http://anewworldsociety.ning.com/profiles/blogs/sandy-hook-elementary-school-massacre-is-a-possible-false-flag?xg_source=activity LOTS OF VID'S WATCH !!!
Sandy Hook Elementary School Massacre is a Possible False Flag Psyop
2 Years in the Making
On Friday, December 14, 2012, Bill of Rights Day as proclaimed by Barack Obama,
the false flag school shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School in
Newtown, Connecticut was perpetrated to launch another US communist gun
confiscation program. So what actually happened at that elementary
school? Well, just like the Clackamas, Oregon mall false flag, the
Aurora, Colorado theater false flag, the Tucson, Arizona false flag, and
the 911 false flag we will never know as these are all internal black
ops, which are designed to leave the population in a permanent state of
confusion.
In this day of high tech surveillance with government controlled cameras looking at us and documenting our actions everywhere we go, there always seems to be a breakdown when it comes to government sponsored terrorism.
A source outside the mainstream reported on The Word From the Trenches – December 14, 2012 that a message came over her police scanner that stated in reference to Sandy Hook Elementary School, “Tell them the cameras are not working”. Tell who, the Homeland Security Agents running the black op?
An initial report from an eyewitness inside the principal’s office said that the principal, vice principal, and the school psychologist went out into the hall upon hearing gun shots. Three went out and only one came back, who was the vice-principal who had been shot in the leg. The eye witness repeated the assertion that three went out and only one came back in, declaring that the principal and psychologist had been shot to death out in the hall and that is where their bodies were.
The official account we are now hearing is saying the shooter crashed into the principal’s office and killed four people therein, including the principal and the psychologist. This is no small discrepancy considering the eye witness who gave the original account to the mainstream media said she was in a meeting in the office when the shooting occurred.
This is a black op.
Original reports said a maroon van with the back window shot out left the scene with a suspected second shooter therein. It was later reported that the van had been found in the nearby town and that the driver/second shooter had been arrested.
Also around the same time it was reported that another individual wearing camouflage fatigue pants who had ran into the woods had also been arrested. And then, in the blink of an eye, these two arrests became a single arrest of the fellow who had ran into the woods who was declared to be an innocent bystander fleeing the shooting and the maroon van and the third suspect disappeared from reality, just like John Doe number two at the Oklahoma City bombing.
It is now being declared that all the bullets fired were fired inside the school. So who shot the back window out of that maroon van and what became of the van and the fellow who was driving it and was arrested in the nearby town? Don’t look at the man behind the curtain.
This is a black op.
Original reports said the shooter was wearing camouflage pants and a utility vest and then it was black fatigues and an armored vest. Today the two accounts which would indicate two shooters have been morphed into the lone wolf dressed in “black camouflage”.
This is a black op.
Then there is the strange misidentification of the shooter which defies logic in its most basic terms. First reports identified the shooter as a 20 year old and then the name leaked out as Ryan Lanza. The Word From the Trenches was up on the air at this point. #1 NWO Hatr called in with a report from the internet that said Ryan Lanza was on his Facebook declaring that he was on a bus in New Jersey and very much alive and that he is 24 years old. The mainstream media then began reporting the shooter as 24 year old Ryan Lanza.
Approximately an hour later an attempt to cover up this obvious discrepancy was made by authorities, saying that the shooter was actually Ryan Lanza’s younger brother Adam Lanza, who is 20 years old. The contention was that he and his brother had swapped IDs, resulting in the misidentification.
Well let’s look at this on its face. The shooter is dead on the floor. The police remove his identification, which according to original reports said he was 20 years old, which dictates it was Adam’s ID as his brother Ryan’s ID would have identified him as 24 years old. Any other contention defies logic.
This was a black op.
Finally, the security system at Sandy Hook Elementary School is brand new, state of the art, designed to specifically keep anyone with a gun from entering the building. Initial reports said the shooter was “buzzed in” as this would have been the only way he could get in. And now we are told that the shooter just busted right through the security door, apparently without any problem.
If you have been to a school you know the entry doors are not made of glass, in fact there is not even a window. So what new state of the art security system would put a glass door as the only barrier for a shooter wanting to enter the no gun safety zone?
This is a black op.
It was also mentioned by a couple of the participants in the conversation on The Word From the Trenches that all gun free zones must by law have an armed officer within to protect the unarmed people from any armed intruder who breaches the security.
This is a black op. A full blown campaign for gun confiscation in the US has been orchestrated around this black op. The soviet insurgents who have taken over the United States government are getting ready to initiate austerity measures designed to bring the theft of private property to a new level. They know the people have been arming as never before as we intend to resist the communist takeover of our country.
Petitions began popping up on government websites demanding gun confiscation before the smoke cleared. I believe there are a couple with 40,000 or 50,000 signatures. This is no surprise as we know who the communists are and what their numbers are. There have also been millions and millions and millions of gun and ammunition purchases over the past year and this shows the American nationals’ numbers.
Twenty children being killed, hell, twenty babies, is enough to make any sane person sick, but then these communists are not sane except to the point that they know they cannot conquer our armed population. We must let our enemies know that no matter how many MK Ultra, Prozac propelled psychos they let into schools to murder children, they are not going to take our liberty teeth from us so that they can complete the theft of our nation and slaughter us wholesale like their comrades slaughtered the Russian people during the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917.
In short, our answer to gun confiscation is “No” and no matter what they do the answer will continue to be “No”. Once the Republic has been restored, those deep in the communist insurgency who are really responsible for the murder of these innocent Americans are going to be found out and brought to justice.
God bless the Republic, death to the international corporate mafia, we shall prevail.
The
shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Connecticut is now being
morphed into a straight up battle over gun confiscation between the
socialists and the NRA…..the gun grabbers wish. We American nationals
count on the NRA about as far as the littlest one among us can throw
Mount Rushmore. The NRA is packed with traitors and represents nothing
more than controlled opposition, with the elitists therein more than
willing to sell out our 2nd Amendment for an elevated status of privilege.
Here is a heads up for you communists out there. Don’t worry about the N.R.A., worry T.H.E. P.E.O.P.L.E. Though we do intend to find out who killed 20 children and 4 adults at the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting as soon as law and order is restored in the United States, our number one concern right now is the Bolsheviks who have infiltrated our government and recently purchased 400 million rounds of .40 caliber hollow points for the purpose of murdering Americans.
If you think we are going to disarm in the smallest degree, you are truly delusional. The only ones who are waving your anti-gun flag are the same traitors who marched in your May Day parade. You are the few, we are the many.
