Stealth Terror: Weather Warfare and the End of America, Part I
By James Hanson*
The following is the first installment of an exclusive four part series on memoryholeblog.com probing
the relationship between America’s police state and less-understood
weather warfare programs. The work will run weekly through July 30. -JFT
Mother Nature does not engage in
terrorism. Her ravages are integral to the natural world in which
mankind must adapt or die. Insofar as we know, Mother Nature has no
motive to induce terror. That’s where human beings come in.
The following report is about aspects of weather and environmental
modification which are not presented in the corporate media but can be
found at alternative news and analysis websites offering explanations of
weather phenomena caused by human beings. For example, in an
introductory note of an article found at Global Research, Prof. Michel
Chossudovsky
states:
Environmental modification techniques (ENMOD) for
military use constitute, in the present context of global warfare, the
ultimate weapon of mass destruction. Rarely acknowledged in the debate
on global climate change, the world’s weather can now be modified as
part of a new generation of sophisticated electromagnetic weapons. Both
the US and Russia have developed capabilities to manipulate the climate
for military use.
… The US military has developed advanced capabilities that enable it
selectively to alter weather patterns. The technology, which is being
perfected under the High-frequency Active Auroral Research Program
(HAARP), is an appendage of the Strategic Defense Initiative – “Star
Wars”. From a military standpoint, HAARP is a weapon of mass
destruction, operating from the outer atmosphere and capable of
destabilizing agricultural and ecological systems around the world.
There is no official statement or major media recognition of the uses
that have been made of this capability to bring death and ruin to large
numbers of people. In my report I provide details which I believe
illustrate the high probability of implementation of these capabilities
including their use in planned debilitation of the people and productive
capacity of the United States.
Hurricane Sandy is my first subject because it fit such a use of the
power. Before one dismisses this particular possibility as a fool’s
errand they must conclude that it is never used for deleterious effects
upon the United States, even if it might seem more than coincidental in
its use on nations such as Russia or Iran at critical places and times.
Along these lines, for a conspiracy researcher such as I, Sandy has
been an especially suspicious phenomenon. I couldn’t turn away because
it was so historically unprecedented and affected the political
situation at such a high level. With terrorist events—such as 9/11—one
is left more so to guess at the suspects, and it takes a while to find
out because the news media can’t seem to hear those low notes. While
the aftermath of Sandy was still bounding around in the public
consciousness there was a smaller event called “Sandy Hook” that
understandably got to everyone’s heart and made them want to do
something. Further, because it featured firearms and the slaughter a
flock of first graders in their schoolrooms, naturally enough many
wanted to ban guns so that such an event would never happen again.
Mother Nature didn’t do that one, of course, nor in my estimation
Hurricane Sandy, a form of terrorism unrecognized as such. “The Sandy
Hook massacre” is a new form used to alter public policy. One can sense
the terror that energizes action due to the pain in everyone’s heart
for those lovely young children who were mercilessly slaughtered. I
felt it. But after a calm appraisal of the facts my reaction turned to
assessing the named terrorist, Adam Lanza, to be as innocent as the
children–a probable victim of terrorists who established his reputation
as having performed the single most unfathomably dreadful deed in
collective memory. As one faces the actual facts, he finds the same
sort of evil (illegal) force behind Sandy Hook as that responsible for
Hurricane Sandy, the result in both cases being debilitation of the
American people and their human rights.
The similarity to 9/11 terror was not apparent at first. Sandy Hook
Elementary School was much smaller and it focused on the horror of
blood-drenched children who were 100% innocent, while 9/11 destroyed all
the buildings in the World Trade Center and some 3,000 100%-innocent
adults. (The thousands who had notice and didn’t come to work that day
were not 100% innocent, and survived.) If you are amazed that
intelligent people can still believe that it was attributable to four
airplanes flown by amateurs, you will be blown away by the national
credibility accorded the “Sandy Hook massacre.” Blown away. It is
connected by the same old principle of substituted reality, or “false
flag,” used for terrorism designed to affect the judgment of target
groups of people–e.g. leaders of a fleet, an army, or the people in a
republic. With 9/11, the blame was placed falsely on 19 Muslim
hijackers in order to create hatred to permit our leaders to start
illegal wars against Middle Eastern countries populated by Muslims.
