EXO-VATICANA
(Pt 17)
Petrus Romanus, PROJECT LUCIFER, and the Vatican's astonishing exo-theological plan for the arrival of an alien savior.
You only think you know what's coming...
Posted: February 27, 2013
8:00 am Eastern
Most
people are probably
unaware that in
addition to the
Secrets of Fátima, a
second, most renowned
Marian apparition
from La Salette,
France, which was
approved by Popes Pius
IX and Leo XIII,
revealed analogous
information about a
crisis of faith that
would transpire within
Roman Catholicism in
the last days, during
which Rome would
become the seat of the
Antichrist.
The
solidarity between
Pope Benedict and
Cardinal Bertone goes
back a long way and it
certainly appears to
have continued—at
least for the first
few years of
Benedict’s
papacy—in the time
following the
“Message of Fátima”
controversy. After
being elected pope in
April, 2005 and taking
his place as successor
of John Paul II as
Sovereign of the
Vatican City State and
leader of the Roman
Catholic Church,
Ratzinger as “Pope
Benedict XVI”
quickly appointed
Cardinal Bertone to
replace Fátima
co-conspirator Angelo
Sodano as the Cardinal
Secretary of State. On
April 4, 2007,
Benedict also
appointed Bertone as
his Camerlengo to
administrate the duty
of the Pope in the
case of a vacancy of
the papacy. Benedict
has since made
decisions that
indicate Bertone could
be (or once was) his
choice for successor,
and both men have at
times appeared to be
stacking and massaging
the Red Hats in
Bertone’s favor for
the next (final?)
conclave. This was
noted in the May 13,
2011 National
Catholic Reporter
article, “A Triptych
on Benedict’s
Papacy, and Hints of
What Lies Beyond,”
when NCR Senior
Correspondent John L.
Allen Jr. spoke of the
shake-up inside the
Roman Curia (the Curia
is the administrative
apparatus of the
Vatican and, together
with the pope, the
central governing body
of the Catholic
Church) in which
Italian Archbishop
Giovanni Angelo Becciu
was appointed the
Substitute for General
Affairs by Pope
Benedict XVI. Becciu,
who replaced
Archbishop Fernando
Filoni for the job,
seemed at first an odd
selection to Vatican
insiders. “Given how
difficult it is to
master the role [of
Substitute], many
observers found it
curious that Filoni
would be shipped out
after less than four
years, to be replaced
by someone in Becciu
who has no previous
experience at all
working inside the
Vatican,” observed
the NCR.[vii]
But then the nail was
hit on the head when
the news service
added, “When the
dust settles, the most
obvious beneficiary of
these moves would seem
to be Italian Cardinal
Tarcisio Bertone, the
Secretary of State,
who will not have to
be concerned about the
new substitute forming
a rival center of
power.”[viii]
The
job of the Substitute
for General Affairs
has been described as
the most complicated
and demanding
responsibility in the
Roman Curia due to the
staggering amount of
concerns the
Substitute must carry
on a daily basis.
Roughly compared to a
White House Chief of
Staff, the Substitute
meets with the Pontiff
usually once per day
to administer Vatican
affairs and also
regularly reports to
the Cardinal Secretary
of State (currently
Cardinal Bertone). The
organizational
“success or failure
of a papacy often
rests on his
shoulders,” adds the
NCR. And those who
have handled the
office well over the
years “have been the
stuff of legend:
Giovanni Battista
Montini, for instance,
was the substitute
under Pius XII from
1937 to 1953, and went
on to become Pope Paul
VI; Giovanni Benelli,
who was Paul’s own
substitute from 1967
to 1977, was widely
understood to be the
power behind the
throne”
(emphasis added).[ix]
Only
a week following the National
Catholic Reporter
celebration, however,
and only ten days
after Turkson released
his document calling
for a global financial
authority, an
emergency summit at
the Vatican was called
by…you guessed
it…the Secretariat
of State—Cardinal
Tarcisio Bertone. And
this time he wasn’t
taking any prisoners.
Bertone blasted the
document by Turkson
and laid down a new
set of laws. From that
day forward, he
ordered, any new
Vatican text would
have to be authorized
in advance by himself.
The popular Chiesa
News in Rome said
of the power play:
Petrus Romanus, PROJECT LUCIFER, and the Vatican's astonishing exo-theological plan for the arrival of an alien savior.