What a world it would be if one could declare war and then just command his enemy to lay down his arms and acquiesce to slaughter. Dream on communists. You have your agents in the middle crying, “It’s futile to resist. Your guns are no match for their technology”, as your mainstream lapdogs betray your absolute well founded fear thereof. When you kill children you do unleash righteous indignation, but when you fail to shift the blame for the murder from yourselves to a patsy and then a gun, you aid in your destruction.
Sandy Hook Elementary School Shooting – No sale, that is unless you are a gun distributer.
The HSEEP is maintained by the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s National Preparedness Directorate, Department of Homeland Security.
Veterans Today – by Niall Bradley
The massacre of 20 children and 7 adults at the Sandy Hook elementary school last Friday was one more in a long line of atrocious mass murders committed in the USA. By now, five days later, an official version of events has more or less solidified to explain the chain of events. The familiar ‘lone gunman’ narrative has once more stoked the hot-button issue of gun control and left the general population as clueless as ever as to why people suddenly ‘go postal’ and target the most vulnerable members of society.
On closer inspection, however, there is clearly more to many of these mass shootings than meets the eye. Very often the earliest reports present information that directly contradicts key foundations of the final ‘official’ analysis of events. Granted, confusion is natural when a story breaks, but some of the initial reports conflict so completely with the lone gunman narrative that I’m going to compile them here and then try to put this tragedy in a more objective context. In his speech at the Sandy Hook Interfaith Prayer Vigil in Newtown, Connecticut on Sunday night, President Obama quoted the following biblical passage:
A 20-year-old ‘tech geek’ named Adam Lanza is supposed to have snapped early last Friday, December 14th, shot dead his mother Nancy Lanza, loaded her car up with her guns and ammo, then driven it across town to his former school, the Sandy Hook Elementary School, shot dead 27 people in two classrooms and an adjoining hallway, then turned one of his guns on himself.
That’s how most will now remember the shooting, but is that actually what happened?
All the child victims were first-graders between the ages of 6 and 7. If there’s any saving grace to be found in this event, it’s that it was all over within minutes. Police were reportedly on the scene “instantaneously”, according to Connecticut State Police Commander, Lt. Vance and by then the shooting had ended. Listed among the slain school teachers and administrative staff was the school principal, 47-year-old Dawn Hochsprung. Right here we encounter our first problem:
© The Newtown Bee
How could the principal have survived to give this statement to local press describing what happened … if she was one of the first to be killed? Incidentally, The Newtown Bee‘s
article was taken down on Monday December 17th. Of course, a plausible
explanation is that a reporter mistook another teacher for the
principal.
We were initially told that two handguns – a Glock and a Sig Sauer – were found next to the body of the dead shooter, while a third weapon, a .223-caliber rifle was also recovered “in the trunk of a car” later, in the school’s parking lot. All of the weapons were allegedly legally bought and registered in Nancy Lanza’s name. The car was later identified as a black Honda, also registered in her name. More weapons have since been introduced to the story but we’ll get back to those later on.
Besides anonymous ‘law enforcement officials’ telling the media that Adam Lanza was a former pupil at the school, they also said his mother was currently a teacher there, that she was found among the dead and that her son had specifically sought out her classroom first. But when it emerged that teaching staff at the school hadnever heard of a Nancy Lanza, it was suggested that she was a substitute teacher whose name therefore mightn’t appear on staff lists.
But this claim too has disappeared down the memory hole because it’s now known that Nancy had no connection with the school. Adam Lanza was in fact home-schooled. Nancy Lanza has since been painted as a “survivalist” who loved firearms, taught her sons how to shoot and was “stockpiling” because she was “worried about economic collapse.”
Despite “family insiders” claiming that he was a “deeply disturbed kid”, Adam Lanza, like so many other alleged ‘lone(r) gunmen’ before him, does not fit the profile of a mass-murdering maniac. His 24-year-old brother, Ryan Lanza, said he hadn’t seen his brother since 2010. This fact brings into question Ryan’s claim that his younger brother may have had his identity card on his person at the school shooting. Although perhaps the question that needs to be asked here is, why would a person bother to carry identification with them after going to the trouble of dressing up in a bullet-proof vest, mask and black camouflage gear and going on a killing spree …
The live emergency services audio feed from the scene reveals some interesting observations from first responders that have been completely overlooked by the mainstream media. Note that the unedited version lasts over two hours, so the abridged version I’m going to quote from has a compressed sequence of events that are not in real time. In this abridged version, we hear at 1.38′ a report that gunfire is still being heard, even though the shooting was supposed to have ended by the time police arrived. The next report at 2.35′ says that the shooting has stopped and the school is “in lockdown”. At 3.23′, the police relay a teacher’s report that she saw “two shadows running past the gym”. This is followed by another officer on the scene who says, “Yeh, we got ‘em, they’re coming at me! … [inaudible] … coming up the driveway real slowly!” That same officer at 5.40′ says he has them “proned out”, which presumably means he has apprehended them and they are laid out on the ground, before another officer comes on to say, “be aware that we do have a second[inaudible] …”
Later on, at 19.10′, an officer who sounds out of breath, like he’s just given chase, reports what I think sounds like “these guys” followed certainly by “multiple weapons, including long rifles and shotgun”. If these were found so early on, why were they not included in the initial press reports which stated that three firearms had been found – the above mentioned Glock, Sig Sauer and Bushmaster AR-15 rifle? Further conflicting, and possibly planted evidence was thrown into the mix by ‘law enforcement officials’ when they published video footage of a long weapon being retrieved from the trunk of a car. Look closely and you’ll see that it’s a shotgun, not a rifle. In addition, this ‘discovery’ was made late in the day (it’s dark outside), while the Bushmaster rifle was first reported found “in the trunk of a car” much earlier in the day. This would logically suggest that the rifle and shotgun were found in the trunks of two different cars.
Besides the above two suspects “proned out” in front of the school, another suspected gunman was apprehended after he gave chase, this time in the woods next to the school:
YouTube – Veterans Today -
The police are clearly chasing someone whom they appear to apprehend in the middle of the woods next to the school, a fact confirmed by several eyewitnesses:
YouTube – Veterans Today -
This fleeing suspect, wearing camouflage gear, a bulletproof vest and armed with four guns, has since disappeared from media coverage. Who was this person and how did he know what “it” was when he protested that “I didn’t do it”?
Perhaps most astonishingly, this suspect arrested in the woods was named in an Associated Press report as 24-year-old Ryan Lanza. The original report has long since vanished of course, but you can see it referenced here. This was despite the fact that Ryan had already been named as the deceased suspect inside the school, lying next to two handguns.
