---BREAKAWAY CIVILIZATION ---ALTERNATIVE HISTORY---NEW BUSINESS MODELS--- ROCK & ROLL 'S STRANGE BEGINNINGS---SERIAL KILLERS---YEA AND THAT BAD WORD "CONSPIRACY"--- AMERICANS DON'T EXPLORE ANYTHING ANYMORE.WE JUST CONSUME AND DIE.---
Guy Fawkes Day: Why 'V for Vendetta' is More Important Than Ever
Image Credit: Superior PicsWarning: major spoilers below
Every Nov. 5 for the past few years, I've sat back with a few friends to watch V for Vendetta. While ostensibly we did this to commemorate Guy Fawkes Day,
which marks the anniversary of British revolutionary Guy Fawkes's
attempt to blow up the Parliament in 1605, we really did it because
everyone else was doing it, and we were bored.
But this Nov. 5, I expect I'll be a bit more alert when I watch V. Why? Because the movie's lessons are more important now than ever before.
Originally a graphic novel by Alan Moore, Vfor Vendetta is set in a dystopian England where a revolutionary wearing a Guy Fawkes mask sets out to destroy a fascist party called Norsefire by convincing citizens to stand up and rule themselves.
The most important lesson that the movie teaches, is distilled by this scene, where V talks about how irrational fear has resulted sacrificing liberty for security:
V for Vendetta: The Revolutionary Speech (HD)
Additionally, this quote is a reminder of recent events: "Where once you had the freedom to object, to think and speak as you saw fit, you now have censors and systems of surveillance
coercing your conformity and soliciting your submission. How did this
happen? Who's to blame? Well, certainly there are those more responsible
than others ... but ... truth be told, if you're looking for the
guilty, you need only look into a mirror. I
know why you did it. I know you were afraid. Who wouldn't be? War,
terror, disease. There were a myriad of problems which conspired to
corrupt your reason and rob you of your common sense. Fear got the best
of you, and in your panic you turned to the now-High Chancellor ... He promised you order, he promised you peace, and all he demanded in return was your silent, obedient consent."
Because of fear, Americans — like the English citizens in V —
are trading our precious liberty in for a false sense of security.
Sept. 11 happened, and it was horrible, but instead of reacting with
resolve, we reacted with fear. We passed the so-called "Patriot" Act,
which implied that anyone who disagreed with this utter trampling of
the Bill of Rights was a traitor, or worse. We held people in prison without respecting habeas corpus.And so on.
Yet, in our rabid fear, in our race to the paternalistic government,
in our herd impulse to trade in our most central rights for false
security, we forgot one incredibly important fact: Liberty is much
easier lost than recovered.
As V said, "Fear got the best of [us]." Amidst our panic, we turned
to the CIA, the NSA, the FBI, and to secretive organizations that are
well-intentioned but notaccountable to the people because they
are not visible. Those who oppose this trampling of our liberty are
labeled "unpatriotic." In reality, they are the most patriotic people America has.
We are acting like a frightened herd of sheep — like sheeple in the truest sense of the term. It is time to end this madness. So, this Nov. 5, when you watch V for Vendetta, watch it with a critical eye, and remember: Usurping freedom by appealing to security concerns is the oldest trick in the book.
Michael is a student at Harvard Law and graduated summa cum
laude from Duke with a degree in International Relations. Feel free to
contact him at mshammas@alumni.duke.edu.
hehe notice folks! ..ass pipe didn't stop the "spying" on the American People .....just the "bankers" & the "elites" ..ya know the "folks" who got the "bail out" $$$$$$$$$$ .hows it going America ..welcome to wal~mart ..motherfuckers lol
Obama halted NSA spying on IMF and World Bank headquarters
(Reuters) - President Barack Obama
has ordered the National Security Agency to stop eavesdropping on the
headquarters of the International Monetary Fund and World Bank as part
of a review of intelligence gathering activities, according to a U.S.
official familiar with the matter. The order is the
latest move by the White House to demonstrate that it is willing to curb
at least some surveillance in the wake of leaks by former NSA
contractor Edward Snowden of programs that collect huge quantities of
data on U.S. allies and adversaries, and American citizens.
The
NSA's surveillance of the Washington-based IMF and World Bank has not
previously been disclosed. Details of such spy programs are usually
highly classified.
In
response to Reuters inquiries, a senior Obama administration official
said, "The United States is not conducting electronic surveillance
targeting the headquarters of the World Bank or IMF in Washington."
The
Obama administration official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, did
not address whether the NSA had eavesdropped on the two entities in the
past.
The first official
said Obama had ordered a halt to such practices within the last few
weeks, about the same time he instructed the NSA to curtail
eavesdropping on the United Nations headquarters in New York.
The IMF and the World Bank both declined to comment.
Representatives of the NSA and the Office of Director of National Intelligence had no immediate comment.
Loch
K. Johnson, a former congressional oversight aide who is now a
professor of international relations at the University of Georgia, said
Obama made the right decision by curbing eavesdropping on international
organizations and friendly foreign leaders such as German Chancellor
Angela Merkel.
"I think
it's a good idea to cut back on surveillance" of economic-related
targets, Johnson said. "The enemy is terrorism and we should focus on
that. We have to focus almost all of our resources on Al Qaeda and its
affiliates," he said.
Paul
Pillar, a former senior analyst for the Central Intelligence Agency,
said that U.S. policy makers have to weigh the value of collecting
intelligence on an organization like the IMF against the risk it will
become public.
"In this instance the gain from that information is likely to be minimal," Pillar said.
"Sound
analysis on international economic issues of concern to U.S.
policymakers is apt to draw more from other sources of information, both
secret and public, and from tapping relevant expertise both outside and
inside government, than from eavesdropping on conversations at the
IMF," he added.
It is no
secret that U.S. spy agencies historically have collected and analyzed
information related to economic affairs - in public briefings to
Congress, top intelligence officials have discussed assessments of
economic issues.
But a
former senior U.S. intelligence official said that the Obama
Administration had put greater emphasis and resources than predecessors
into collecting and assessing economic information.
In
February 2009, shortly after Obama entered the White House, the Central
Intelligence Agency began producing a new "Economic Intelligence Brief"
for him to review along with the regular President's Daily Brief on
international security and threats.