You only think you know what's coming...
Posted: February 27, 2013
8:00 am Eastern
|
PART
17: THE WARNINGS
(Cont.)
|
The Warning Of La SaletteBy Tom Horn & Cris Putnam |
Most
people are probably
unaware that in
addition to the
Secrets of Fátima, a
second, most renowned
Marian apparition
from La Salette,
France, which was
approved by Popes Pius
IX and Leo XIII,
revealed analogous
information about a
crisis of faith that
would transpire within
Roman Catholicism in
the last days, during
which Rome would
become the seat of the
Antichrist.
Delivered
to Mélanie Calvat and
Maximin Giraud on
September 19, 1846,
while they tended
cattle in the
mountains, the Secret
of La Salette
reads in part:
The
earth will be struck
by calamities of all
kinds (in addition to
plague and famine
which will be
wide-spread). There
will be a series of
wars until the last
war, which will then
be fought by the ten
Kings of the
Antichrist, all of
whom will have one and
the same plan and will
be the only rulers of
the world. Before this
comes to pass, there
will be a kind of
false peace in the
world. People will
think of nothing but
amusement. The wicked
will give themselves
over to all kinds of
sin…this will be the
hour of darkness. The
Church will suffer a
terrible crisis…
Rome will lose the
Faith and become the
seat of the
Antichrist… The
Church will be in
eclipse, the world
will be in dismay.[i]
In
The
Plot Against The Pope;
Coup dé’tat in the
Conclave–1958,
Gary Giuffré
discusses how French
Masonic influences who
had infiltrated the
Catholic clergy in the
1800s were working
overtime to suppress
and discredit the
Secret of La Salette,
even though its
message had been
officially favored by
two popes. This was
because at that time,
prophetic references
to Rome “becoming
the seat of
Antichrist” was
forming a common
eschatology among
Catholic scholars like
Cardinal Henry Manning
(discussed elsewhere
in this book), Bishop
Salvator Grafen Zola,
and Frederick William
Helle, who saw in
these predictions the
work of Masonically
infested clergy who
plotted the overthrow
of the papacy and the
use of the Church as a
political vehicle for
an occult World Order.
“These kinds of
details, found in the
genuine, modern-day,
Marian prophecies,
would always generate
the greatest
opposition from the
Church’s enemies who
had infiltrated her
structures,” wrote
Giuffré. “For they
threatened to expose
the satanic plot and
long-time goal of the
Masonic Lodge’s
agents in the Vatican,
to usurp and control
the papal chair.”[ii]
And
it has to be
remembered that the
specter of
infiltration of the
Roman Catholic
hierarchy by members
of Freemasonry’s
luciferian “light
bearers” was a
fairly
well-established
agenda historically,
one which Pope Pius IX
called the
“Synagogue of
Satan.” Pope Leo
XIII went so far as to
issue a damning
encyclical (Humanum
Genus) on April 20,
1884 against the
efforts to invade and
corrupt Roman
Catholicism by
Freemasons, and yet
Leo’s own Secretary
of State, Cardinal
Mariano Rampolla del
Tindaro was later
identified as a secret
Freemason of the
diabolical Ordo Templi
Orientis (O.T.O.) sect
of whom Satanist
Aleister Crowley
belonged and later
became leader. When
Pope Leo passed away
in 1903, it was widely
anticipated that
Rampolla would replace
him as pope, and
Rampolla did receive
the early votes during
conclave. Then
something
extraordinary
happened, and the
balloting was
interrupted when
Prince Jan Maurycy
Paweł Puzyna de
Kosielsko, a Polish
Roman Catholic
Cardinal from Kraków,
rose on behalf of his
Sovereign, Emperor
Franz Joseph of
Austria, and shocked
the assembly by
declaring in Latin,
“…officially and
in the name and by the
authority of
Franz-Josef, Emperor
of Austria and King of
Hungary, that His
Majesty, in virtue of
an ancient right and
privilege, pronounces
the veto of exclusion
against my Most
Eminent Lord, Cardinal
Mariano Rampolla del
Tindaro.”[iii]
This
Jus
Exclusivæ
(“right of
exclusion” or papal
veto) was an ancient
rule of order claimed
by Catholic monarchs
to veto a candidate
for the papacy. “At
times the right was
claimed by the French
monarch, the Spanish
monarch, the Holy
Roman Emperor, and the
Emperor of Austria.