Ryan Lanza was actually at work in Hoboken, New Jersey, that morning when his name and photo began circulating in the media. And so, for most of Friday, the ‘lone shooter’ was erroneously reported as “Ryan Lanza, confirmed dead.” At the same time, we were being told that Ryan’s girlfriend and a room-mate were reported missing, also from Hoboken, New Jersey.
So this isn’t just a case of mistaken identity, as later claimed when it was suggested that Adam had a piece of identification belonging to his brother on his person. Not one, but BOTH Lanza brothers were being placed by ‘law enforcement officials’ at the scene of the shooting. It could be that Ryan’s quick reflexes to leave his workplace to get on a bus to go back to his apartment while protesting innocence via his Facebook page may have saved his life.
Now remember, all of this confusion somehow resulted from a single guy going into a school and shooting children and teachers and then shooting himself, all within three to five minutes. Surely it should have been fairly easy to rapidly and concretely identify the details of such a crime and a rough layout of the scene?
What it’s starting to look like is that the Lanzas were framed for this mass shooting in advance. Long before any suspects were named, and even as we were being told that Nancy Lanza was among the dead at the school, we were told that police were investigating a murder in … Hoboken, New Jersey, where a body had been found at the home of … Ryan Lanza! An older “confirmed” version of events had RYAN, not Adam, travelling to Hoboken that morning to murder his father before going to the school in Newtown, Connecticut. Other variants had Ryan OR Adam going to both their divorced parents’ homes and killing them before going to the school.
The narrative has now settled on the younger brother killing his mother in Newtown then going to the school. So what about the rest of it? Do we just put it down to ‘keen’ journalism that was having a field day last Friday as media outlets sought to bring us the latest ‘breaking news’? Confusion and ‘Chinese whispers’ undoubtedly play a part in the early stages of national media events, but I think back to those news anchors reading scripts about Osama Bin Laden within minutes of the first plane being hit on 9/11 and I think, ‘Wait a minute!’ All these misleading reports had to have been issued by someone or some people “confirming” to Associated Press and other media outlets that the Ryans’s father had been murdered [he wasn't even aware that the shooting at the school had taken place until journalists turned up on his doorstep], or that Ryan’s girlfriend had gone missing from Hoboken, or that either Ryan or Adam were pulled out of the adjacent woods in handcuffs yelling “I DIDN’T DO IT” to assembled parents. These aren’t just ‘little details’ that can be confused for other details, these are detailed narratives. So how, or why, would any member of the press come up with such details? They strike me as a set of alternative scenarios that might have found their way into the official narrative had facts on the ground turned out differently.
Watch this snippet of State Police Lt. Paul Vance at the press conference he gave the day after the shootings. His answer is as bizarre as it is revealing. When asked whether Nancy Lanza had any connection with the school, he replied defensively about something that is both unrelated and arguably the most significant fact that completely undermines the official narrative: the arrest of a second gunman in the woods:
YouTube – Veterans Today -
Most of the initial mainstream media reports have since been rewritten to fit ‘new’ facts proclaimed by ‘law enforcement officials’. Here’s an example from Business Insider. The following excerpts are the opening paragraphs from the ‘same’ article, one earlier original version, followed by the later revised version:
The
three guns Adam Lanza is supposed to have brought to the school with
him. © New York Daily News. The rifle was left in the trunk, leaving
‘Adam Lanza’ just the two handguns to let off “hundreds of rounds”…
firing .233 caliber bullets that belonged to the rifle… which was left
in the car
This Associated Press/Newsday article on Saturday, December 15th, reported that “Only the rifle was used on the victims“,
a statement that is supported by Dr. H. Wayne Carver II, Connecticut
state’s chief medical examiner. Of the seven autopsies he personally
performed on Sandy Hook victims, all of them had “three to 11 wounds apiece”. He also said that the ‘gunman’ used a military-style rifle rigged to quickly reload, and that the ‘shooter’ was able to reload so quickly because he had “taped two magazines together.”
Even before the State Chief Medical Examiner had given these
statements, it had been stated that spent shell casings from
.233-caliber (rifle) bullets werefound inside the school.
So all the victims’ wounds were the result of rifle-fire, specifically from “the rifle”, the one we were told in early reports was found in the trunk of a car in the parking lot! This is simply not credible.
Remember that only “the rifle” was used on all the victims. If only this rifle was used, and if we try to make this claim fit into the (admittedly fluid) official version of events, then the alleged lone gunman would have had to leave the school, place the rifle back in his trunk, then return inside the school and shoot himself. No one reported any such maneuver on the part of any gunman or gunmen. What we do have, however, is live emergency services radio feed in which we hear that two men have been apprehended and are “proned out” AND live video footage supported by eyewitness testimony showing what appears to be a THIRD man being arrested by police in the woods.
We can see how the authorities’ hands are tied because they need to fit all the facts into the usual ‘lone gunman’ narrative. For that, there can only be ONE rifle and a couple of handguns. The problem is that they have already claimed to find that solitary Bushmaster rifle in the trunk of a car in the school parking lot, so the earliest police reports of a cache of long arms being found inside the school will no longer fit with the lone gunman narrative, especially as they’re now saying that he had already opened fire as he burst into the school.
Could “scrawny” 20-year-old Adam Lanza have stormed the school, solo Rambo-style, while carrying “multiple long arms, including rifles and shotguns”? Only one person was wounded. Everyone else who was shot was killed. How could Adam Lanza achieve such deadly accuracy, in such a short length of recorded time?
Initial reports put the beginning of the shooting in the school administrators’ office, where someone, reportedly the school principal, had a confrontation with the gunman(men). We know this because someone supposedly turned on the school intercom system, alerting the teaching staff to the loud swearing and commotion in the principal’s office and probably saving many more children from being gunned down as teachers took measures to hide the children in closets.
Similarly
heavily armed men wearing black combat gear from head to toe… their job
is to kill ‘terrorists’ to keep us safe, which they do by terrorising
us all
One brave teacher, Kaitlin Roig, bundled a bunch of children into a
bathroom and locked the door. What’s interesting about her testimony to
ABC News is that when police arrived and asked her to open the door, she refused, saying that “if
they were really cops, they’d know where to find keys to open the
door.” In addition, she requested that they slide their badges under the
door.