Leon
Panetta, Obama's first CIA director, said at the time the change was
aimed at understanding the implications of the global economic crisis,
and that the agency was considering hiring more economic analysts.
The
former U.S. intelligence official noted that insider detail on economic
policy developments - for example, financial crises affecting the
economies of European countries such as Greece, Italy and Spain, and the stability of the Euro - is the type of critical information U.S. policymakers welcome.
The
desire by U.S. policymakers for such information could help explain why
NSA collected information on foreign leaders such as Merkel. Her
cellphone number was listed in a NSA targeting document, which German
media outlets apparently obtained from Snowden's cache. U.S. officials
have now indicated that much NSA eavesdropping on Merkel and other
allied leaders is likely to be curtailed if not halted.
(Additional reporting by Warren Strobel; Editing by Tiffany Wu and Grant McCool)
America is a Rigged Poker Game, So It's Time We Change the Rules
The culture of entrepreneurship and risk-taking
has always been central to American history and character, but in the
last few decades it has taken on a rather bizarre and unnatural form.
The ideology of competition has penetrated our political and national
discourse so deeply that we glorify the risk-takers and pity or tolerate
salaried workers.
America today reminds me of a poker table where one player has sucked
in all the other players’ chips and insists on keeping the game going,
dismayed that the customers don’t have any money. "Come on, people,
what’s the matter with you? Let’s play!" he laments. But he gets no
action. He's great at taking other people’s money but there are no
customers around. What’s the point of having billions in cash if you
have nowhere to invest it? There are fewer and fewer outlets out there
to demonstrate those skills. But competitive spirit will always find a
way.
Game and action — that, even more than money, is what gamblers are
seeking at that point. Perfecting your skills and promoting your gospel
is the reason you wake up in the morning. That’s the main reason,
perhaps, that many billionaires go into politics. With this mindset you
invite, or rather, insist on others participating in your game. You view
any human interaction as a business transaction, an opportunity for
one-upmanship. To keep playing this game you have to convince all the
suckers out there that, if they work hard, they too can
learn to play it. It is only when millions of others are striving to
become like you, to play at your table, by your rules, that you can have
a lasting legacy. If they don’t, you’re just a lonely guy with
mountains of chips at an empty table. And after you used all the
leverage out there to improve your returns and received all the
political favors, it still comes down to having players at your table.
When the flow of new customers slows over the normal course of business,
you begin to devise plans to extract fees from the existing ones to
keep the original pace of growth. That’s how we got the new business
models with various "financial innovation" schemes: private equity funds
or activist investors extracting
value from already existing caches, like pension funds or profitable
companies; raiding others for value rather than building it.
With such a mindset one becomes blind to the idea that, perhaps,
making a few hires, parting with a few chips, would jump start the game.
But what defines the game and the people who play it is this lack of
introspection. Today's over-the-top encouragement of risk-taking
produces a great number of bad players. Extracting value from companies
through mergers and acquisitions, rent seeking, and trading synthetic
indices is not entrepreneurship in its distilled form, because there’s
no risk involved or product being made. Bad players have entered the
game over the last few decades and, in order to win, they began to
manipulate the odds for all other players. They situated themselves
permanently on the button (the best position in poker) by making deals
with dealers and floor managers. But of course, they don’t attribute
their success to their privileged position — they attribute it to their
skills. They look at 9-to-5 cubicle workers as cost centers, because
those schmucks don’t engage in a game. And yet they would like for them
to join the table.
We rarely hear stories of a businessman becoming an office worker,
because that is viewed as a failure. We expect, nay, demand, that
everyone becomes a small entrepreneur. College students are encouraged to scrape around or borrow money
and start their own businesses. Good luck with that, kid. Except you
won’t be doing M&A, or charging others 2/20, or collecting insurance
premiums from dumb customers with money, the businesses with
essentially zero risk — the kind of businesses only “serious people in suits”,
incidentally the biggest advocates of risk-taking, are engaged in.
You’ll be spending that last $50K to open a cupcake shop or a restaurant
that has an 80% chance of closing in a few years. Giving such advice to someone right out of college can only be done in bad faith.
Strangely, the loudest advocates of risk-taking are those who face no risk at all.
But what’s wrong with simply wanting a quiet life, a stable paycheck,
and some financial security? Today's young workers have seen the
statistics — the majority of small businesses fail, so perhaps they
decided that such gamble would be imprudent given their circumstances.
And why should such a decision be derided by the gambling worshipers on
top of the hierarchy? These workers simply assessed the situation and
decided, correctly, that it would be a bad investment. If anything they
should be commended for it, not ridiculed and called names, like
“moochers” or “takers.” Since when did simply working for a paycheck
become a point of derision?
Poker players in the casino have a choice not to play — they can
stand up and leave the table if they don’t like the game. Average
citizens do not have that luxury. If the business community still
insists on fleecing those unfortunate individuals who scrape by paycheck
to paycheck, the least they can do is stop calling them names.
Katya Grishakova left the financial industry after spending
more than a decade at various Wall Street firms. She is now a board
member of ACT NOW, a New York progressive organization.
10 Corporations Control Almost Everything You Buy — This Chart Shows How
(Click to enlarge)
Ten mega corporations control the output of almost everything you buy; from household products to pet food to jeans.
According to this chart via Reddit, called
"The Illusion of Choice," these corporations create a chain that begins
at one of 10 super companies. You've heard of the biggest names, but
it's amazing to see what these giants own.
Here are just a few examples: Yum Brands owns KFC and Taco Bell. The
company was a spin-off of Pepsi. All Yum Brands restaurants sell only
Pepsi products because of a lifetime deal with the soda-maker.
$84 billion-company Proctor & Gamble — the largest advertiser in the U.S. — owns companies that produce everything from medicine to toothpaste to high-end fashion. P&G reportedly serves a whopping 4.8 billion people around the world with their products.
Nestle — famous for chocolate, but which is the biggest food
company in the world — owns shampoo company L'Oreal, baby food giant
Gerber, clothing brand Diesel, and pet food makers Purina and Friskies.
Unilever, of soap fame, produces everything from Q-tips to Skippy peanut butter.
And it's not just the products you buy and consume, either. In recent
decades, the very news and information that you get has bundled
together: 90% of the media is now controlled by just six companies, down
from 50 in 1983, according to a Frugal Dad infographic from last year.