These powers would
make known to a papal
conclave, through a
crown-cardinal, that a
certain candidate for
election was
considered
objectionable as a
prospective Pope.”[iv]
It has since been
suggested by some
historians that the
alert Emperor Franz
Joseph knew something
of Rampolla’s
masonic connection and
saved Rome from
usurpation. It is also
noteworthy that the
official Liber LII
Manifesto of the O.T.O.
BAPHOMET XI° does
indeed list Cardinal
Rampolla among its
members.[v]
But was Rampolla just
one of many covert
Masons? The answer to
that question appears
to be yes
according to experts
like the late Canadian
naval officer, author,
and popular lecturer
William James Guy
Carr. In addition to
his accounts of
wartime activity as a
Navigating Submarine
Officer during World
War One, Carr—though
a conspiracy
theorist—was a noted
authority on the
history of the
Illuminati and its
connection to
Freemasonry. He
chronicled the
movement from its
founding in 1776 by
Adam Weishaupt to its
purported penetration
of the Vatican. In
1959, Carr published The
Red Fog Over America,
in which he said:
Weishaupt
boasted that the
Illuminati would
infiltrate into the
Vatican and bore from
within, until they
left it nothing but an
empty shell… Since I
exposed certain events
which indicate that
agentur of the
Illuminati have
infiltrated into the
Vatican, I have
received a number of
letters from priests
who have studied in
the Vatican… Those
who wrote assured me
that the fears I
express are more than
well founded. One
priest informed me
that the Pope was
surrounded by picked
“Specialists”,
“Experts” and
“Advisors” to such
an extent that he was
little better than a
prisoner in his own
palace. Another priest
informed me of the
eternal surveillance
exercised over the
Pope…those who
maintain the
surveillance…give
him no freedom of
action even in the
privacy of his own
chambers. The priest
said ‘Those who
exercise this
surveillance are all
hand-picked members of
a certain order and
they all come from the
same
institution…where
Weishaupt…conspired.’”[vi]
Carr’s
description matches so
closely to what
Malachi Martin and
similar priests have
alleged on different
occasions concerning a
formidable
Illuminati-Masonic
group inside the
Vatican that it is
tempting to believe
Malachi himself may
have been one of
Carr’s informants.
But was this
Illuminated council
the unseen hand in
Rome that “forced”
Cardinal Ratzinger
(Pope Benedict) and
Cardinal Bertone to
issue what Antonio
Socci thought was astuzia
inganno (cunning
deception) at Fátima?
And would this
indicate both the
current pope and his
Secretary of State are
clandestinely
committed to, or being
forced to go along
with, the overarching
scheme of a secret
order inside the Holy
See?
The
solidarity between
Pope Benedict and
Cardinal Bertone goes
back a long way and it
certainly appears to
have continued—at
least for the first
few years of
Benedict’s
papacy—in the time
following the
“Message of Fátima”
controversy. After
being elected pope in
April, 2005 and taking
his place as successor
of John Paul II as
Sovereign of the
Vatican City State and
leader of the Roman
Catholic Church,
Ratzinger as “Pope
Benedict XVI”
quickly appointed
Cardinal Bertone to
replace Fátima
co-conspirator Angelo
Sodano as the Cardinal
Secretary of State. On
April 4, 2007,
Benedict also
appointed Bertone as
his Camerlengo to
administrate the duty
of the Pope in the
case of a vacancy of
the papacy. Benedict
has since made
decisions that
indicate Bertone could
be (or once was) his
choice for successor,
and both men have at
times appeared to be
stacking and massaging
the Red Hats in
Bertone’s favor for
the next (final?)
conclave. This was
noted in the May 13,
2011 National
Catholic Reporter
article, “A Triptych
on Benedict’s
Papacy, and Hints of
What Lies Beyond,”
when NCR Senior
Correspondent John L.