Now, this is generally a smart thing to do in any and allinteractions with the police, especially in the U.S. But to have the wherewithal to do so under such traumatic circumstances strongly suggests that Ms. Roig had logically deduced by that point that multiple perpetrators were involved, and that they were either impersonating police officers or wereindistinguishable from SWAT team police commandos, either in the way they dressed or the way they behaved upon entering the building. It also reminds us just how narrow the time window of the actual shooting was. The shooting appears to have barely ended when men knocked on that bathroom door and told Ms. Roig they were police.
There are also conflicting reports about how the gunmen entered the building. We were told initially that they came in through the main front entrance and proceeded straight to the administrators’/principal’s offices. But Sandy Hook elementary school has a security system with a video monitor, which allows staff to screen visitors before buzzing them in. A “masked gunman dressed in black tactical combat gear” from head to toe would kinda raise red flags, don’t you think?
Another possible anomaly is that Victoria Soto, one of the teachers killed at the school, appears to have had an ‘in memoriam’ Facebook page created in her name four days before the shooting.
Regarding this alleged ‘LIBOR scandal’ connection between this shooting and the Aurora theater shooting, there is as yet zero evidence to support the claim that either father of Lanza or Holmes were going to testify to anyone about anything, so for now this must remain just another rumor. I rather think that this is being spread to create the impression of a direct link that can be easily refuted, as in a straw man argument. The obvious and direct link staring everyone in the face is that the official accounts of these events are hocus-pocus. The glaring connection between these two shootings, the Sikh Temple shooting and the Fort Hood shooting is that multiple gunmen were reported at the time by eyewitnesses, but they are now all officially claimed to have been carried out by ‘lone gunmen’. This logically tells us that the real perpetrators are being protected with cover stories of what really happened because if the truth were known, some section of the U.S. government would be implicated.
Wade Michael Page, the ‘lone gunman’ in the Sikh Temple shooting in Wisconsin in August this year, was a highly decorated U.S. army psychological operations specialist, according to the Pentagon. But what happened to the three other gunmen seen by witnesses? It can’t surely be coincidence that Wade was (former?) military psy-ops. The thought has crossed my mind more than once during the aftermath of the Connecticut shooting. Others too have suggested this was a ‘false-flag’ event, or that Lanza was some sort of Manchurian Candidate.
But maybe there’s a simpler explanation (albeit more outrageous) than that? Was that really Adam Lanza they found inside the school? Do we even know for a fact that one of the gunmen was found dead inside the school? What we have instead are reports of two or three masked gunmen, apparently all dressed similarly in black tactical gear from head to toe, being wilfully forgotten about at best, or protected by the Federal Government at worst. Based on the authorities’ persistent but futile efforts to connect the Lanzas to this school, the multiple eyewitness reports of two shooters, the Connecticut State Medical Examiner’s report that all the victims were riddled with bullets from a rifle that we’re simultaneously being asked to believe was in the trunk of a car the whole time, similar reports of multiple shooters in previous mass shootings in recent years and the media focusing the emotional outcry onto the hot-button topic of gun control … I’m left wondering if this was actually the work of some highly trained professional hit team?
Was the massacre at Sandy Hook elementary school in Newtown, Connecticut, a psy-op, using what amounts to a ‘death squad’ and a carefully planned mission to terrorise people on behalf of the government, in combination with perception management to shape the narrative and vector the emotional fallout?
Gun control isn’t really the issue here. Control – period – is the issue. The U.S. government would long since have taken measures, quietly, to limit the supply of weapons, the 2nd Amendment of the constitution be damned (it’s “just a goddamned piece of paper“, remember?), if it was really concerned with limiting civilian access to weapons. That we’ve seen gun sales increase in the last few days to the point where Wal-Mart is all out of assault rifles is wholly unsurprising.
The psychopaths in power have absolutely no compunction about using state terrorism, in this case organising the deliberate massacre of innocent children, to control people. In effect, this is little different from what the U.S. government calls counter-insurgency or counter-terrorism in foreign countries, where it attacks innocent civilians to create the impression that they were killed by ‘communists’, ‘terrorists’, ‘insurgents’ or ‘militants’, with the aim of generating public support for the illusion that the common people need a strong, ruthless government to protect them from the ‘evil-doers’. When the common people buy into this manipulation, the end result, as history shows repeatedly, is an overt and brutal police state.
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/12/20/sandy-hook-massacre-officia...
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Why Banning guns across the U.S. is not the Solution to solving Violent Crime
Sandy Hook Actors, DHS Conducted Training in the Area, False Flag Attack.
'ROBBIE PARKER' SOLICITING MONEY ON SAME DAY AS SANDY HOOK
Sandy Hook: ►"Hunger Games Author / Gotham Map!◄
On Friday, December 14, 2012, Bill of Rights Day as proclaimed by Barack Obama,
the false flag school shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School in
Newtown, Connecticut was perpetrated to launch another US communist gun
confiscation program. So what actually happened at that elementary
school? Well, just like the Clackamas, Oregon mall false flag, the
Aurora, Colorado theater false flag, the Tucson, Arizona false flag, and
the 911 false flag we will never know as these are all internal black
ops, which are designed to leave the population in a permanent state of
confusion.In this day of high tech surveillance with government controlled cameras looking at us and documenting our actions everywhere we go, there always seems to be a breakdown when it comes to government sponsored terrorism.
A source outside the mainstream reported on The Word From the Trenches – December 14, 2012 that a message came over her police scanner that stated in reference to Sandy Hook Elementary School, “Tell them the cameras are not working”. Tell who, the Homeland Security Agents running the black op?
An initial report from an eyewitness inside the principal’s office said that the principal, vice principal, and the school psychologist went out into the hall upon hearing gun shots. Three went out and only one came back, who was the vice-principal who had been shot in the leg. The eye witness repeated the assertion that three went out and only one came back in, declaring that the principal and psychologist had been shot to death out in the hall and that is where their bodies were.
The official account we are now hearing is saying the shooter crashed into the principal’s office and killed four people therein, including the principal and the psychologist. This is no small discrepancy considering the eye witness who gave the original account to the mainstream media said she was in a meeting in the office when the shooting occurred.
This is a black op.
Original reports said a maroon van with the back window shot out left the scene with a suspected second shooter therein. It was later reported that the van had been found in the nearby town and that the driver/second shooter had been arrested.
Also around the same time it was reported that another individual wearing camouflage fatigue pants who had ran into the woods had also been arrested. And then, in the blink of an eye, these two arrests became a single arrest of the fellow who had ran into the woods who was declared to be an innocent bystander fleeing the shooting and the maroon van and the third suspect disappeared from reality, just like John Doe number two at the Oklahoma City bombing.