It gets even more macro, too: 37 banks have merged to become just
four — JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Wells Fargo and CitiGroup in a
little over two decades, according to this Federal Reserve map.
The nation's 10 largest financial institutions hold 54% of our total financial assets; in 1990, they held 20%. As MotherJonesreports, the number of banks has dropped from more than 12,500 to about 8,000.
(Click to enlarge)
The numbers are stark, and the charts visualize the mind-bending reality. This is the world we live in.
War
correspondent Michael Hastings, who died in a car crash in April, had
reportedly become concerned that his car had been tampered with in the
days leading up to his death, and asked friend Jordanna Thigpen to
borrow hers, according to new profile in the LA Weekly.
From the report:
Helicopters
often circle over the hills, but Hastings believed there were more of
them around whenever he was at home, keeping an eye on him. He came to
believe his Mercedes was being tampered with. “Nothing I could say could
console him,” Thigpen says.
One night in June, he came to
Thigpen’s apartment after midnight and urgently asked to borrow her
Volvo. He said he was afraid to drive his own car. She declined, telling
him her car was having mechanical problems.
“He was scared, and he wanted to leave town,” she says.
The
next day, around 11:15 a.m., she got a call from her landlord, who told
her Hastings had died early that morning. His car had crashed into a
palm tree at 75 mph and exploded in a ball of fire.
According
to the LA Weekly, this was not the only indication of Hastings’
“increasingly erratic” behavior, as writer Gene Maddaus put it, in the
days leading up to his death:
The day before Hastings
died, he sent an email to his BuzzFeed bosses with the subject line “FBI
investigation, re: NSA.” The email informed them that “the Feds are
interviewing ‘my close friends and associates,’ ” and advised them to
get a lawyer if they were contacted. (No friends or associates have
stepped forward to say that they were interviewed, and the FBI has
denied it was investigating Hastings.)
As Salon’s Natasha Lennard reported following
the accident, conspiracy theories about Hastings’ death were swirling
around, largely emanating from the WikiLeaks Twitter account. A
coroner’s report released this week found that Hastings had drugs in his system, but they “likely did not contribute” to the accident.
Jillian Rayfield is an Assistant News Editor for Salon,
focusing on politics. Follow her on Twitter at @jillrayfield or email
her at jrayfield@salon.com.
For more than six months, WhoWhatWhy has been asking questions about the Boston Marathon bombing and aftermath, pursuing our constitutionally protected duty. By and large, reaction from official sources has been mute.
Is the FBI conducting an honest investigation or working diligently on a cover-up? It’s impossible to know.
But the Bureau’s silence should be a red flag, since the FBI and
other secretive U.S. agencies have a well-known record of duplicity when
left to operate in the shadows.
Secrecy has become the rule. In Boston, the prosecutor of accused
bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev has asked the judge to withhold filings from
the media. The FBI won’t even identify the agent who shot and killed a
key witness in the investigation in Orlando, Florida, let alone clear up
the muddy circumstances around the shooting. And the Bureau has ordered
the sealing of a county coroner’s completed autopsy report of that
killing.
And it’s not only the media that is being stonewalled. Politicians are being shut out, as well.
U.S. Sen. Charles Grassley, a reliably conservative Republican from Iowa, is now demanding answers
from the FBI about its bombing investigation. In a letter to bureau
Director James Comey, Grassley criticized the FBI’s lack of transparency
and asked for answers to a series of questions about the bombing he
first asked in June.
Three months ago, U.S. Rep. William Keating, a Massachusetts Democrat, asked his own questions in a scathing letter to Comey. Favored Reporters Are Fed Leaks
The information blackout of the past six months stands in stark
contrast to the FBI’s river of leaks to pet reporters during the week
following the April 15 bombing.
This tactic of handing out selective “scoops” gave the FBI control of
the narrative as it steered public opinion toward viewing the Boston
Bombing as an open-and-shut case against the Tsarnaev brothers, Tamerlan
and Dzhokhar.
As part of the quid pro quo for these scoops, favored journalists are
not likely to press the government for answers to discomfiting
questions.
But don’t take our word for it.
CBS News correspondent John Miller enjoys most-favored-journalist
status as a former flack for the FBI and other law enforcement agencies.
He explained the scoops-for-softballs system in an interview with David Bauder of the Associated Press.
“I am reluctant to criticize
authorities,” Miller said. “My interpretation of when they need to be
(criticized) and somebody else’s might be different…If you’ve been there
and you know how that works and what it’s like, and how easy it is to
take potshots from the outside, your criticism is more measured, your
analysis of what is worthy of criticism and what isn’t is slightly
different.”
Our Pursuit of a Police Report
According to the official narrative, the Tsarnaev brothers were
“self-radicalized” Muslims who hatched the bomb plot unassisted,
constructed rather sophisticated bombs on their own, killed university
police Officer Sean Collier for his gun (which they somehow did not
take), and carjacked the still-anonymous “Danny” (who either escaped or
was let go).
And in order to catch the Tsarnaevs, the Boston region was in essence locked down under martial law.
In scrutinizing the prevailing narrative, WhoWhatWhy has found it instructive to follow one of the many loose threads.
We sought a copy of a Cambridge, Massachusetts police report related
to the “Danny” carjacking in Cambridge on the night the Tsarnaev
brothers were revealed as suspects. We hoped to clear up some
conflicting information.
We know the report exists. The Wall Street Journal
published a story based on the document. The reporter, Pervaiz
Shallwani, claims to have been given access to the official document.
Police incident reports are considered public information. Since the
report had already been released to a Wall Street Journal reporter, we
thought it would be a simple matter to get a copy for WhoWhatWhy. Report Withheld; ‘Ongoing Investigation’
We called Daniel Riviello, a Cambridge police communications
specialist, to ask for the report. He replied that he would have to find
out whether it was available for release.
Later that day, he replied by email that the report was being
withheld under an exemption of the Massachusetts Public Records Law
because it was part of an ongoing investigation.
That’s a broad exemption. It is hard to conceive of a fresh police report that is not part of an ongoing investigation.
We pointed out to Riviello that the report already had been released
to the Wall Street Journal, and we sent him a link to the story. We
asked him to explain what had changed in the release status of the
police report since that reporter was given access.