Allen Jr. spoke of the
shake-up inside the
Roman Curia (the Curia
is the administrative
apparatus of the
Vatican and, together
with the pope, the
central governing body
of the Catholic
Church) in which
Italian Archbishop
Giovanni Angelo Becciu
was appointed the
Substitute for General
Affairs by Pope
Benedict XVI. Becciu,
who replaced
Archbishop Fernando
Filoni for the job,
seemed at first an odd
selection to Vatican
insiders. “Given how
difficult it is to
master the role [of
Substitute], many
observers found it
curious that Filoni
would be shipped out
after less than four
years, to be replaced
by someone in Becciu
who has no previous
experience at all
working inside the
Vatican,” observed
the NCR.[vii]
But then the nail was
hit on the head when
the news service
added, “When the
dust settles, the most
obvious beneficiary of
these moves would seem
to be Italian Cardinal
Tarcisio Bertone, the
Secretary of State,
who will not have to
be concerned about the
new substitute forming
a rival center of
power.”[viii]
The
job of the Substitute
for General Affairs
has been described as
the most complicated
and demanding
responsibility in the
Roman Curia due to the
staggering amount of
concerns the
Substitute must carry
on a daily basis.
Roughly compared to a
White House Chief of
Staff, the Substitute
meets with the Pontiff
usually once per day
to administer Vatican
affairs and also
regularly reports to
the Cardinal Secretary
of State (currently
Cardinal Bertone). The
organizational
“success or failure
of a papacy often
rests on his
shoulders,” adds the
NCR. And those who
have handled the
office well over the
years “have been the
stuff of legend:
Giovanni Battista
Montini, for instance,
was the substitute
under Pius XII from
1937 to 1953, and went
on to become Pope Paul
VI; Giovanni Benelli,
who was Paul’s own
substitute from 1967
to 1977, was widely
understood to be the
power behind the
throne”
(emphasis added).[ix]
Of
course, just when we
thought it couldn’t
get any more obvious,
another—and this
time
unprecedented—move
to consolidate his
power (and which also
raises the question of
a third contender for
the throne of St.
Peter) was made by
Bertone himself. It
followed the October
24, 2011, document,
“Toward Reforming
the International
Financial and Monetary
Systems in the Context
of a Global Public
Authority,” which
amounted to a call by
the Vatican for a
World Political and
Financial Authority.
Published by the
Pontifical Council for
Justice and Peace,
which is headed by
Cardinal Peter Turkson,
the media was
quick—inside and
outside
Christianity—to see
the dark side of
socialism raising its
head, not to mention
prophetic implications
of the paper’s call
for a Global Authority
seated inside the
United Nations. In a
different chapter we
explain how
this new unsettling
directive attempts to
devise a “moral”
mandate for
establishing “a
global public
authority” and “a
central world bank”
that would oversee
individual and world
pecuniary institutions
through subjugation to
a new global power
made “at
the cost of a gradual,
balanced transfer of a
part of each
nation’s powers to a
world authority and to
regional
authorities”
(emphasis added).[xii]
The
document was addressed
at the 2011 G20 Summit
in Cannes in comments
by President Barack
Obama and French
President Nicholas
Sarkozy, but nothing
came of it there due
to what Cardinal
Bertone did just ten
days later. And this
is where things start
getting interesting,
as some soothsayers
were already
predicting that the
author of the
document, Peter
Turkson of Ghana
(Peter the Roman?)
could be the next
pope, as he is
considered papabile by
the College of
Cardinals.
Following
the election of
America’s first
black president in
Obama, analysts around
the world began
speculating that
perhaps Rome would
follow suit and roll
out the red carpet for
a black pope, the
first in fifteen
hundred years, in
somebody like Turkson.
Cardinal Francis
Arinze, whom Ronald L.
Conte Jr. believes
will be the next pope
and fulfill “The
Prophecy of the
Popes” by taking the
name Pius XIII, is
also a black man, an
Igbo Nigerian
considered papabile
since before the 2005
conclave that elected
Cardinal Ratzinger
(Pope Benedict XVI).
“The election of
Barack Obama as the
first African-American
US President could
pave the way for the
election of [a] black
Pope, according to a
leading black American
Catholic,” wrote the
Times Online in
2008. “Wilton Daniel
Gregory, 60, the
Archbishop of Atlanta,
said that in the past
Pope Benedict XVI had
himself suggested that
the election of a
black pontiff would
‘send a splendid
signal to the world’
about the universal
Church.”[xiii]
The
Associated Press
agreed. “The pope
has appointed Cardinal
Peter Turkson of Ghana
to head the
Vatican’s justice
and peace office, a
high-profile post that
cements his reputation
as a possible future
papal candidate…
Turkson told reporters
there was no reason
there couldn’t be a
black pope,
particularly after
Barack Obama was
elected U.S.
president.”[xiv]
Given
that Turkson is
popular in some
circles, here is how
the National
Catholic Reporter
heralded the release
of his document on
Reforming the
International
Financial and Monetary
Systems in their
October 28, 2011,
headline: A Papal Contender Grabs the Spotlight:
Rome
saw a striking
coincidence this week,
which could be either
simple luck or a sign
of things to come.