It is now being declared that all the bullets fired were fired inside the school. So who shot the back window out of that maroon van and what became of the van and the fellow who was driving it and was arrested in the nearby town? Don’t look at the man behind the curtain.
This is a black op.
Original reports said the shooter was wearing camouflage pants and a utility vest and then it was black fatigues and an armored vest. Today the two accounts which would indicate two shooters have been morphed into the lone wolf dressed in “black camouflage”.
This is a black op.
Then there is the strange misidentification of the shooter which defies logic in its most basic terms. First reports identified the shooter as a 20 year old and then the name leaked out as Ryan Lanza. The Word From the Trenches was up on the air at this point. #1 NWO Hatr called in with a report from the internet that said Ryan Lanza was on his Facebook declaring that he was on a bus in New Jersey and very much alive and that he is 24 years old. The mainstream media then began reporting the shooter as 24 year old Ryan Lanza.
Approximately an hour later an attempt to cover up this obvious discrepancy was made by authorities, saying that the shooter was actually Ryan Lanza’s younger brother Adam Lanza, who is 20 years old. The contention was that he and his brother had swapped IDs, resulting in the misidentification.
Well let’s look at this on its face. The shooter is dead on the floor. The police remove his identification, which according to original reports said he was 20 years old, which dictates it was Adam’s ID as his brother Ryan’s ID would have identified him as 24 years old. Any other contention defies logic.
This was a black op.
Finally, the security system at Sandy Hook Elementary School is brand new, state of the art, designed to specifically keep anyone with a gun from entering the building. Initial reports said the shooter was “buzzed in” as this would have been the only way he could get in. And now we are told that the shooter just busted right through the security door, apparently without any problem.
If you have been to a school you know the entry doors are not made of glass, in fact there is not even a window. So what new state of the art security system would put a glass door as the only barrier for a shooter wanting to enter the no gun safety zone?
This is a black op.
It was also mentioned by a couple of the participants in the conversation on The Word From the Trenches that all gun free zones must by law have an armed officer within to protect the unarmed people from any armed intruder who breaches the security.
This is a black op. A full blown campaign for gun confiscation in the US has been orchestrated around this black op. The soviet insurgents who have taken over the United States government are getting ready to initiate austerity measures designed to bring the theft of private property to a new level. They know the people have been arming as never before as we intend to resist the communist takeover of our country.
Petitions began popping up on government websites demanding gun confiscation before the smoke cleared. I believe there are a couple with 40,000 or 50,000 signatures. This is no surprise as we know who the communists are and what their numbers are. There have also been millions and millions and millions of gun and ammunition purchases over the past year and this shows the American nationals’ numbers.
Twenty children being killed, hell, twenty babies, is enough to make any sane person sick, but then these communists are not sane except to the point that they know they cannot conquer our armed population. We must let our enemies know that no matter how many MK Ultra, Prozac propelled psychos they let into schools to murder children, they are not going to take our liberty teeth from us so that they can complete the theft of our nation and slaughter us wholesale like their comrades slaughtered the Russian people during the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917.
In short, our answer to gun confiscation is “No” and no matter what they do the answer will continue to be “No”. Once the Republic has been restored, those deep in the communist insurgency who are really responsible for the murder of these innocent Americans are going to be found out and brought to justice.
God bless the Republic, death to the international corporate mafia, we shall prevail.
Sandy Hook Communist False Flag Falling Apart at the Seams
The
shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Connecticut is now being
morphed into a straight up battle over gun confiscation between the
socialists and the NRA…..the gun grabbers wish. We American nationals
count on the NRA about as far as the littlest one among us can throw
Mount Rushmore. The NRA is packed with traitors and represents nothing
more than controlled opposition, with the elitists therein more than
willing to sell out our 2nd Amendment for an elevated status of privilege.This from the New York Times:Any person who openly advocates for the overthrow of any part of the US Bill of Rights is guilty of constructive treason against the Republic and we the people. It is being said that the NRA is being silent on the Sandy Hook shooting and all of the talk in the mainstream is the NRA this and the NRA that with Bloomberg saying that the NRA doesn’t have the sway it once did.
Joe Manchin III, the pro-gun-rights West Virginia senator who drew attention in 2010 after running a commercial that showed him firing a rifle at an environmental bill, said that “everything should be on the table” as gun control is debated in the coming weeks and months.
Representative John Yarmuth, a moderate Democrat from Kentucky, said he finally felt compelled to speak out on an issue that has been untouchable for many elected officials.
“I have been largely silent on the issue of gun violence over the past six years, and I am now as sorry for that as I am for what happened to the families who lost so much in this most recent, but sadly not isolated, tragedy,” Mr. Yarmuth said in a statement. “The National Rifle Association has spent untold millions of dollars instilling fear in our citizens and our politicians.”
He added, “I believe it is more rational to fear guns far more than the illusory political power of the N.R.A.”
And in a Twitter message sent out before a television appearance, Senator Mark Warner of Virginia called the episode a “game changer.”
Here is a heads up for you communists out there. Don’t worry about the N.R.A., worry T.H.E. P.E.O.P.L.E. Though we do intend to find out who killed 20 children and 4 adults at the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting as soon as law and order is restored in the United States, our number one concern right now is the Bolsheviks who have infiltrated our government and recently purchased 400 million rounds of .40 caliber hollow points for the purpose of murdering Americans.
If you think we are going to disarm in the smallest degree, you are truly delusional. The only ones who are waving your anti-gun flag are the same traitors who marched in your May Day parade. You are the few, we are the many.
What a world it would be if one could declare war and then just command his enemy to lay down his arms and acquiesce to slaughter. Dream on communists. You have your agents in the middle crying, “It’s futile to resist. Your guns are no match for their technology”, as your mainstream lapdogs betray your absolute well founded fear thereof. When you kill children you do unleash righteous indignation, but when you fail to shift the blame for the murder from yourselves to a patsy and then a gun, you aid in your destruction.
Sandy Hook Elementary School Shooting – No sale, that is unless you are a gun distributer.
What Was DHS Doing In Sandy Hook? False Flag Two Years In The Making Or Department Of Homeland Security Fail?
Wednesday, December 19, 2012 15:13
What was DHS doing in Sandy Hook, CT, in the years prior to the recent Shady Hook shooting? According to the Department of Homeland Security’s website in Connecticut, Sandy Hook residents took part in specialized Department of Homeland Security HSEEP training drills over the two years prior to the mass shootings last Friday. Check out the location of these drills in Sandy Hook in the first video below, only hundreds of feet away from the Shady Hook Elementary school; was this truly a ‘false flag’ two years in the making? Anyone who has been paying any attention to this knows, nothing adds up.