Riviello replied by email:
I do not know how the Wall Street Journal
(reportedly) obtained a copy of the report in question as it was not
released by my office. My office is responsible for all releases to the
media and this report was not released to the WSJ or any other outlets.
So we called Journal reporter Shallwani. He said he got the report
from “a law enforcement source,” although he would not elaborate. He
said the narrative section of the report included the name of the police
officer who interviewed “Danny,” but the carjacking victim’s real name
was blacked out.
Later, Cambridge police said the report had been forwarded to the
U.S. Attorney’s Office in Boston, which is prosecuting the bombing case.
We contacted Christina Dilorio-Sterling, the prosecutor’s spokeswoman,
many times. She hasn’t replied. ‘Wide Swaths of Records Omitted’
WhoWhatWhy and the two skeptical politicians are not alone in
wondering why law enforcement agencies are refusing to allow access to
information about the Boston Marathon bombing.
Gatehouse Media, which publishes the Quincy Patriot Ledger, the Fall River Herald News and other papers in the Boston area, complained in a letter to the federal district court in Boston about the unprecedented lock on information about the bombing investigation.
Gatehouse alleges violations of the public’s constitutionally guaranteed right to scrutinize legal proceedings. The Herald News reported
in late August that 48 entries were missing from the court file related
to Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, which the publisher says is a violation of the
First Amendment.
The article quoted from the letter:
Wide swaths of court records have been
omitted in their entirety from the docket listings. The incomplete
public docket sheet maintained in this case … does not accurately
reflect the materials on file with the Court. As a result, the
Newspapers’ constitutionally protected newsgathering and reporting
efforts have been frustrated.
The fact that the circumstances
culminating in Mr. Tsarnaev’s arrest and the charges against him have
received extensive media attention is simply not enough to seal
allegedly prejudicial information, (attorney Michael) Grygiel said,
arguing that the high-profile nature of the case requires more
transparency, not less, because justice must not only be done, it must
be perceived as being done.
And, it turns out, Dzhokhar Tsarnaev’s defense team is facing the same obstacles.
A motion
filed in court by the defense team lists numerous requests for
exculpatory information that have either been denied or provided
incompletely during discovery. The Rush to Judgment In 1996
“Discovery” is a good idea, whether it’s part of a legal compact
between adversarial attorneys or the often-contentious relationship
between law enforcement and a robust, skeptical media.
Rushing to judgment, after all, is certifiably foolish.
One egregious media stampede involved Richard Jewell, the luckless
security guard on whom was pinned the Atlanta Olympics bombing of July
27, 1996. The media circus was triggered by a scurrilous “extra edition” scoop in the Atlanta Journal, based largely on the reporting of an intern.
Richard Jewell
The article said Jewell “fits the profile of the lone bomber,” and
the rush to judgment commenced. The FBI pursued Jewell relentlessly
after the bombing, which killed two and injured 111 people.
Ultimately, it became clear that Jewell could not possibly have
perpetrated the bombing. The FBI and the media were forced to admit
their mistakes after tormenting Jewell and his family for months.
A decade later, Eric Rudolph, a violent anti-abortionist activist,
was identified as the Olympic bomber. Jewell died of complications from
diabetes not long after the true bomber was outed.
Eric Rudolph
Simplistic View of Complicated Events
Would the investigation of Jewell have developed any differently
today? And how would we have reacted to the false accusation of this
man today? If anything, we seem even quicker now to accept simplistic
views of complicated events—at least in part because we are kept in the
dark by law enforcement.
In Connecticut, for example, the Hartford Courant continues to argue
for release of the full state report on the massacre last December at
Sandy Hook Elementary School. Are there details in the report that
might help stop future atrocities?
We may never know.
The timely release of detailed information related to complicated
criminal investigations – the Kennedy assassinations, Sandy Hook, the
Atlanta and Boston bombings–is one thing that makes open societies
different from closed ones, democracies from oligarchies.
In all such cases, the media has a simple imperative: disclosure to
the full extent possible. To do this, we must ask tough questions in the
name of a public that has the right, and the need, to know the truth.
WhoWhatWhy plans to continue doing this
kind of groundbreaking original reporting. You can count on it. But can
we count on you? We cannot do our work without your support.
Please click here to donate; it’s tax deductible. And it packs a punch.
Posted on Oct 31, 2013 in Health, Food News, & Big Pharma, Science & TechnologyKevin Hayden – TruthisTreason.net Source: Stop Smart Meters!
Here is an excellent collection of scientific papers finding adverse
biological effects or damage to health from Wi-Fi signals, Wi-Fi-enabled
devices or Wi-Fi frequencies (2.4 or 5 GHz), complied by campaign
group WiFi In Schools.
The papers listed are only those where exposures were 16V/m or
below. Someone using a Wi-Fi-enabled tablet computer can be exposed to
electromagnetic fields up to 16V/m. Papers are in alphabetical order. A
file of first pages, for printing, can be found here.
If you feel like sending a copy of this collection to the local schools in your area, you can search for them here and either print out this article to post or email the link.
Wi-Fi papers
1. Atasoy H.I. et al., 2013. Immunohistopathologic demonstration of
deleterious effects on growing rat testes of radiofrequency waves
emitted from conventional Wi-Fi devices. Journal of Pediatric
Urology 9(2): 223-229.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22465825
2. Avendaño C. et al., 2012. Use of laptop computers connected to
internet through Wi-Fi decreases human sperm motility and increases
sperm DNA fragmentation. Fertility and Sterility 97(1): 39-45.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22112647
3. Avendaño C. et al., 2010. Laptop expositions affect motility and
induce DNA fragmentation in human spermatozoa in vitro by a non-thermal
effect: a preliminary report. American Society for Reproductive Medicine
66th Annual Meeting: O-249 http://wifiinschools.org.uk/resources/laptops+and+sperm.pdf)
4. Aynali G. et al., 2013. Modulation of wireless (2.45 GHz)-induced
oxidative toxicity in laryngotracheal mucosa of rat by melatonin. Eur
Arch Otorhinolaryngol 270(5): 1695-1700. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23479077
5. Gumral N. et al., 2009. Effects of selenium and L-carnitine on
oxidative stress in blood of rat induced by 2.45-GHz radiation from
wireless devices. Biol Trace Elem Res. 132(1-3): 153-163. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19396408
6. Havas M. et al., 2010. Provocation study using heart rate
variability shows microwave radiation from 2.4GHz cordless phone affects
autonomic nervous system. European Journal of Oncology Library Vol. 5:
273-300.http://www.icems.eu/papers.htm?f=/c/a/2009/12/15/MNHJ1B49KH.DTL part 2.