There were two
big-ticket Vatican
news flashes,
Monday’s note on
reform of the
international economy
and Thursday’s
summit of religious
leaders in Assisi. In
both cases, the same
Vatican official was a
prime mover: Cardinal
Peter Turkson of
Ghana, president of
the Pontifical Council
for Justice and Peace.
Turkson,
still young in church
terms at 63, was the
chief organizer of the
Assisi gathering, just
as he was the top
signatory on the
document blasting
“neo-liberal”
ideologies and calling
for a “true world
political authority”
to regulate the
economy. During
Vatican press
conferences to present
both, Turkson was the
star attraction each
time.
Only
a week following the National
Catholic Reporter
celebration, however,
and only ten days
after Turkson released
his document calling
for a global financial
authority, an
emergency summit at
the Vatican was called
by…you guessed
it…the Secretariat
of State—Cardinal
Tarcisio Bertone. And
this time he wasn’t
taking any prisoners.
Bertone blasted the
document by Turkson
and laid down a new
set of laws. From that
day forward, he
ordered, any new
Vatican text would
have to be authorized
in advance by himself.
The popular Chiesa
News in Rome said
of the power play:
Precisely
when the G20 summit in
Cannes was coming to
its weak and uncertain
conclusion, on that
same Friday, November
4 at the Vatican, a
smaller summit
convened in the
secretariat of
state… In the hot
seat was the [Turkson]
document on the global
financial crisis
released ten days
earlier by the
pontifical council for
justice and peace…
The secretary of
state, Cardinal
Tarcisio Bertone,
complained that he had
not known about it
until the last moment.
And precisely for this
reason he had called
that meeting in the
secretariat of state.
The conclusion of the
summit was that this
binding order would be
transmitted to all of
the offices of the
curia: from that point
on, nothing in writing
would be released
unless it had been
inspected and
authorized by the
secretariat of state.[xvi]
While
Bertone convinced some
Vatican watchers that
his overreaching
motives had to do with
protecting the Holy
See from confusion by
claiming that he had
been in the dark and
thus side-swiped by
the release of the
document (a case Chiesa
News thoroughly
debunked), others saw
in it another giant
step in Bertone
carefully solidifying
his powerbase in Rome.
They also imagined
that old enemy the
Freemasons having
something to do with
it. “It would seem
that the dark forces
in the Vatican are
making their moves to
seize control of the
Catholic Church,”
wrote Catholic Jew
Aron Ben Gilad.
“They are using the
recent document of the
Pontifical Council of
Justice and Peace on
the global financial
crisis as the excuse
to seize autocratic
control of all the
congregations of the
curia and putting them
under the control of
Cardinal Bertone and
the Vatican’s
Secretariat of State.
Whatever the merits or
demerits of this
document is not the
important question, but
its use as an
instrument for
ecclesiastical masonry
to take control of the
Roman Curia”
(emphasis added).[xvii]
Top
Vatican watcher and
journalist Andrea
Tornielli had stated
as much earlier,
documenting how
Bertone had been
consolidating his
influence in the
Vatican:
…through
a number of actions:
he appointed bishops
who are well known to
him and friends in key
roles, especially in
positions involving
the management and
control of the Holy
See’s finances. The
last individual
appointed, was the
Bishop of Alexandria
Giuseppe Versaldinew,
to the position of
President of the
Prefecture for
Economic Affairs of
the Holy See… On the
other hand, Bertone
has done away with
prelates who had moved
against him in some
way or another, such
as Archbishop Carlo
Maria Viganò, who had
left the Government
office to become
Nuncio (ambassador) to
the United States, or
Bishop Vincenzo di
Mauro, who left the
Office of Economic
Affairs to become
Archbishop of
Vigevano.[xviii]
Coming
up next:
The
Siri Thesis, Dark
Horses Appear
No comments:
Post a Comment