If this wasn’t a false flag, then this was another disastrous DHS program. What are the chances of a shooting of this scale occurring only hundreds of feet away from where a Department of Homeland Security ‘training’ course was recently held, or is this the new ‘par for the course’? With this Departments ‘Security’ programs ‘working’ like the one trained for by residents of Sandy Hook, the DHS has shown once again they are completely useless. What a failure of security. Unless, of course, that was the point of these DHS drills…
By the way, KelliInTheRaw in the 2nd vid below from YouTube makes a great point, HSEEP or SHEEP? With Americans continuing to sleep soundly and the Shady Hook DHS failure or false flag, it’s quite apparent that the latter is what the DHS puppet masters had in mind.
The Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP) is a capabilities and performance-based exercise program that provides a standardized methodology and terminology for exercise design, development, conduct, evaluation, and improvement planning.
The Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP) constitutes a national standard for all exercises. Through exercises, the National Exercise Program supports organizations to achieve objective assessments of their capabilities so that strengths and areas for improvement are identified, corrected, and shared as appropriate prior to a real incident. To learn more about the HSEEP program, click on the About HSEEP tab above.The HSEEP is maintained by the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s National Preparedness Directorate, Department of Homeland Security.
Sandy Hook massacre: Official story spins out of control
Veterans Today – by Niall BradleyThe massacre of 20 children and 7 adults at the Sandy Hook elementary school last Friday was one more in a long line of atrocious mass murders committed in the USA. By now, five days later, an official version of events has more or less solidified to explain the chain of events. The familiar ‘lone gunman’ narrative has once more stoked the hot-button issue of gun control and left the general population as clueless as ever as to why people suddenly ‘go postal’ and target the most vulnerable members of society.
On closer inspection, however, there is clearly more to many of these mass shootings than meets the eye. Very often the earliest reports present information that directly contradicts key foundations of the final ‘official’ analysis of events. Granted, confusion is natural when a story breaks, but some of the initial reports conflict so completely with the lone gunman narrative that I’m going to compile them here and then try to put this tragedy in a more objective context. In his speech at the Sandy Hook Interfaith Prayer Vigil in Newtown, Connecticut on Sunday night, President Obama quoted the following biblical passage:
“So we fix our eyes not on what is seen, but on what is unseen, since what is seen is temporary, but what is unseen is eternal.”The traumatised Newtown community deserves the facts without the spin. Everyone touched by this brutal event deserves to know what really happened, so let’s fix our eyes on what remains unseen…
~ 2 Corinthians 4:18
A 20-year-old ‘tech geek’ named Adam Lanza is supposed to have snapped early last Friday, December 14th, shot dead his mother Nancy Lanza, loaded her car up with her guns and ammo, then driven it across town to his former school, the Sandy Hook Elementary School, shot dead 27 people in two classrooms and an adjoining hallway, then turned one of his guns on himself.
That’s how most will now remember the shooting, but is that actually what happened?
All the child victims were first-graders between the ages of 6 and 7. If there’s any saving grace to be found in this event, it’s that it was all over within minutes. Police were reportedly on the scene “instantaneously”, according to Connecticut State Police Commander, Lt. Vance and by then the shooting had ended. Listed among the slain school teachers and administrative staff was the school principal, 47-year-old Dawn Hochsprung. Right here we encounter our first problem:
The Newtown Bee
December 14, 2012
Sandy Hook School Principal Dawn Hochsprung told The Bee that a masked man entered the school with a rifle and started shooting multiple shots – more than she could count – that went “on and on.”
© The Newtown Bee
We were initially told that two handguns – a Glock and a Sig Sauer – were found next to the body of the dead shooter, while a third weapon, a .223-caliber rifle was also recovered “in the trunk of a car” later, in the school’s parking lot. All of the weapons were allegedly legally bought and registered in Nancy Lanza’s name. The car was later identified as a black Honda, also registered in her name. More weapons have since been introduced to the story but we’ll get back to those later on.
Besides anonymous ‘law enforcement officials’ telling the media that Adam Lanza was a former pupil at the school, they also said his mother was currently a teacher there, that she was found among the dead and that her son had specifically sought out her classroom first. But when it emerged that teaching staff at the school hadnever heard of a Nancy Lanza, it was suggested that she was a substitute teacher whose name therefore mightn’t appear on staff lists.
But this claim too has disappeared down the memory hole because it’s now known that Nancy had no connection with the school. Adam Lanza was in fact home-schooled. Nancy Lanza has since been painted as a “survivalist” who loved firearms, taught her sons how to shoot and was “stockpiling” because she was “worried about economic collapse.”
Daily Mail, UKIt’s not difficult to see that their efforts to insinuate that Nancy Lanza was somehow responsible for this massacre by being an irresponsible mother also serve to rile the large contingent of gun owners in the country, particularly the far-right who see a conspiracy on the government’s part to “take back our guns.” More on that later, but for now I just want to note that all of the Lanza family members seemed to live more or less normal middle-class lives. Yes, the parents were divorced, but it was apparently amicable and both put their own needs second to those of their children (and anyway, divorce in the US these days is decidedly ‘normal middle class’).
December 16, 2012
Last night it also emerged Nancy was a member of the Doomsday Preppers movement, which believes people should prepare for end of the world.
Her former sister-in-law Marsha said she had turned her home ‘into a fortress’. She added: ‘Nancy had a survivalist philosophy which is why she was stockpiling guns. She had them for defense.
‘She was stockpiling food. She grew up on a farm in New Hampshire. She was skilled with guns. We talked about preppers and preparing for the economy collapsing.’