Most Americans and most media are still buying the “hijacker”
explanation as correct in reference to that underworld event.
The enemy selected as the villains of Sandy Hook are not Muslims but
gun owners said to be led by the National Rifle Association, known for
its history in preserving firearm ownership. When one examines the
detail, one finds that a false image was created at Sandy Hook to
stampede citizens for a political end just as was the historic event of
9/11. The desired effect by managers of the false flag of Sandy Hook is
a diminution toward ultimate deletion of Article II of the U.S.
Constitution which grants states and their citizens a means to defend
themselves against a federal tyrant to replace the one they rejected by
use of firearms in 1776. That tyrannical voice echoes as Englishman
Piers Morgan speaks down to those bold enough to stand up for American
principles inconsistent with those of the royal tradition, as if
dim-witted American loyalists should be taught of their error.
If the Sandy Hook event had been a tornado someone could point to the
damage and say “That’s Mother Nature for you!” The essence of Sandy
Hook is that the declared damage is fictional, devised, playing
Americans as dull, complacent folks who are confident that the
commercial media would analyze the facts before nullifying dissent with
their opinions. Surely, the people behind this would not be a party to
the construction of a police state. This hope is dashed by the way the
media has succumbed to a carefully-organized plot for just that. You
will find me critical of the
New York Times on this subject because it is not unlike the “hometown paper” for Newtown, Connecticut, and likely knew of the falsehood.
An Election Season Hurricane
Hurricane Sandy was the largest in history for Atlantic hurricanes,
rather specially put together as hurricanes go, the most costly since
Katrina, and remarkably timed by Mother Nature to “freeze” the
presidential campaign by closing airports and roads in east coast
states. She crossed into New York and New Jersey on October 29 just
before hurricane season closed on October 31. The presidential election
was held on November 6. In the society of hurricanes, Sandy was a
stranger. President Obama immediately went out to the disaster area to
promise help to everyone when they badly needed reassurance.
In this four-part report that begins with an analysis of Sandy, I
want to describe connections between this storm and other apparently
natural events. After hurricanes and aspects of weather control, I’ve
included earthquakes, which are like an ancestor of “weather warfare.” I
must refer to Sandy Hook because it is an eminently notable part of
deceptive democracy. You and I are arguably connected to all this by
the phenomenon called “chemtrails,” which are connected to the police
state that Paul Craig Roberts so eloquently describes in “
It Has Happened Here in America: The Police State is Real.”According
to Roberts, “9/11 was used to create an open-ended ‘war on terror’ and a
police state. It is extraordinary that so many Americans believe that
‘it can’t happen here’ when it already has.”
New York City had a notable hurricane in 1938. Remarkably the next
one of similar notability was Hurricane Irene in 2011–73 years later.
Overnight, Irene had spread out and didn’t flood the subway as feared.
Before Sandy hit, people thought she would be another Irene. Sandy
turned out the lights, the water, all transportation, and future
prospects of life near the seacoast. She flooded the subways like they
had never been flooded before and destroyed or made unlivable more than
300,000 homes, of which New York Governor Andrew Cuomo announced that he
would buy 10,000 to turn the land into flood-proof parks and beaches.
The state would pay for flood-proofing structures in the hazard areas.
Buildings at sea level would require giant 15-foot pylons. In March
more than 2,000 people were still living in hotels at an average $252 a
night, paid for by FEMA, because they could not afford to rent an
apartment.