7. Havas M. and Marrongelle J. 2013. Replication of heart rate
variability provocation study with 2.45GHz cordless phone confirms
original findings. Electromagn Biol Med 32(2): 253-266.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23675629
8. Maganioti A. E. et al., 2010. Wi-Fi electromagnetic fields exert
gender related alterations on EEG. 6th International Workshop
on Biological Effects of Electromagnetic fields.http://www.istanbul.edu.tr/6internatwshopbioeffemf/cd/pdf/poster/WI-FI%20ELECTROMAGNETIC%20FIELDS%20EXERT%20GENDER.pdf
9. Margaritis L.H. et al., 2013. Drosophila oogenesis as a bio-marker responding to EMF sources.
Electromagn Biol Med., Epub ahead of print. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23915130
10. Naziroğlu M. and Gumral 2009. Modulator effects of L-carnitine
and selenium on wireless devices (2.45 GHz)-induced oxidative stress and
electroencephalography records in brain of rat. Int J Radiat Biol.
85(8): 680-689.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19637079
11. Nazıroğlu M. et al., 2012. 2.45-Gz wireless devices induce
oxidative stress and proliferation through cytosolic Ca2+ influx in
human leukemia cancer cells. International Journal of Radiation
Biology 88(6): 449–456.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22489926
12. Nazıroğlu M. et al., 2012b. Melatonin modulates wireless (2.45
GHz)-induced oxidative injury through TRPM2 and voltage gated Ca(2+)
channels in brain and dorsal root ganglion in rat. Physiol Behav.
105(3): 683-92.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22019785
13. Oksay T. et al., 2012. Protective effects of melatonin against
oxidative injury in rat testis induced by wireless (2.45 GHz) devices.
Andrologia doi: 10.1111/and.12044, Epub ahead of print. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23145464
14. Papageorgiou C. C. et al., 2011. Effects of Wi-Fi signals on the
p300 component of event-related potentials during an auditory hayling
task. Journal of Integrative Neuroscience 10(2): 189-202.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21714138 (Wi-Fi alters brain activity in young adults:http://wifiinschools.org.uk/resources/wifi+brain+July+2011.pdf)
15. Shahin S. et al., 2013. 2.45 GHz Microwave Irradiation-Induced
Oxidative Stress Affects Implantation or Pregnancy in Mice, Mus
musculus. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 169: 1727–1751. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23334843
16. Türker Y. et al., 2011. Selenium and L-carnitine reduce oxidative
stress in the heart of rat induced by 2.45-GHz radiation from wireless
devices. Biol Trace Elem Res. 143(3): 1640-1650. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21360060
And here are a few more studies of similar microwave frequencies at low exposures (6V/m or below) (this is not comprehensive):
17. Balmori A. 2010. Mobile phone mast effects on common frog (Rana
temporaria) tadpoles: the city turned into a laboratory. Electromagn.
Biol. Med. 29(1-2):31-35.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20560769
18. Erdinc O. O. et al., 2003. Electromagnetic waves of 900MHz in
acute pentylenetetrazole model in ontogenesis in mice. Neurol. Sci.
24:111-116http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14600821
19. Fesenko E. E. et al., 1999. Stimulation of murine natural killer
cells by weak electromagnetic waves in the centimeter range. Biofizika
44:737–741 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10544828
20. Fesenko E. E. et al., 1999. Microwaves and cellular immunity. I.
Effect of whole body microwave irradiation on tumor necrosis factor
production in mouse cells, Bioelectrochem. Bioenerg. 49:29–35http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10619445
21. Havas M. et al., 2010. Provocation study using heart rate
variability shows microwave radiation from 2.4GHz cordless phone affects
autonomic nervous system. European Journal of Oncology Library Vol. 5:
273-300http://www.icems.eu/papers.htm?f=/c/a/2009/12/15/MNHJ1B49KH.DTL part 2.
22. Kesari K. K. and Behari J., 2009. Microwave exposure affecting
reproductive system in male rats. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.
162(2):416-428 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19768389
23. Kesari K. K. and Behari J., 2009. Fifty-gigahertz microwave
exposure effect of radiations on rat brain. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.
158:126-139 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19089649
24. Khurana V. G. et al., 2010. Epidemiological Evidence for a Health
Risk from Mobile Phone Base Stations. Int. J. Occup. Environ. Health
16:263–267 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20662418
25. Maier R. et al., 2004. Effects of pulsed electromagnetic fields
on cognitive processes – a pilot study on pulsed field interference with
cognitive regeneration. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica 110: 46-52http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15180806
26. Nittby H. et al., 2008. Cognitive impairment in rats after
long-term exposure to GSM-900 mobile phone radiation.
Bioelectromagnetics 29: 219-232 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18044737
27. Novoselova E. G. et al., 1998. Stimulation of production of tumor
necrosis factor by murine macrophages when exposed in vivo and in vitro
to weak electromagnetic waves in the centimeter range Bofizika
43:1132–1333.
28. Novoselova E. G. et al., 1999. Microwaves and cellular immunity.
II. Immunostimulating effects of microwaves and naturally occurring
antioxidant nutrients. Bioelectrochem. Bioenerg. 49:37–41 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10619446
29. Otitoloju A. A. et al., 2010. Preliminary study on the induction
of sperm head abnormalities in mice, Mus musculus, exposed to
radiofrequency radiations from Global System for Mobile Communication
Base Stations. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 84(1):51-4. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19816647
30. Panagopoulos D. J.et al., 2010. Bioeffects of mobile telephony
radiation in relation to its intensity or distance from the antenna.
Int. J. Radiat. Biol. Vol 86(5):345-357.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20397839
31. Persson B. R. R. et al., 1997. Blood-brain barrier permeability
in rats exposed to electromagnetic fields used in wireless
communication. Wireless Networks 3: 455-461.
32. Pyrpasopoulou A. et al., 2004. Bone morphogenic protein
expression in newborn kidneys after prenatal exposure to radiofrequency
radiation. Bioelectromagnetics 25:216-27 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15042631
33. Salford L. G. et al., 2010. Effects of microwave radiation upon
the mammalian blood-brain barrier. European Journal of Oncology Library
Vol. 5:333-355 http://www.icems.eu/papers.htm?f=/c/a/2009/12/15/MNHJ1B49KH.DTL part 2.