Despite “family insiders” claiming that he was a “deeply disturbed kid”, Adam Lanza, like so many other alleged ‘lone(r) gunmen’ before him, does not fit the profile of a mass-murdering maniac. His 24-year-old brother, Ryan Lanza, said he hadn’t seen his brother since 2010. This fact brings into question Ryan’s claim that his younger brother may have had his identity card on his person at the school shooting. Although perhaps the question that needs to be asked here is, why would a person bother to carry identification with them after going to the trouble of dressing up in a bullet-proof vest, mask and black camouflage gear and going on a killing spree …
The live emergency services audio feed from the scene reveals some interesting observations from first responders that have been completely overlooked by the mainstream media. Note that the unedited version lasts over two hours, so the abridged version I’m going to quote from has a compressed sequence of events that are not in real time. In this abridged version, we hear at 1.38′ a report that gunfire is still being heard, even though the shooting was supposed to have ended by the time police arrived. The next report at 2.35′ says that the shooting has stopped and the school is “in lockdown”. At 3.23′, the police relay a teacher’s report that she saw “two shadows running past the gym”. This is followed by another officer on the scene who says, “Yeh, we got ‘em, they’re coming at me! … [inaudible] … coming up the driveway real slowly!” That same officer at 5.40′ says he has them “proned out”, which presumably means he has apprehended them and they are laid out on the ground, before another officer comes on to say, “be aware that we do have a second[inaudible] …”
Later on, at 19.10′, an officer who sounds out of breath, like he’s just given chase, reports what I think sounds like “these guys” followed certainly by “multiple weapons, including long rifles and shotgun”. If these were found so early on, why were they not included in the initial press reports which stated that three firearms had been found – the above mentioned Glock, Sig Sauer and Bushmaster AR-15 rifle? Further conflicting, and possibly planted evidence was thrown into the mix by ‘law enforcement officials’ when they published video footage of a long weapon being retrieved from the trunk of a car. Look closely and you’ll see that it’s a shotgun, not a rifle. In addition, this ‘discovery’ was made late in the day (it’s dark outside), while the Bushmaster rifle was first reported found “in the trunk of a car” much earlier in the day. This would logically suggest that the rifle and shotgun were found in the trunks of two different cars.
Besides the above two suspects “proned out” in front of the school, another suspected gunman was apprehended after he gave chase, this time in the woods next to the school:
YouTube – Veterans Today -
The police are clearly chasing someone whom they appear to apprehend in the middle of the woods next to the school, a fact confirmed by several eyewitnesses:
YouTube – Veterans Today -
This fleeing suspect, wearing camouflage gear, a bulletproof vest and armed with four guns, has since disappeared from media coverage. Who was this person and how did he know what “it” was when he protested that “I didn’t do it”?
Perhaps most astonishingly, this suspect arrested in the woods was named in an Associated Press report as 24-year-old Ryan Lanza. The original report has long since vanished of course, but you can see it referenced here. This was despite the fact that Ryan had already been named as the deceased suspect inside the school, lying next to two handguns.
Ryan Lanza was actually at work in Hoboken, New Jersey, that morning when his name and photo began circulating in the media. And so, for most of Friday, the ‘lone shooter’ was erroneously reported as “Ryan Lanza, confirmed dead.” At the same time, we were being told that Ryan’s girlfriend and a room-mate were reported missing, also from Hoboken, New Jersey.
So this isn’t just a case of mistaken identity, as later claimed when it was suggested that Adam had a piece of identification belonging to his brother on his person. Not one, but BOTH Lanza brothers were being placed by ‘law enforcement officials’ at the scene of the shooting. It could be that Ryan’s quick reflexes to leave his workplace to get on a bus to go back to his apartment while protesting innocence via his Facebook page may have saved his life.
Now remember, all of this confusion somehow resulted from a single guy going into a school and shooting children and teachers and then shooting himself, all within three to five minutes. Surely it should have been fairly easy to rapidly and concretely identify the details of such a crime and a rough layout of the scene?
What it’s starting to look like is that the Lanzas were framed for this mass shooting in advance. Long before any suspects were named, and even as we were being told that Nancy Lanza was among the dead at the school, we were told that police were investigating a murder in … Hoboken, New Jersey, where a body had been found at the home of … Ryan Lanza! An older “confirmed” version of events had RYAN, not Adam, travelling to Hoboken that morning to murder his father before going to the school in Newtown, Connecticut. Other variants had Ryan OR Adam going to both their divorced parents’ homes and killing them before going to the school.
The narrative has now settled on the younger brother killing his mother in Newtown then going to the school. So what about the rest of it? Do we just put it down to ‘keen’ journalism that was having a field day last Friday as media outlets sought to bring us the latest ‘breaking news’? Confusion and ‘Chinese whispers’ undoubtedly play a part in the early stages of national media events, but I think back to those news anchors reading scripts about Osama Bin Laden within minutes of the first plane being hit on 9/11 and I think, ‘Wait a minute!’ All these misleading reports had to have been issued by someone or some people “confirming” to Associated Press and other media outlets that the Ryans’s father had been murdered [he wasn't even aware that the shooting at the school had taken place until journalists turned up on his doorstep], or that Ryan’s girlfriend had gone missing from Hoboken, or that either Ryan or Adam were pulled out of the adjacent woods in handcuffs yelling “I DIDN’T DO IT” to assembled parents. These aren’t just ‘little details’ that can be confused for other details, these are detailed narratives. So how, or why, would any member of the press come up with such details? They strike me as a set of alternative scenarios that might have found their way into the official narrative had facts on the ground turned out differently.
Watch this snippet of State Police Lt. Paul Vance at the press conference he gave the day after the shootings. His answer is as bizarre as it is revealing. When asked whether Nancy Lanza had any connection with the school, he replied defensively about something that is both unrelated and arguably the most significant fact that completely undermines the official narrative: the arrest of a second gunman in the woods:
YouTube – Veterans Today -
Most of the initial mainstream media reports have since been rewritten to fit ‘new’ facts proclaimed by ‘law enforcement officials’. Here’s an example from Business Insider. The following excerpts are the opening paragraphs from the ‘same’ article, one earlier original version, followed by the later revised version:
The massacre [...] was reportedly perpetrated with a .233 caliber rifle, a Glock pistol and a Sig Sauer pistol.Indeed, I was wondering the same thing. How could two pistols do so much damage? The report was updated as follows:
The Bushmaster rifle was found in the trunk of the shooter’s car. The Sig Sauer and Glock pistols were the only weapons used in the shooting, according to CBS. Now the question is what kind of magazine would allow a shooter to fire “100″ rounds in such a short period.
The massacre in Connecticut that’s taken the lives of at least 26 people was reportedly perpetrated with a .223 caliber rifle, a Glock pistol and a Sig Sauer pistol, according to NBC:What actually happened may not matter to some, but surely a journalist’s role is to at least try to find out?
The shooter was using one Sig Sauer and one Glock pistol, according to CNN. Later details emerged that the primary weapon was the Bushmaster “assault-style” rifle.
Altogether, though, it doesn’t matter what type of weapon the shooter used. The bottom line is that it was likely a magazine fed, semi-automatic, with enough rounds to shoot “100 shots” in a matter of minutes,as quoted in USA Today.
