ROLL 'S STRANGE BEGINNINGS---SERIAL KILLERS---YEA AND THAT BAD WORD "CONSPIRACY"--- AMERICANS DON'T EXPLORE ANYTHING ANYMORE.WE JUST CONSUME AND DIE.---
Pages
▼
Sunday, August 4, 2013
3-D PRINTING SET TO ENTER MAINSTREAM… (?): GEOPOLITICAL CONTEXTS
Over
the past several weeks, I’ve been advancing a thesis concerning 3-d
printing, in conjunction with a financial and economic analysis by
former Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, Catherine
Austin Fitts. This scenario emerged during discussions she, Dr. de Hart,
and I had during her recent visit. Basically, our argument runs like
this:
During the post-Cold War period, the Anglo-American oligarchy – or
the military-industrial-intelligence-finance complex – attempted to
quick-start a unipolar world order based around America’s status as the
sole remaining superpower (q.v. Zbnw Brzznsk’s The Grand Chessboard for example). The game plan appeared to have been to bring in a global government on this basis.
Discerning this agenda, Russia and China quickly moved to counteract
this dangerous geopolitical agenda by forming the Shanghai Accords, a
broad set of agreements in areas of economic and political cooperation
between the two countries, and invited in other nations. This basis has
now expanded into the BRICSA nations;
9/11 occurred, and regardless of how one might analyze the
conspiratorial forces behind this event, it did serve to inject Western
power – principally American and British – into Central Asia in a major
way, and this served only to intensify the efforts of Russia and China
to expand their alliance and the BRICS concept;
Then there was the meltdown of the housing market, leading to the
derivatives crisis and the bailouts that followed, indicating a dramatic
loss of confidence in the western financial system. While aspects of
this are irrevocably tied to what I believe was a hidden system of
finance put into place using Axis loot following World War Two, and
related financial shenanigans in post-Soviet Russia, the net effect was
to produce a call for gold repatriation on the part of nations like
Venezuela and more importantly, Germany. The BRICSA nations bagan buying
physical gold, while Mr. Putin placed Russian naval vessels in
Venezuela for good measure, again thumbing his nose at an over-extended
West.
During the period of the 1970s to the 2000s, an effort was made to
shift the basis of the US dollar’s reserve status from oil to GMOs,
another controllable resource, and concurrently with this, efforts began
during the Administration of G.H.W. Bush to extend the concepts of
American patent law – friendly to GMOs – on a world wide basis. As the
science began to roll in that GMOs were at the minimum questionable,
pushback against them began to occur from the BRICS nations, beginning
with India, and spreading quickly to Europe.
All this led us to the conclusion that a decision was taken sometime
during the last decade to retrench into their base of power in North
America, and to do this, three things began to occur:
As Secretary Fitts pointed out during her visit, the first thing
that began to occur was the development of energy resources to liberate
the West from Middle Eastern oil;
The second thing was the vast expansion of electronic surveillance,
which, as I have argued, is not only intimately connected to Secretary
Fitts’ idea of the “ultimate insider trading mechanism” and ability to
manipulate markets, but perhaps equally, a move to base the dollar on information and global clearing
capability (not that anyone would trust the USSA in this role any more,
but nonetheless, it is a tremendous capability for currency in the
electronic age);
Finally, there was the need to bring back manufacturing to North America in a major way.
Enter 3-d printing, which, as I have argued, is the lever here, and
most likely a technology leaked into the public from the black projects
world. Now, our friends at phys.org have noted these developments in the
following article: Economic analysis shows 3-D printing is ready for showtime
I hope you noted something very significant in this piece:
“In the study, Pearce and his team chose 20 common household items
listed on Thingiverse. Then they used Google Shopping to determine the
maximum and minimum cost of buying those 20 items online, shipping
charges not included.”
Three-dimensional printers
deposit multiple thin layers of plastic and other materials to make a
virtually infinite variety of designs, such as these parts for a 3-D
printer. Credit: Justin Plichta/Michigan Technological University
Next, they calculated the cost of making them with 3D printers. The
conclusion: it would cost the typical consumer from $312 to $1,944 to
buy those 20 things compared to $18 to make them in a weekend.
Read more at: http://phys.org/news/2013-07-economic-analysis-d-ready-showtime.html#jCp
“Next, they calculated the cost of making them with 3D printers. The
conclusion: it would cost the typical consumer from $312 to $1,944 to
buy those 20 things compared to $18 to make them in a weekend.”
In other words, the cost of 3-d printing is not labor-intensive. So
we thus have the two ingredients for a tremendous industrial and
cultural transformation: low energy cost, and low labor cost.
There is a third consideration here: 3-d printing, on a massive scale, is also decentralized,
a viable solution for dispersal of manufacturing from centralized
plants (and therefore, big targets), to a decentralized system (one
requiring greater surveillance capabilities, we might add).
In short, it appears a major effort is underway to promote three-d
printing, and that this effort is being driven by the power oligarchy
through its various media organs. The response, of course, will be
similar moves on the part of the BRICSA nations.
The real question is why is all this being done? That’s a subject for much speculation, and another day….
No comments:
Post a Comment