An
article in the Arts section of the
New York Times
for November 20 by Michael Kimmelman refers to “no brainers” that
aggravated the damage from Sandy, like not having floodgates at subway
entrances, not getting transformers and switching stations out of harm’s
way, and not getting Congress to order a Corps of Engineers study on
the impact of barriers and barrier islands. “Hurricane Sandy was a toll
paid for procrastination.” Early pledges were made by officialdom to
bring things back the way they were. But that’s the last thing we want
to do, says Kimmelman. “Now the task is to create a whole new
ecological infrastructure for the region.” This seems to make Sandy a
blessing, like a timely gift from God.
The
Times had synthesized the problem in a November 1 editorial, “
Worrying Beyond Hurricane Sandy.”
This piece views Sandy as a lesson for both cities and citizens for
ignoring the “grimly precise detail by scientists in the latest state
and city climate studies.” The coastal waters are rising as the ocean
warms and expands. The editor quotes Klaus Jacob, research scientist at
the Columbia University’s Earth Institute and adviser to the city on
climate change as saying the political process hadn’t recognized that
we’re playing Russian roulette. Governor Cuomo wants surge barriers,
involving billions of dollars, which the
Times editors see as
“a bargain if Sandy and Irene are truly harbingers of more frequent
disasters eating deeper into the city’s heart.”
The fact that Sandy came ashore eight days before the presidential
election gave President Barack Obama time to find his way through the
debris in New Jersey for a tearful embrace and endorsement (before the
television cameras) of Governor Chris Christie, who had become known for
his livid excoriation of Obama in the election season. With the
election less than a week away the President must have said something to
the Republican governor that made him very happy. New York City Mayor
Michael Bloomberg, neither Republican nor Democrat, enthusiastically
joined in the endorsement. Definitely not a Mormon hurricane, Sandy put
Mitt Romney’s campaign out of action in the transportation vacuum of
critical eastern states where his staff was organized for a strong
finish. No airports, railroads, highways, restaurants, hotels, parking
lots, schools, welcoming crowds, or time for paying attention to TV ads
even if they had electricity.
A few weeks after Obama’s re-election, using the entire front page of
its November 25 Sunday Review for a picture of the Statue of Liberty,
the flame of her torch breaking the surface of the water just above her
head, the
Times asked “Is This the End?” This headlined a
James Atlas op ed with the explanatory subhead “Whether in 50 or 100
years, there’s a good chance that New York City will sink beneath the
sea.” Now this is getting serious.
In the midst of this gnawing uncertainty, a rather small event
occurred, compared with Hurricane Sandy. On December 14 the national
attention was yanked from the still-flowing stream of unnerving
discoveries of debilitating harm from Sandy, to an event in the track of
Sandy: a new nightmare named “Sandy Hook Elementary School,”
envisioning a pile of 20 shredded first graders. It instantly overcame
Hurricane Sandy’s rank in national attention, gaining daily with
wholehearted engagement of the media as if it were the essence of what
news should be. No need for a huge investigation. When 20 innocent
children are murdered, we don’t need one. It was obviously a local boy,
Adam Lanza, who killed himself, thus no need for a trial. He was seen
as a mental case, with a whole bunch of guns which evidently were his
mother’s. Gun control was now equated with the subject of “Sandy Hook.”
Mother Nature: not guilty
Hurricane Sandy thus far has taken 44 American lives, almost 300
total. Older people were affected in ways that will hasten their
demise. They weren’t tourists in a hot air balloon, or vacationers on a
4,000-passenger cruise ship, they were people simply trying to live day
by day wherever they happened to be located and had no choice but to
stay, wait, and hope.
If I hear Mother Nature being blamed, I rise to her defense. Anyone
analyzing the current atmosphere of threat to human rights must clearly
see the fact that the USA does not have to experience any hurricane it
does not prefer to experience. “We” have long had the capability to
prevent hurricanes and tornadoes, and to guide and empower them. Sandy
was not the result of “Russian roulette,” it was more likely the result
of targeting with our military assault weapon: weather.