34. Salford L. G., et al., 2003. Nerve cell damage in mammalian brain
after exposure to microwaves from GSM mobile phones. Environ. Health
Perspect. 111:881-883. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12782486
With thanks to WifiInSchools.
folks! just remember satellites & spy drones ....LOOK UP !!! as well as down ??? (wonder "who" "they" be looking for )
Lockheed Martin announces plans for SR-72 hypersonic spy drone
Image by Lockheed Martin
Aircraft experts and military
aficionados have cause to rejoice now that Lockheed Martin has debuted
the SR-72 unmanned spy plane, the long-awaited successor to the SR-71
Blackbird and potentially the first hypersonic craft to enter service.
Plans for the SR-72 drone were first unveiled Friday in an Aviation
Week article which revealed that Lockheed Martin’s Skunk Works advanced
development program has drafted plans for a plane that could fly as fast
as Mach 6 – twice the speed of the Blackbird.
The SR-72 would have the ability to gather intelligence, conduct
surveillance and reconnaissance, and launch combat strikes at an
unprecedented speed. The plane is designed to fill what is considered in
military circles to be a gap in capabilities between the spy satellites orbiting Earth and the manned and unmanned technology meant to replace the SR-71.
The original Blackbird, which was introduced in 1966 and served until
1999, was primarily used by the US Air Force and NASA to collect
intelligence through the Cold War. Along with flying at speeds fast
enough to outrun a surface-to-air missile, the Blackbird also avoided
enemy radar by flying at low altitudes. A total of 32 aircraft were
built and, although 12 were lost to accidents, not a single one was lost
to enemy combat.
Yet the sheer cost of replicating the Blackbird has prevented the US military
from commissioning such a powerful weapon at a time when the Air Force
has dominated international skies with the drone program.
But Lockheed Martin now believes it has encountered a technological
breakthrough rendering the conversation around costs irrelevant.
Brad Leland, portfolio manager for air-breathing hypersonic
technologies, said the crux of the new project hinges on an air
breathing engine that combines the traditional turbine with a scramjet.
The US Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) explored the
idea on previous projects but abandoned it because of cost.
“The Skunk Works has been working with Aerojet Rocketdyne for the
past seven years to develop a method to integrate an off-the-shelf
turbine with a scramjet to power the aircraft from standstill to Mach 6
plus,” Leland said. “Our approach builds on HTV-3X, but this
extends a lot beyond that and addresses the one key technical issue that
remained on that program: the high-speed turbine engine.”
Leland, who said that roughly 20 employees have worked on the project so far, elaborated in an interview with Reuters.
“What we are doing is defining a missile that would have a small incremental cost to go at hypersonic speed,” he said. “Hypersonic
is the new stealth. Your adversaries cannot hide or move their critical
assets. They will be found. That becomes a game-changer.”
Source: RT
When it comes to replicating human poses and natural movement,
artists often look to anatomical models. Traditional figures do have
their limitations, though, with the lack of details making it difficult
to recreate the lines of a raised shoulder or a clasped fist. But things
are set to change, with a new figure on the market called the
S.F.B.T-3, (Special Full-action Body Type v.3). Ten years in the making,
this girl has 80 moveable parts in her body, allowing
for an unprecedented number of poses and anatomical designs. We take a
look at the doll’s amazing details and see how it performs in some
popular anime poses for the illustrator’s eye.
Manufactured in Japan by Dolk Station, the S.F.B.T-3 is made from ABS
resin, which is stronger than the colour range used in the first
version. Priced at US$300, orders can be shipped internationally.
▼ The lines and shadows in the hands give you incredible detail when
it comes to gun-holding scenes. All that’s left to do is load her up
with the weaponry of choice.
▼ The flexible torso allows for increased movement and more precision when it comes to the natural angle of a back arch.
▼ The eyes can even be manipulated to face left, right, up or down.
▼ The forearm twists with the hand to provide an accurate silhouette.
▼ The toes can be adjusted for accurate running and leaping movements.
▼ Although able to support herself in a number of poses, a stand is included in delivery.
▼ The attention to detail is enhanced thanks to over 200 parts used in her construction.
Back in 2011, news reports
that Chinese-made “health supplements” contained ground-up corpses of
babies and fetuses shocked the world. Unfortunately, this macabre story
continues as some of the so-called “human flesh capsules” have made their way into South Korea again. Even though there has been a heavy crackdown
on these kind of black market “medicine,” Korean authorities arrested
two Chinese men last month for smuggling the gruesome pills and then
reselling them as “diet supplements.”
False advertising
The Chinese men in their 20s were living on Jeju island and sold the
black market capsules through the Internet in South Korea. The duo
advertised the powdered flesh-containing capsules as a “diet supplement”
and sold them to about 80 people. Korean authorities arrested the men
on October 24. “High-end diet supplement”
The two men would buy about 30 capsules from a Chinese seller for
20,000 won ($19US) and then sell them for 60,000 won, making a decent
profit off the smuggled capsules. They sold over 6,000,000 won worth of
the human flesh capsules to the mostly Korean customers before getting
caught. 100 percent human DNA
According to laboratory analysis by Seoul’s National Forensic
Services, the contents of the pills contained “100 percent human DNA.”
We can only imagine the horrifying Soylent Green
moment the scientists had in the lab. They also detected other banned
substances, making these capsules potentially very dangerous. Blindsided customers
The pills were originally bought in a Chinese shopping mall. Then
were then smuggled into Korea by the two men, repackaged and then sold
online. Since the repackaged box led the consumers to believe they were
taking “diet supplements,” they had no idea they were unintentionally
buying and consuming human flesh capsules. High demand
In this case, the customers had no idea what they were buying, but
human flesh capsules have been flooding the black market in South Korea
due to a seemingly high demand. Currently, it does not seem like demand
for this grisly product has reached far beyond China and Korea. We hope
the makers of this sick “medicine” have a change of heart and reconsider
their lives. Also, let this be a reminder to read the labels on the
products we consume, and perhaps be extra careful about buying any
miracle weight-loss pill online.