The
three guns Adam Lanza is supposed to have brought to the school with
him. © New York Daily News. The rifle was left in the trunk, leaving
‘Adam Lanza’ just the two handguns to let off “hundreds of rounds”…
firing .233 caliber bullets that belonged to the rifle… which was left
in the car
So all the victims’ wounds were the result of rifle-fire, specifically from “the rifle”, the one we were told in early reports was found in the trunk of a car in the parking lot! This is simply not credible.
Remember that only “the rifle” was used on all the victims. If only this rifle was used, and if we try to make this claim fit into the (admittedly fluid) official version of events, then the alleged lone gunman would have had to leave the school, place the rifle back in his trunk, then return inside the school and shoot himself. No one reported any such maneuver on the part of any gunman or gunmen. What we do have, however, is live emergency services radio feed in which we hear that two men have been apprehended and are “proned out” AND live video footage supported by eyewitness testimony showing what appears to be a THIRD man being arrested by police in the woods.
We can see how the authorities’ hands are tied because they need to fit all the facts into the usual ‘lone gunman’ narrative. For that, there can only be ONE rifle and a couple of handguns. The problem is that they have already claimed to find that solitary Bushmaster rifle in the trunk of a car in the school parking lot, so the earliest police reports of a cache of long arms being found inside the school will no longer fit with the lone gunman narrative, especially as they’re now saying that he had already opened fire as he burst into the school.
Could “scrawny” 20-year-old Adam Lanza have stormed the school, solo Rambo-style, while carrying “multiple long arms, including rifles and shotguns”? Only one person was wounded. Everyone else who was shot was killed. How could Adam Lanza achieve such deadly accuracy, in such a short length of recorded time?
Initial reports put the beginning of the shooting in the school administrators’ office, where someone, reportedly the school principal, had a confrontation with the gunman(men). We know this because someone supposedly turned on the school intercom system, alerting the teaching staff to the loud swearing and commotion in the principal’s office and probably saving many more children from being gunned down as teachers took measures to hide the children in closets.
Similarly
heavily armed men wearing black combat gear from head to toe… their job
is to kill ‘terrorists’ to keep us safe, which they do by terrorising
us all
Now, this is generally a smart thing to do in any and allinteractions with the police, especially in the U.S. But to have the wherewithal to do so under such traumatic circumstances strongly suggests that Ms. Roig had logically deduced by that point that multiple perpetrators were involved, and that they were either impersonating police officers or wereindistinguishable from SWAT team police commandos, either in the way they dressed or the way they behaved upon entering the building. It also reminds us just how narrow the time window of the actual shooting was. The shooting appears to have barely ended when men knocked on that bathroom door and told Ms. Roig they were police.
There are also conflicting reports about how the gunmen entered the building. We were told initially that they came in through the main front entrance and proceeded straight to the administrators’/principal’s offices. But Sandy Hook elementary school has a security system with a video monitor, which allows staff to screen visitors before buzzing them in. A “masked gunman dressed in black tactical combat gear” from head to toe would kinda raise red flags, don’t you think?
Another possible anomaly is that Victoria Soto, one of the teachers killed at the school, appears to have had an ‘in memoriam’ Facebook page created in her name four days before the shooting.
Regarding this alleged ‘LIBOR scandal’ connection between this shooting and the Aurora theater shooting, there is as yet zero evidence to support the claim that either father of Lanza or Holmes were going to testify to anyone about anything, so for now this must remain just another rumor. I rather think that this is being spread to create the impression of a direct link that can be easily refuted, as in a straw man argument. The obvious and direct link staring everyone in the face is that the official accounts of these events are hocus-pocus. The glaring connection between these two shootings, the Sikh Temple shooting and the Fort Hood shooting is that multiple gunmen were reported at the time by eyewitnesses, but they are now all officially claimed to have been carried out by ‘lone gunmen’. This logically tells us that the real perpetrators are being protected with cover stories of what really happened because if the truth were known, some section of the U.S. government would be implicated.
Wade Michael Page, the ‘lone gunman’ in the Sikh Temple shooting in Wisconsin in August this year, was a highly decorated U.S. army psychological operations specialist, according to the Pentagon. But what happened to the three other gunmen seen by witnesses? It can’t surely be coincidence that Wade was (former?) military psy-ops. The thought has crossed my mind more than once during the aftermath of the Connecticut shooting. Others too have suggested this was a ‘false-flag’ event, or that Lanza was some sort of Manchurian Candidate.
But maybe there’s a simpler explanation (albeit more outrageous) than that? Was that really Adam Lanza they found inside the school? Do we even know for a fact that one of the gunmen was found dead inside the school? What we have instead are reports of two or three masked gunmen, apparently all dressed similarly in black tactical gear from head to toe, being wilfully forgotten about at best, or protected by the Federal Government at worst. Based on the authorities’ persistent but futile efforts to connect the Lanzas to this school, the multiple eyewitness reports of two shooters, the Connecticut State Medical Examiner’s report that all the victims were riddled with bullets from a rifle that we’re simultaneously being asked to believe was in the trunk of a car the whole time, similar reports of multiple shooters in previous mass shootings in recent years and the media focusing the emotional outcry onto the hot-button topic of gun control … I’m left wondering if this was actually the work of some highly trained professional hit team?
Was the massacre at Sandy Hook elementary school in Newtown, Connecticut, a psy-op, using what amounts to a ‘death squad’ and a carefully planned mission to terrorise people on behalf of the government, in combination with perception management to shape the narrative and vector the emotional fallout?
Gun control isn’t really the issue here. Control – period – is the issue. The U.S. government would long since have taken measures, quietly, to limit the supply of weapons, the 2nd Amendment of the constitution be damned (it’s “just a goddamned piece of paper“, remember?), if it was really concerned with limiting civilian access to weapons. That we’ve seen gun sales increase in the last few days to the point where Wal-Mart is all out of assault rifles is wholly unsurprising.
The psychopaths in power have absolutely no compunction about using state terrorism, in this case organising the deliberate massacre of innocent children, to control people. In effect, this is little different from what the U.S. government calls counter-insurgency or counter-terrorism in foreign countries, where it attacks innocent civilians to create the impression that they were killed by ‘communists’, ‘terrorists’, ‘insurgents’ or ‘militants’, with the aim of generating public support for the illusion that the common people need a strong, ruthless government to protect them from the ‘evil-doers’. When the common people buy into this manipulation, the end result, as history shows repeatedly, is an overt and brutal police state.
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/12/20/sandy-hook-massacre-officia...
Why Banning guns across the U.S. is not the Solution to solving Violent Crime
No comments:
Post a Comment