For the states or the Congress to be preparing gun control bills in
this light is corrupt in itself, because its motivational reference is
presumptively false. If directed from the White House—to which the
event does not appear unimportant, but rather, vital—one must bear in
mind that human life and justice, even for Americans, is not considered
as important as the need for respect of fabrications vital to secret
government objectives.
Would our federal government lie to us? We hear of nameless agencies
equipped with “black budget” money of secret and incredible amounts
that even the president and Congress are not permitted to know, and we
are required to pay taxes without knowing how the money is spent in
addition to wars that have clearly been improper and wasteful.
The Iraq “war clock” is currently approaching $900 billion, the
estimated overall damage in trillions That was enabled by a
Bush/Cheney lie. But Obama? In order to adequately defend the nation,
no one outside the black budget agency can know what it is doing because
of the presumed advantage that knowledge would give to the nation’s
enemies. The black budget that has grown and been used continuously
since World War II could by itself make it impossible for the United
States to survive as the free state we say we admire.
Hurricane Sandy has the fingerprints of a criminal phenomenon, one
being shielded by the President, the Vice-President, all federal
agencies concerned with the military or the environment, and the major
media which are threatened and commercially blackmailed into silence.
Blackmailed? That is a generalization, but I must assert that for
one reason or another the flow of facts has been so restricted that it
feels like the atmosphere after 9/11.
Some weeks ago I watched a couple of Weather Channel
programs—“Hacking Tornadoes” and “Hacking Hurricanes,” presented as
cheery-jokey explanations for schoolchildren, in which the object of
each was ways to protect ourselves from them. “What if we could have
pushed a button and prevented Sandy?” Hurricanes have been getting more
numerous in the past decade due to ocean warming. “We need to reduce
insurance claims.” Or play offense, attack the hurricanes the way they
attack us. Some ideas, nothing practical, need more resources for study
and experiment. Sorry, folks, nothing yet, but silver iodide produced
rain in Vietnam a few decades ago.
For comparison I watched my DVD of “Weather Warfare,” from the
History Channel, one clearly for adults, telling us about the High
Frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP) and its 3.6 megawatt
ELF wave projection from Alaska. These waves are Extremely Low
Frequency which allows them to penetrate the earth, or bounce off the
ionosphere to cause an earthquake or a hurricane, or re-route the jet
stream and decide who gets rain and who doesn’t. Or—affect the human
mind.
There is much more information available in books I reference is
subsequent installments of this series, but I find that most people
don’t see what’s happening to us. The History Channel DVD came out
about four years ago, was shown a few times on TV, then the History
Channel refashioned its programming to focus on trivial things such as
artifacts in a pawn shop. The DVD is still available for purchase under
the politically correct title, “THAT’S IMPOSSIBLE.” Yes, I had thought
it impossible that several of the best-informed people on this subject
would be allowed to do an exposure on television.
Before New York City is re-designed as a subterranean metropolis, why
not look to the well-funded and forward-looking scientific community
and ask if there isn’t some way to prevent another Sandy, not just sit
back and let it happen? I picture the late Senator Claiborne Pell
looking down at all this and shaking his head. He had seen the future
clearly when the Treaty on Environmental Modification (ENMOD) was being
discussed in 1976-77. Its main thrust was to prohibit use against an
enemy of “techniques that would have widespread, long-lasting or severe
effects through deliberate manipulation of natural processes and cause
such phenomena as earthquakes, tidal waves, and changes in climate and
weather patterns.”
Pell lost in his challenge to an amendment allowing research and
experimentation on these prohibited techniques, correctly picturing any
agency permitted to develop them as becoming unable to resist the
temptation to use environmental modification as a military weapon. He
may have anticipated their domestic use, but should he have seriously
anticipated illegal (criminal) domestic use to distort public opinion
and Congressional motivation? Or long-term, to convert the United
States into a police state on par with the Soviet Union or a Nazi
Germany?