▼ A close-up of the repackaged “diet supplements”
▼ ”Detox pills” and other smuggled supplements were found by the police
▼ One of the two alleged smugglers being held by police
▼ Police searching the alleged smugglers’ home for evidence
U.S. government may force doctors to accept Obamacare and Medicare patients, eventually at gunpoint
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, NaturalNews Editor
(NaturalNews) The primary tool of socialism is force, and while that
force usually begins with good intentions codified into law, it
inevitably ends up with the kind of force used by Mao Zedong to murder
millions of his own citizens. "Political power grows out of the barrel
of a gun," he famously stated, and Obama-supporting democrats are
following in his footsteps.
Word from the street is that Kathleen Murphy, a democrat running for the House, wants to make it a legal requirement that doctors accept Medicare and Obamacare patients.
Many
doctors, of course, have already announced that will not accept such
patients because they would go bankrupt if they did. The government's
payout on medical services rendered to patients in these groups is a
total joke, you see: doctors sometimes receive only 30% of what they
actually billed. And they can't negotiate, either. The government simply
tells you what you "get" to receive in terms of payment, regardless of
how much you actually billed as a doctor.
So forcing doctors to accept Medicare / Obamacare patients is the same as forcing them to work for free.
Most doctors won't work for free, as they have their own families to
financially support, so they'll simply quit the industry altogether.
That, in turn, will cause a radical worsening of the existing doctor shortage across the USA, resulting in yet more people going without health care.
Force doctors to practice medicine at gunpoint
The
reaction by democrats to all this, of course, will be to make it
illegal for doctors to quit. And that will sooner or later be enforced
at gunpoint, because force is the only tool that socialists really
understand since they operate in total ignorance of the mechanisms of
the free market and informed consumer choice. With Obama and the
democrats, it's always "Mandate! Mandate! Mandate!" even if it means
assigning a government paramilitary worker to hold a pistol to the head
of every doctor across America to make them see patients against their will.
And why not? Obamacare
already forces hundreds of millions of American citizens to buy health
insurance against their will. Now Kathleen Murphy wants to force doctors
to accept all these patients against their will. Where does it ever
end?
I'll tell you where it ends: Violent revolution. Every
socialist entitlement dream -- whether it's in China, Venezuela,
Argentina or even Fascist-style systems like Nazi Germany -- always end in violent collapse and mass slaughter.
Because, you see, a centrally-planned economy simply never works. And once the government
has to resort to threats, penalties and force to make everyone comply,
you end up with nothing more than an oppressive police state where
everybody is angry, everybody lives in fear, and the costs of goods and
service skyrocket because the free market is crippled.
Sooner or later the people revolt and overthrow the tyranny for the simple reason that liberty is part of the DNA of all humans.
We are beings with free will and consciousness, and that means we don't
want to be enslaved and forced to act against our will -- especially
not by a criminal, incompetent government run like a mafia.
A health care voucher system would slash costs almost immediately
The
way to really bring down health care costs in America while still
fulfilling part of the Big Government dream of entitlements to the
masses would be for Obama to announce a voucher system where every person gets (for example) $500 / month in a free health care voucher that they can spend as they like.
This
would put consumers in the position of actually shopping around for
affordable doctors, affordable medications and even preventive services
such as holistic health care fitness memberships or dietary supplements
that prevent chronic disease.
A voucher system is the opposite of
the current monopoly system, and that's exactly why democrats hate
voucher systems: They give people the freedom to choose.
Government hates choice, and the Obama government in particular hates
the entire private sector. Deep inside, all Obama supporters believe in a
soviet-style centrally-planned economy, and they live in a matrix of
wild delusions in which they believe government actually delivers
services more efficiently and cheaply than the private sector.
Just
look at Healthcare.gov if you want to refute that delusion. In truth,
no institution is more inefficient, wasteful and crooked in delivering
services than the government itself. That's why the real solution to
health care in America is to allow consumers to shop for their own
treatments, cures, insurance policies and doctor visits using free
market principles of 1) informed consumers, 2) freedom to choose, 3)
incentives for consumers to find the best price.
I proposed a solution to national health care in 2009
I'm
actually the creator of a voucher system proposal that could have
turned Obamacare into an amazing success instead of a disastrous
failure. I proposed this system in 2009 and you can read it here:
That
petition was endorsed by the Life Extension Foundation, the Organic
Consumers Association, the American Association for Health Freedom and
Citizens for Health, among other groups.
Had America chosen that
kind of system instead of the disastrous Obamacare, we wouldn't be
hearing democrats today saying incredibly stupid things like, "We have
to MAKE doctors accept Obamacare patients!"
Here's the full text of my Health Revolution Petition from 2009. It remains a viable system today:
We,
the People of these United States of America, hereby call for
revolutionary changes in our health care system that encourage health
and prosperity instead of disease and corporate profit.
Specifically, we call for:
1. Federal government encouragement and reward for the People taking personal responsibility for their own health
-
A full federal income tax deduction, with no minimum, for the purchase
of any product, service, or device that is intended for use in the
improvement of health. This includes, but is not limited to, dietary
and herbal supplements, gym memberships, health coaching services,
exercise equipment, Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM)
therapies or any other health-enhancing products and services.
-
The immediate creation of an investigatory panel, comprised of leaders
from both conventional and naturopathic backgrounds, that would
investigate the "Citizens In Charge" debit card health care system
described at www.HealthRevolutionPetition.org/CitizensInC...
* The "Citizens In Charge" health care system is a
"socialized-free-market" system of health care that eliminates all
health insurance and puts health care decisions back into the hands of
the People, allowing them to spend their government-provided health care
funds on any health-related products or services they choose
(conventional, alternative, licensed or unlicensed).
* The
investigatory panel shall report on the economic viability (and
potential savings) of the program, as well as the likely improvements in
health care outcomes. This report shall be made publicly available on
the internet for all citizens to read and discuss.
2. Restore Health Freedom to All Americans and Legalize Healing
-
Allow all practitioners of the healing arts, licensed or otherwise, the
freedom to practice healing arts with the consent of patients. End all
government persecution of alternative and complementary care
practitioners and clinics.
- End FDA oppression of free speech about health products and therapies.
- Protect access to dietary supplements, colloidal silver, medicinal herbs and anti-cancer products.
-
End FTC and FDA assaults on the Free Speech rights of natural health
companies who accurately describe the health benefits of their products.