The U.S. and the U.S.S.R. signed the treaty in 1978, bringing a
momentary quiet, but after the U.S.S.R. was dissolved in 1991 it
announced that as “Russia” it was no longer bound by the treaty,
followed by the U.S. position that neither was the U.S. The race was
on. Ten years later, Representative Dennis Kucinich could be quoted in
“Columbus Alive” for January, 2002: “The truth is there’s an entire
program in the Department of Defense, ‘Vision for 2020,’ that’s
developing these weapons.” Publisher Bob Fitrakis was asking him about
the use of “chemtrails,” an operation which the U.S. Air Force denied,
and still routinely denies, calling them “a hoax.” In print, the Air
Force had announced its objective to master (“own”) the weather, once
seen essentially as an answer to Russia. There is no reason whatsoever
to believe that this objective has been discontinued or reduced. The
more useful it becomes, the heavier the silence surrounding it.
Representative Kucinich has been constant in his attempt to enact
legislation to prevent weather control from becoming standard operating
procedure, as has Fitrakis in keeping it before readers of the
Free Press.
The Ohio Republicans, as of this Congressional term, have thrown the
courageous Kucinich off the train by isolating him from his voting
support through re-districting. That’s “dirty trick” democracy.
Gun control is a foremost ingredient to a “police state.” Guns of
sufficient number and size are an obstacle to the growing concretion of
such a police state, which following rules of the rapist, gets its way
unless someone can effectively say “no.” It needn’t come to a violent
revolution. Gun ownership gives the people confidence, just as it gives
pause to officials who would compress the middle class and enslave all
but the wealthy. It cannot be discussed rationally with everyone
weeping over dead children. It’s too serious for snap judgment, either
way, when “the people” are democratically disabled.
When I first heard a talk on the subject of weather control in a
water management conference some 25 years ago, chatting with a civil
engineer at intermission I found him enthusiastic about the
possibilities of growing crops more predictably and economically by
reallocating rainfall. As an attorney I was appalled, picturing the
impossible confluence of this human factor in life or death with due
process of law, which requires that the taking of property meet
standards decided by U.S. Supreme Court interpretations of the U.S.
Constitution. Secret weather control turns the Constitution into a
worthless document.
The tough question is not just the taking of property by drought,
flood, snow, or wind but the accompanying deprivation of life and
health. Will there be a special court for that? One who can control
the weather has his hand on a switch (perhaps a keyboard) to kill
people, a subject still considered by most as improper, and clearly
unconstitutional. Today we talk about use of drones and the thoughtless
murder of innocents, including children not unlike those said to have
been killed at Sandy Hook Elementary School and considerably more
numerous. This is justified by those who defend it as necessary if the
U.S.A. is to be “safe from terrorists.” We openly deplore it, but it
will most likely be the course again on any day somewhere, to our
discredit as Americans.
It has become increasingly impressed on all involved that the
outstanding aspect of weather as a military force is that it must appear
to be the action of Mother Nature. It thus cannot be successfully
attributed to a particular source to attract a reaction, military or
political, by the injured party. In the United States at the present
time the façade includes disciplined fabrication by all federal agencies
concerning the ability to affect the weather, from chemtrails to
floods, droughts, tornadoes, hurricanes, and earthquakes. This
phenomenon of tight secrecy is intended to furnish “plausible
deniability,” an overriding objective that is most feasible with a
controlled media, as in a police state. The inherent problem that
undercuts virtue, and thus human rights, is that the method requires
that the government lie to its citizens, and that the media cooperate–
not just now and then, but by principle, all agencies, always. It all
but makes the country destined to become a police state.
In considering the morality of weather warfare bear in mind that
weather kills people, whether you intend it or not, including
kindergartners and first graders in much greater numbers than massacres
by assassins. As discussed extensively in the U.S. Congress in the
lead-up to approval of ENMOD, hurricanes, tornadoes, floods, droughts,
heat waves, extreme cold, and earthquakes amount to lethal weaponry
capable of being used secretly by a military force to destroy another
nation without its knowing who did it, feigning innocence and tsk-tsking
about Mother Nature and global warming. Masked by “plausible
deniability” it starves an enemy, drowns it, tears up its cities,
destabilizes its people and its military gradually without their knowing
what is happening. With the same facility, it can spread toxins and
hallucinogens from the air, unsuspected, or endured for lack of
proof—that is, “plausible deniability.”
With weather warfare used against an avowed enemy, cooperation of
citizens would be considered patriotic. Using it against one’s own
citizens would be a crime of the highest order, the withdrawal of human
rights, a police-state standard. In a police state, people who protest
would be “disloyal” and subject to penalty as severe as necessary to
prevent cracks in the illusion of national greatness. A letter-writer
to the
Columbus Dispatch asks “Is the U.S. government
tyrannical? Of course not!” He asserts that to make such an allegation
demonstrates contempt for the democratic principles that make our
country great. “To express disagreement one goes to the voting booth,”
says he.
If one has studied Ohio elections as have Bob Fitrakis and Harvey
Wasserman, one must see this letter-writer as the ideal citizen for a
police state, an element of which would be elections decided by those
able to prevent media from reporting or acknowledging substitute vote
counts, as seen by those of us watching from Ohio. The newspapers in
Ohio, one being the capital city’s Columbus Dispatch, saw no evil in the
method that gave Bush/Cheney another term—Ohio being the swing state in
2004. Bush had been overwhelmed. Depression ruled in the Bush camp
until the next morning after things had been rearranged. The Republican
state chairman, to whom I had earlier written to tell him he was head
of a criminal organization, got the last laugh.
That banditry changed elections in more ways than we realized at the
time. It allowed Bush appointee John Roberts to become Chief Justice of
the U.S. Supreme Court, where he chose the “Citizens United” case for
hearing even though the subject upon which the court acted was not the
issue on appeal. It allowed Roberts, with the court majority, to
declare that a corporation be treated as a “person” for purposes of
political contributions, thus without the limits intended to keep
corporate contributions from overpowering those from individuals. It
has had the predicted undemocratic result by shifting the effect of
money to those who have the most. It took us a long step away from a
free state where the “common man” still had a voice that could be heard.
In these reports it is my purpose to examine weather control, not
detailing how it is done, but to give the reader a circumstantial and
statistical basis for seeing it in a different light. One must start
with the reality of the power. There is no question whether it is
possible. The “chemtrail” factor, for one, is not just possible, but an
actual, provable crime that anyone who chooses can witness being
committed, yet another manifestation of a permanent police state,
enshrouded in official lies.
*James R. Hanson is a native of Nebraska and
graduate of Oberlin College. His first job was as reporter for the
Defiance, Ohio Crescent-News. Drafted, he was with the Korea Military
Advisory Group (KMAG) 1952-1953. His law degree is from the University
of Michigan, where he learned the importance of well-drafted
legislation.
For the Ohio Water Commission, born of the 1959
flood, Hanson assisted in creating an intelligent framework for water
management. He was legal advisor to the Director of Natural Resources,
then legislative counsel for the Ohio Legislative Service Commission.
In private practice Hanson’s long-term
representations were for environmental organizations such as the
volunteer Water Management Association of Ohio and the Ohio Water
Development Authority, bond-issuing agency for municipal sewer and water
facilities. The Wildlife Legislative Fund and the Wildlife Legislative
Fund of America became his major clients, which he created under the
direction of James H. Glass as the defenders of sportsmen’s interests in
Ohio and wherever wildlife laws came under attack. Their present
successor is the U.S. Sportsmen’s Alliance.
We’ve
long known that Google sells data about our searches and Gmail activity
to advertisers. This is why ads for Sam’s Club pop up on your browser
if you run a search for Costco. Well, now big companies are selling data to advertisers as well.