- Affirm the rights of American moms and dads to choose to avoid mandatory vaccinations of their children.
-
End federal assaults (DEA) on the possession or sale of medicinal
plants that have been medically recognized and legalized by States such
as California.
- Legalize Healing: End state monopoly medical
licensing laws that grant conventional medical authorities absolute
power to decide who can or cannot practice medicine.
3. End FDA Tyranny, Censorship and Corruption
- End the FDA's definition of a "drug" and strip it of authority to censor truthful health claims about dietary supplements.
-
End revolving door employment between the FDA and Big Pharma; fire
current FDA employees and advisors with past financial ties to Big
Pharma.
- Require full disclosures of financial conflicts of interest of FDA managers, scientists and decision panel members.
- End the FDA's Big Pharma-initiated attack on compounding pharmacies and bioidentical hormone therapy.
- Investigate the FDA's collusion with pharmaceutical companies in hiding clinical trial data from the American public.
4. Protect the Food Supply
- Ban GMOs in the U.S. food supply.
- Ban harmful food additives: MSG, aspartame and sodium nitrite.
- Require honest labeling of irradiated foods.
- Require country-of-origin labeling for all foods sold in the U.S.
- Ban the importation of foods using pesticides outlawed in the U.S.
- Save California's almond growers and end the fumigation of raw almonds.
- Require honest investigation into mad cow disease and the questionable practices of factory animal farms.
-
Only permit "harmonization" of our healthcare and food laws with other
nations if all the freedoms and rights mentioned in this petition are
respected and guaranteed both domestically and in the harmonizing
nation.
5. Restore Honest Science to Medicine
- Require the open, timely publication of all medical studies.
- Require open disclosure of all ties between study authors, researchers and for-profit entities.
- Require clinical trial results to report ABSOLUTE numbers, not just relative numbers.
- Require long-term testing of drugs (at least 12 months) before approval in order to determine real-world side effects.
- Require safety testing of multiple drug combinations that are commonly prescribed to real patients.
-
End disease mongering and the psychiatric medication of infants and
toddlers. Outlaw the drugging of young children with mind-altering
chemicals such as ADHD drugs.
6. End Era of Big Pharma Domination Over Health Care
-
End all drug-company-funded "benefits" to doctors, including
vacation-style CME events, speaking fees, consulting fees and author
fees.
- Investigate and prosecute drug company executives for
intentionally hiding negative drug trial data and misleading the public
about the safety of their products.
- Get Big Pharma out of medical schools.
- Guarantee the right of consumers to sue drug companies and medical device manufacturers for damages caused by unsafe products.
- Restore power to the FTC to regulate commercial drug advertising practices.
-
Modify the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act to double product liability and
personal injury awards involving any pharmaceuticals that are advertised
in a Direct-To-Consumer (DTC) manner.
- Enact legislation that
would impose substantial criminal penalties for executives of drug
companies that advertise drugs for which serious adverse events were
known by the company at the time the drug was submitted to the FDA for
approval.
- Regulate direct-to-consumer (DTC) advertising of
prescription medications by removing its jurisdiction from the FDA and
shifting it to the FTC, which is normally the agency that exercises
jurisdiction over commercial advertising. Additionally:
*
Require such ads to prominently and conspicuously display, for a period
of no less than five seconds, a toll-free phone number that drug
consumers may use to report drug side effects.
* Disallow the practice of using celebrity spokespersons for the promotion of any drug.
* Disallow ads that exaggerate claims of drug benefits or that do not
accurately reflect the scientific findings of clinical trials.
* Require all statistical claims of drug benefits to be stated in absolute numbers, not relative numbers.
* Require drug side effects reports gathered through the toll-free phone number to be reported on a timely basis to the FDA.
* Require the FTC to disallow pharmaceutical "lifestyle advertising"
that suggests taking a drug will dramatically transform the lifestyle of
the patient. Lifestyle advertising sends a dangerous message that the
"before" person (depressed, miserable, unhealthy-looking) will be
magically changed into the "after" person (healthy, vibrant, happy,
energetic and sexy) by taking the drug.
7. Protect Children From Products That Compromise Their Health
-
Restrict commercial advertising of junk foods, sodas and caffeine
energy drinks to programming hours not commonly viewed by children.
- Eliminate junk food and soda vending machines from all schools and public buildings.
- Get processed foods out of the school lunch program and encourage the use of fresh, unprocessed foods.
- End mandatory vaccination requirements (as per section 2, above), restoring this decision to parents.
8. Ban Man-Made, Non-Natural Cancer-Causing Chemicals in Cosmetics and Personal Care Products
- Ban man-made, non-natural chemicals in cosmetics that have not been proven safe.
- Require government-funded testing of commonly used man-made, non-natural chemicals to determine their safety.
- Require honest labeling of cosmetics and personal care products with appropriate cancer warnings.
- Recognize that the skin absorbs chemicals, and chemicals used on the skin can enter the bloodstream.
9. Invest in Disease Prevention
- Encourage and permit tax deductions for routine testing of vitamin D as part of routine patient exams.
- Encourage vitamin D supplementation and sensible sunlight exposure to correct deficiencies.
- Teach the population about nutrition, vitamin D, medicinal foods and disease prevention by using Public Service Announcements.
10. Protect the Environment from Drug and Chemical Companies
- Require the EPA to investigate the environmental impact of pharmaceuticals in the water supply.
- End the chemical fluoridation of public water supplies.
-
Require hospitals, pharmacies and nursing homes to dispose of expired
pharmaceuticals in an environmentally-conscious away that avoids more
drugs being flushed down the drain and passing intact through waste
water treatment facilities and then into our bodies when we consume tap
water.
All content posted on this site is commentary or opinion and is
protected under Free Speech. Truth Publishing LLC takes sole
responsibility for all content. Truth Publishing sells no hard products
and earns no money from the recommendation of products. NaturalNews.com
is presented for educational and commentary purposes only and should not
be construed as professional advice from any licensed practitioner.
Truth Publishing assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this
material. For the full terms of usage of this material, visit
www.NaturalNews.com/terms.shtml
Yet, in our rabid fear, in our race to the paternalistic government,
in our herd impulse to trade in our most central rights for false
security, we forgot one incredibly important fact: Liberty is much
easier lost than recovered.
